Tonight With Vincent Browne Thread v3.0 (07/04/13 - 08/07/14)

JONJO THE MISER

It makes sense now, he is a PR prat.

take everything

Good man Vinny boy.

vicwatson

JONJO THE MISER wrote: »

Who's this asshole in the pink shirt:mad:

John McGuirk "PR Consultant" AKA Tosser !

Days 298

Vincent has answered my calls Shout Vincent!

COYW

I love McGuirk v VB.

McGuirk is great at getting a rise out of VB.

vicwatson

McGuirk's mother mustn't have hugged him as a child

take everything

Ah lads, stop making McGuirk look good.
Vinny and his communism.
Jesus.

lightspeed

JONJO THE MISER wrote: »

He would want a good punch in the face, what a prat.

Couldnt agree more, what an arrogant jackass

RayM

Has anyone noticed that McGuirk never looks at people when he's arguing with them? There's something very fraudulent and untrustworthy about him. I don't think he even believes any of the crap he spouts. Having an unreasonable, obnoxious opinion on (literally) every topic allows him to appear on late night panel shows far more than somebody so ineloquent deserves.

Days 298

Vincents idea of an ideal society borders on Orwells Animal Farm IMO....

Roger_007

take everything wrote: »

Ah lads, stop making McGuirk look good.
Vinny and his communism.
Jesus.

Anyone know what Vinny's salary is?; would it by any chance be more than 4 times that of the lowest paid? What a hypocrite.:mad:

Good loser

Vinnie's interminablly long question snookered in 10 seconds by McGurk.

Vinnie then takes over the scene with a rant about Cuba.

The 'inequality' argument sinks again.

take everything

Vinny really should've had that Kieran Allen guy (eh Kieran Allen...) for real sparks to fly tonight.
Missed opportunity.

hotmail.com

People in this country are too greedy for economic equality.

Busted Flat.

Roger_007 wrote: »

Anyone know what Vinny's salary is?; would it by any chance be more than 4 times that of the lowest pai? What a hypocrite.:mad:

IMO that is a stupid question, with all his interest's in journalism and article's he writes, it would be considerable. That is what you would expect to get when you take your position seriously.

Roger_007

Good loser wrote: »

Vinnie's interminablly long question snookered in 10 seconds by McGurk.

Vinnie then takes over the scene with a rant about Cuba.

The 'inequality' argument sinks again.

Mass emigration to Cuba imminent!:rolleyes:

take everything

McGuirk seemed to agree with Peter when he suggested debt-forgiveness on a European level.
Wonder does he believe all bondholders should've been made whole. Would be interesting.

COYW

Lol, so the publicans are planning on bringing youngsters in pubs, to teach them how to drink.

I presume the drink is free. :rolleyes:

Roger_007

That's a new one, a discussion about what wasn't in the papers???

BlaasForRafa

Dammit, I missed a McGuirk show? :mad:

Vinnie should have asked him if he liked to wear Hugo Boss uniforms suits :pac:

BaZmO*

I'd love to Poverty Punch McGuirk!

Busted Flat.

Bill Cullen had a smug position like McGuirk, pennies fall through small holes as Bill found out.

alaimacerc

Good loser wrote: »

Vinnie's interminablly long question snookered in 10 seconds by McGurk.

Vinnie then takes over the scene with a rant about Cuba.

The 'inequality' argument sinks again.

Bah, just because McGurk can't follow the thread of his own argument, do try keep up with it regardless. TMG asserted that large income inequalities were necessary to get consultants to bother to show up to work. VB produces counterexample of a medical system that appears to work without such. Seems an entirely sensible point to me. In contrast, McGurk;s "the poor will always be with us" blather seemed to be deliberately avoiding address actual income and wealth inequalities with a series of trite deflections and platitudes.

I'm inclined to cut Vinnie some slack for the mega-questions on occasions like this when it reduces the pain of hearing a Tory Turd like Tom oligineously ooze on out of his obnoxious orifice.

Good loser

alaimacerc wrote: »

Bah, just because McGurk can't follow the thread of his own argument, do try keep up with it regardless. TMG asserted that large income inequalities were necessary to get consultants to bother to show up to work. VB produces counterexample of a medical system that appears to work without such. Seems an entirely sensible point to me. In contrast, McGurk;s "the poor will always be with us" blather seemed to be deliberately avoiding address actual income and wealth inequalities with a series of trite deflections and platitudes.

I'm inclined to cut Vinnie some slack for the mega-questions on occasions like this when it reduces the pain of hearing a Tory Turd like Tom oligineously ooze on out of his obnoxious orifice.

You make about as much sense as Vincent.

The question was outrageously long in the context of a short discussion programme with four panelists. Further it was all too familiar from this host as he advances the same rubbish again and again. The initial thrust is always the same 'Everyone should be paid the same' which then metamorphoses into 'The highest should get four times the pay of the lowest'. There is a 400% difference between the two so why does he not short circuit to the seond proposition if he holds the latter view? Or does he hold both at the same time?

As for McGurk among a myriad of examples he choose a medical example - he could for instance have choosen pop stars, jockeys, footballers, engineers +++. Vincent knows his theory is going to be blown in short order (yes he does) so he jumps in to head it off with the Cuban stuff. Nobody in Ireland has much of a clue about the accuracy of that. Plus the example was only that. You see Vincent's ability to grasp multiple facts at the same time is extremely limited and his ability to marshall any facts in support of arguments even less so.

Hence the loaded panels - even when the biased host is discounted!

grey_so_what

Can't live with Lawyers, can't live without them......

And they regulate themselves...........

Lady Chatterton

This lad is Jeffrey Archer and Robert Wagner rolled into one.

Busted Flat.

MrsD007 wrote: »

This lad is Jeffrey Archer and Robert Wagner rolled into one.

Did his wife fall off the boat as well.

Roger_007

MrsD007 wrote: »

This lad is Jeffrey Archer and Robert Wagner rolled into one.

Big lad, alright.:pac:

grey_so_what

MrsD007 wrote: »

This lad is Jeffrey Archer and Robert Wagner rolled into one.

It's a joke if anyone thinks that the clients will contact a Barrister

Nice man, he is living in a land of make-believe

grey_so_what

I still can't get over Alan Shatters rather "raunchy" book..........