Tonight With Vincent Browne Thread v3.0 (07/04/13 - 08/07/14)

Busted Flat.

grey_so_what wrote: »

If Michael D eats any more meals he'll roll down the stairs of the plane...

Be no problem for him, he is the same width as his height.

hotmail.com

I can't imagine Dana at all them events!

Roger_007

grey_so_what wrote: »

If Michael D eats any more meals he'll roll down the stairs of the plane...

He will have one whopping big doggy bag to take home....;)

Busted Flat.

hotmail.com wrote: »

I can't imagine Dana at all them events!

Why did you fook up a pathetic day, ten mins to go.

grey_so_what

Busted Flat. wrote: »

ten mins to go.

Eight of them ad's!!....:(

Harry Angstrom

Busted Flat. wrote: »

Be no problem for him, he is the same width as his height.

He reminds me of O'Connell Bridge - wider than it is long.

coolhull

Sabina's Diary :

March - Visit Limerick Prison to see old lady

April : Visit Buck Palace to see another old lady

Harry Angstrom

hotmail.com wrote: »

I can't imagine Dana at all them events!

Or Sean Gallagher :eek:

hotmail.com

Get well soon Angela.

hotmail.com

Harry Angstrom wrote: »

Or Sean Gallagher :eek:

For Gallagher's faults, I don't think he can be compared with Dana. She is a fruit cake.

grey_so_what

What a dreadful position to be in to lose your house.

And so many get away with so much.....

Harry Angstrom

hotmail.com wrote: »

For Gallagher's faults, I don't think he can be compared with Dana. She is a fruit cake.

And he was a Fianna Fáil man trying desperately to shun his past history. At least Dana stuck by her principles, even if people disagreed with her (which I'm 100% certain you did).

hotmail.com

Harry Angstrom wrote: »

And he was a Fianna Fáil man trying desperately to shun his past history. At least Dana stuck by her principles, even if people disagreed with her (which I'm 100% certain you did).

Hell yes!

I remember the assassination attempt on her, when it turned out to be a blown tyre.

Busted Flat.

hotmail.com wrote: »

For Gallagher's faults, I don't think he can be compared with Dana. She is a fruit cake.

Ah jaysus that is unfair to fruit.

Harry Angstrom

hotmail.com wrote: »

Hell yes!

I remember the assassination attempt on her, when it turned out to be a blown tyre.

Yeah, and I remember when Gallagher pathetically tried to deny that he was a bagman for Fianna Fáil. I wonder which of these two incidents you would consider the more serious??

Busted Flat.

Harry Angstrom wrote: »

And he was a Fianna Fáil man trying desperately to shun his past history. At least Dana stuck by her principles, even if people disagreed with her (which I'm 100% certain you did).

Why didn't Fox news take her on after the attempt on her life by the the tyre company. They took on Sarah Palin for less.

Harry Angstrom

Busted Flat. wrote: »

Why didn't Fox news take her on after the attempt on her life by the the tyre company. They took on Sarah Palin for less.

I'm no apologist for Dana. I just find it strange that a poster could overlook Gallagher's past so readily whilst singling out Dana for abuse. For all her faults, at least she stood by her beliefs (however flawed they might be, and however much it alienated her from plenty of the electorate), whilst Gallagher tried to be all things to all people, and attempted to completely whitewash his past history with Fianna Fáil.

Busted Flat.

Harry Angstrom wrote: »

I'm no apologist for Dana. I just find it strange that a poster could overlook Gallagher's past so readily whilst singling out Dana for abuse. For all her faults, at least she stood by her beliefs (however flawed they might be, and however much it alienated her from plenty of the electorate), whilst Gallagher tried to be all things to all people, and attempted to completely whitewash his past history with Fianna Fáil.

Harry look up her US connections, holy than thou religious crap, and child abuse.

hotmail.com

Harry Angstrom wrote: »

I'm no apologist for Dana. I just find it strange that a poster could overlook Gallagher's past so readily whilst singling out Dana for abuse. For all her faults, at least she stood by her beliefs (however flawed they might be, and however much it alienated her from plenty of the electorate), whilst Gallagher tried to be all things to all people, and attempted to completely whitewash his past history with Fianna Fáil.

I didn't overlook anything. I mentioned that Dana was a nut.

Just because someone stands up for their beliefs doesn't grant them special status..it's like saying Stalin had his principles, so he was great because he stood by his principles.

Harry Angstrom

hotmail.com wrote: »

I didn't overlook anything. I mentioned that Dana was a nut.

Just because someone stands up for their beliefs doesn't grant them special status..it's like saying Stalin had his principles, so he was great because he stood by his principles.

Fook right off if you're going to equate Dana with Stalin. You've just lost your argument in such a stupidly pathetic fashion.

hotmail.com

Harry Angstrom wrote: »

Fook right off if you're going to equate Dana with Stalin. You've just lost your argument in such a stupidly pathetic fashion.

In other words, you can't dispute my point!

alaimacerc

Harry Angstrom wrote: »

Fook right off if you're going to equate Dana with Stalin.

He didn't. He compared them, and in one particular respect, too.

You've just lost your argument in such a stupidly pathetic fashion.

It's always helpful when one of the players decides to declare themselves ref and scoreboard operator, too.

alaimacerc

Harry Angstrom wrote: »

I'm no apologist for Dana. I just find it strange that a poster could overlook Gallagher's past so readily whilst singling out Dana for abuse. For all her faults, at least she stood by her beliefs (however flawed they might be, and however much it alienated her from plenty of the electorate), whilst Gallagher tried to be all things to all people, and attempted to completely whitewash his past history with Fianna Fáil.

I agree with you there to a point; I can respect people to a degree for being straight about what they believe, , rather than someone who's simply a BS artist or too sophistry-ridden for their own good (or at least, my liking). (And SG doesn't have the brains to be a sophist, he's was just a spoofer.)

Then again, DRS has had her own "inexactitudes" with her own past. And who'd know FF "beliefs" if they actually found them? I think "keep pulling strokes, and hope noone notices" pretty much are their "core principles".

In any case, I'm not sure either's past is especially pertinent to whether they'd give the country a right showing up giving formal setpiece speeches during UK state visits if they'd been elected. I rather wonder, would they even been invited to give such, even if they had been elected? And in any event, I get the impression there were more Irish people than British watching, so it's not quite that big a deal...

alaimacerc

grey_so_what wrote: »

Eight of them ad's!!....:(

Best advert for getting a "plus" box going!

alaimacerc

grey_so_what wrote: »

It's eleven minutes in and the program still hasn't started!....:(

And the second best advert for plus boxes!

Harry Angstrom

hotmail.com wrote: »

In other words, you can't dispute my point!

And what point is that? You're making a correlation between Dana and Stalin, which is crass in the extreme.

hotmail.com

Harry Angstrom wrote: »

And what point is that? You're making a correlation between Dana and Stalin, which is crass in the extreme.

I didn't, I was making a point that just because someone stands by their principles, doesn't make them great if them principles are flawed.

tomdempsey200

one thing I like about vinnie

he gets into the detail of the issues

take everything

"potentially damaging to the reputation of the people in rehab".
What reputation.
Vincent is starting to really annoy me. He gets something in his head and listens to nobody.
Is he friends with Flannery.

BaZmO*

tomdempsey200 wrote: »

one thing I like about vinnie

he gets into the detail of the issues

He's labouring the same point for ages though.