Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Milk Price- Please read Mod note in post #1

1113114116118119201

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭pedigree 6


    kevthegaff wrote: »
    Maybe I'm a bit cynical but for a large beef farmer swapping to dairy it's a lot easier then a greenfield, with sheds, large SFP, stock to sell. I started with no quota, no stock, no machinery, v small sfp but Luckily relativrly cheep rented land! And I think I'm getting there after 8 years!! I'd like to see more background to some of these success stories.. I have to admire the guys that went to nz share farming eventually buying they're own

    The way I look at life and farming (or try to) is that it's not a competition and no one is better than another for nobody knows everyones circumstances whether health, family or financial.

    What I try to do (this is going to sound loopy) is rob. I will rob as much information and ideas as I can anywhere I can and if they suit implement them.

    The saying "the grass is not always greener on the other side" comes to mind but i'll rob all the information I can off them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,282 ✭✭✭Deepsouthwest



    72% heifers and 454 kgs/ms sold per cow, where the fcuk did I go wrong?!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,433 ✭✭✭Milked out


    kevthegaff wrote: »
    Maybe I'm a bit cynical but for a large beef farmer swapping to dairy it's a lot easier then a greenfield, with sheds, large SFP, stock to sell. I started with no quota, no stock, no machinery, v small sfp but Luckily relativrly cheep rented land! And I think I'm getting there after 8 years!! I'd like to see more background to some of these success stories.. I have to admire the guys that went to nz share farming eventually buying they're own

    Take your point and fair play on your progress tis drive like that that would see a lad thru most obstacles but as the phrase goes you can only play the hand you're dealt every person has a different starting point and scenario around it so once they make a go of it I say fair play to em


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,278 ✭✭✭frazzledhome


    72% heifers and 454 kgs/ms sold per cow, where the fcuk did I go wrong?!!

    My thoughts exactly


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,075 ✭✭✭kevthegaff


    72% heifers and 454 kgs/ms sold per cow, where the fcuk did I go wrong?!!
    Bet if a lot of lads had an article on agriland there kgs/ms would increase overnight :-D!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,282 ✭✭✭Deepsouthwest


    kevthegaff wrote: »
    Bet if a lot of lads had an article on agriland there kgs/ms would increase overnight :-D!

    Often wonder about the accuracy of some of these articles, heard recent rumours about a OAD guy featured in a prominent publication having fairly inflated figures. But I think this is info from a teagasc event, and I know from experience, at least around here their v fussy about putting out accurate figures. I just mentioned in another thread, about having a particularly low pr test two days before hosting a coop/Teagasc walk a while back, I thought because this test was lower than the norm, we'd work off the average of maybe the previous 3/4test results, but they were adamant exact present performance could only be the most recent collection results available to us and that was the figures that would go on the handout. Talk about giving them a stick to beat me with! Ironically 15 mins after the walk had finished I got a txt showing my pr had jumped back up .17 again, bit late for bovril then though!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,075 ✭✭✭kevthegaff


    Often wonder about the accuracy of some of these articles, heard recent rumours about a OAD guy featured in a prominent publication having fairly inflated figures. But I think this is info from a teagasc event, and I know from experience, at least around here their v fussy about putting out accurate figures. I just mentioned in another thread, about having a particularly low pr test two days before hosting a coop/Teagasc walk a while back, I thought because this test was lower than the norm, we'd work off the average of maybe the previous 3/4test results, but they were adamant exact present performance could only be the most recent collection results available to us and that was the figures that would go on the handout. Talk about giving them a stick to beat me with! Ironically 15 mins after the walk had finished I got a txt showing my pr had jumped back up .17 again, bit late for bovril then though!
    Bang on the money


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,623 ✭✭✭Mehaffey1


    Synlait Milk drop payout 80cents to $4.20 falling in line with Fonterra, Westland Milk and Open Country Dairy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,075 ✭✭✭kevthegaff


    Mehaffey1 wrote: »
    Synlait Milk drop payout 80cents to $4.20 falling in line with Fonterra, Westland Milk and Open Country Dairy.
    How are guys coping over there Mehaffey with the low payout?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,551 ✭✭✭keep going


    Often wonder about the accuracy of some of these articles, heard recent rumours about a OAD guy featured in a prominent publication having fairly inflated figures. But I think this is info from a teagasc event, and I know from experience, at least around here their v fussy about putting out accurate figures. I just mentioned in another thread, about having a particularly low pr test two days before hosting a coop/Teagasc walk a while back, I thought because this test was lower than the norm, we'd work off the average of maybe the previous 3/4test results, but they were adamant exact present performance could only be the most recent collection results available to us and that was the figures that would go on the handout. Talk about giving them a stick to beat me with! Ironically 15 mins after the walk had finished I got a txt showing my pr had jumped back up .17 again, bit late for bovril then though!

    At the end of the day the only figures that matter are your own.ive a tendency to look at the practice on farm walks rather than figures and then go home and do your own sums in relation to my place


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,414 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    keep going wrote: »
    At the end of the day the only figures that matter are your own.ive a tendency to look at the practice on farm walks rather than figures and then go home and do your own sums in relation to my place

    +1


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭atlantic mist


    the russia market is closed to eu and usa, this has opened up the market for new zealand

    you'd have to wonder why they keep dropping price on the farmers out there they have markets for all products no mountain like were building in eu

    i know they get a dividend on top of yearly payout and coops only made up of dairy producers so not sharing divends with other enterprises

    are they pushing it to see how far they can go to reduce supply from other regions?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,506 ✭✭✭Dawggone



    are they pushing it to see how far they can go to reduce supply from other regions?

    There could be a grain of truth to that....or conspiracy theory?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭trixi2011


    the russia market is closed to eu and usa, this has opened up the market for new zealand

    you'd have to wonder why they keep dropping price on the farmers out there they have markets for all products no mountain like were building in eu

    i know they get a dividend on top of yearly payout and coops only made up of dairy producers so not sharing divends with other enterprises

    are they pushing it to see how far they can go to reduce supply from other regions?

    Unless something has changed the russia ban applied to oz and nz


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭kowtow


    trixi2011 wrote:
    Unless something has changed the russia ban applied to oz and nz

    Notwithstanding that unless Russian consumption has changed significantly the embargo has displaced, rather than depressed global demand.

    Too many commentators blaming Russia for my liking.

    I suspect the Russian ban will begin to resolve itself this year but not so sure it will have anything but a short term relief effect unless wider supply / demand position is reversed.

    The overhang being created by EU intervention is also looming larger.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,170 ✭✭✭WheatenBriar


    Commodity buyers of all ilks, like to talk down their buying price and quietly make a killing quietly somewhere at either the producers or the shareholders expense
    That's the biggest influence a Russian ban would have had


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,938 ✭✭✭C0N0R


    kevthegaff wrote: »
    How are guys coping over there Mehaffey with the low payout?

    One of the farms I worked on was owned by a couple, was a nice 100ha 400 cow farm. They bought 240 ha across the road which some of it had irrigation rights on. in the second year we milked 800 cows walking them across the road. After I left an underpass was installed and more development work was done on the new farm. This was 2013. The whole thing is now up for sale, couple owned four other farms and I hear they have to sell four in total. System of production was high input high output, didn't last I guess. From what I hear there will be no shortage of farms for sale soon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,623 ✭✭✭Mehaffey1


    C0N0R wrote: »
    One of the farms I worked on was owned by a couple, was a nice 100ha 400 cow farm. They bought 240 ha across the road which some of it had irrigation rights on. in the second year we milked 800 cows walking them across the road. After I left an underpass was installed and more development work was done on the new farm. This was 2013. The whole thing is now up for sale, couple owned four other farms and I hear they have to sell four in total. System of production was high input high output, didn't last I guess. From what I hear there will be no shortage of farms for sale soon.

    Anyone who isn't low input will be losing a lot of money and hanging on. Everyone is running lower than normal stock levels and trying to cut feed that's bought in. We're as low input as it gets these days with no bought in feed (except for round straw bales) this year. Expenses set at around 3.70dollars per Ms.

    Being the second year of poor prices, the drought last year and the fear of drought this year many arent holding on to much.

    Crying shame is(for us St least) grass is going mad and we had over 100mm of rain in the month of January compared to about 12mm last year. If the payout was anywhere respectable we'd be pumping feed and milking like hell but now is too little too late.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,551 ✭✭✭keep going


    Local ag adviser gave us a run down on his recent trip to nz and its not a pretty picture.most farmers pay no capital only interest onloans and work on the basis that they will make theircmoney on rising land prices.told a great story about a chat with a banker out there who told them thay had successfully decreased their problem loans by 60 % in one year.how did they do it , rolled overdrafts and short term debt into a mortage and bobs your uncle, problem solved on paper anyway until the next time.it has alot of a feel of a bubble about it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,623 ✭✭✭Mehaffey1


    On the subject of farm sales they've actually held off and price of land has stayed similar to the last few years. Sad to hear about your old employers Conor, my boss told me one of his friends who is managing a farm here has been given his 6 week notice with the owner stepping back in for everyday work. By the end of March the landscape may look in disarray in terms of sharemilkers/managers being shown the way out.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,623 ✭✭✭Mehaffey1


    Commodity buyers of all ilks, like to talk down their buying price and quietly make a killing quietly somewhere at either the producers or the shareholders expense
    That's the biggest influence a Russian ban would have had

    Synlait at least have the decency to say they are making a lot of money on milk while Fonterra emphasise how much of an all in this together Co op they are, still making good profits.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,551 ✭✭✭keep going


    Mehaffey1 wrote: »
    On the subject of farm sales they've actually held off and price of land has stayed similar to the last few years. Sad to hear about your old employers Conor, my boss told me one of his friends who is managing a farm here has been given his 6 week notice with the owner stepping back in for everyday work. By the end of March the landscape may look in disarray in terms of sharemilkers/managers being shown the way out.

    Is it true there was only 5 share milking offered in the whole of nz last year and this step on the nz dairy ladder is now almost a thing of the past


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,623 ✭✭✭Mehaffey1


    keep going wrote: »
    Is it true there was only 5 share milking offered in the whole of nz last year and this step on the nz dairy ladder is now almost a thing of the past

    Nope. There were a bit less than the year before due to the fall in payout but a lot more than 5 lol. In challenging payout years it can be possible that more sharemilking positions are available due to a lot less money and confidence around to take on the debt level needed to start as a sharemilker.

    In terms of is sharemilking looking to be a thing of the past then perhaps so. Many people are looking to contract milking which is a simple $ per Ms produced per season plus a percentage of total ms produced. Needs a lot less of a loan to start into but in high payout years they can possibly miss out.

    The way of the 50% sharemilker is slowly on the way out as interest would be growing in equity partnerships. Many 50%sharemilkers now are family owned farms with the son or daughter running it and leasing stock back to the farm.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,802 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    Mehaffey1 wrote: »
    On the subject of farm sales they've actually held off and price of land has stayed similar to the last few years. Sad to hear about your old employers Conor, my boss told me one of his friends who is managing a farm here has been given his 6 week notice with the owner stepping back in for everyday work. By the end of March the landscape may look in disarray in terms of sharemilkers/managers being shown the way out.

    It really seems the whole new zealand dairy industry is a timebomb waiting to go off, re the owners stepping back-in like above is it not just one desperate last attempt to salvage the business on their own part that really is just a token gesture....
    Where kiwi banks are getting their funding from and weather they will be able to access another chunk of new cash to prop up farmers for another loss making season is going to be intresting things could get very messy quickly if banks start calling in loans and land values plummet


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,623 ✭✭✭Mehaffey1


    jaymla627 wrote: »
    It really seems the whole new zealand dairy industry is a timebomb waiting to go off, re the owners stepping back-in like above is it not just one desperate last attempt to salvage the business on their own part that really is just a token gesture....
    Where kiwi banks are getting their funding from and weather they will be able to access another chunk of new cash to prop up farmers for another loss making season is going to be intresting things could get very messy quickly if banks start calling in loans and land values plummet

    Some owners may only have stepped back off the farm in the last few years comforted by the high milk price. If they had run their figures at normal milk prices say $5.50 then the books would've shown they couldn't afford to step back.

    What also makes it tough is that many 20%sharemilkers can get strong armed as they are variable order contracts down to 17.5-18% in low payout years.

    Something has to give and we hope it's the Gdt picking up. If next season doesn't open with a payout with a 6 as the first number then it will be doomed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,506 ✭✭✭Dawggone


    Mehaffey1 wrote: »
    . If next season doesn't open with a payout with a 6 as the first number then it will be doomed.

    Doomed?
    Strong word.
    Is it really that difficult Mehaffey?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭trixi2011


    Mehaffey1 wrote: »
    Synlait at least have the decency to say they are making a lot of money on milk while Fonterra emphasise how much of an all in this together Co op they are, still making good profits.

    Synlait have a lot of value added products on the go such as a2 milk night milk and a few more. Saw an arictal last year that they were selling some of this value added product into america of all places. Add to that they still have a market in china for baby milk powder afaik.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,623 ✭✭✭Mehaffey1


    Dawggone wrote: »
    Doomed?
    Strong word.
    Is it really that difficult Mehaffey?

    Look to your average farm round these parts say stocked at 3.4 cows/ha. Feeding maize/palm kernel/ home grown silage and wintering block/run off for young stock.

    1 year of poor milk price alongside a drought, no major problem, trim a few luxuries, so no new tractor this year?

    2 years or poor milk price, things getting tight, drop the maize out of the system, drop a cow numbers a little to cut down on the need for pk, start thinking do we really need that third full time worker or 20ha for calves?

    3 years of poor milk price, what's left to get rid of thats not essential?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,617 ✭✭✭Farmer Ed


    In Ireland our goal is to grow up to be just like Nz. We never will archive your scale for various reasons. But we are fast achieving your milk price. We really should be careful what we wish for.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,506 ✭✭✭Dawggone


    Mehaffey1 wrote: »
    Look to your average farm round these parts say stocked at 3.4 cows/ha. Feeding maize/palm kernel/ home grown silage and wintering block/run off for young stock.

    1 year of poor milk price alongside a drought, no major problem, trim a few luxuries, so no new tractor this year?

    2 years or poor milk price, things getting tight, drop the maize out of the system, drop a cow numbers a little to cut down on the need for pk, start thinking do we really need that third full time worker or 20ha for calves?

    3 years of poor milk price, what's left to get rid of thats not essential?

    Thanks.
    Would it be possible that the European system of direct and indirect supports has an advantage over the Kiwis?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,506 ✭✭✭Dawggone


    Mehaffey1 wrote: »
    Look to your average farm round these parts say stocked at 3.4 cows/ha. Feeding maize/palm kernel/ home grown silage and wintering block/run off for young stock.

    1 year of poor milk price alongside a drought, no major problem, trim a few luxuries, so no new tractor this year?

    2 years or poor milk price, things getting tight, drop the maize out of the system, drop a cow numbers a little to cut down on the need for pk, start thinking do we really need that third full time worker or 20ha for calves?

    3 years of poor milk price, what's left to get rid of thats not essential?

    Thanks.
    Would it be possible that the European system of direct and indirect supports has an advantage over the Kiwis?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,623 ✭✭✭Mehaffey1


    Dawggone wrote: »
    Thanks.
    Would it be possible that the European system of direct and indirect supports has an advantage over the Kiwis?

    I don't know enough about the system at home to comment really, have only farmed in NZ. So my answer is the same as a politician's, both most have their merits and downfalls haha


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,551 ✭✭✭keep going


    Farmer Ed wrote: »
    In Ireland our goal is to grow up to be just like Nz. We never will archive your scale for various reasons. But we are fast achieving your milk price. We really should be careful what we wish for.
    nz isnt the only country where farmers are in trouble at current prices,there probaly isnt a country in the world making profit on milk with out goverment intervention


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,623 ✭✭✭Mehaffey1


    Farmer Ed wrote: »
    In Ireland our goal is to grow up to be just like Nz. We never will archive your scale for various reasons. But we are fast achieving your milk price. We really should be careful what we wish for.

    For all I talk about nz, which I'm limited to, I have noticed a lot of Irish focus on how dairying out here is the 'way to be', agriland articles etc.

    Think it's a very simple minded way of looking at things. Why focus on doing things the kiwi way when most farmers should be focusing on improving their own systems and improving their efficiencies etc?

    The only thing really to take out of Nz farming as a whole is the grass management obsession but even nz had been moving away from the grass only mindset. If the world milk price average was high would the focus not be on how to feed huge percentages of supplement to power ms production?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭kowtow


    keep going wrote:
    nz isnt the only country where farmers are in trouble at current prices,there probaly isnt a country in the world making profit on milk with out goverment intervention

    I think the US probably is in parts, although maybe not for long.

    (I don't regard margin insurance as govt. Intervention, is a marketplace measure.)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,551 ✭✭✭keep going


    kowtow wrote: »
    I think the US probably is in parts, although maybe not for long.

    (I don't regard margin insurance as govt. Intervention, is a marketplace measure.)

    Why is margin insurance not goverment intervention, would an insurance company offer that product


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,433 ✭✭✭Milked out


    https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/dairy-prices-may-not-lift-2017
    Fixed price schemes may look more appealing yet..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,981 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    Milked out wrote: »
    https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/dairy-prices-may-not-lift-2017
    Fixed price schemes may look more appealing yet..
    Didnt read it but these gloom and doom articles do my head in, who knows whats going to happen. I live for whats happening now not in 2017


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭kowtow


    keep going wrote: »
    Why is margin insurance not goverment intervention, would an insurance company offer that product

    There's no reason to my mind why it couldn't, given the (relatively) liquid contracts available at the CME. There is some element of state quota / reference year I think but that isn't what makes the scheme tick.

    The US government have provided mortgage certainty via Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (occasionally disastrously) - both entities which are a part of the market but were originally facilitated by Govt - for the best part of a century but I don't think anyone would class that as state intervention.

    Also given that the scheme covers a margin over feed, with low feed prices, it may not actually be supporting any production at the moment?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,506 ✭✭✭Dawggone


    Milked out wrote: »
    https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/dairy-prices-may-not-lift-2017
    Fixed price schemes may look more appealing yet..

    Hard to disagree with the content of that commentary.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,993 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    kowtow wrote: »
    There's no reason to my mind why it couldn't, given the (relatively) liquid contracts available at the CME. There is some element of state quota / reference year I think but that isn't what makes the scheme tick.

    The US government have provided mortgage certainty via Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (occasionally disastrously) - both entities which are a part of the market but were originally facilitated by Govt - for the best part of a century but I don't think anyone would class that as state intervention.

    Also given that the scheme covers a margin over feed, with low feed prices, it may not actually be supporting any production at the moment?

    According to this its not supporting anything yet
    http://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/Dairy-MPP/index


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,075 ✭✭✭kevthegaff




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,633 ✭✭✭✭Buford T. Justice XIX


    kevthegaff wrote: »
    They had that flagged from the milk futures market late last week. The butter drop was the surprise, though, iirc they expected butter to hold or drop slightly.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,141 ✭✭✭RightTurnClyde


    kevthegaff wrote: »

    Jesus, the wheels are really starting to fall off now.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,617 ✭✭✭Farmer Ed


    Mehaffey1 wrote: »
    For all I talk about nz, which I'm limited to, I have noticed a lot of Irish focus on how dairying out here is the 'way to be', agriland articles etc.

    Think it's a very simple minded way of looking at things. Why focus on doing things the kiwi way when most farmers should be focusing on improving their own systems and improving their efficiencies etc?

    The only thing really to take out of Nz farming as a whole is the grass management obsession but even nz had been moving away from the grass only mindset. If the world milk price average was high would the focus not be on how to feed huge percentages of supplement to power ms production?

    I fully agree but some in Ireland long for the day when we have only one or two. Large milk processors also. I doubt if that model is all the sunshine it's made out to be judging by the milk price paid to. Nz farmers. As far as I can see the only advantage large Co ops have is they can spend more on pr in order to make themselves look good.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭kowtow


    They had that flagged from the milk futures market late last week. The butter drop was the surprise, though, iirc they expected butter to hold or drop slightly.

    Ironically it might be a butter drop which is needed to pull the carpet out from underneath US production in the near term. Certainly there has been something of a butterfat bubble going on.

    In essence, though, this is all short term price speculation. As others point out, whether any farm can survive it depends on decisions inside the gate.

    What we should be looking at is the change in the overall supply landscape -- as long as oil & soft commodity prices are in a new low phase the feed ratio / margin over feed means that the trigger price at which intensively fed competitors will take cows out of production is lower than it was between 2007-2014 when nuts were dear. In other words we might not be quite as competitive as we would like to think.

    Is 600,000 litres per man from grass in fact economically sustainable in a low price commodity era, if that is what settles in for the long term. If it is - what price should land be?, and if it isn't - where are those premium products going to come from to save our bacon?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,506 ✭✭✭Dawggone


    kowtow wrote: »



    What we should be looking at is the change in the overall supply landscape -- as long as oil & soft commodity prices are in a new low phase the feed ratio / margin over feed means that the trigger price at which intensively fed competitors will take cows out of production is lower than it was between 2007-2014 when nuts were dear. In other words we might not be quite as competitive as we would like to think.

    Is 600,000 litres per man from grass in fact economically sustainable in a low price commodity era, if that is what settles in for the long term. If it is - what price should land be?, and if it isn't - where are those premium products going to come from to save our bacon?


    Bang on the money Kowtow
    In the low commodity price cycles the non grass based milk producers have a distinct edge. This in turn lowers the overall base price bottom line for all. Does anybody remember back to the 80s when there were articles in the IFJ wondering how we could compete with french farmers that had maize and soya at tiny prices?

    I'm trying to move some wheat atm and the best I can get is €131/ton for next July. The world is awash with cheap grains and stocks are huge....by my rough estimates €131 for wheat equates to about 18cpl for milk. I'm sorry that I planted any winter cereals.

    What price is conacre this year? Now is usually the main trade on conacre for the year.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,633 ✭✭✭✭Buford T. Justice XIX


    kowtow wrote: »
    Ironically it might be a butter drop which is needed to pull the carpet out from underneath US production in the near term. Certainly there has been something of a butterfat bubble going on.

    In essence, though, this is all short term price speculation. As others point out, whether any farm can survive it depends on decisions inside the gate.

    What we should be looking at is the change in the overall supply landscape -- as long as oil & soft commodity prices are in a new low phase the feed ratio / margin over feed means that the trigger price at which intensively fed competitors will take cows out of production is lower than it was between 2007-2014 when nuts were dear. In other words we might not be quite as competitive as we would like to think.

    Is 600,000 litres per man from grass in fact economically sustainable in a low price commodity era, if that is what settles in for the long term. If it is - what price should land be?, and if it isn't - where are those premium products going to come from to save our bacon?
    There's the rub, though. In the PLC model, the premium return goes to shareholders rather than suppliers so suppliers only get a reducing % of the premium return as time goes on and shareholdings are removed from inside the farm gate.

    And bar Carbery, there isn't any great sign of value added coming from the co-op side either.

    Unless there is a fundamental change in the whole structure and attitude of the processing sector, nothing is going to change in the medium term.

    Yeah, Whelan2, I'm not going to cheer you up either:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,136 ✭✭✭alps


    kevthegaff wrote: »

    Easy guys.....European spot orices up..butter ip 5% in the US....This uncomfortable GTD doesn't control our world.

    Imagine a beef world that was controlled by prices at Bandon mart each Monday, and by lunch time Mon the world would be shaken with by she revaltions on the press and the Media..."Bandon down 7%"
    Farmers, processors., bankers the world ov er loosing the run of themselves with worry...where will it ever stop. Beef is phuqed..........


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,551 ✭✭✭keep going


    Just out of curiosty where in the world is the cheapest place to produce milk at the moment


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement