Liverpool v Chelsea 4:00pm

mike65

23 goal attempts by Liverpool.

Paully D

Juventus will be rubbing their hands.

Paul Tergat

Mikeyt086 wrote: »

Such a primitive thing to do I just don't know what goes through his head. Watching the replay of it there Ivanovic reacts like a Zombie has attacked him.

but wait, ivanovic then punches him and its like reacting to bad tackle :rolleyes:

Francie Barrett

If Defoe wasn't banned for the same thing than Suarez shouldn't be banned either. Of course Suarez is a dirty foreigner so the bookw ill be thrown at him.

klose

What the **** is souness talking about, yad swear he murdered somebody

Guy:Incognito

The_Kew_Tour wrote: »

I love it!!

However when it's at certin grounds........

I dint make the rules. Its clearly called as a minimum . The amounts of minutes given as the minimum is for anyone to dispute but the fact is its a figure that the ref cant blow up before.

Cantona's Collars

Deleted User wrote: »

The referee spoke to both of them so surely that means that he dealt with the incident?

He didn't see the bite,just saw Suarez falling then pretending to be injured after it.

BorneTobyWilde

Deleted User wrote: »

The referee spoke to both of them so surely that means that he dealt with the incident?

Yea, for Auegro and anyone else
But Suarez
Lets bend the rules to ban him

Allyall

Dcully wrote: »

?

They showed the full view. It looks way worse than the clips i saw.

He grabbed onto his elbow and was proper sinking his teeth in.

The fact that he already got banned for it, won't go in his favour. He'll get a long ban, and probably be sold..

ThunbergsAreGo

mike65 wrote: »

23 goal attempts by Liverpool.

Yes the corner woes are a worry. We should have won that.

JonJo is so close to being a good option off the bench he just needs to fine tune his finishing, hes always in the right place

peteeeed

Minimum 9 game ban so he'll miss his first 4 games for Munich

inmyday

super_furry wrote: »

Souness talking out his arse. He seems to forget just how nasty he was on the pitch himself.

He never had a bite of someone.

Hard tackles, bad fouls. All apart of football, especially 30years ago.

Biting and spitting are way worse than tackles. No question.

CSF

Francie Barrett wrote: »

If Defoe wasn't banned for the same thing than Suarez shouldn't be banned either. Of course Suarez is a dirty foreigner so the bookw ill be thrown at him.

Seriously, just stop posting.

BorneTobyWilde

mike65 wrote: »

23 goal attempts by Liverpool.

Yea, there was a real bite to us today

Rayne Wooney

Hitting the nail right on the head, one of the best players in the world but as a person he's really a pathetic man.

I hope he gets rid of it from his game as it will be sad to see his talent go to waste. Without him this season Liverpool would be 5-10 places down the table.

I think the best way forward for Liverpool is to sell him in the summer and reinvest the cash in new players, could easily get 40 million for him on the back if this season. That could buy Erickson and 2 other quality players.

Bodhisopha

Sounness is no man to talk, he almost incited a riot in Turkey.

The_Kew_Tour

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

I dint make the rules. Its clearly called as a minimum . The amounts of minutes given as the minimum is for anyone to dispute but the fact is its a figure that the ref cant blow up before.

Oh I agree but I and others having being saying that before and Conspiracey theory nuts have gone mad.

Fair play to pool for comeback btw.

Dcully

Allyall wrote: »

They showed the full view. It looks way worse than the clips i saw.

He grabbed onto his elbow and was proper sinking his teeth in.

The fact that he already got banned for it, won't go in his favour. He'll get a long ban, and probably be sold..

AH yeah fair enough and i totally agree about a ban, its just you quoted me in your post and i was like wtf.

Panthro

Will the book be thrown at Suarez?

Jayob10

klose wrote: »

What the **** is souness talking about, yad swear he murdered somebody

it was disgraceful and claiming anything otherwise is ignorance of the fact. It says alot about the man's character if anything, not just as to what the hell is going on in his head, but he has also let the club down with another **** storm of publicity on the way on top of a lengthy ban.

zerks

zerks wrote: »

He didn't see the bite,just saw Suarez falling then pretending to be injured after it.

I didn't think it mattered if he saw it properly, he dealt with it and moved on. The authorities shouldn't be undermining referees, isn't that the BS line that's usually trotted out?

Allyall

Dcully wrote: »

AH yeah fair enough and i totally agree about a ban, its just you quoted me in your post and i was like wtf.

Did i? Oops.. Sorry lol. didn't notice..

super_furry

super_furry wrote: »

Didn't get punished http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/t/tottenham_hotspur/6076094.stm

I presume the same shítstorm kicked off in here that day...

murpho999

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

Yea, for Auegro and anyone else
But Suarez
Lets bend the rules to ban him

Really, as an LFC supporter myself I don't see how anyone can defend Suarez today.

What he did was just wrong on any level, and he's going to be punished for it.

Other incidents have nothing to do with it.

Fuhrer

Id rather be bitten on the arm than have someones studs in my knee

Gbear

inmyday wrote: »

Haha. First of all, stop defending the bite.

99% of the time, when a leg is broken in a tackle, it is an accident. But biting someone is madness. Scumy, very scumy. He is a nutter.

In what way am I defending it?

Have I said it's ok to bite people?

He should get a 3 game ban, just like anyone who deliberately strikes an opponent should.
Nobody goes ape**** if in a rush of blood someone punches someone in the face.

Because his particular act of stupidity was novel and because of his reputation people are going mental over it.
Swirling sea of stupidity on here. No sense of perspective and scarcely a rational response to be found.

As far as I'm concerned Shelvey is a far bigger disgrace. He makes a tackle at least as bad as the one on Azpilicueta at least once every game. They're often worse. He should've had another 3 or 4 reds this season. He's been lucky he hasn't been caught and that he hasn't hurt someone.

Jayob10

Bodhisopha wrote: »

Sounness is no man to talk, he almost incited a riot in Turkey.

Just because its Souness saying it, doesn't make it wrong.

Courtesy Flush

You couldn't make it up! Luis Suarez gets away from Branislav Ivanovic this time to head home Daniel Sturridge's cross, with Petr Cech getting a hand to it but not keeping it out.

Unbelievable!

CSF

Gbear wrote: »

In what way am I defending it?

Have I said it's ok to bite people?

He should get a 3 game ban, just like anyone who deliberately strikes an opponent should.
Nobody goes ape**** if in a rush of blood someone punches someone in the face.

Because his particular act of stupidity was novel and because of his reputation people are going mental over it.
Swirling sea of stupidity on here. No sense of perspective and scarcely a rational response to be found.

As far as I'm concerned Shelvey is a far bigger disgrace. He makes a tackle at least as bad as the one on Azpilicueta at least once every game. They're often worse. He should've had another 3 or 4 reds this season. He's been lucky he hasn't been caught and that he hasn't hurt someone.

Pretty sure you get more than just a 3 game ban for punching someone in the face.

jive

Gbear wrote: »

He should get a 3 game ban, just like anyone who deliberately strikes an opponent should.
Nobody goes ape**** if in a rush of blood someone punches someone in the face.

Because his particular act of stupidity was novel and because of his reputation people are going mental over it.
Swirling sea of stupidity on here. No sense of perspective and scarcely a rational response to be found.

Lmao biting is not the equivalent of striking someone. Get a clue

edgecutter

Again this leaves Liverpool in a bad light which can't help when you have no European football and need sponsorship money to get the players they need(although I am delighted).

Paul Tergat

rarnes1 wrote: »

I presume the same shítstorm kicked off in here that day...

murpho999 wrote: »

Really, as an LFC supporter myself I don't see how anyone can defend Suarez today.

What he did was just wrong on any level, and he's going to be punished for it.

Other incidents have nothing to do with it.

.

kfallon

inmyday wrote: »

He never had a bite of someone.

Hard tackles, bad fouls. All apart of football, especially 30years ago.

Biting and spitting are way worse than tackles. No question.

Tbh if I was playing I'd rather have a little bite on me arm than this potential career ender

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygVgxYa3mlo

Either way they are both wrong

Paul Tergat

Fuhrer wrote: »

Id rather be bitten on the arm than have someones studs in my knee

oohhh kinky :pac:

inmyday

Fuhrer wrote: »

Id rather be bitten on the arm than have someones studs in my knee

Are you a liverpool fan by any chance???

Francie Barrett

by the way, it should have been a red and he should be sent off, but talk of 12 match bans is just nonsense.

BorneTobyWilde

murpho999 wrote: »

Really, as an LFC supporter myself I don't see how anyone can defend Suarez today.

What he did was just wrong on any level, and he's going to be punished for it.

Other incidents have nothing to do with it.

I agree, What Augero did was shocking foul too
IN reality I believe its a silly rule, Both Suarez and Augero are guilty
One got off free though, my only point
Can't defend Suarez, just saying if ref took note of it during game,then in reality you would need to bend rules to punish Suarez

kmart6

Cop out by Rodgers!!

Pathetic trying to shift attention by going on about Torres!!

markie29

Francie Barrett wrote: »

by the way, it should have been a red and he should be sent off, but talk of 12 match bans is just nonsense.

he will get that...because of his 8 match ban before there is a big chance they will double the ban for this incident.

The Internet

Now he's tasted Champions League success, he's bound to want to leave in the Summer

Pudsy33

Fuhrer wrote: »

Id rather be bitten on the arm than have someones studs in my knee

Studs to the knee can happen by accident, biting someone cannot. The former may hurt more then the later, but thats not the point at all. They are on two totally different ends of the spectrum in my mind.

Paully D

Rodgers as embarrassing as ever in that interview.

Sky interviewer didn't ask one question about the game :rolleyes:

Paully D

Paully D wrote: »

Rodgers as embarrassing as ever in that interview.

Remember who your own manager is

murpho999

kmart6 wrote: »

Cop out by Rodgers!!

Pathetic trying to shift attention by going on about Torres!!

What the f**k else do you expect him to say?

Shankly Gates

"We'll come to the football in a sec..."

Followed by three questions about the bite and then letting him go.

Nice one Sky.

Cantona's Collars

The Internet wrote: »

Now he's tasted Champions League success, he's bound to want to leave in the Summer

Well played sir,well played.

Allyall

kmart6 wrote: »

Cop out by Rodgers!!

Pathetic trying to shift attention by going on about Torres!!

Not really. What else is he supposed to say? He can't defend it, but he'll probably have to try over the next week.
Rafa on now..

Pudsy33

People trying to defend it by saying a bad tackle is worse really need to cop on!

Benimar

Paully D wrote: »

Rodgers as embarrassing as ever in that interview.

Oh yeah, because Ferguson, Wenger et al would have thrown their player under the bus :rolleyes: