Suarez Banned for 10 games

alchemist33

alchemist33 wrote: »

Or he could racially abuse them. That's only eight games.

4 if you're England captain

darced

This post has been deleted.

Reekwind

Grayditch wrote: »

He bit someone. It's possibly the worst thing you can do to someone...

I find that to be an absolutely bizarre statement. Biting someone on the pitch is disgusting and unacceptable but to compare it unfavourably to throwing a punch or breaking someone's leg is absurd. You're really going to tell me that this is worse than Alf-Inge Haland?

Even accounting for past behaviour, ten games (three more than racist abuse!) is far too much. The FA are making it up as they go along

zerks wrote:

If Joey Barton did it,there'd be no argument

Joey Barton got twelve games in 2012 for three separate counts of violent conduct. Suarez is being treated quantifiably worse. And don't tell me that Barton isn't a repeat offender

Cantona's Collars

If Ivanovich had been black,they would say "sure how could he be racist and not like blacks,didn't he bite one".

He even managed to embarass a Liverpool legend in Dalglish by the way he was supported then went back on his word to the man that he'd shake Evra's hand yet refused to.This fella has no moral compass yet his fans back him to the hilt after he just keeps dragging the club through the mud,sad.

smileyj1987

darced wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

He has everything he is the devil !

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sV9AQ4ncuac

TheBunk1

Chucky the tree wrote: »

lol.





I said he should learn his lesson, he needs to keep kicking and stamping on players when he gets angry instead of biting them.

At least you're not denying he's a frequent offender anyway.

Makes sense, he'll just get lesser bans but shur what harm, that's part of what makes him a great player.

Paul Tergat

Paul Tergat wrote: »

You are being defensive, not defending him. You are seeing it as an attack on Suarez, its not, its just he continues to do crazy things.

edit: see your posts above, you want to trivialise it and make it out like its unjust. Its not the case

I've made my feelings on Suarez's stupidity clear. You can't defend biting another player.

However, it's natural to compare to other cases and see how inconsistant the FA are. Afaik, you're a Utd fan so you'll remember Rooney swearing ban. I'd imagine you thought that was unjust.

SantryRed

Biting is as bad as spitting on someone. It is an outrageously scummy thing to do. And given his track record already, I'm not surprised at all at the ten games, he deserves it.

handsomecake

delighted for him

theoneeyedman

Its a good job Ivanovic isn't black or he'd have been banned for a year.
While 10 games is ott, I can't say I'm surprised given who was involved and the haste to 'justice'.
The saddest part of it all that this will inevitably hasten Suarez departure from the EPL.Whether you love him or hate him, he is pure box office.....a hugely talented player that is likely to do anything, either for good or 'evil'. For all the talent of the likes of van persie or bale they are a little lacking in personality imo. The league need talented nutcases like suarez and tevez to liven things up a bit. The EPL has been on everyones lips this week due to this incident as much if not more than uniteds procession to another title. The FA might rue hounding him out of their league one day .

zerks

zerks wrote: »

If Ivanovich had been black,they would say "sure how could he be racist and not like blacks,didn't he bite one".

He even managed to embarass a Liverpool legend in Dalglish by the way he was supported then went back on his word to the man that he'd shake Evra's hand yet refused to.This fella has no moral compass yet his fans back him to the hilt after he just keeps dragging the club through the mud,sad.

Lol, and the guy with the lowest morals in the league plays for Utd and bangs his brothers wife.

So get off that high horse.

Also, if you're so outraged by his behaviour why are you posting jokes about it all week.

Typical hypocritcal nonsense.

Cantona's Collars

rarnes1 wrote: »

you're a Utd fan so you'll remember Rooney swearing ban. I'd imagine you thought that was unjust.

Swearing is part of the game,like it or not.Biting isn't.

Reekwind

CSF wrote: »

A punch could also kill you, so I don't get where you're going with that argument?

So you'd suggest charging every footballer who throws a punch with attempted murder?

Paul Tergat

rarnes1 wrote: »

I've made my feelings on Suarez's stupidity clear. You can't defend biting another player.

However, it's natural to compare to other cases and see how inconsistant the FA are. Afaik, you're a Utd fan so you'll remember Rooney swearing ban. I'd imagine you thought that was unjust.

Fair enough on the first bit.

Swearing at a camera is not even on the same scale as someone biting another person. If Rooney gets a 2 match ban for foul language Suarez getting 5x that for, again its mad to even say this, biting someone then he got off lightly imo.

Ilik Urgee

Ten games well justified. A dog on the streets would've been shot for the same thing, AIDS or no AIDS.

SantryRed

SantryRed wrote: »

Biting is as bad as spitting on someone. It is an outrageously scummy thing to do. And given his track record already, I'm not surprised at all at the ten games, he deserves it.

3 match ban for spitting.

So biting is 3 times worse from an FA point of view.

dixiefly

Reekwind wrote: »

I find that to be an absolutely bizarre statement. Biting someone on the pitch is disgusting and unacceptable but to compare it unfavourably to throwing a punch or breaking someone's leg is absurd. You're really going to tell me that this is worse than Alf-Inge Haland?

Even accounting for past behaviour, ten games (three more than racist abuse!) is far too much. The FA are making it up as they go along

Joey Barton got twelve games in 2012 for three separate counts of violent conduct. Suarez is being treated quantifiably worse. And don't tell me that Barton isn't a repeat offender

I just posted on the other thread. I am a united supporter but was disgusted at Keane. Keane got 3 games with an additional 5 after the biography. That is the standard and is a lot worse than Suarez last weekend.

Keane should have got the same punishment as Cantona and then some following the biography.

Paul Tergat

Paul Tergat wrote: »

Fair enough on the first bit.

Swearing at a camera is not even on the same scale as someone biting another person. If Rooney gets a 2 match ban for foul language Suarez getting 5x that for, again its mad to even say this, biting someone then he got off lightly imo.

What about pre meditated challenges that lead to serious injuries? A year? Life bans?

Moist Bread

Ilik Urgee wrote: »

Ten games well justified. A dog on the streets would've been shot for the same thing, AIDS or no AIDS.

What

Red Crow

Rarnes is probably sitting at home with that white Suarez t-shirt on.

Cantona's Collars

rarnes1 wrote: »

Lol, and the guy with the lowest morals in the league plays for Utd and bangs his brothers wife.

So get off that high horse.

Also, if you're so outraged by his behaviour why are you posting jokes about it all week.

Typical hypocritcal nonsense.

Why not poke fun at him,no matter what I'd say on the matter you'd appear to moan about it.Nothing hypocritical about it at all,where did I say I'm outraged,you are once more trying to twist things to point score.

Guy does scummy things,gets banned and his fanclub go into meltdown and denial,plus have you ever seen me defend Giggs,I made jokes about him and nobody became enraged unlike yourself.It seems as if my every word irks you in some way.

At least Giggs did it behind closed doors;)

Ilik Urgee

Moist Bread wrote: »

What

Didn't you hear? Suarez has AIDS....

Super AIDS!

Eli Manning

Eli Manning wrote: »

Rarnes is probably sitting at home with that white Suarez t-shirt on.

Sure am.

Skype?

zerks

zerks wrote: »

Why not poke fun at him,no matter what I'd say on the matter you'd appear to moan about it.Nothing hypocritical about it at all,where did I say I'm outraged,you are once more trying to twist things to point score.

Guy does scummy things,gets banned and his fanclub go into meltdown and denial,plus have you ever seen me defend Giggs,I made jokes about him and nobody became enraged unlike yourself.It seems as if my every word irks you in some way.

At least Giggs did it behind closed doors;)

Makes two of us then

Will I Amnt

rarnes1 wrote: »

Lol, and the guy with the lowest morals in the league plays for Utd and bangs his brothers wife.

So get off that high horse.

Also, if you're so outraged by his behaviour why are you posting jokes about it all week.

Typical hypocritcal nonsense.

So we're not allowed post about Suarez morality because Giggs plays for United?

You're very quick to tell people that Liverpool players/managers have nothing to do with a topic if someone compares them in other instances.

Hypocritical nonsense indeed...

smileyj1987

Eli Manning wrote: »

Rarnes is probably sitting at home with that white Suarez t-shirt on.

Any Chance of a lend Rarnes ?

messinkiapina

Anyone who thinks 10 matches is justified clearly has a personal dislike for Liverpool FC or Luis Suarez. Any neutral who can be the least bit objective would say that 10 matches is a big over-reaction by the FA.

jive

niallo27 wrote: »

You could say a punch to the head or chest could lead to death if your going down that line.

Yeah it could what's your point? There's a certain risk involved here that seems to have gone over your head. Biting carries a significantly higher risk than a dig.

darced

This post has been deleted.

smileyj1987

jive wrote: »

Yeah it could what's your point? There's a certain risk involved here that seems to have gone over your head. Biting carries a significantly higher risk than a dig.

In what way ?

cambo2008

cambo2008 wrote: »

So we're not allowed post about Suarez morality because Giggs plays for United?

You're very quick to tell people that Liverpool players/managers have nothing to do with a topic if someone compares them in other instances.

Hypocritical nonsense indeed...

Who said that? Your fascination with Liverpool is fascinating

Giggsy11

messinkiapina wrote: »

Anyone who thinks 10 matches is justified clearly has a personal dislike for Liverpool FC or Luis Suarez. Any neutral who can be the least bit objective would say that 10 matches is a big over-reaction by the FA.

So it's either you agree with me or you are wrong?

Will I Amnt

messinkiapina wrote: »

Anyone who thinks 10 matches is justified clearly has a personal dislike for Liverpool FC or Luis Suarez. Any neutral who can be the least bit objective would say that 10 matches is a big over-reaction by the FA.

I had no problem with Joey Barton's 12 match ban and I've no problem with this.

You can't expect to be treated the same as everybody else if you're going to behave like nobody else.

CSF

darced wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

As opposed to the racist, repeat biter Suarez? Peas in a pod.

jive

smileyj1987 wrote: »

Hepatitis C and Aids cannot be gotten from Salivia there needs to be blood to blood contact . Now where in christ would you get a pipe on a football pitch ? Also if you hit somebody hard enough you could also kill somebody !

They can be transmitted through biting, amongst many other more likely candidates. They're rarely transmitted but I wouldn't want to be waiting on those test results because some twat bit me, would you?

CSF wrote: »

A punch could also kill you, so I don't get where you're going with that argument?

See above.

Red Crow

rarnes1 wrote: »

Who said that? Your fascination with Liverpool is fascinating

Everybody who watches football is going to be fascinated in some way with the second most successful club in English football - Liverpool

darced

This post has been deleted.

citytillidie

CSF wrote: »

As opposed to the racist, repeat biter Suarez? Peas in a pod.

Throw in the other racist in the premier league and it is the perfect pea pod

CSF

CSF wrote: »

As opposed to the racist, repeat biter Suarez? Peas in a pod.

I'd rather get a "bite" on the arm than my brother banging my wife.

Doesn't even compare tbh.

TheTownie

messinkiapina wrote: »

Anyone who thinks 10 matches is justified clearly has a personal dislike for Liverpool FC or Luis Suarez. Any neutral who can be the least bit objective would say that 10 matches is a big over-reaction by the FA.

An objective person would wait for the release of the reasoning behind the severity of the ban before passing an opinion.

Paul Tergat

rarnes1 wrote: »

What about pre meditated challenges that lead to serious injuries? A year? Life bans?

How do you prove its pre meditated? Challenges are part of the game. Sure we see some really bad ones but its easier to argue 'I was going for the ball' than 'errr i decided to bite him'. do you see the difference?

Will I Amnt

rarnes1 wrote: »

Who said that? Your fascination with Liverpool is fascinating

Well we would be just told to come down off our high horses if we did.

Your varying moral outrage, depending on who the recipient might be is very fascinating.

Paul Tergat

darced wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

see. this is the problem, cant see the woods from the trees. everyone is just out to get liverpool. same old bs

rarnes1

rarnes1 wrote: »

I'd rather get a "bite" on the arm than my brother banging my wife.

Doesn't even compare tbh.

In fairness I'd rather get a bite on the arm than ride your wife.

cambo2008

cambo2008 wrote: »

Well we would be just told to come down off our high horses if we did.

Your varying moral outrage, depending on who the recipient might be is very fascinating.

As is yours

Lonesome Boatman

have to say this whole episode has turned me off Liverpool, especially the defending of Saurez's racism.

Paul Tergat

rarnes1 wrote: »

I'd rather get a "bite" on the arm than my brother banging my wife.

Doesn't even compare tbh.

bringing a united player into it, another deflecting tactic.

so in this thread we have had well its not as bad as doing X, headbutting is worse, FA are corrupt, united players are horrible.

see it for what it is. theres no other point to be made.

Regina Uptight Bucket

Regina Uptight Bucket wrote: »

In fairness I'd rather get a bite on the arm than ride your wife.

Ah jaysus, have we sank that low we need personal insults.

CSF

darced wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

Solid logic there.

Paul Tergat

Paul Tergat wrote: »

bringing a united player into it, another deflecting tactic.

so in this thread we have had well its not as bad as doing X, headbutting is worse, FA are corrupt, united players are horrible.

see it for what it is. theres no other point to be made.

No deflecting from me. I've made my feelings known on Suarez.