** HL Physics Before / after **

NanaAcidWrap

Hey guys, I got a question I'd be very thankful if anyone could answer , if you have written down you're doing OL PHYSICS on the paper with levels of the subjects which we had to fill in few months ago can you I still do higher level physics paper tommorow?

Leaving Cert Student

he is talking feces out of his highly distrubing hole and preaching words of excrement with no meaning whatsoever but we are worse to be endorsing such an array of utter vomit

NanaAcidWrap

Leaving Cert Student wrote: »

he is talking feces out of his highly distrubing hole and preaching words of excrement with no meaning whatsoever but we are worse to be endorsing such an array of utter vomit

Well you can't really say anything against his predictions, he's just giving tips, besides his biology predictions were spot on.. then again one could say "It's rather easy to see what's comming up".

mikeyod123

his ass would be jealous of the amount of sh1te that comes out of his mouth :P
although he has joules law and co-planar forces as no.1 and 2 so that seems right to me

MarieCurie22

Leaving Cert Student wrote: »

he is talking feces out of his highly distrubing hole and preaching words of excrement with no meaning whatsoever but we are worse to be endorsing such an array of utter vomit

In fairness though he hit the nail on the head with what I had noticed in the papers too.....from it I'd take...

Radioactivity...
Electrostatics...
Semi Conductors...
Momentum and forces...
SHM
Doppler affect
Some form of a heat q (none last year!)
Xrays!!

Experiments:
Co-planar forces or g by free fall
Latent heat of fusion of ice
Wavelength of monochromatic light or speed of sound in air...
Joules law...

xJEx

Prodigious wrote: »

Pathetic predictions. Puts up 20 out of the 25 possible. What a knob...

My thoughts exactly

MarieCurie22

http://www.youtube.com/user/LeavingCertificate

curly135

Well, I've done all the revision I can do. :pac: It's in the lap of the gods now...

xJEx

curly135 wrote: »

Well, I've done all the revision I can do. :pac: It's in the lap of the gods now...

You're just gonna rest til then?

MarieCurie22

xJEx wrote: »

You're just gonna rest til then?

I have soooo much to do

MarieCurie22

Explain how a geiger mueller tube works?

yoppo

The radiation ionizes the air in the tube, that causes a current to flow which shows up on the meter (I think)....

MarieCurie22

yoppo wrote: »

The radiation ionizes the air in the tube, that causes a current to flow which shows up on the meter (I think)....

Thank you! I am so braindead from cramming i nearly highlighted the laptop screen with my highlighter

optimus125

I would be willing to bet almost anything in my possession that co-planar forces is coming up tomorrow. KNOW IT PEOPLE.

MarieCurie22

optimus125 wrote: »

I would be willing to bet almost anything in my possession that co-planar forces is coming up tomorrow. KNOW IT PEOPLE.

I second that!

xJEx

MarieCurie22 wrote: »

I have soooo much to do

Same girl gonna be up all night

and then be fecking exhausted for spanish and chem...

MarieCurie22

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5KaeCZ_AaY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIvVzJ6KZpk

Doppler effect

xJEx

yoppo wrote: »

The radiation ionizes the air in the tube, that causes a current to flow which shows up on the meter (I think)....

We wouldn't be asked to draw a GM tube would we? Cause the diagram for that in my book is ****ed up..

MarieCurie22

xJEx wrote: »

We wouldn't be asked to draw a GM tube would we? Cause the diagram for that in my book is ****ed up..

I hope not!

Monsieur Folie

Are his predicted topics what people were expecting? Don't want to rely on them if not. I know all the experiments so I'm not really worried about that. :P

VincentLeB

Monsieur Folie wrote: »

Are his predicted topics what people were expecting? Don't want to rely on them if not. I know all the experiments so I'm not really worried about that. :P

This is what he's predicting:


—Radioactivity
—Capacitance
—Sound Frequencies & Harmonics
—Gravity & Circular Motion
—Electromagnetic Induction

(As well as option. Like he has more, but these are his top ones.)

Is this what people were expecting? If not, why not?

Brad768

Monsieur Folie wrote: »

Are his predicted topics what people were expecting? Don't want to rely on them if not. I know all the experiments so I'm not really worried about that. :P

I'm the opposite :P Spending most of tonight going over experiments. Feeling confident about it though

MarieCurie22

VincentLeB wrote: »

This is what he's predicting:


—Radioactivity
—Capacitance
—Sound Frequencies & Harmonics
—Gravity & Circular Motion
—Electromagnetic Induction

(As well as option. Like he has more, but these are his top ones.)

Is this what people were expecting? If not, why not?

Radioactivity yes hasnt appeared in a while as a full q

Capacitance maybe...electrostatics more so id say...
Sound and frequincies yes...
Gravity and circular motion No both came up last year! So Im saying....momentum and forces (2004) or SHM

VincentLeB

MarieCurie22 wrote: »

Radioactivity yes hasnt appeared in a while as a full q

Capacitance maybe...electrostatics more so id say...
Sound and frequincies yes...
Gravity and circular motion No both came up last year! So Im saying....momentum and forces (2004) or SHM

Thanks a million for that. I'm so fücked for this, and my teacher expects me to pull an A1 out of somewhere... at least I know every single definition off by heart :pac:

MarieCurie22

VincentLeB wrote: »

Thanks a million for that. I'm so fücked for this, and my teacher expects me to pull an A1 out of somewhere... at least I know every single definition off by heart :pac:

thats like 10+% of the paper so :P more than I know

VincentLeB

MarieCurie22 wrote: »

thats like 10+% of the paper so :P more than I know

Yeah I used a flash-card program with spaced repetition back in January, and I went from knowing maybe five or six to getting the best in the class in a 80+ definition test after only learning all 160 of them over two nights XD But all I did for those two nights was physics definitions and I stayed up until like 03.00 in the morning. But it was worth it now so all I had to do was look over a few a week and they're ingrained in my memory.

Wish I had done it for everything else though...

no scope codgod

VincentLeB wrote: »

Yeah I used a flash-card program with spaced repetition back in January, and I went from knowing maybe five or six to getting the best in the class in a 80+ definition test after only learning all 160 of them over two nights XD But all I did for those two nights was physics definitions and I stayed up until like 03.00 in the morning. But it was worth it now so all I had to do was look over a few a week and they're ingrained in my memory.

Wish I had done it for everything else though...

Do you even need that many definitions? For most of them you can just quote the formula from the log books.

Lukeyy

Nice to see I'm not the only one f***** for this!

Mr.Fun

I. Got an A1 in physics higher level last year hahahahahaha

Lukeyy

Mr.Fun wrote: »

I. Got an A1 in physics higher level last year hahahahahaha

Well for some. -.-