Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

** HL Physics Before / after **

145791019

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 149 ✭✭D_s


    P=IsquaredR isn't in tables, neither is W=VI (For power cables), that's 2 off the top of my head anyway


  • Registered Users Posts: 204 ✭✭MarieCurie22


    http://www.thephysicsteacher.ie/leavingcertphysicsrevision.html

    Try here!? Idk you might find something there


  • Registered Users Posts: 149 ✭✭D_s


    Lambda = 4(l+0.3d) is a must to learn off.


  • Registered Users Posts: 166 ✭✭xJEx


    LCStudent - if you have the marking scheme for the mock paper do you have the answers to the SHM calculation please? (Q6)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭Leaving Cert Student


    D_s wrote: »
    Lambda = 4(l+0.3d) is a must to learn off.

    For this exp. do you apply the c=f(lambda) formula afterwards? And do you take the average of all teh values of speed of sound after doing this?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭Leaving Cert Student


    xJEx wrote: »
    LCStudent - if you have the marking scheme for the mock paper do you have the answers to the SHM calculation please? (Q6)

    Question 6.
    • a = −ω 2s (4m)
    Explain notation (2m)
    • Hookes law: F = −ks (4m)
    Explain notation (2m)
    • F = −ks (3m)
    F ma a F ks
    m m
    = ∴ = = − (3m)
    as a 2s then 2 k
    m
    = −ω ϖ = (3m)
    as T 2 then T 2 m
    k
    π π
    ω
    = = (3m)
    • (i) – 10 : 20→4 : 40 = 6 h 20 min (3m)
    – 6 20 min 1 period
    2
    h =
    – ∴ Period = 45600 s (3m)
    – Amplitude 25 12 6.5
    2
    = − = m (3m)
    (ii) 4 : 40 1
    4
    + period (3m)
    4 : 40 + 3 h10 min = 7.50 p.m. (3m)
    (iii) From above a =ω 2s ∴F = mω 2s (3m)
    ( )20,000 1.378×10−4 2 6.5 = 2.468×10−3 N (3m)
    (iv) F = mω 2s ( )∴1×10−3 = 20,000 1.378×10−4 2 s
    ∴s = 2.6331m (2m)
    – Equilibrium position 25 12 13.5
    2
    = + = m (2m)
    – 13⋅5+ 2⋅63 =16⋅13 m (2m)
    13⋅5− 2⋅63 =10⋅87 m (2m)
    – Simple pendulum … etc.


  • Registered Users Posts: 149 ✭✭D_s


    For this exp. do you apply the c=f(lambda) formula afterwards? And do you take the average of all teh values of speed of sound after doing this?

    Yes and Yes :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 166 ✭✭xJEx


    Question 6.
    • a = −ω 2s (4m)
    Explain notation (2m)
    • Hookes law: F = −ks (4m)
    Explain notation (2m)
    • F = −ks (3m)
    F ma a F ks
    m m
    = ∴ = = − (3m)
    as a 2s then 2 k
    m
    = −ω ϖ = (3m)
    as T 2 then T 2 m
    k
    π π
    ω
    = = (3m)
    • (i) – 10 : 20→4 : 40 = 6 h 20 min (3m)
    – 6 20 min 1 period
    2
    h =
    – ∴ Period = 45600 s (3m)
    – Amplitude 25 12 6.5
    2
    = − = m (3m)
    (ii) 4 : 40 1
    4
    + period (3m)
    4 : 40 + 3 h10 min = 7.50 p.m. (3m)
    (iii) From above a =ω 2s ∴F = mω 2s (3m)
    ( )20,000 1.378×10−4 2 6.5 = 2.468×10−3 N (3m)
    (iv) F = mω 2s ( )∴1×10−3 = 20,000 1.378×10−4 2 s
    ∴s = 2.6331m (2m)
    – Equilibrium position 25 12 13.5
    2
    = + = m (2m)
    – 13⋅5+ 2⋅63 =16⋅13 m (2m)
    13⋅5− 2⋅63 =10⋅87 m (2m)
    – Simple pendulum … etc.

    Thank you dude!


  • Registered Users Posts: 204 ✭✭MarieCurie22




  • Registered Users Posts: 32 cremeeggeater


    Thinking of dropping to ordinary since it's my 7th subject and I failed the mock, anyone any idea for what I need to know for pass?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,553 ✭✭✭✭Copper_pipe


    What experiments do ye predict lads?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭Leaving Cert Student


    What experiments do ye predict lads?

    Resistivity, moments and specific latent heat of fusion of ice


  • Registered Users Posts: 287 ✭✭YoursSincerely


    Resistivity, moments and specific latent heat of fusion of ice

    All those plus snells law


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 200 ✭✭mulciber


    Hey guys, I have a question:

    Our teacher never did Hooks law/Simple harmonic motion or Electromagnetism with us. Am I screwed? =/


  • Registered Users Posts: 64 ✭✭no scope codgod


    One question they seem somewhat fond of asking is about sweat and how it cools you down when you exercise because it takes heat from your body to overcome the latent heat needed to cause evaporation. Can anyone explain how this happens? If heat can only flow from hot to cold how does a body get hot enough to cause evaporation at 100 degrees?


  • Registered Users Posts: 166 ✭✭xJEx


    mulciber wrote: »
    Hey guys, I have a question:

    Our teacher never did Hooks law/Simple harmonic motion or Electromagnetism with us. Am I screwed? =/

    A lot of people avoid SHM and Hooke's anyway cause they find it difficult so no for that.. but do you mean you didn't do magnets at all?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭Leaving Cert Student


    You can avoid getting deep in mechanics, magnets and electricity provided you know the basics and experiments and everything else really well


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭Leaving Cert Student


    One question they seem somewhat fond of asking is about sweat and how it cools you down when you exercise because it takes heat from your body to overcome the latent heat needed to cause evaporation. Can anyone explain how this happens? If heat can only flow from hot to cold how does a body get hot enough to cause evaporation at 100 degrees?

    Evaporation doesn't have to occur at 100 degrees.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 200 ✭✭mulciber


    Well, we did the thing where you can see a magnetic field by creating a p.d. with to bits of metal and some oil. We never did rotating coils, flux or any of that though. None of the electromagnetism stuff in the book "investigating Physics". =/


  • Registered Users Posts: 166 ✭✭xJEx


    One question they seem somewhat fond of asking is about sweat and how it cools you down when you exercise because it takes heat from your body to overcome the latent heat needed to cause evaporation. Can anyone explain how this happens? If heat can only flow from hot to cold how does a body get hot enough to cause evaporation at 100 degrees?

    I love these type of questions :P It's not quite 100 degrees and don't think of it in terms of that. Basically - the latent heat is needed for a change of state - the body supplies the heat - body cools down. thats all youre gonna need to say


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 166 ✭✭xJEx


    mulciber wrote: »
    Well, we did the thing where you can see a magnetic field by creating a p.d. with to bits of metal and some oil. We never did rotating coils and stuff though. =/

    Do you have the Essentials Unfolded by any chance?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 200 ✭✭mulciber


    xJEx wrote: »
    Do you have the Essentials Unfolded by any chance?

    No, sorry. But I do have the less stress more success book.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,207 ✭✭✭decisions


    Experiments:
    1. G by free fall/ coplaner forces
    2. Heat
    3. Snells Law / Speed of sound
    4. Resistivity of wire

    6. Planetary Motion / SHM
    7. Waves, Doppler ect
    8. Capacitance, Coulombs Law
    9. Photoelectric emission, X rays
    10. Cockcroft and Walton experiment
    11. ?
    12. Electromagnitism, Semi conductor, refractive index (optical fibers?)

    Anybody else got any predictions?


  • Registered Users Posts: 204 ✭✭MarieCurie22


    decisions wrote: »
    Experiments:
    1. G by free fall/ coplaner forces
    2. Heat
    3. Snells Law / Speed of sound
    4. Resistivity of wire

    6. Planetary Motion / SHM
    7. Waves, Doppler ect
    8. Capacitance, Coulombs Law
    9. Photoelectric emission, X rays
    10. Cockcroft and Walton experiment
    11. ?
    12. Electromagnitism, Semi conductor, refractive index (optical fibers?)

    Planetary motion was there last year no? And SHM also came up recently Id say forces of motion and uvast....


  • Registered Users Posts: 166 ✭✭xJEx


    mulciber wrote: »
    No, sorry. But I do have the less stress more success book.

    Oh cause I was gonna say you can get a good grasp from reading the ike 5 pages in that book. I'd advise doing a few Qs in the papers now and see how you get on, look over the most common definitions, like Faraday's Law, and then that with your basic understanding of the topic will be grand - it's just in case a little something comes up in Q5 if you like that Q or if you you get unlucky and need it to fall back on in a long question :/

    when I say do a few Qs in papers I mean calculations


  • Registered Users Posts: 33 carlos123455


    One question they seem somewhat fond of asking is about sweat and how it cools you down when you exercise because it takes heat from your body to overcome the latent heat needed to cause evaporation. Can anyone explain how this happens? If heat can only flow from hot to cold how does a body get hot enough to cause evaporation at 100 degrees?

    You don't need 100 degrees to evaporate water, evaporating and boiling are two different things, our teacher explained it to us by clothes drying on a line, you don't get 100 degrees from the sun yet the water evaporates from the clothes.. Get it? :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 200 ✭✭mulciber


    xJEx wrote: »
    Oh cause I was gonna say you can get a good grasp from reading the ike 5 pages in that book. I'd advise doing a few Qs in the papers now and see how you get on, look over the most common definitions, like Faraday's Law, and then that with your basic understanding of the topic will be grand - it's just in case a little something comes up in Q5 if you like that Q or if you you get unlucky and need it to fall back on in a long question :/

    Ok, I'll do that. Thanks for the help. =)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 200 ✭✭mulciber


    Planetary motion was there last year no? And SHM also came up recently Id say forces of motion and uvast....

    I hope that you're right. I love uvast questions. :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,207 ✭✭✭decisions


    Planetary motion was there last year no? And SHM also came up recently Id say forces of motion and uvast....

    It did kinda come up, but it was really a vertical motion q.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 200 ✭✭mulciber


    decisions wrote: »
    It did kinda come up, but it was really a vertical motion q.

    Looking at the pattern now I would guess that Newton's laws, momentum or density and pressure will come up. I really don't want a SHM question. If that comes up I'm screwed. =/


Advertisement