RAF Regiment win military comps

tac foley

Quote - 'TAC Foley I am convinced you are a walt.'

A 'walt' claims to have done things that he has not. I have not claimed to do any of these things.

A 'walt' wears medals to which he is not entitled. I do not wear medals to which I am not entitled.

Please visit the DISC at Chicksands near Bedford UK.

Please walk in to JSPI, and look at the list of Chief Instructors, located on your left, as you enter the instructional block, by the door leading to the Chief Instructor's office.

Please read my name there, and the dates relating to that name.

Then come back here and feel free to apologise for calling me a Walt.

tac

pablomakaveli

Well look who's back.

Crusader you didn't happen to catch this thread during your last wave of activity here did you?

Also it's kind of odd how we seem to have some RAF regiment cheerleader squad on this forum none of whom seem to be serving in the RAF regiment

cruasder777

pablomakaveli wrote: »

Well look who's back.

Crusader you didn't happen to catch this thread during your last wave of activity here did you?

Also it's kind of odd how we seem to have some RAF regiment cheerleader squad on this forum none of whom seem to be serving in the RAF regiment

So you are telling me I should not reply to inaccurate posts ?

pablomakaveli

cruasder777 wrote: »

So you are telling me I should not reply to inaccurate posts ?

I'm seeing more of an ad hominem attack on another poster than a reply.

cruasder777

pablomakaveli wrote: »

I'm seeing more of an ad hominem attack on another poster than a reply.

Tac is claiming to be a Lt Col, I questioned that due to the inaccurate info he posts, as for ad hominem attacks, numerous on this thread all against pro RAF Regiment posters, both by Tac and his pack of little yapping dogs, all ignored by moderators.

pablomakaveli

cruasder777 wrote: »

Tac is claiming to be a Lt Col, I questioned that due to the inaccurate info he posts, as for ad hominem attacks, numerous on this thread all against pro RAF Regiment posters, both by Tac and his pack of little yapping dogs, all ignored by moderators.

He's retired i believe and has mentioned that several times on this forum. I haven't seen any questionable claims from him nor any other posters serving or have served in the British services, US forces or Irish DF. Yet you and a couple of other posters with no military experience are aggressively claiming to know better about how the armed forces are based on googling the RAF regiment and then insulting actual serving or former serving personnel by calling them walts. (Which you've tried to hide by editing).

I completely understand how Tac is frustrated. You wouldn't go up to your doctor or solicitor and claim you know better than they do about their field and how their job works based on some googling for info now would you?

pablomakaveli

Also i am genuinely baffled by this cheerleading for the RAF regiment. I don't even think the guys in the RAF regiment are as passionate about the RAF regiment as some of the posters on here.

cruasder777

pablomakaveli wrote: »

He's retired i believe and has mentioned that several times on this forum. I haven't seen any questionable claims from him nor any other posters serving or have served in the British services, US forces or Irish DF. Yet you and a couple of other posters with no military experience are aggressively claiming to know better about how the armed forces are based on googling the RAF regiment and then insulting actual serving or former serving personnel by calling them walts. (Which you've tried to hide by editing).

I completely understand how Tac is frustrated. You wouldn't go up to your doctor or solicitor and claim you know better than they do about their field and how their job works based on some googling for info now would you?

No military experience ?

I will scan some pics when I get the chance of me at 17 doing P coy, tabbing up pen-y-fen and some of me in the Croatian civil war.


What have you done ?

cruasder777

pablomakaveli wrote: »

He's retired i believe and has mentioned that several times on this forum. I haven't seen any questionable claims from him nor any other posters serving or have served in the British services, US forces or Irish DF. Yet you and a couple of other posters with no military experience are aggressively claiming to know better about how the armed forces are based on googling the RAF regiment and then insulting actual serving or former serving personnel by calling them walts. (Which you've tried to hide by editing).

I completely understand how Tac is frustrated. You wouldn't go up to your doctor or solicitor and claim you know better than they do about their field and how their job works based on some googling for info now would you?

So even though all the claims by Tac and others about the RAF regiment have been proven wrong, you still insist they are correct ?

pablomakaveli

cruasder777 wrote: »

No military experience ?

I will scan some pics when I get the chance of me at 17 doing P coy, tabbing up pen-y-fen and some of me in the Croatian civil war.


What have you done ?

By all means go for it. And keep in mind I'll be using tineye to make sure you haven't pulled them off the net.

And since I've only been in two years I haven't done much in the way of deployment but have never claimed otherwise so I don't see what relevance that has.

pablomakaveli

cruasder777 wrote: »

So even though all the claims by Tac and others about the RAF regiment have been proven wrong, you still insist they are correct ?

You haven't provided much in the way of evidence that they are elite. In one post you say the RAF website says the RAF regiment is elite so it must be so. That kind of nonsense doesn't give you much credibility tbh

tac foley

cruasder777 wrote: »

Tac is claiming to be a Lt Col, I questioned that due to the inaccurate info he posts, as for ad hominem attacks, numerous on this thread all against pro RAF Regiment posters, both by Tac and his pack of little yapping dogs, all ignored by moderators.

tac claimed to act as a Lt Col, interim a replacement CO was posted.

As for 'Tac' and his pack of yapping dogs, THAT deserves looking at by a Mod.

So now, it's MY turn.

1. Proof, please, of you 'at 17 doing P Coy'.

2. Proof of 'tabbing up pen-y-fen' [that's Pen-y-Fan, BTW].

3. Proof of time 'in the Croatian civil war'.

Names, places, unit COC, CO, that kind of thing....?

Thanks in advance.

tac

PS - PM me with your regimental number and P Coy course number so I can check YOU out. I'm easy to check out, my name here is my name. As I said, just call up the DISC at Chicksands - I retired 14 years ago this August, but records are records, right?

tac foley

...and just in case you decide to edit your post in which you accused me of being a walt, here is the bit that you wrote...

...here is what 2 sqd RAF Regiment actually do...see for yourself. From jumping with US Special Forces to various operations and aggressive patrols, TAC Foley I am convinced you are a walt.

http://www.raf.mod.uk/rafregiment/sq...sqnhistory.cfm


Incidentally for somebody who, it now transpires, claims to have extensive military experience - P Coy, Croatian civil war [?], it's odd that the official Staff Duties in the Field military terminology seems to have been forgotten - sqd?

tac

Manic Moran

cruasder777 wrote: »

Tac is claiming to be a Lt Col, I questioned that due to the inaccurate info he posts, as for ad hominem attacks, numerous on this thread all against pro RAF Regiment posters, both by Tac and his pack of little yapping dogs, all ignored by moderators.

[Mod]Yes, well, this moderator isn't ignoring that one.

As far as I'm concerned, you can both be vets or you can both be fake. Since it can't be proven online, I don't give a damn and will treat people on the basis of how they post.

The above quote is out of line.[/mod]

Out of mod mode, your refutations are not exactly conclusive. Members of my national guard cavalry troop took part in an op in Afghanistan with US Special Forces and French Forces. (Video footage of their extraction under fire: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbTjmCz-Ilk ). That does not make my little troop of reservists in any way an elite unit, nor does it make the role of my unit anything other than that of a battlefield cavalry unit. It just meant that a couple of my troopers were considered good enough to partake, and the SF unit operating in our area of interest felt like it could use the company.

NTM

chopper6

cruasder777 wrote: »

No military experience ?

I will scan some pics when I get the chance of me at 17 doing P coy, tabbing up pen-y-fen and some of me in the Croatian civil war.


What have you done ?

What year were you there?

Who was your CO?

Manic Moran

and what colour was the gymnasium roof?

In fairness, I can't remember the name of my CO in Basic, I can't even remember my drill sergeants and they were God over me every day for three months. (Except for DS Ford, he was a damned tank)

discus

It'll be on his course photo.

pablomakaveli

Manic Moran wrote: »

and what colour was the gymnasium roof?

In fairness, I can't remember the name of my CO in Basic, I can't even remember my drill sergeants and they were God over me every day for three months. (Except for DS Ford, he was a damned tank)

You'd be surprised. I've met lads who left the army 20 years ago and remember too much about their time in if anything. The civvies teaching the course I'm on at the moment are ex- military and spend as much time regaling us about their time in the army as they do teaching.

tac foley

I joined the Army in September 1967, and I still remember the names of EVERYBODY who shouted at me.

tac

iceage

Christ tac, your older than I thought you were, that was the year before I was born!

tac foley

Well, I never claimed to be young, and I retired from the Army in 2000, aged 54.

Do the math.

tac

chopper6

Manic Moran wrote: »

and what colour was the gymnasium roof?

In fairness, I can't remember the name of my CO in Basic, I can't even remember my drill sergeants and they were God over me every day for three months. (Except for DS Ford, he was a damned tank)

*IF* he did P Coy he'll remember the name of everybody from the Colour Sergeant to the Regimental Blanket Stacker.

tac foley

I'd just like to point out at this natural break that in the British Army we don't call our drill sergeants 'DS'.

The term drill sergeant is a regimental honorific, not a rank. We say that 'our drill sergeant was Sgt XYZ.......'

The US forces, if the many movies I have seen bear any relationship to actuality, DO address their drill sergeants as 'YES/NO DRILL SERGEANT!', usually after having a new one ripped.

'DS' means - Detective Sergeant, or, in the British Army, any member of the Directing Staff in a military exercise, as in 'the DS is to comprise WO2 [CSM] XYZ, C/S X & Y, Sgt X & Y and Cpls X,Y,Z. They are to act as DS in Exercise OP TENDRIL.'

I am rapidly forming the opinion that all responders to the original post - me included - are having smoke blown up our nether regions.

tac

pablomakaveli

tac foley wrote: »

I'd just like to point out at this natural break that in the British Army we don't call our drill sergeants 'DS'.

The term drill sergeant is a regimental honorific, not a rank. We say that 'our drill sergeant was Sgt XYZ.......'

The US forces, if the many movies I have seen bear any relationship to actuality, DO address their drill sergeants as 'YES/NO DRILL SERGEANT!', usually after having a new one ripped.

'DS' means - Detective Sergeant, or, in the British Army, any member of the Directing Staff in a military exercise, as in 'the DS is to comprise WO2 [CSM] XYZ, C/S X & Y, Sgt X & Y and Cpls X,Y,Z. They are to act as DS in Exercise OP TENDRIL.'

I am rapidly forming the opinion that all responders to the original post - me included - are having smoke blown up our nether regions.

tac

Drill instructor seems to be the main one nowadays. Doesn't even need to be a sergeant. They can be corporals or equivalent to do the drill instructors course.

chopper6

tac foley wrote: »

I am rapidly forming the opinion that all responders to the original post - me included - are having smoke blown up our nether regions.

tac

Standard Walt answer to a question like "Who was on the training staff in xyz year in P Coy?" would be "Not allowed talk about it for operational reasons...signed the MOD Official Secrets Act " and other such bolloxology.

tac foley

Yup.

I also post on arrse.co.uk where we are well-used to outing people with their imaginary military exploits.

You'll notice, I hope, the marked lack of response from our OP? I have no doubt that anybody who has actually served would have no difficulty in remembering their regimental number............

I will, of course, make a fulsome apology if he provides the necessary numbers that we can check for veracity.

Here are the names of two of the Basic Training Staff who shouted at me at the REME Depot, Poperinghe Barracks, Arborfield, Berks in 1967, AND the major i/c Basic Training Wing -

L/Cpl Ron Selwood ex Coldstream Guards

Cpl Alan Gillanders ex Royal Scots

and Major Burgess.

tac

chopper6

Don't forget posing with a blacked-out face and an airsoft Uzi....or posting up a pic robbed from teh internet.

I beleive the British term for such behaviour is "Cumpering".

tac foley

Don't forget that there are ways of checking if an image has been taken off the internet...

Can anybody help me post a pic here?

PM me if you are willing to do so.

TIA

tac

discus

chopper6 wrote: »

Don't forget posing with a blacked-out face and an airsoft Uzi....or posting up a pic robbed from teh internet.

I beleive the British term for such behaviour is "Cumpering".

It's amazing, if you've claimed to be in the army, someone will always be able to verify or deny it for you. I reckon with the 6 lads in my sigs store, we can make contact with 3/4's of all the regiments in the BA, through our facebook contacts alone. You can't hide if you've been walting!

chopper6

This....

chopper6

Typical walt pretending to have served in Para Reg.

Please note:

*Unshaped Beret.

*Unshaven.

*'Group photographs' ripped out of Bravo Two Zero etc on wall behind him.

*Mother's bedroom backdrop with unregimental mug of tea on locker behind him.

*Sink to right of pic and door with lock on the left


*Stable belt used for holding up trousers bizarely worn with Old-style DPM goretex jacket instead of para smock etc etc

discus

And look how he does his hood! Imagine walking onto any camp like that. The MPGS would have words before the RSM saw you!

By the way, I have the exact same sink/door set up here in my grot. Don't be hating on the 'en suite'!!

chopper6

Walter gets Punked!

Quite long but well worth the read:

http://www.parachuteregiment-hsf.org/Dave_Reeve.htm

pablomakaveli

discus wrote: »

And look how he does his hood! Imagine walking onto any camp like that. The MPGS would have words before the RSM saw you!

By the way, I have the exact same sink/door set up here in my grot. Don't be hating on the 'en suite'!!

Living a life of luxury. Don't have a sink in my room.:(

tac foley

pablomakaveli wrote: »

Living a life of luxury. Don't have a sink in my room.:(

You have a room? I didn't get a room to myself until after my transfer and on my first posting. I 'lived' in the room in Chester Castle that is now the museum of the Cheshire Regiment and Carabiniers.....happy days, eh?

After my first tour in NI I went to Saighton Camp.....

tac

Lemming

Posted on tac's behalf due to technical issues; and with apologies for the delay this evening in doing so.

tac foley wrote:

This photo of me was taken by a Russian officer when we were detained by elements of the artilley back in 1982. I was then a S/Sgt in the British Military Mission to the Group of Soviet Forces in Germany - BRIXMIS for short. We got chased by the vehicle you can see behind the car - a GaZ-66 radio truck, and detained by the Sovs that we were, ah, liaising with. Hence I'm looking really pissed off. The strange-looking handraily-thing you can see at the left of the photo is the HAND RAIL antenna on a BTR-60 PA[Command] APC that eventually, after many hours, hauled us out of the two-foot deep muddy field we had ended up in, in our effort to get away....

I can't furnish other details of the detention to you because they are copyright to the BRIXMIS association site. This photo appeared out of nowhere a couple of years ago at an association meeting, where we often meet our former adversaries and remember all the good old bad times.

tac foley

Thank you, Lemming - I owe you a pint of Theakstons/Sam Smiths/John Smiths or the appropriate Irish equivalent!!

Best

tac

tac foley

How flime ties!! Two and a bit years later I was the Captain Ops Offr in a RAF Squadron on the Dutch German border.

OK, Mr OP, now let's see one of YOUR memorable pix!

tac

Beano

thats a fantastic pic Tac. Your mucker in the back seems to find it much funnier than you do. the BRIXMIS thread on arrse is a great read.

tac foley

Guess he caught me with my sense of humour around my ankles - the guy taking the photograph had just told his pal to try and crowbar open our trunk while the tour officer was distracted.

tac

Beano

those sneaky commies. they never play by the rules.

tac foley

Beano wrote: »

thats a fantastic pic Tac. Your mucker in the back seems to find it much funnier than you do. the BRIXMIS thread on arrse is a great read.

If you are an Irish speaker you can find me on arrse.....................just look for the translation of my family name from the original Irish.

tac

PS - I also post on -

sigforum.com
gunboards.com
muzzleloadingforum.com
swissrifles.com
airgunbbs.com
vcrai.com
northwestfirearms.com
canadiangunnutz.com
largescalecentral.com
Three channels on Youtube - tac's guns, trains, and cars
...and a few others.

Beano

i'm been a lurker on arrse for a long time so i made the connection a while ago. I think you mentioned it on here before. I'm not stalking you, honest

tac foley

...so you say.....................................;/

tac

cruasder777

So far I have learned on this thread

1) The RAF Reg are not are not as good as army infantry regiments, even though man for man they supply most men to the SAS and have more cambrian patrol medals then any unit in the UK armed forces.


2) Their fitness as a unit is not great, even though they hold the world speed marching record, which the Royal Marines have failed to beat many times.

3) Their training isnt very good, even though at 32 weeks it (along with the RMs) is the longest in NATO.

4) RAF Paras are not proper paras even though they do a harder version of P company along with some potential SAS recruits, who dont have wings

5) That they are not very bright, even though you have to score much higher to get into the RAF reg then the army infantry, fitness entry tests are also harder then army infantry.

6) They never see action, even though they have a pathfinder type medium patrol role and have served in offensive airborne ops with UK Special forces

7) What next ? They are crap at drill ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk0qyBiqdAE



Thanks, its been an education.



this is the mindset you are dealing with : From the RAF Regiment forum.


Firstly, massive congratulations to 15 Sqn RAF Regt Sniper team for winning the Sniper team competition at Bisley this week.

Secondly...... Despite beating the Army's best (not to mention the Marines etc), the 15 Sqn lads were told to report for prize givings in front of the rest of the Army, Navy and RAF only to watch the trophy go to the second place team! The Rifles! Who deserve some credit for questioning this, only to be told "its an Army competition"

chopper6

cruasder777 wrote: »

So far I have learned on this thread

1) The RAF Reg are not are not as good as army infantry regiments, even though man for man they supply most men to the SAS and have more cambrian patrol medals then any unit in the UK armed forces.


2) Their fitness as a unit is not great, even though they hold the world speed marching record, which the Royal Marines have failed to beat many times.

3) Their training isnt very good, even though at 32 weeks it (along with the RMs) is the longest in NATO.

4) RAF Paras are not proper paras even though they do a harder version of P company along with some potential SAS recruits, who dont have wings

5) That they are not very bright, even though you have to score much higher to get into the RAF reg then the army infantry, fitness entry tests are also harder then army infantry.

6) They never see action, even though they have a pathfinder type medium patrol role and have served in offensive airborne ops with UK Special forces

7) What next ? They are crap at drill ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk0qyBiqdAE



Thanks, its been an education.



this is the mindset you are dealing with : From the RAF Regiment forum.


Firstly, massive congratulations to 15 Sqn RAF Regt Sniper team for winning the Sniper team competition at Bisley this week.

Secondly...... Despite beating the Army's best (not to mention the Marines etc), the 15 Sqn lads were told to report for prize givings in front of the rest of the Army, Navy and RAF only to watch the trophy go to the second place team! The Rifles! Who deserve some credit for questioning this, only to be told "its an Army competition"

Well you claim to have done P Coy...how did you find they measured up alongside the other candidates?

cruasder777

I dont understand your question.

P company is the name given to the various tests potential airborne soldiers under take before parachute training, as I said the RAF version is the same but also includes swimming tests.

I will post pics in time, at present my printer/scanner is not working.

Heres is a film of one of the battles the RAF Regiment fought in Iraq.


Quote OS119

"the RAF Regiment is, within the RAF, an elite* in terms of just bog standard weapons handling and infantry skills - the mover, radar tech, ATCer etc.. has no real need to be proficient in such, he needs to know how to defend himself in extremis, but its not something they practice very often or give much thought to: a couple of days a year ****ing about on the range with the war paint on and its time for tea and medals in the mess"

Just to correct you OS199, the RAF Regiment flight (same as a platoon) in the film below lost 6 men in one tour in Iraq, what have you ever done ?

Posters who claim the RAF Reg dont do aggressive patrols insult the memory of the fallen, the RAF Regiment have lost 34 men in Iraq and Afghanistan (3x more then the Royal Irish Regiment).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwEK11nC-ao


Another good thing about the RAF Regiment is you dont get all the sectarian crap you get in army regiments like the Royal Irish Regiment.

tac foley

Just little reminder of what is required to wear wings on your sleeve - Army/RM version - Chapter & Verse (although AGAIs still refer to 5 AB):

43.220. Initial Parachute Training

a. General

(1) Volunteers for service with The Parachute Regiment, 5 Airborne Brigade, and relevant TA units carry out Pre-Parachute Selection training (PPS) at ITC Catterick. Volunteers for service with Special Forces, Regular and TA, carry out their own selection process which is the responsibility of HQ DSF. All personnel are then sent to No 1 PTS for their Basic Parachute Course (BPC).

(2) Those personnel serving with RM and selected Army units in support of 3 Commando Brigade (with a parachute requirement) who have already passed the Commando Selection Course, in lieu of PPS, are eligible to attend the BPC (see paragraph 43.184).

(3) All other personnel wishing to attend a BPC must pass PPS at ITC Catterick.
b. PPS

(1) Aim. The aim of PPS is to test under conditions of stress the courage, military aptitude, fitness, endurance and determination of those volunteering to serve with The Parachute Regiment and Airborne Forces.

(2) PPS Part 1. PPS Part 1 lasts 3 weeks and is an optional Bde unit pre-course build up. It develops stamina prior to students attending PPS Part 2. Individuals are strongly advised to attend a pre-course build up rather than joining PPS Part 2 direct.

(3) PPS Part 2. PPS Part 2 is carried out at ITC Catterick. The course lasts 3 weeks. The initial 2 weeks involves progressive fitness training prior to Selection Weeks.

c. BPC. BPC lasts 4 weeks and is carried out under RAF instructors at No I PTS, RAF Brize Norton.

43.221. Physical Fitness. The training and selection procedures include arduous physical work, PT, cross country movements and marches, requiring a greater expenditure of physical energy than is normally required in other peace time training.

a. Pre Course Standards. All volunteers will be expected to complete the BFT on day one of PPS Part 2 in 9 mins 30 secs and the ICKY in 1 hr 36 mins. Failure to pass either test will result in immediate RTU.

b. Pre Course Preparations. All volunteers will be running and marching with weights of 451bs. This includes 3Olbs in a Bergen, the remainder carried as SLR/SA and webbing. It is essential that stamina is developed beforehand, by gym work and circuit training to enable the volunteer to run 5 miles wearing webbing without pause and to march 10 miles in under 2 hours. In general volunteers should arrive for the course in a good state of fitness and, most importantly, injury free.

43.222. Course only parachuting.

a. A limited number of vacancies may be available on any one course for course only applicants (the course comprises both pre-parachute selection and basic parachute course). Applicants are to submit Annex M to this Chapter which is to be enfaced 'Course Only' through their Commanding Officers direct to PPS Coy, ITC Catterick; copy to HQ 5 AB Bde. The justification must be clearly stated on an attachment slip to the Annex.

b. All bids for such course vacancies will be closely scrutinised by HQ 5 AB Bde and PPS Coy, ITC Catterick.

c. On successful completion of the course, volunteers will be awarded the parachute badge without wings and return to the parent unit.

d. They will not be eligible for parachute pay except for the duration of the course. They may at a later date volunteer for service with airborne forces without undergoing further selection.

43.223. Refresher Training. Volunteers who are already qualified parachutists will be required to undergo refresher training before again carrying out parachuting duties if:

a. They have not parachuted within the previous 12 months.

b. They have suffered any injury causing medical downgrading or change in PULHHEEMS profile regardless of time span.

Annex M para 5 is to state the date of the last military parachute descent and is to be endorsed 'Refresher Training' before being submitted as described above. Each applicant will be treated as an individual case. The specific refresher training requirement will be assessed and individual instructions issued.

Disposal on Ending of Tour of Duty

43.224. Applications for disposal instructions for officers and soldiers nearing the completion of a tour of duty are to be initiated by OCs units at least 8 months before their tours are due to be completed. When a tour of duty is ended for any reason disposal is to be effected as stated in paras 43.225 and 43.226 as applicable.

43.225. Officers and soldiers posted to a unit of the Parachute Regiment. Officers and soldiers will be posted at the end of their tour of duty as follows:

a. Officers. By the officer's MOD personnel branch.

b. Soldiers. By the appropriate MRO.

43.226. Officers and soldiers in regiments or corps other than infantry:

a. Those officers and soldiers may be permitted to remain in their own units or be posted to other units of the airborne forces, filling establishment vacancies as non parachutists.

b. If required to return to normal regimental duty they will be reposted by the officer's MOD personnel branch for officers, and for soldiers serving at home by appropriate MRO, or by the appropriate theatre if they are serving overseas.

tac

cking457

I joined the RAF Regt in 2004, basic at Honington. At week 18 I left as I damaged ligaments. I left the RAF Regt. I could have stayed in, but that would have meant being back-trooped several weeks as no places were available and the time taken to recover, also being immature at the time I decided to leave. Regret that to this day. Anyway, crying over.

In May 2005, I joined ATR Lichfield to join the Royal Signals and went on to Blandford Camp phase 2and then 2 Sigs, York at Imphall Barracks. I went on Herrick 6 and Telic 13 and left last year. I loved both and can compare the two from a basic training point of view, as I didn't finish all my training with RAF Reg.

I can say that the RAF Reg PGAC course, pre-basic was pretty nails on the fitness side, a jack wagon would follow you and if it caught up, you were off the course, simple. All this with a civvie wearing a 35lb bergan, felt like a ton to me at the time. Crawling over razor sharp rocks leaving a scarlet trail, and a few kicks to the ribs whilst talking in the tent with your newly acquired buddie for the night. The Army not so, seemed very relaxed, threw a few flash bangs, we all laughed and a team game.

RAF Reg basic was such a wake up, I have never blown out of my arse so much and I was in the fitter Stream 1. It was very strict (maybe I thought as its the RAF it wouldn't be so) and the field exercises lasted day and night, (My Army basic was to sleep all day and move by night, good tactics but no sleep deprivation, even on Ex-Final Fling) Army basic training, seemed like I was just going through the motion and with a 100% pass rate didn't seem to special on Pass Out Day, the only thing I seem to remember was the usual no time for yourself, but compared to the RAF Regt basic, it does not compare. Physically that is or mentally.

Both had fantastic instructors I have to say, but sorry to disappoint any pongo's, and I was once one of them (pongo that is) but 70% of Army basic recruits would not last 5 minutes in RAF Regt basic, esp on excercise. The RAF Reg has a 60% failure rate when I was going through training, whether through injury and people who can' hack it. The Army has a very high pass rate, in the 90's I believe and I too don't believe its because they have been trained better during the basic stage. As for what the RAF Reg do, and do it well, its their job, same as the Army does a good job, whether that be Signals, REME, Engineer's and so on (Maybe RLC aswell;-)). I think someone already mentioned 'Horses for Courses'. As said, I loved them both, but I wouldn't underestimate RAF Regt capabilities. Are they elite? No, not really, but they are trained harder.

Lets not get into how sh1t each other are. I have met some right mongs in both.

AbusesToilets

That totally doesn't come across like someone made a second account just to post that..