British Military involved in the death of diana

Zebra3

bumper234 wrote: »

Will just leave you sitting their with your tricolour wrapped firmly around your shoulders while you bash that anti-British drum:rolleyes:

It's not anti-British, it's fact. :rolleyes:

Jonny7 wrote: »

Note that you are writing this in English, not German

Note that we're writing this in English, not Irish. :rolleyes:

Fratton Fred

bumper234 wrote: »

Will just leave you sitting their with your tricolour wrapped firmly around your shoulders while you bash that anti-British drum:rolleyes:

Remember of course that the republican movement were actively encouraging a German invasion of Ireland. A few dead Jews/travellers/disabled people were the price they were prepared to pay to create their utopian socialist republic.

Sure, weren't the Nazis nationalists and socialists themselves?

dublinbhoy88

Fratton Fred wrote: »

Remember of course that the republican movement were actively encouraging a German invasion of Ireland. A few dead Jews/travellers/disabled people were the price they were prepared to pay to create their utopian socialist republic.

Sure, weren't the Nazis nationalists and socialists themselves?

were they really,the British legion had fun frolicking with their Nazi buddies in Berlin in the 30's

pablomakaveli

Zebra3 wrote: »

Ah yes, as if Britain had some sort of moral superiority. :rolleyes:

How many countries was Britain occupying at the time?

Who invaded Poland the same month as Germany? USSR, a country that Britain would ally itself with.

Well played Britain.

I know revisionism is in vogue now but this is a whole different level of revisionism.:eek:

I suppose you'll be saying the Jews had it coming next as well.

Fratton Fred

pablomakaveli wrote: »

I know revisionism is in vogue now but this is a whole different level of revisionism.:eek:

I suppose you'll be saying the Jews had it coming next as well.

They did kill Jesus!

Zebra3

pablomakaveli wrote: »

I know revisionism is in vogue now but this is a whole different level of revisionism.:eek:

I suppose you'll be saying the Jews had it coming next as well.

Do you have any idea of what "revisionism" even means?

Why don't you point of anything I've said which isn't factually correct?

Because you can't and instead you start insinuating things about me that are untrue.

Zebra3

Fratton Fred wrote: »

Remember of course that the republican movement were actively encouraging a German invasion of Ireland. A few dead Jews/travellers/disabled people were the price they were prepared to pay to create their utopian socialist republic.

Sure, weren't the Nazis nationalists and socialists themselves?

What about the millions of dead natives in the Americas, Australia and Africa?

A small price to pay for the glory of the civilising British Empire? :rolleyes:

Seen as how you're talking about remembering things...

pablomakaveli

Zebra3 wrote: »

Do you have any idea of what "revisionism" even means?

Why don't you point of anything I've said which isn't factually correct?

Because you can't and instead you start insinuating things about me that are untrue.

You're playing down the seriousness of what Germany did. You said Britain declared war on Germany without mentioning it was because Germany invaded Poland which is a pretty important reason for them to do so.

The way your painting it is that Britain were the aggressors.

Jonny7

pablomakaveli wrote: »

You're playing down the seriousness of what Germany did. You said Britain declared war on Germany without mentioning it was because Germany invaded Poland which is a pretty important reason for them to do so.

The way your painting it is that Britain were the aggressors.

What's all this so called "context"?

The Brits declared war, that automatically means they were the aggressors, you can't argue with fact, case closed!

pablomakaveli

Jonny7 wrote: »

What's all this so called "context"?

The Brits declared war, that automatically means they were the aggressors, you can't argue with fact, case closed!

Did you even bother to read my last post? Germany invaded Poland knowing Britain and France were obliged to defend it. They were the aggressors.

The context you are so wiling to dismiss is actually pretty important.

Fratton Fred

Zebra3 wrote: »

Do you have any idea of what "revisionism" even means? :confused

I have come to believe it means disagreeing with the republican viewpoint on history.

Fratton Fred

Zebra3 wrote: »

What about the millions of dead natives in the Americas, Australia and Africa?

A small price to pay for the glory of the civilising British Empire? :rolleyes:

Seen as how you're talking about remembering things...

So Britain shouldn't have declared war on Germany, is that what you're saying?

WilyCoyote

Fratton Fred wrote: »

Remember of course that the republican movement were actively encouraging a German invasion of Ireland. A few dead Jews/travellers/disabled people were the price they were prepared to pay to create their utopian socialist republic.

Sure, weren't the Nazis nationalists and socialists themselves?

Not to mention the Coburg-Saxe-Gotha brigade aka Windsors who were hastily preparing to become a German puppet. Some family for the English to revere. Perhaps you can enlighten us Fredrick old boy?

philstar

there's a movie coming out soon

i reckon the promoters are rubbing their hands with glee (or maybe they're the ones behind this?)

Fratton Fred

WilyCoyote wrote: »

Not to mention the Coburg-Saxe-Gotha brigade aka Windsors who were hastily preparing to become a German puppet. Some family for the English to revere. Perhaps you can enlighten us Fredrick old boy?

Seeing as you are talking absolute ****e, I'm afraid I can't, no.

Jonny7

pablomakaveli wrote: »

Did you even bother to read my last post? Germany invaded Poland knowing Britain and France were obliged to defend it. They were the aggressors.

The context you are so wiling to dismiss is actually pretty important.

ah was being sarcastic

History gets a rough old time in here

bumper234

Fratton Fred wrote: »

I have come to believe it means disagreeing with the republican viewpoint on history.

Careful...They will accuse you of having some sort of "post to kill" policy:rolleyes:

Zebra3

pablomakaveli wrote: »

You're playing down the seriousness of what Germany did. You said Britain declared war on Germany without mentioning it was because Germany invaded Poland which is a pretty important reason for them to do so.

The way your painting it is that Britain were the aggressors.

If you think Britain had the right to attack Germany over Poland, then you must think every other country had the right to declare war on Britain in 1939 given the lands that she was occupying all over the world.

Fratton Fred wrote: »

So Britain shouldn't have declared war on Germany, is that what you're saying?

What right did Britain have to wage war on Germany when Britain was occupying vast tracts of the globe?

pablomakaveli

Zebra3 wrote: »

If you think Britain had the right to attack Germany over Poland, then you must think every other country had the right to declare war on Britain in 1939 given the lands that she was occupying all over the world.



What right did Britain have to wage war on Germany when Britain was occupying vast tracts of the globe?

You're really starting to sound like a parody of an anti-British person now.

It's a shame does noble German didn't beat them in WW2 then.

Fratton Fred

Zebra3 wrote: »

If you think Britain had the right to attack Germany over Poland, then you must think every other country had the right to declare war on Britain in 1939 given the lands that she was occupying all over the world.



What right did Britain have to wage war on Germany when Britain was occupying vast tracts of the globe?

So Britain were in the wrong?

Sounds to me like you are clutching at any straw you can to indulge in a bit of Brit bashing tbh.

I wish I could say I'm surprised.

bumper234

Zebra3 wrote: »

If you think Britain had the right to attack Germany over Poland, then you must think every other country had the right to declare war on Britain in 1939 given the lands that she was occupying all over the world.



What right did Britain have to wage war on Germany when Britain was occupying vast tracts of the globe?

Am just glad there were not too many people who think the way you do back then.

Jonny7

Zebra3 wrote: »

What right did Britain have to wage war on Germany when Britain was occupying vast tracts of the globe?

World War Two.. the hint is in the name

shopaholic01

NuckingFacker wrote: »

In the world of close protection, things only get left to chance when someone says leave things to chance. Have a goo at the Queens close protection squad and ask yourself, would the papps run her off the road? No? Yeah, no. If a blind eye is turned to Royal protection, and a lapse occurrs, someone turned off the cameras for a bit..

Diana decided that she didn't want Royal protection about the time she decided 'to withdraw' from public life. Ironically, she would probably be alive today if she hadn't made that decision.

donegal_road

Yellow121 wrote: »

What were the reasons for wanting her dead?

they didnt want the step-father to the throne of England to be muslim

genericguy

donegal_road wrote: »

they didnt want the step-father to the throne of England to be muslim

What?

kneemos

genericguy wrote: »

What?

THEY DIDN'T WANT THE STEP FATHER TO THE THRONE OF ENGLAND TO BE MUSLUM.

shopaholic01

genericguy wrote: »

What?

Step-father of the heir in line to the throne, not the throne itself.

Femme_Fatale

NuckingFacker wrote: »

It's funny how laid back people are about this, I'd have thought there would be uproar at the suggestion that she'd been murdered by the Military(which I reckon she was) - she might not have been so well loved after all. "Murdered was she? Ah well.."

Nah I'd say it's just that people are tired of the conspiracy theories, and lots don't see a conspiracy theory but a couple trying to escape the paparazzi and their driver being pissed and unfit to drive.

Fox_In_Socks

Femme_Fatale wrote: »

Nah I'd say it's just that people are tired of the conspiracy theories, and lots don't see a conspiracy theory but a couple trying to escape the paparazzi and their driver being pissed and unfit to drive.

You would say that but where were you on the night of 31st August 1997?

Yeah, "Femme_Fatale", it's all fitting together now.:pac:

Earthwalker

Seen some posters in the cinema tonight for a new movie based on her life. Interesting timing.