911 event highly probable in Dublin Sept 15th

Stick Monkey

MadYaker wrote: »

I think this thread should be closed. It isn't a conspiracy theory, its just incoherent rambling that should be kept to a blog or something. Its impossible to engage with the OP as he refuses to answer any questions and his posts are contradictory.

That's completely untrue

MadYaker

Stick Monkey wrote: »

That's completely untrue

So do you also believe that Billy Maguire is the true president of Ireland and we are at war with Iran?

derry

All is quiet on the western front

Derry

Stick Monkey

MadYaker wrote: »

So do you also believe that Billy Maguire is the true president of Ireland and we are at war with Iran?

I believe there is something odd going on when I see the largest US company in the IFSC making arrangements to protect their building for the air show

28064212

Stick Monkey wrote: »

I believe there is something odd going on when I see the largest US company in the IFSC making arrangements to protect their building for the air show

MadYaker didn't say there was nothing going on. What they said was

MadYaker wrote: »

its just incoherent rambling that should be kept to a blog or something. Its impossible to engage with the OP as he refuses to answer any questions and his posts are contradictory.

That is quite obviously true

MadYaker

Stick Monkey wrote: »

I believe there is something odd going on when I see the largest US company in the IFSC making arrangements to protect their building for the air show

What protections have they put in place?

I assume these arrangements would be enough to protect the building from being hit by an Airbus A380, otherwise common sense would suggest that what they are building is for something else.

Stick Monkey

MadYaker wrote: »

What protections have they put in place?

I assume these arrangements would be enough to protect the building from being hit by an Airbus A380, otherwise common sense would suggest that what they are building is for something else.

Heavy duty sandbagging and window protection

Stick Monkey

28064212 wrote: »

MadYaker didn't say there was nothing going on. What they said was

That is quite obviously true

So you're saying he did say something is going on?

28064212

Stick Monkey wrote: »

So you're saying he did say something is going on?

No. I quoted exactly what they said. Go back and read it again. No part of their post made any comment on the likelihood of anything happening tomorrow

Stick Monkey

28064212 wrote: »

No. I quoted exactly what they said. Go back and read it again. No part of their post made any comment on the likelihood of anything happening tomorrow

That is not correct

MadYaker

Stick Monkey wrote: »

Heavy duty sandbagging and window protection

That doesn't sound like it would stop an airplane.

Stick Monkey wrote: »

So you're saying he did say something is going on?

I didn't say that either. But I don't believe anything will happen. As none of us can predict the future its impossible to say with certainty, however I would bet a very large sum of money that none of the things derry has foretold in this thread will actually happen.

Also, you didn't respond to the second part of my post above.

28064212

Stick Monkey wrote: »

That is not correct

Which part? Use direct quotes to show your workings

Stick Monkey

MadYaker wrote: »

That doesn't sound like it would stop an airplane.




I didn't say that either. But I don't believe anything will happen. As none of us can predict the future its impossible to say with certainty, however I would bet a very large sum of money that none of the things derry has foretold in this thread will actually happen.

Also, you didn't respond to the second part of my post above.

Heavy duty sandbagging and window protection may not stop a plane however it will minimise collateral damage

Stick Monkey

Stick Monkey wrote: »

Heavy duty sandbagging and window protection may not stop a plane however it will minimise collateral damage

So then why are they trying to minimise damage when they are targeting the building with a nuke and a hologram plane?

MadYaker

Stick Monkey wrote: »

Heavy duty sandbagging and window protection may not stop a plane however it will minimise collateral damage

How? I know what that building looks like. If it gets hit by a plane it will be flattened. No amount of sandbags and window protection is going to change that.

You need to think about this logically and take off the conspiracy theorist glasses for a minute. What would you think about the sandbags etc if the flightfest wasn't happening at all?

And please don't start talking about nukes and all that nonsense, its pure fantasy and any attempt to display as anything else is dishonest.

Stick Monkey

King Mob wrote: »

So then why are they trying to minimise damage when they are targeting the building with a nuke and a hologram plane?

Who said they were targeting that specific building ?

Stick Monkey

Stick Monkey wrote: »

Who said they were targeting that specific building ?

Um... derry?

Are you saying that he's wrong?

emo72

Stick Monkey wrote: »

Heavy duty sandbagging and window protection may not stop a plane however it will minimise collateral damage

mate its a 380, sandbags and window covers will stop nothing:D

Stick Monkey

King Mob wrote: »

Um... derry?

Are you saying that he's wrong?

Point out which post where he specified a building ?

dharma200

Another thread saying window paynes fell out some of the newer buildings on the quays after test run today?

As for the rambling ect. I do t see why a thread should be closed just because some one is rambling or seems incoherent... Simple thing is to not engage or read it... People can't be censored just because someone else in the site deems them as incoherent...

wexie

Stick Monkey wrote: »

Heavy duty sandbagging and window protection

gee....you'd nearly think they may be worried about something....like a large crowd of people....or sonic boom or something.


let's just think for a moment


-) IF (big if) any company in the IFSC was aware of something happening tomorrow and wanted to keep the secret

-) they would NOT be wanting to jeopardize this 'happening' by giving anything away and therefore would NOT be taking any protective measures. In case people would start wondering why.


It's fare more likely they are taken precautionary measures for something much more innocent.

JJJJNR

MadYaker wrote: »

That doesn't sound like it would stop an airplane.




I didn't say that either. But I don't believe anything will happen. As none of us can predict the future its impossible to say with certainty, however I would bet a very large sum of money that none of the things derry has foretold in this thread will actually happen.

Also, you didn't respond to the second part of my post above.

theres a storm hitting tomorrow... maybe they are taking precautions.

wexie

emo72 wrote: »

mate its a 380, sandbags and window covers will stop nothing:D

They're special high density ballistic nylon sandbags....

Stick Monkey

JJJJNR wrote: »

theres a storm hitting tomorrow... maybe they are taking precautions.

Really ? What storm ? I have never see not heard of any buildings being protected in the IFSC for potential storm damage

Stick Monkey

Stick Monkey wrote: »

Point out which post where he specified a building ?

In the OP.

The proposed route off the large airliner planes takes the airshow event directly over the Irish financial services center (IFSC ). Therefore we can then assume the target building for the unmanned aircraft to crash onto has to be a suitable building that is in the IFSC that the globalist need to destroy to cover up some financial hole they have made .

Can't blame you for not seeing it. He's a bit rambly and self contradicting.

wexie

Stick Monkey wrote: »

Who said they were targeting that specific building ?

It really won't matter much, if they're targeting ANY building in the IFSC then sandbags and plywood in front of the windows are going to make absolutely zilch of a difference to ANY of the other buildings in the IFSC.

sandbags and window protection for a nuke or an A380 is like wearing kneepads in case you get hit by a runaway bus.

emo72

its an absolute peach of an evening out in dublin tonight. and we are all here talking shi ite :pac:

MadYaker

dharma200 wrote: »

Another thread saying window paynes fell out some of the newer buildings on the quays after test run today?

That's the most logical explanation, if the aircraft are going to be flying low the sound waves would be powerful enough to damage or dislodge the glass, the outside of all the IFSC buildings are pretty much made of huge panes of glass.

As far the sandbags I dunno, maybe they are to keep people away from the building on that day in case any glass does fall?

Stick Monkey

King Mob wrote: »

In the OP.



Can't blame you for not seeing it. He's a bit rambly and self contradicting.

He does not specify a building. You are mistaken like most of your contributions on this thread

Quote and highlight the building to prove me wrong

Stick Monkey

wexie wrote: »

It really won't matter much, if they're targeting ANY building in the IFSC then sandbags and plywood in front of the windows are going to make absolutely zilch of a difference to ANY of the other buildings in the IFSC.

sandbags and window protection for a nuke or an A380 is like wearing kneepads in case you get hit by a runaway bus.

Do you know how big the IFSC is ? It's at least a mile in diameter

MadYaker

Stick Monkey wrote: »

Do you know how big the IFSC is ? It's at least a mile in diameter

How is that relevant? The window protection is to protect the windows from powerful sound waves (like a sonic boom) the sandbags are to keep people away in case glass falls. Case closed.

wexie

Stick Monkey wrote: »

Do you know how big the IFSC is ? It's at least a mile in diameter

So that'd be about the radius of 'complete distruction' of the blast wave for a SMALL nuclear weapon then?

http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

still don't quite see how sandbags are going to help here....

28064212

Stick Monkey wrote: »

Do you know how big the IFSC is ? It's at least a mile in diameter

Nope it's about 400m in diameter. Source: http://www.ifsc.ie/page.aspx?idpage=6. 15.8 hectares.

Not to mention the fact that derry has already told us how it's going to be a massive explosion, it is an A380 after all carrying full tanks of fuel. Or a mini-nuke, he never did clear that up.

Stick Monkey

wexie wrote: »

So that'd be about the radius of 'complete distruction' of the blast wave for a SMALL nuclear weapon then?

http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

still don't quite see how sandbags are going to help here....

How small do you think the device will be ?

Stick Monkey

Stick Monkey wrote: »

He does not specify a building. You are mistaken like most of your contributions on this thread

Quote and highlight the building to prove me wrong

Again, they plan to hit the IFSC with a plane and a nuke. Sand bags aren't going to do anything.

And he does specify a building:

building that is in the IFSC that the globalist need to destroy

what building would they want to destroy other than the American one?

And of course derry also claims that they intend to destory all of the IFSC
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=86430871

Throw nice little nuke event into that mix decapitate the IFSC

BunShopVoyeur.

I'm going to enjoy reading this thread tomorrow night.

MadYaker

BunShopVoyeur. wrote: »

I'm going to enjoy reading this thread tomorrow night.

It will probably get locked.

Owryan

28064212 wrote: »

Nope it's about 400m in diameter. Source: http://www.ifsc.ie/page.aspx?idpage=6. 15.8 hectares.

Not to mention the fact that derry has already told us how it's going to be a massive explosion, it is an A380 after all carrying full tanks of fuel. Or a mini-nuke, he never did clear that up.

You mean its not the missile strike on a holographic plane, flown by the queen sitting on a mini nuke

Stick Monkey

King Mob wrote: »

Again, they plan to hit the IFSC with a plane and a nuke. Sand bags aren't going to do anything.

And he does specify a building:


what building would they want to destroy other than the American one?

And of course derry also claims that they intend to destory all of the IFSC
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=86430871

It is obviously not the same building being protected. And it's like the least damaged will rise to the top in the event of this happening

wexie

Stick Monkey wrote: »

How small do you think the device will be ?

err....you're the expert?

I don't think there will be a device AT ALL.

Either way, whatever size it is, sandbags and plywood aren't going to be feasible protection anywhere in the IFSC.

Stick Monkey

wexie wrote: »

err....you're the expert?

I don't think there will be a device AT ALL.

Either way, whatever size it is, sandbags and plywood aren't going to be feasible protection anywhere in the IFSC.

It would if information was known that the event would happen at the other end of the IFSC. And who knows about the plywood - it could be lead lined or reinforced with steal

MadYaker

Stick Monkey wrote: »

It would if information was known that the event would happen at the other end of the IFSC. And who knows about the plywood - it could be lead lined or reinforced with steal

You must be taking the piss.

Edit: Your inability to spell "steel" correctly leads me to think otherwise....

Sigourney

Owryan wrote: »

You mean its not the missile strike on a holographic plane, flown by the queen sitting on a mini nuke

She'll parachute out before the impact, like she did at the Olympics.

Stick Monkey

MadYaker wrote: »

You must be taking the piss.

I question things - so should you. Maybe all this discussion may go someway to prevent this thing

wexie

Stick Monkey wrote: »

It would if information was known that the event would happen at the other end of the IFSC. And who knows about the plywood - it could be lead lined or reinforced with steal

right....of course....

and if this information was known of course nobody would be wondering afterwards how come they knew to take protective measures and why they didn't tell anyone???

:rolleyes:

BunShopVoyeur.

Stick Monkey wrote: »

I question things - so should you. Maybe all this discussion may go someway to prevent this thing

Is that the excuse?

We talked about it enough on Boards the night before so it was called off?

Cool.

MadYaker

Stick Monkey wrote: »

I question things - so should you. Maybe all this discussion may go someway to prevent this thing

I question things too, but sometimes things should just be taken at face value when there is no reason to think otherwise.

wexie

BunShopVoyeur. wrote: »

Is that the excuse?

We talked about it enough on Boards the night before so it was called off?

Cool.

that is just bloody amazing circular 'logic'

Stick Monkey

MadYaker wrote: »

I question things too, but sometimes things should just be taken at face value when there is no reason to think otherwise.

There is always a reason to think otherwise

emo72

Stick Monkey wrote: »

There is always a reason to think otherwise

not always mate. sometimes things are just normal.