Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Flightradar24 Thread

Options
1…214215217219220…334

Comments

  • Options
    #6482
    arubex
    Registered Users Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭arubex


    b757 wrote: »
    Ukraine Air Alliance AN12 just departed SNN.

    UKL4012 UR-DFW

    Short hop into Prestwick.


  • Options
    #6483
    bronn
    Registered Users Posts: 482 ✭✭bronn


    weisses wrote: »
    Any idea what this bird is up to ?


    http://www.flightradar24.com/HZXY7/431b1fc
    Huh. How odd. It seems to have overshot the runway in New York... by a few thousand miles. :pac:

    th_ScreenShot2014-08-29at112454_zps448311c5.jpg


  • Options
    #6484
    L1011
    Registered Users Posts: 68,907 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The routes on Flightradar are guessed, not squawked and hence cannot be considered to be accurate.


  • Options
    #6485
    weisses
    Registered Users Posts: 9,474 ✭✭✭weisses


    MYOB wrote: »
    The routes on Flightradar are guessed, not squawked and hence cannot be considered to be accurate.

    In the History it showed as flying between Las Vegas And New York a couple of times in a row .. Is that guessed as well then ?


  • Options
    #6486
    L1011
    Registered Users Posts: 68,907 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    weisses wrote: »
    In the History it showed as flying between Las Vegas And New York a couple of times in a row .. Is that guessed as well then ?

    Possibly, take a look at the tracks recorded for them rather than the airport codes.

    Reused squawk codes lead to this, people enter the route actually flown when the code is first seen/recorded and then when its reused the airports get shown again.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #6487
    mickger844posts
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 4,467 Mod ✭✭✭✭mickger844posts


    b757 wrote: »
    Lovely Phenom 300, apparently going to be a regular. :)

    Any idea when she is due back or departing again?


  • Options
    #6488
    b757
    Registered Users Posts: 1,370 ✭✭✭b757


    mickger844posts wrote: »
    Any idea when she is due back or departing again?

    Will let you know if I hear anything.


  • Options
    #6489
    billie1b
    Registered Users Posts: 3,813 ✭✭✭billie1b


    RYR57KA FEZ to MRS squawking 7700


  • Options
    #6490
    KoolKid
    Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,789 Mod ✭✭✭✭KoolKid


    Just looking at that now.
    Seems like a standard approach.


  • Options
    #6491
    billie1b
    Registered Users Posts: 3,813 ✭✭✭billie1b


    Seems to be dropping quite fast now, 4500fpm a minute ago


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #6492
    breanach78
    Registered Users Posts: 1,042 ✭✭✭breanach78


    Hope it gets down ok. Any ATC info?


  • Options
    #6493
    fr336
    Registered Users Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    breanach78 wrote: »
    Hope it get down ok. Any ATC info?

    I looked but didn't find anything.


  • Options
    #6494
    breanach78
    Registered Users Posts: 1,042 ✭✭✭breanach78


    fr336 wrote: »
    I looked but didn't find anything.

    Seems to be down ok.


  • Options
    #6495
    cyclops999
    Registered Users Posts: 402 ✭✭cyclops999


    Landed ok


  • Options
    #6496
    fr336
    Registered Users Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    On the ground.


  • Options
    #6497
    fr336
    Registered Users Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    Not sure how it's known for aircraft to be ok or safe purely for getting on the ground but ok :pac:


  • Options
    #6498
    breanach78
    Registered Users Posts: 1,042 ✭✭✭breanach78


    fr336 wrote: »
    Not sure how it's known for aircraft to be ok or safe purely for getting on the ground but ok :pac:

    A hopeful presumption. Approach from FR24 seems good so hope it's ok.


  • Options
    #6499
    owenc
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭owenc


    Does the dreamliner fly faster?

    Noticed one from Glasgow to NYC reaching NYC in 5 hours!?


  • Options
    #6500
    fr336
    Registered Users Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    owenc wrote: »
    Does the dreamliner fly faster?

    Noticed one from Glasgow to NYC reaching NYC in 5 hours!?

    Glasgow to NYC route eh.


  • Options
    #6501
    owenc
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭owenc


    No it was flying over NYC after only 5 hours


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #6502
    fr336
    Registered Users Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    owenc wrote: »
    No it was flying over NYC after only 5 hours

    Where was its destination?


  • Options
    #6503
    owenc
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭owenc


    Florida


  • Options
    #6504
    fr336
    Registered Users Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    Ah ok


  • Options
    #6505
    arubex
    Registered Users Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭arubex


    owenc wrote: »
    Does the dreamliner fly faster?

    They are designed for Mach 0.85 cruising, about the same as a 747-400 and a smidge more than the 777 ( 0.84 ). So quite nippy for a twin, seem to cruise about 10 or 20 knots faster thhan an A330 in practice.

    But there were some grand jetstreams yesterday that really pushed them along, Thomson's G-TUIF hit 578 knots / 665 mph; in my logs for the same day only a Kalitta 747 beat that at 584 kts.


  • Options
    #6506
    arubex
    Registered Users Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭arubex


    RSAF C-130H over Lough Neagh, 25,000 ft

    http://planefinder.net/flight/RSF191


  • Options
    #6507
    arubex
    Registered Users Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭arubex


    G-POWD must rake in the cash for Titan. Operating Norwegian Long Haul this morning, usually Euroatlantic sub on this one for the sickly Dreamliners.

    http://fr24.com/NAX7012


  • Options
    #6508
    Tenger
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,869 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Will the EIDW feed pick up the F-16's today?


  • Options
    #6509
    owenc
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭owenc


    arubex wrote: »
    They are designed for Mach 0.85 cruising, about the same as a 747-400 and a smidge more than the 777 ( 0.84 ). So quite nippy for a twin, seem to cruise about 10 or 20 knots faster thhan an A330 in practice.

    But there were some grand jetstreams yesterday that really pushed them along, Thomson's G-TUIF hit 578 knots / 665 mph; in my logs for the same day only a Kalitta 747 beat that at 584 kts.

    Really? :confused: The flights from Ireland to NYC weren't any faster.. I think it might be the height and speed it goes at.


  • Options
    #6510
    Mech1
    Registered Users Posts: 5,099 ✭✭✭Mech1


    Tenger wrote: »
    Will the EIDW feed pick up the F-16's today?

    I dont know, but I have silenced all the ground based freq to give us as much chance as poss.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #6511
    billie1b
    Registered Users Posts: 3,813 ✭✭✭billie1b


    BA830 not too happy about the Fly-by, said if they are delayed anymore than a couple of minutes they'll be short on fuel


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement