Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Multi-functional events centre (Budget 2014)

Options
145791015

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭Fabio


    Good news!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,172 ✭✭✭shnaek


    Michael.. wrote: »
    More in The Examiner today about it. The new tender stipulates a start date of 5th January.

    It's good to see some set dates instead of having an open ended mess where no one knows what's going on.

    I think the old tender specified the 1st of June this year as the start date, so I'm not sure those start dates mean too much.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,385 ✭✭✭✭D'Agger


    Glad to hear the process is back moving at least - hopefully some great strides will be made in the coming months - something like this is huge for Cork with regard to bringing some life/vibrancy to the city.


  • Registered Users Posts: 540 ✭✭✭BUNK1982


    I'm not sure if this will ever get the go ahead with the City Council involved.

    From what i've seen and read so far they don't have a good track record and have already managed to make a mess of this first time around.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,669 ✭✭✭who_me


    BUNK1982 wrote: »
    I'm not sure if this will ever get the go ahead with the City Council involved.

    From what i've seen and read so far they don't have a good track record and have already managed to make a mess of this first time around.

    That probably can only happen if the council funding is withdrawn too - I can't see them handing over a grant of €4m+ with no conditions attached. Given funding was one of the reasons Live Nation withdrew, it'd probably leave us in a worse situation if the public funding were reduced.

    It seems like both submitters are still interested which is good news. I just hope we don't end up with another Mahon Point scenario where the event centre never materialises as part of the development.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,385 ✭✭✭✭D'Agger


    Was that supposed to be part of Mahon Point?

    The more I think about it, the more I'd like to see it on the Beamish site - something so central would be great for City business and generate a buzz around the city centre which is badly needed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭Fabio


    Owen O'Callaghan was supposed to build an event centre at Mahon Point. He had to pay a penalty fee to the City Council for not doing so which, I think, was just pocket-change reallly.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,613 ✭✭✭evilivor


    Fabio wrote: »
    Owen O'Callaghan was supposed to build an event centre at Mahon Point. He had to pay a penalty fee to the City Council for not doing so which, I think, was just pocket-change reallly.

    It was a Trade Centre and the penalty fee was just over €6 million.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,385 ✭✭✭✭D'Agger


    evilivor wrote: »
    It was a Trade Centre and the penalty fee was just over €6 million.
    :eek: how big was the trade centre supposed to be??

    It wouldn't have been a bad spot for something like that - busses going out there, not a long taxi ride from the Northside or City & with the tunnell and south link it mightn't have been the worst for congestion....barring trying to leave the area! :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,701 ✭✭✭Bacchus


    D'Agger wrote: »
    :eek: how big was the trade centre supposed to be??

    It wouldn't have been a bad spot for something like that - busses going out there, not a long taxi ride from the Northside or City & with the tunnell and south link it mightn't have been the worst for congestion....barring trying to leave the area! :pac:

    Really? Mahon SC is regularly moaned about for having terrible infrastructure around it. The road network is already under severe pressure from the business parks, the residential hub and the shopping center. The buses you refer to is a 'once every 30 minutes' route to the city center, that at peak traffic hours is painfully slow and packed to capacity with commuters.

    As an aside, the place is a disaster now for parking too with all the new companies set up there. The roads around City Gate & the NSC are littered with cars parked there for the day.

    I can only imagine how bad things would be if there was a huge trade center there too. Glad it never got the go ahead.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,385 ✭✭✭✭D'Agger


    Bacchus wrote: »
    Really? Mahon SC is regularly moaned about for having terrible infrastructure around it. The road network is already under severe pressure from the business parks, the residential hub and the shopping center. The buses you refer to is a 'once every 30 minutes' route to the city center, that at peak traffic hours is painfully slow and packed to capacity with commuters.

    As an aside, the place is a disaster now for parking too with all the new companies set up there. The roads around City Gate & the NSC are littered with cars parked there for the day.

    I can only imagine how bad things would be if there was a huge trade center there too. Glad it never got the go ahead.
    My point was - there's infrastructure there - it's simply not organized well as it stands - you can use the link to get to and from Mahon Point, it's the 4 sets of traffic lights at the junction after it that bottle it up.

    They need a car park out there to facilitate the company growth in the past few months alright and you'd have to imagine if the had put one out there then the bus service used would have to run more regularly.

    If an event centre was put out there then you'd obviously need to look at how people get to an from the place - Beamish & Crawford site will absolutely have to look at it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,701 ✭✭✭Bacchus


    D'Agger wrote: »
    My point was - there's infrastructure there - it's simply not organized well as it stands - you can use the link to get to and from Mahon Point, it's the 4 sets of traffic lights at the junction after it that bottle it up.

    There really isn't. 1 road in and out is not an infrastructure. There are massive problems with traffic in and out of Mahon and it is not the traffic lights fault. The traffic lights are the only thing maintaining some sort of order to proceedings. The bottleneck at the tunnel compounds the traffic problems further.

    Between 16:30 and around 18:00 traffic moves at a snails pace through Mahon. The mornings aren't quite as bad but still suffer from the same problem of all the traffic having to flow through the one road.
    D'Agger wrote: »
    They need a car park out there to facilitate the company growth in the past few months alright and you'd have to imagine if the had put one out there then the bus service used would have to run more regularly.

    If an event centre was put out there then you'd obviously need to look at how people get to an from the place - Beamish & Crawford site will absolutely have to look at it.

    There's been huge growth out in Mahon in the past 2 years and there's not a sign of a new car park or improved bus service to be had. What makes you think it'd have been different if they put in a trade/event center? There's no evidence to support that. I'm not even sure how much either of those things would help with traffic anyway. A bus service just isn't an option for most people travelling to work/shop in Mahon.

    As it stands Mahon is turning in to a disaster to get to/from at peak times. This is something I really hope gets addressed by the city/county council soon though I'm not really sure what could be done. It's a fairly well built up area, with not much room for more roads. A fly over for the roundabout on the far side of the tunnel may help. Anyway, this is going a bit off topic :o


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,800 ✭✭✭CHealy


    In the Echo today saying if this isnt fast tracked we'll lose the government 10m funding. No doubt this wont happen due to the incompetence/stubbornness of someone down here, a reoccurring issue with developments in Cork it seems.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭Fabio


    Bloody tumbleweed again.

    What's the betting we'll lose the government grant for this? I can see it happening.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,385 ✭✭✭✭D'Agger


    Fabio wrote: »
    Bloody tumbleweed again.

    What's the betting we'll lose the government grant for this? I can see it happening.
    Sure initial tenders aren't due in for another two weeks aren't they?

    Won't hear much until then I'd imagine.


  • Registered Users Posts: 490 ✭✭mire


    Tender deadline was last Friday 17th afaik


  • Registered Users Posts: 195 ✭✭Pitcairn


    It was discussed in City Hall last night. The same two applicants are involved in this second process and officials said they should have a decision before Christmas.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,385 ✭✭✭✭D'Agger


    mire wrote: »
    Tender deadline was last Friday 17th afaik
    Well according to this IE article the below is the schedule so the tender doesn't get officially submitted until October 8th....whether parties need to involve themselves in the preceding events I'm not sure!


    Deadline for response to contract notice: | September 17
    Evaluate suitability:| September 22
    Invitation to participate in the competitive negotiated procedure:| September 24
    Submission of initial tenders:| October 8
    Commencement of negotiation: | October 17
    Submission of final tenders: | November 14
    Contractual process: | November/December 2014


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 Thepikapi


    At this stage I honestly don't give a feck as to what site they choose, we just desperately need an events centre... Anyone else feeling the same?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,701 ✭✭✭Bacchus


    Agreed. It's getting to the point where by the time they build the thing I'll probably will have moved out of the city and will have... other commitments that will prevent me having a night out anywhere, never mind this events centre :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,800 ✭✭✭CHealy


    I'm starting to accept the fact that we'll never be able to have anything nice.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,669 ✭✭✭who_me


    Bacchus wrote: »
    Agreed. It's getting to the point where by the time they build the thing I'll probably will have moved out of the city and will have... other commitments that will prevent me having a night out anywhere, never mind this events centre :pac:

    Optimistic! By the time the event centre opens, your... commitments will have moved out and maybe even have... commitments of their own ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,007 ✭✭✭opus


    Spotted this on the Beamish site this morning, what's going on there :confused:

    2lxi8tl.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 481 ✭✭clerk


    opus wrote: »
    Spotted this on the Beamish site this morning, what's going on there :confused:

    Got to love the way you can't read the "date" for objections, yet the signature is clearly visible at the bottom.

    The date must have 'errmmmmmmmmm' washed off in the rain. Funny that. :eek::D:p


  • Registered Users Posts: 490 ✭✭mire


    Assume this is the City Council assisting with the tidying up of title. Often happens on large sites where there are ambiguities and complications surrounding land ownership.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,669 ✭✭✭who_me


    mire wrote: »
    Assume this is the City Council assisting with the tidying up of title. Often happens on large sites where there are ambiguities and complications surrounding land ownership.

    Interesting - how does this work? Is this a "just in case" application, or are they definitely purchasing it? Seems odd to be doing this when the event-centre decision hasn't even been made - publicly at least.


  • Registered Users Posts: 195 ✭✭Pitcairn


    who_me wrote: »
    Interesting - how does this work? Is this a "just in case" application, or are they definitely purchasing it? Seems odd to be doing this when the event-centre decision hasn't even been made - publicly at least.

    It's one of the oldest sites in the city so perhaps there's a section of land that Heineken don't own. The council can acquire it compulsorily and then sell it to them for a nominal fee.

    Event centre or not it'd be important that no minor land issues delay the redevelopment of the site.


  • Registered Users Posts: 459 ✭✭Meursault


    Cork badly needs this events centre. The success of the Marquee underlines this. I would prefer the Beamish site. it would bring some life back to the city centre. Parking, access, etc, may be an issue.

    At this stage, as someone already said above, i would be delighted with either location, as long as we get the events centre. The amount of money the city is losing with people having to go to the O2 in dublin, must be enormous. you could also probably add in people coming from nearby counties for big gigs. here's hoping it gets the go ahead.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,441 ✭✭✭forzacalcio


    Why is this not laminated?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭Fabio


    It is. But I thought not for a second...if we can't laminate something then how can we build an event centre?! :p


Advertisement