The 'Funny (ha, ha)' side of religion

Hotblack Desiato

Lucifer MorningStar wrote: »

It's like the blaxploitation version of the Human Centipede.

Her in front is getting the highest quality nutrition, those behind, less so...

Hotblack Desiato

pauldla wrote: »

Sorry, I thought we were giving the name and date of last romantic dalliance.

O_o

There are catholic clergy getting more action with consenting adults than that

Lucifer MorningStar

Worztron

Kivaro

Worztron

Lucifer MorningStar

Worztron

Worztron

Lucifer MorningStar

robindch

atheistmemebase looks into christianity.

Lucifer MorningStar

BlitzKrieg

A game about nazi super soldiers in an alternative history line where germany wins world war 2 and what do they set their goals on?

http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=261990217

think big guys

think big

(in other words easter egg in wolfenstein pokes fun at creationists)

Nodin

Lucifer MorningStar wrote: »

Pic is a fake. Been doing the rounds for a while.

Worztron

Lucifer MorningStar

Nodin wrote: »

Pic is a fake. Been doing the rounds for a while.

Still goes on though.

Nodin

Lucifer MorningStar wrote: »

Still goes on though.

Yes, but not in the supposed manner shown in the picture, which is the point. There are enough faults within Islam without people having to make them up.

robindch

Best use of the phrase "Hello, mummy" you'll hear all day:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCdUY_B9f9A

Worztron

MOD NOTE:
Not funny in the least.

Lucifer MorningStar

recedite

Worztron wrote: »

Probably a big hit in the convent.
The free market can decide whether the designer failed or not

Mark Hamill

Worztron wrote: »

What part of that is supposed to be funny?

Lingua Franca

Bloe Joggs

Lingua Franca wrote: »

It looks like the Koran may have started out as a carpet catalogue that got out of control....

Lucifer MorningStar

AstraMonti

This almost had me in tears laughing

Dades

Mark Hamill wrote: »

What part of that is supposed to be funny?

None.

Worztron, this thread is for (even remotely) funny images etc, not just Islam bashing.

Lucifer MorningStar

Worztron

Dades wrote: »

None.

Worztron, this thread is for (even remotely) funny images etc, not just Islam bashing.

How was that islam bashing? He was a pedo. It's funny how that part is generally whitewashed.

Removing my image smacks of censorship.

Worztron

robindch

Worztron wrote: »

How was that islam bashing? He was a pedo. It's funny how that part is generally whitewashed. Removing my image smacks of censorship.

The thread title is "The Funny Side of Religion". While the image you posted may or may not have been historically accurate, there was nothing remotely funny about it.

Gbear

Worztron wrote: »

How was that islam bashing? He was a pedo. It's funny how that part is generally whitewashed.

Removing my image smacks of censorship.

If I posted a picture of 6 severed heads and a bag of crisps, would their removal for not being funny amount to censorship?

Dades

Worztron wrote: »

It's funny how that part is generally whitewashed.

So that was the funny bit?

Worztron

robindch wrote: »

The thread title is "The Funny Side of Religion". While the image you posted may or may not have been historically accurate, there was nothing remotely funny about it.

It is accurate, their own silly book even says it.

Gbear wrote: »

If I posted a picture of 6 severed heads and a bag of crisps, would their removal for not being funny amount to censorship?

That picture would have no relevance to religion.

Dades wrote: »

So that was the funny bit?

Why ignore the other parts of my post?

oscarBravo

Worztron wrote: »

It is accurate, their own silly book even says it.

It wasn't funny. It was off-topic for a humour thread. Why are you flogging this dead horse?

Sonics2k

Worztron wrote: »

It is accurate, their own silly book even says it.



That picture would have no relevene to religion.



Why ignore the other parts of my post?

I don't think anyone wants to directly censor you, we all know that what you posted is true according to the book. More precisely, the image itself is not funny, so does not really belong in this particular thread.
Surely it'd be more a Hazards of Religion post or similar?

Delirium

Worztron wrote: »

How was that islam bashing? He was a pedo. It's funny how that part is generally whitewashed.

Removing my image smacks of censorship.

The image you posted didn't convey that. The only possible "punch-line" was that it was funny he was having sex with a 9 year old.

Worztron

Sonics2k wrote: »

I don't think anyone wants to directly censor you, we all know that what you posted is true according to the book. More precisely, the image itself is not funny, so does not really belong in this particular thread.
Surely it'd be more a Hazards of Religion post or similar?

There are numerous unfunny posts on this thread but they will never be removed.

Dades wrote: »

So that was the funny bit?

SW wrote: »

The image you posted didn't convey that. The only possible "punch-line" was that it was funny he was having sex with a 9 year old.

Funny has more than one meaning.

e.g. "difficult to explain or understand; strange or curious."

Delirium

smacl

Worztron wrote: »

There are numerous unfunny posts on this thread but they will never be removed.

Humour is personal, what one person will laugh at another might find offensive. I'm not easily offended, and am easily enough amused, but found the last bunch of posts by yourself and lucifer morningstar to be a pretty píss poor dig at Islam, which came across as pretty bitter and humourless.

Plenty of opportunity on other threads to reasonably highlight the many problems with Islam, but I come to this thread in the hope of a smile rather than a scowl.

Don't give up the day job.

robindch

Worztron wrote: »

It is accurate, their own silly book even says it.

Uh, that's a defense in a forum for atheists and agnostics?

:rolleyes:

Worztron

Worztron

smacl wrote: »

Humour is personal, what one person will laugh at another might find offensive. I'm not easily offended, and am easily enough amused, but found the last bunch of posts by yourself and lucifer morningstar to be a pretty píss poor dig at Islam, which came across as pretty bitter and humourless.

Plenty of opportunity on other threads to reasonably highlight the many problems with Islam, but I come to this thread in the hope of a smile rather than a scowl.

Don't give up the day job.

You'd want to re-look at my last bunch of posts. Most were not even about islam.

robindch wrote: »

Uh, that's a defense in a forum for atheists and agnostics?

Perhaps that's the only accurate thing within its pages.

Lucifer MorningStar

Jesus Christ, some people are so damn touchy. Every religion deserves to be mocked and ridiculed, and yes that even includes Islam which is even bigger BS than Christianity.

Lucifer MorningStar

shruikan2553

This one gave me a laugh, maybe they were flooded because God is unhappy with the church leaders? Has as much evidence.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/serbia/10850219/Conchita-Wurst-caused-Balkan-floods-after-Eurovision-win-say-church-leaders.html

Worztron

yeppydeppy

This woman's stupidity is hilarious:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh1NO2GHnnc

robindch

^^^ The stupid is strong in that one. Very strong.

Standman

yeppydeppy wrote: »

This woman's stupidity is hilarious:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh1NO2GHnnc

"the waterways in Ireland... and the streams, are contaminated with the eestregens from the contraceptive pills".

Shes right! Every day thousands of eestregens are being tossed haphazardly into not only the waterways, but also the streams.

Well said.