Are you interested in a new Gameworld

GT_TDI_150 · 18-10-2013 9:50pm

tupac_healy wrote: »

Eh for what?

go'on, add yourself to the list

icarus86 · 18-10-2013 9:53pm

Hi I don't post that often, but im in the other boards league and would like to be part of this as well

swoody · 18-10-2013 9:55pm

No

icarus86 wrote: »

Hi I don't post that often, but im in the other boards league and would like to be part of this as well

what's the capital of south africa?

Rayne Wooney · 18-10-2013 9:55pm

Are you actually doing a squad cap PPPP?

If so I think 45 would be reasonable..

irishgoldberg · 18-10-2013 9:57pm

GT_TDI_150 wrote: »

1.PPPP -CHELSEA
2.Herrick
3.Rayne Wooney
4.TeamShadowclan
5.Maldjd23
6.gerp99
7.IvySlayer
8.Seanh
9.swoody
10.MrBlobby
11.GT_TDI_150
12.TheInternet
13.12gauge dave
14.MunsterMagic
15.IRISH GOLDBERG
16.

as far as I remember I was right behind munster magic in the other league as well. Can defo say im not managing old man inter again!!!!

12gauge dave · 18-10-2013 9:58pm

No

GT_TDI_150 wrote: »

Its in order of reply in here

fair enough lads didnt know that was the way it was going

GT_TDI_150 · 18-10-2013 9:58pm

Rayne Wooney wrote: »

Are you actually doing a squad cap PPPP?

If so I think 45 would be reasonable..

can it even be set because again monitoring it amongst teams will cause fricction irc.

if it can be set I think 60 is fair, you'd have 20 1st teamers, 20 in the cup team and possibly 20 up and commers

swoody · 18-10-2013 9:59pm

No

any chance of a time limit on picking your team otherwise this could take ages

Lord TSC · 18-10-2013 9:59pm

No

4th is good. Means I have a garruntee of one BIG team :P

EDIT: Quick idea; something that works well in other things like this I've been involved in is that when you make your pick, PM the next person in line. So someone PM Herrick to let him know he's up

KERSPLAT! · 18-10-2013 9:59pm

No

Tupac is more than well come, you too icarus86.

Do ye want a squad cap? If there is maybe we could go a little higher? If theres only 40 teams or so then there's plenty of talent to be snapped up. Maybe 50/55?

How do people feel about the SM monitoring, are we in agreement that it should be left on?

Iago · 18-10-2013 10:00pm

No

In

KERSPLAT! · 18-10-2013 10:00pm

No

swoody wrote: »

any chance of a time limit on picking your team otherwise this could take ages

What kinda time limit you thinking? 48hrs?

GT_TDI_150 · 18-10-2013 10:00pm

irishgoldberg wrote: »

as far as I remember I was right behind munster magic in the other league as well. Can defo say im not managing old man inter again!!!!

was behind him last time and he took my first pick

are people going for big teams or are we going to make it a little challenging?

swoody · 18-10-2013 10:02pm

No

Princess Petulia Pissy Pants wrote: »

Tupac is more than well come, you too icarus86.

Do ye want a squad cap? If there is maybe we could go a little higher? If theres only 40 teams or so then there's plenty of talent to be snapped up. Maybe 50/55?

How do people feel about the SM monitoring, are we in agreement that it should be left on?

keep it low so everyone can have a good team, 45 tops!

Rayne Wooney · 18-10-2013 10:02pm

GT_TDI_150 wrote: »

can it even be set because again monitoring it amongst teams will cause fricction irc.

if it can be set I think 60 is fair, you'd have 20 1st teamers, 20 in the cup team and possibly 20 up and commers

I'll agree to monitor if it's just 40 teams, and if someone else does it's 20 teams each not too hard to check once or twice a week when I log in.

PPPP could write a GW "charter" into his OP, set the rules, "to join you have to agree to a squad cap at X" then everyone says I agree next to their team pick.

That's if he wants to do it anyway but I think it was a problem in the boards league but just too late to put in now.

irishgoldberg · 18-10-2013 10:04pm

GT_TDI_150 wrote: »

was behind him last time and he took my first pick

are people going for big teams or are we going to make it a little challenging?

Im tempted to go for a LOI team and if I picked up any points it wud be a bonus!!! Or else maybe a championship team just to have a good challenge.

Al Capwned · 18-10-2013 10:04pm

No

1.PPPP -CHELSEA
2.Herrick
3.Rayne Wooney
4.TeamShadowclan
5.Maldjd23
6.gerp99
7.IvySlayer
8.Seanh
9.swoody
10.MrBlobby
11.GT_TDI_150
12.TheInternet
13.12gauge dave
14.MunsterMagic
15.IRISH GOLDBERG
16. Al Capwned

_______

Sure why not.... Fair play to u PPPP.

tupac_healy · 18-10-2013 10:04pm

I <3 Princess

swoody wrote: »

keep it low so everyone can have a good team, 45 tops!

Sound about right for you wouldn't it? Couldn't have ya not landing on your feet and actually doing a bit....

Best of luck with ur league lads, appreciate not being excluded PPPP but ill pass

KERSPLAT! · 18-10-2013 10:05pm

No

The problem is how to "punish" for want of a better word, someone who breaks the charter. I think we should stick to ingame rules because I have no power to stop anyone doing anything in reality

Rayne Wooney · 18-10-2013 10:07pm

Princess Petulia Pissy Pants wrote: »

The problem is how to "punish" for want of a better word, someone who breaks the charter. I think we should stick to ingame rules because I have no power to stop anyone doing anything in reality

Don't sell players to them until they get under the cap is one way.

It'll just end up like a hoarders paradise again if not

Maldjd23 · 18-10-2013 10:07pm

Princess Petulia Pissy Pants wrote: »

The problem is how to "punish" for want of a better word, someone who breaks the charter. I think we should stick to ingame rules because I have no power to stop anyone doing anything in reality

Everyone else could refuse to do transfer deals with them?
That's all i can think of....

Ah, already suggested!!!

KERSPLAT! · 18-10-2013 10:08pm

No

Rayne Wooney wrote: »

Don't sell players to them until they get under the cap is one way.

It'll just end up like a hoarders paradise again if not

If that suits everyone then it's fine by me. Is 45 ok then. Hoping for input from other managers, I can't keep agreeing to things from just one or two of ye

Al Capwned · 18-10-2013 10:09pm

No

Question!

Why the need for Gold membership?
No problem doing it, just wondering what the advantages are...

Rayne Wooney · 18-10-2013 10:09pm

Another thread with a poll is a democratic way of picking the cap

irishgoldberg · 18-10-2013 10:10pm

Princess Petulia Pissy Pants wrote: »

If that suits everyone then it's fine by me. Is 45 ok then. Hoping for input from other managers, I can't keep agreeing to things from just one or two of ye

I think 45 as well,

tonic wine · 18-10-2013 10:14pm

Can someone add me to the list please.

Thanks.

GT_TDI_150 · 18-10-2013 10:15pm

irishgoldberg wrote: »

Im tempted to go for a LOI team and if I picked up any points it wud be a bonus!!! Or else maybe a championship team just to have a good challenge.

tempted to go with my childhood team or a league1 team in uk .. depends on what people ahead of me pick really

KERSPLAT! · 18-10-2013 10:16pm

No

1.PPPP -CHELSEA
2.Herrick
3.Rayne Wooney
4.TeamShadowclan
5.Maldjd23
6.gerp99
7.IvySlayer
8.Seanh
9.swoody
10.MrBlobby
11.GT_TDI_150
12.TheInternet
13.12gauge dave
14.MunsterMagic
15.IRISH GOLDBERG
16. Al Capwned
17. Tonic Wine

I'll PM Herrick now

GT_TDI_150 · 18-10-2013 10:17pm

Al Capwned wrote: »

Question!

Why the need for Gold membership?
No problem doing it, just wondering what the advantages are...

you can only have 2 teams 'free', so unless I'm going to drop one I had to get membership

batistuta9 · 18-10-2013 10:18pm

i think you'd be better off making it a countries league setup instead of a world GW

it'll go the same as the other GW, guaranteed

Are you interested in a new Gameworld

Comments