Are you interested in a new Gameworld

Rayne Wooney

PPPP you should post in the off topic soccer thread, it'll fill up places quickly

Al Capwned

No

GT_TDI_150 wrote: »

you can only have 2 teams 'free', so unless I'm going to drop one I had to get membership

The only other one I have is AZ in The Boards.ie league...


Also, I'd agree with a cap of 45 players in any squad.

GT_TDI_150

do we know what the starting squads sizes are of the clubs - would be a pain if you set a squad limit and a teams starting squad is over by 5-10.

I think 45 is a little tight personally

KERSPLAT!

No

I'd urge people to stay in Macs league and if you've room, join this one. He put alot of work into his and it'd be great if the two leagues could run together with no problems

Rayne Wooney

batistuta9 wrote: »

i think you'd be better off making it a countries league setup instead of a world GW

it'll go the same as the other GW, guaranteed

Is that what it says on the tin? Like no transfers or anything? Could be a bit of a 3 team monopoly with whoever gets Spain, Germany and Brazil.

GT_TDI_150

batistuta9 wrote: »

i think you'd be better off making it a countries league setup instead of a world GW

it'll go the same as the other GW, guaranteed

that limits teams people can take then tho ... I've my eye on a Belgian team for example

KERSPLAT!

No

GT_TDI_150 wrote: »

do we know what the starting squads sizes are of the clubs - would be a pain if you set a squad limit and a teams starting squad is over by 5-10.

I think 45 is a little tight personally

Maybe give 1 months grace to get your team in order? Some may have a little over 45 but it should be handy enough to cull it down

Al Capwned

No

GT_TDI_150 wrote: »

do we know what the starting squads sizes are of the clubs - would be a pain if you set a squad limit and a teams starting squad is over by 5-10.

I think 45 is a little tight personally

Yeah, ya know thinking about it, this is a good point - I'm used to having my squad size of 23/24 with AZ in the Boards.ie gameworld

GT_TDI_150

the more I think of it the more I reckon 45 is too low a squad limit... cant see how you can develop players and make money to buy others when the numbers are that tight

Al Capwned

No

GT_TDI_150 wrote: »

that limits teams people can take then tho ... I've my eye on a Belgian team for example

Oi!!!!!!

GT_TDI_150

Al Capwned wrote: »

Oi!!!!!!

doubt if its the same team to be honest .... btw, I hope you arent referring to AZ .... *whispers* they're Dutch!;)

Rayne Wooney

I think virtually no teams have more than 30 players in their squad, but loans is where it gets tricky with some big teams having 20/25 out on loan.

Maybe people could be given a week or two deadline to get their team down to 45 maybe bump it to 50 to be fair.

swoody

No

GT_TDI_150 wrote: »

that limits teams people can take then tho ... I've my eye on a Belgian team for example

hmmm

KERSPLAT!

No

I was shouting for 50. Like someone said above that leaves plenty of room for a starting 11, a 2nd 11 for cups and then 28 backup, reserves and youths. I dunno, again I'm open to suggestions

swoody

No

Princess Petulia Pissy Pants wrote: »

I was shouting for 50. Like someone said above that leaves plenty of room for a starting 11, a 2nd 11 for cups and then 28 backup, reserves and youths. I dunno, again I'm open to suggestions

50's grand now can we get back picking teams.........

Rayne Wooney

So far the biggest squad + loans I've seen is Madrid with 59, so whoever gets Madrid will have to sell 9 players. Seems reasonable enough

Maldjd23

Princess Petulia Pissy Pants wrote: »

1.PPPP -CHELSEA
2.Herrick
3.Rayne Wooney
4.TeamShadowclan
5.Maldjd23
6.gerp99
7.IvySlayer
8.Seanh
9.swoody
10.MrBlobby
11.GT_TDI_150
12.TheInternet
13.12gauge dave
14.MunsterMagic
15.IRISH GOLDBERG
16. Al Capwned
17. Tonic Wine

I'll PM Herrick now

Herrick says on page one he wants Spurs

GT_TDI_150

Princess Petulia Pissy Pants wrote: »

I was shouting for 50. Like someone said above that leaves plenty of room for a starting 11, a 2nd 11 for cups and then 28 backup, reserves and youths. I dunno, again I'm open to suggestions

I think the barca squad is huge enough ....

I had said 60 as an number ... give people a little room to pick up some youngsters(if that is how they like to play - develop a squad over time), when we have 1/2 the teams in the league, more players will be available to get so a little room for players does mke sence in my opinion

Maldjd23

I agree 50 is more then enough, think there should be a period of grace thou to allow teams to sort out their squads..

batistuta9

Rayne Wooney wrote: »

Is that what it says on the tin? Like no transfers or anything? Could be a bit of a 3 team monopoly with whoever gets Spain, Germany and Brazil.

not an international league. england div. 1-4 or spain 1-4, etc.

that's my experience of them anyway. they go stale too quick

the only thing about them is you could say they may be a bit too hard/too much work for some people & it mightn't gather enough interest, people won't be bothered.

with a smaller club it's more challenging, money means more, buying players means more, etc.
look at the squads/ratings/stadium sizes of some clubs here http://www.soccerwiki.org/wiki.php?action=countryProfile&countryId=ENG

obviously a down side is there's big clubs in england too but i think it's worth considering

swoody

No

imagine if we did skybet league 1 and league 2 or lower teams instead for the crack

Rayne Wooney

GT_TDI_150 wrote: »

I think the barca squad is huge enough ....

I had said 60 as an number ... give people a little room to pick up some youngsters(if that is how they like to play - develop a squad over time), when we have 1/2 the teams in the league, more players will be available to get so a little room for players does mke sence in my opinion

Barca have 55 players, I think 60 really is
pushing the boundary, 50 is high but reasonable.

With 50 you've your first 11, 7 subs, cup 11, 7 subs and then 14 youth players.

tupac_healy

I <3 Princess

batistuta9 wrote: »

with a smaller club it's more challenging, money means more, buying players means more, etc.
look at the squads/ratings/stadium sizes of some clubs here http://www.soccerwiki.org/wiki.php?action=countryProfile&countryId=ENG

obviously a down side is there's big clubs in england too but i think it's worth considering

You may as well have been speaking Latin to Swoody regards that part

KERSPLAT!

No

swoody wrote: »

imagine if we did skybet league 1 and league 2 or lower teams instead for the crack

That'd be good but I don't want to buy a world only for it to turn into a ghost town after a month or two

Herrick

No

Put me down for Tottenham

swoody

No

Princess Petulia Pissy Pants wrote: »

That'd be good but I don't want to buy a world only for it to turn into a ghost town after a month or two

i'd turn Barnet into Barca

batistuta9

Princess Petulia Pissy Pants wrote: »

That'd be good but I don't want to buy a world only for it to turn into a ghost town after a month or two

you need people to have the appetite for it. you could even out the div.1 teams off limits

i'd rather it but it's time consuming & hard work.
like if you've mansfield say with a 10k stadium & around an avg. rating of 71/72 you can't be just going an signing anyone - it'll kill you, you need to be buying guaranteed risers, etc.

12gauge dave

No

Originally Posted by Princess Petulia Pissy Pants View Post
1.PPPP -CHELSEA
2.Herrick-TOTTENHAM
3.Rayne Wooney
4.TeamShadowclan
5.Maldjd23
6.gerp99
7.IvySlayer
8.Seanh
9.swoody
10.MrBlobby
11.GT_TDI_150
12.TheInternet
13.12gauge dave
14.MunsterMagic
15.IRISH GOLDBERG
16. Al Capwned
17. Tonic Wine


rayne wooney take your pick quick and hurry this the f*ck along:)

mackeire

No

stick me down

tupac_healy

I <3 Princess

mackeire wrote: »

stick me down

Please be a big stick.....