Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Mux 2 Launched / Saorview Rescan Required

1101113151626

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    jimbo2007 wrote: »
    Nearly 2 weeks on, is this still the same line-up today? has there been any change since this list and, any news as to when SD simulcasting will end for RTE 1?

    Thanks.

    It is strange that no date has been mentioned. Have there been more problems?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭Gerry Wicklow


    The number of people on here complaining of mux 2 problems is anything to go by, it has probably forced a rethink for now. Too many coat hangers to upgrade:)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    Elmo wrote: »
    . . . Have there been more problems?

    More problems? You mean there are known problems already? What are they?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    Peter Rhea wrote: »
    More problems? You mean there are known problems already? What are they?
    The number of people on here complaining of mux 2 problems is anything to go by, it has probably forced a rethink for now. Too many coat hangers to upgrade:)

    Individual customers.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    Individual 'customer' problems caused by inadequate receiving aerial installs can affect either mux: most of the complainers here are those who say they had 'perfect signal up until mux 2 started', when in reality they had nothing of the sort. They are just the random number who happened to get a slightly worse signal for the 2nd mux.

    Anyway, 2rn don't do domestic receiving aerial installations, so nobody is a customer in that respect.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭Gerry Wicklow


    Peter Rhea wrote: »
    Individual 'customer' problems caused by inadequate receiving aerial installs can affect either mux: most of the complainers here are those who say they had 'perfect signal up until mux 2 started', when in reality they had nothing of the sort. They are just the random number who happened to get a slightly worse signal for the 2nd mux.

    Anyway, 2rn don't do domestic receiving aerial installations, so nobody is a customer in that respect.
    Agreed but you can imagine the row on Joe Duffy if RTÉ1 suddenly disappeared from their "perfectly good up to now" coat hangers :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    Agreed but you can imagine the row on Joe Duffy if RTÉ1 suddenly disappeared from their "perfectly good up to now" coat hangers :D

    Problems caused by not launching both muxes together.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    Elmo wrote: »
    Problems caused by not launching both muxes together.

    How? Did people go back to using single-channel aerials?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 607 ✭✭✭Oscarziggy


    What I can't understand is why since the launch of MUX 2 people have LOST channels.
    Over here in Wales if you fail to receive a MUX because your aerial isn't up to it then you get less channels.
    Why are people over there complaining that since MUX 2 launched they have lost channels that were previously ok.?
    Is it bad channel MUX planning --- if you remember Mt Leinster launched a MUX on ch45 which wiped out Preseli reception on the North coast of Pembrokeshire --- Preseli using ch45 as well ?
    Regards


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    Oscarziggy wrote: »
    What I can't understand is why since the launch of MUX 2 people have LOST channels.

    They haven't lost channels yet, as the 'old' mux 1 versions are still running.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 607 ✭✭✭Oscarziggy


    I thought people were saying they have lost BBC channels etc?
    Regards


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    Oscarziggy wrote: »
    I thought people were saying they have lost BBC channels etc?

    Most that lost Freeview muxes due to Saorview mux 2 switch-on would be outside the Freeview service area in NI. Anyone in NI would be in a poor Freeview reception area.

    Most complaints of this nature would be due to Mt. Leinster sharing frequencies with Divis com. muxes. There might be issues between Castlebar & Brougher Mtn. in places too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,463 ✭✭✭Mr Cumulonimbus


    Peter Rhea wrote: »
    as the 'old' mux 1 versions are still running.

    Any date as to when these actually finish?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,679 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    Any date as to when these actually finish?

    No, I assume it depends on the level of calls to the Saorview helpline and probably posts here from people experiencing continued reception problems etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,564 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    The Cush wrote: »
    No, I assume it depends on the level of calls to the Saorview helpline and probably posts here from people experiencing continued reception problems etc.

    If they'd taken that approach to ASO, it probably still wouldn't have happened.

    405 was shut down only 16 years after it started here, TVs cost far far more in real terms then, there were no cheap STB converter options, yet there was no outcry.

    People have had ample warning that a decent aerial and approved equipment are recommended. If they want to wing it on a rabbit's ears and some dodgy receiver it's up to them, but they can have no guarantee of what they'll be able to receive.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 848 ✭✭✭marclt


    Has there been any *formal* notification to viewers to perform a retune?

    All I'm aware of is the one for viewers on the small number of relays where freq changes have taken place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,679 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    marclt wrote: »
    Has there been any *formal* notification to viewers to perform a retune?

    All I'm aware of is the one for viewers on the small number of relays where freq changes have taken place.

    "Re-scan Required/Ath-scanadh ag Teastáil" information in the programme information banner, radio and TV announcements. They did place a notice on the 2RN/RTÉNL website but removed it within a few days, the same notice was emailed later to the trade according to Tony from satellite.ie.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,456 ✭✭✭larrymiller


    Are yee all talking code or wha???


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,733 ✭✭✭bigron2109


    Ive a Aerial on the roof, but since this re-scan my RTE 2 has been unwatchable. But RTE 1 is perfect. Any suggestions.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    bigron2109 wrote: »
    Ive a Aerial on the roof, but since this re-scan my RTE 2 has been unwatchable.

    Is your receiver Saorview approved? Saorview approved receivers are supposed to store the channels with best signal. Other receivers might store the 1st they come across (lowest frequency) in the top EPG position, with duplicates (possibly including your best signal) further down the list.

    You need to know the UHF channel no. or frequency (in mHz or kHz) on which you are receiving RTE2 & also the transmitter your aerial is set up for.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 788 ✭✭✭Souriau


    RTEjr frozen on Mux 1 while on Mux 2 is still showing


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,733 ✭✭✭bigron2109


    Peter Rhea wrote: »
    Is your receiver Saorview approved? Saorview approved receivers are supposed to store the channels with best signal. Other receivers might store the 1st they come across (lowest frequency) in the top EPG position, with duplicates (possibly including your best signal) further down the list.

    You need to know the UHF channel no. or frequency (in mHz or kHz) on which you are receiving RTE2 & also the transmitter your aerial is set up for.

    Bascially the set up is as follows,

    In the Kitchen we have a saorview approved tele, and the reception for the stations are poor there, apart from RTE one which is excellent. This is since the re-scan.

    In my room, i dont have a saorview tv, and the box i have is not saorview either but i was getting the RTE'S and TV3 in perfectly before the re-scan.

    We have a aerial on the roof which is what i used to get my RTE's etc.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    Where approx. are you located? On which UHF channels/frequencies are you receiving Saorview mux 1 & 2 at each receiver? (Check RTE2 for mux 1, RTE1 for mux 2.) Do you know which transmitter your aerial is pointed at?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 518 ✭✭✭JeanClaude


    Sorry for my ignorance but after I rescanned my Saorview box I'm only getting RTE1. By looking at the 1st page of this thread, I seem to be on the "MUX2" channel lineup and I'm not sure how to change to "MUX1".

    The Saorview box is the TVSTAR from LIDL.


  • Registered Users Posts: 37 Horsetiger


    I'm having the same problem - picking up RTE 1, RTE 1+1 and RTE jr but nothing on MUX1 - standard Walker Saorview receiver with 'One for All' aerial.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33 mandrk


    Similar to bigron I'm having trouble with the channels remaining on MUX 1 since turning on mux2. Is this 'transition' complete and will channels now continue to be split over the 2 MUXs? Or will they all eventually move to MUX 2?

    I've been working off mt Leinster quite happily since march 2010. My aerial is in the attic. I have one TV connected directly to the aerial then another 2 via a wideband splitter. Ever since the launch of mux2 the signal strength and quality of the channels on MUX1 one are really bad. Those on MUX 2 are perfect.

    The TVs connected via the splitter seem to be suffering worse. Rte 2 breaks up continually on one TV and the other has lost it completely on rescan. The TV connected directly to aerial seems to be managing OK. But signal strength and quality is better on MUX 2 in this case too. So do I :

    1) move my aerial outside to get better signal?
    2) re wire all my cables directly to the aerial?
    3) wait for all channels to move to MUX 2?

    I've been waiting/hoping for number 3 to happen but I'm guessing this is going to be the case

    Find the information on this from saorview and rtenl has been pretty poor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,906 ✭✭✭kooga


    mandrk wrote: »
    Similar to bigron I'm having trouble with the channels remaining on MUX 1 since turning on mux2. Is this 'transition' complete and will channels now continue to be split over the 2 MUXs? Or will they all eventually move to MUX 2?

    I've been working off mt Leinster quite happily since march 2010. My aerial is in the attic. I have one TV connected directly to the aerial then another 2 via a wideband splitter. Ever since the launch of mux2 the signal strength and quality of the channels on MUX1 one are really bad. Those on MUX 2 are perfect.

    The TVs connected via the splitter seem to be suffering worse. Rte 2 breaks up continually on one TV and the other has lost it completely on rescan. The TV connected directly to aerial seems to be managing OK. But signal strength and quality is better on MUX 2 in this case too. So do I :

    1) move my aerial outside to get better signal?
    2) re wire all my cables directly to the aerial?
    3) wait for all channels to move to MUX 2?

    I've been waiting/hoping for number 3 to happen but I'm guessing this is going to be the case

    Find the information on this from saorview and rtenl has been pretty poor.

    4. what i did installed a masthead amp and an aerial power amp and hav eperfect signal


  • Registered Users Posts: 33 mandrk


    kooga wrote: »
    4. what i did installed a masthead amp and an aerial power amp and hav eperfect signal

    Cheers. Can you suggest a power amp?

    Any thoughts as to why MUX 1 would be gone so poor when MUX 2 reception is perfect?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    mandrk wrote: »
    My aerial is in the attic. I have one TV connected directly to the aerial then another 2 via a wideband splitter . . .

    . . . The TVs connected via the splitter seem to be suffering worse.

    So the splitter is fed from the aerial-out of a STB at the TV point that is fed direct from the aerial?

    The channels won't all be moving to mux 2 btw: the launch of the 2nd mux was to increase overall capacity, allowing more HD services.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 607 ✭✭✭Oscarziggy


    mandrk wrote: »
    Ever since the launch of mux2 the signal strength and quality of the channels on MUX1 one are really bad. Those on MUX 2 are perfect.

    Can anyone explain why this has happened ?
    I can't understand why switching on another channel should cause this unless the strength on MUX2 is swamping the wideband splitter -- if that is the case it isn't an amp that is needed but an attenuator --- variable ones are available which I have used in the past to overcome a similar problem with a receiver that had a very sensitive tuner.
    Oddly. that receiver would quite happily tune all SD channels (UK) BUT refused to find any HD channels (again UK) until the attenuator was used to reduce the signal.

    Just my thoughts ....
    Regards


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    Oscarziggy wrote: »
    Can anyone explain why this has happened ?

    Maybe a weaker transmitter was tuned in on the problem TVs? Could be something on a lower frequency e.g. Arklow, Gallows Hill, Mullaghanish: depends where mandrk is located.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 607 ✭✭✭Oscarziggy


    Peter Rhea wrote: »
    Maybe a weaker transmitter was tuned in on the problem TVs? Could be something on a lower frequency e.g. Arklow, Gallows Hill, Mullaghanish: depends where mandrk is located.

    Hadn't thought of that --- I am only in range of one TX here -- apart from yours over there with an additional aerial.
    I wonder what is going to happen when MUX1 is turned off !!
    Regards.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,463 ✭✭✭Mr Cumulonimbus


    Oscarziggy wrote: »
    Hadn't thought of that --- I am only in range of one TX here -- apart from yours over there with an additional aerial.
    I wonder what is going to happen when MUX1 is turned off !!
    Regards.

    Will still be there. Just RTE1, RTEjr and RTE 1+1 being removed from it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33 mandrk


    Peter Rhea wrote: »
    So the splitter is fed from the aerial-out of a STB at the TV point that is fed direct from the aerial?

    No, aerial connected directly to mvision combo stb. This is working fine all be it with worse quality/strength on mux1. Then I've a second feed from the same aerial going to a 4 way splitter then off to 2 other TVs. These TVs are the ones I'm having trouble with.
    Peter Rhea wrote: »
    Maybe a weaker transmitter was tuned in on the problem TVs? Could be something on a lower frequency e.g. Arklow, Gallows Hill, Mullaghanish: depends where mandrk is located.

    No I've got the right CHs/freqs for mt Leinster as per the rtenl doc. 23/490 on MUX 1 and 26/514 for MUX 2. I'm based in hilly south Wicklow between aughrim and tinahely but have clear line of sight to mt leinster all be it 25 miles away. Arklow is probably closer but I've never been able to pick up this tx which is on CH 21 I think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 607 ✭✭✭Oscarziggy


    Will still be there. Just RTE1, RTEjr and RTE 1+1 being removed from it.
    Thanks --- my fault, you have said what I meant to say !!
    Maybe it's these duplicates that are causing the problems -- time will tell.
    Regards


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    mandrk wrote: »
    I've a second feed from the same aerial going to a 4 way splitter then off to 2 other TVs.

    What kind of aerial? I think I've only seen 1 that had provision for more than 1 connection, via an integrated amplifier. Just jamming extra cables into a connection intended for 1 only, is a no-no.


  • Registered Users Posts: 61 ✭✭dubb


    Peter Rhea wrote: »
    the 'old' mux 1 versions are still running.
    Any date as to when these actually finish?

    The 'old' MUX1 broadcasts should continue past Christmas according to RTÉNL/2RN. I guess they would like to avoid the bad PR of 'switching off' people's RTE1 before Christmas, especially if nobody needs the SD MUX1 channels yet.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33 mandrk


    Peter Rhea wrote: »
    What kind of aerial? I think I've only seen 1 that had provision for more than 1 connection, via an integrated amplifier. Just jamming extra cables into a connection intended for 1 only, is a no-no.

    Its a 15 euro piece of crap UHF aerial I picked up in b&q years ago. Yes its only meant for single feed but issues only kicked off when MUX 2 was turned on. All was fine for close on 4 years before that.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    Anything used to divide the signal from the aerial must maintain the correct system impedance. Connecting cables together directly won't do this & signal won't be transferred efficiently from aerial to receiver(s).

    You should just have 1 feed from the aerial to the splitter, & feed the receivers from the splitter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,679 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    mandrk wrote: »
    Its a 15 euro piece of crap UHF aerial I picked up in b&q years ago. Yes its only meant for single feed but issues only kicked off when MUX 2 was turned on. All was fine for close on 4 years before that.

    Going back to your initial post, my suggestion would be to mount the aerial outside with a distribution amp in the attic to feed the different TV points.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 33 mandrk


    Thanks for the tips guys. Will try to rewire and distribute off single feed first before drilling holes & buying an amp. Will let you know how I go.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,463 ✭✭✭Mr Cumulonimbus


    Oscarziggy wrote: »
    Maybe it's these duplicates that are causing the problems

    It's a factor for some I'd say. They should switch them off on a given date, say 10th January, with a permanent onscreen message saying this for about a week preceeding it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,905 ✭✭✭steveon


    Oscarziggy wrote: »
    What I can't understand is why since the launch of MUX 2 people have LOST channels.
    Over here in Wales if you fail to receive a MUX because your aerial isn't up to it then you get less channels.
    Why are people over there complaining that since MUX 2 launched they have lost channels that were previously ok.?
    Is it bad channel MUX planning --- if you remember Mt Leinster launched a MUX on ch45 which wiped out Preseli reception on the North coast of Pembrokeshire --- Preseli using ch45 as well ?
    Regards

    Some people lost the channels as the old versions are not broadcasting any name so some tv's such as Samsung and Lg's simply remove them from the listing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 607 ✭✭✭Oscarziggy


    steveon wrote: »
    Some people lost the channels as the old versions are not broadcasting any name so some tv's such as Samsung and Lg's simply remove them from the listing.

    That could explain why the odd set top box I have - View21 PVR - is the same .
    BUT if,after a "first time install" I watch RTE1 HD and leave the box on that channel it will remain.
    If I change channels to RTE2 HD or any other then when I try to come back
    to RTE1 HD it's not available --- as in GONE !!
    If,after a "first time install" I tune into RTE2 HD then try to change to RTE1 HD it's already GONE !!
    Very odd box ....
    My Sony TV keeps them all.

    Regards


  • Registered Users Posts: 33 mandrk


    mandrk wrote: »
    Thanks for the tips guys. Will try to rewire and distribute off single feed first before drilling holes & buying an amp. Will let you know how I go.

    All sorted. Moving the second feed I had from the aerial to the splitter did the trick. All stbs and TVs working fine for both MUXs. Thanks for help.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,906 ✭✭✭kooga


    good to see all is quiet here on the mux 2 rescan thread..................all must be ok or else people have just given up watching rte 1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,079 ✭✭✭timmy4u2


    kooga wrote: »
    good to see all is quiet here on the mux 2 rescan thread..................all must be ok or else people have just given up watching rte 1
    Things get very easy when you get to know everything about them:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 607 ✭✭✭Oscarziggy


    Waiting for reply from the maker of my set top box for a work around and with interest when the duplicates are shut down in January I believe.

    It's only TV after all ..!!

    Regards


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,543 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    Oscarziggy wrote: »
    Waiting for reply from the maker of my set top box for a work around and with interest when the duplicates are shut down in January I believe.

    It's only TV after all ..!!

    Regards

    Well we won't have to wait any longer now because RTE1 HD on both Saorview & UPC will launch from next Monday.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/business/sectors/media-and-marketing/rt%C3%A9-one-hd-to-launch-next-monday-1.1624437


  • Registered Users Posts: 123 ✭✭jimbo2007


    The Cush wrote: »
    This is the current channel line-up on Saorview .

    Channel line-up by LCN
    LCN
    |
    Channel
    ||
    Mux
    |
    01|RTÉ One|HD|2|
    02|RTÉ Two|HD|1|
    03|TV3|SD|1|
    04|TG4|SD|1|
    05|3e|SD|1|
    06|RTÉ News Now|SD|1|
    07|RTÉjr**|SD|2|
    08|RTÉ One +1**|SD|2|
    09-10|(not used)|||
    11|no channel name/programme info (RTÉ 1 simulcast)|SD|1|temporary, ends 11/12th Nov?
    12*|(no channel name/testcard)|HD|2|
    13*|(no channel name/testcard)|SD|2|RTÉ Lyric FM audio
    14*|(no channel name/testcard)|HD|2|TG4 subtitles and teletext tested previously
    15*|(no channel name/testcard)|SD|2| RTÉ Raidió na Gaeltachta audio
    16|(not used)|||
    17|no channel name/programme info (RTÉjr simulcast**)|SD|1|temporary, ends 11/12th Nov?
    18|no channel name/programme info (RTÉ1 +1 simulcast**)|SD|1|temporary, ends 11/12th Nov?
    200|RTÉ Radio 1|Radio|1|
    201|RTÉ Radio 1 Extra|Radio|1|
    202|RTÉ 2FM|Radio|1|
    203|RTÉ Lyric FM|Radio|1|
    204|RTÉ Raidió na Gaeltachta|Radio|1|
    205|RTÉ Pulse|Radio|1|
    206|RTÉ 2XM|Radio|1|
    207*|(not used)||1|previously RTÉ Choice
    208|RTÉ Gold|Radio|1|
    209|RTÉ Junior/RTÉ Chill|Radio|1|
    210|(not used)||
    211-212*|(no radio channel names)|Radio|2|no audio
    213*|(no radio channel name)|Radio|2|RTÉ Lyric FM audio
    214*|(no radio channel name)|Radio|2|RTÉ Raidió na Gaeltachta audio
    215-217*|(no radio channel names)|Radio|2|no audio
    218-219*|(no radio channel name)|Radio|2|RTÉ Gold audio
    220*|(no radio channel name)|Radio|2|no audio
    249*|SSU|data channel|1|
    250*|SSU|data channel|2|

    * Hidden but can be selected by entering the channel no. via the remote control
    ** RTÉjr 0700-1845 approx / RTÉ One +1 1900-0100/0200 approx. Timesharing.

    I assume this is still the same line-up today - but on Monday after the changes, please can you update this table for us? Thanks.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement