Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Lack of new routes at Cork airport

Options
1568101137

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 573 ✭✭✭rebs23


    Here, here.

    Cork is substantially larger than either Limerick, Galway or Waterford and should be prioritised complete differently than the other 3.

    I simply cannot workout why Limerick is getting such investment. It cannot just be better politicians ?
    In terms of Private sector investment, Cork gets far more than Limerick but that is only to be expected given the significant population difference, economic output, etc.
    Where we suffer is the Public Investment. Limerick gets a lot of sympathy as a result of all the problems in the City over the last few years and with the Minister for Finance being a Limerick man he has done a lot in relation to public investment.
    We need to sort out the City Boundary issue so that we can accurately reflect the economic and population statistical basis for attracting more public investment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,553 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    who_me wrote: »
    Then start looking at the sports stadia.. Dublin has Croke Park, Lansdowne Rd. and even the RDS (probably) which are better than any stadium here, Limerick has Thomond and the Gaelic Grounds. Even Thurles probably has a better stadium than Cork. The revamped PUC will rectify that greatly - assuming it happens - though many are questioning the need for it. :rolleyes:

    Cork isn't allowed nice things. Simple as that. Surprised that more in nay sayers aren't trying to block the development of the events centre and have it move to Limerick.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,172 ✭✭✭shnaek




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,112 ✭✭✭notharrypotter


    http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/half-of-shannon-group-properties-lie-empty-290725.html

    I read the article in question.
    Managing director of commercial properties, Ray O’Driscoll, said that up to 57% of properties or around 230 buildings and lands were vacant. Many structures were built between the 1960s and 1980s, he told members of the Dáil’s Public Accounts Committee.
    and
    The company said the Shannon properties were “the jewel in the crown,” but needed big investment. Some need to be knocked down and others needed to be developed, the committee heard.
    I would suspect that they might have a lot of property but its patently outdated and not suitable.

    Cork is being rightly screwed. Add in the annual subsidy to Kerry and Waterford Airports
    So you want Waterford and Kerry airports closed to benefit Cork?


    effectively the Governments aviation policy page 23 of 49 gives a paragraph to Cork/Shannon combined.

    Not looking good.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,853 ✭✭✭lisasimpson


    Im surprised there isn't a flight to Frankfurt considering its a major European hub and connection centre.
    Big problem for cork is there are feck all flights to bring tourist in directly. When you think of it a large proportion of the flights up are to take us to the usual sun spots and very little of them in tourist on the return flights. One worldwide tool people use when researching holidays is Tourradar. Of all the tours around Ireland only two start from Cork, they are hiking,cycling trips. So many organisations need to come together to fight the cause of airport against the government and DAA, not just the big mutlinationals like EMC, but the food boards, hotels, car hire companies, adventure centres,county councils from surrounding counties etc, 3rd level institutions (use empty college campus accommodation in the summer to promote summer language schools- expand whats already in use) or apartments that families could rent) im sure more could be added to that list.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Mumha


    Im surprised there isn't a flight to Frankfurt considering its a major European hub and connection centre.
    Big problem for cork is there are feck all flights to bring tourist in directly. When you think of it a large proportion of the flights up are to take us to the usual sun spots and very little of them in tourist on the return flights. One worldwide tool people use when researching holidays is Tourradar. Of all the tours around Ireland only two start from Cork, they are hiking,cycling trips. So many organisations need to come together to fight the cause of airport against the government and DAA, not just the big mutlinationals like EMC, but the food boards, hotels, car hire companies, adventure centres,county councils from surrounding counties etc, 3rd level institutions (use empty college campus accommodation in the summer to promote summer language schools- expand whats already in use) or apartments that families could rent) im sure more could be added to that list.

    There are a number of problems, before you consider the marketing of Cork.
    1. Ryanair will dump 1000s of free seats on a route to drive any competitor out. Completely anti competitive.
    2. 2. Utterly ineffectual CAA management...time watchers
    3. 3. Extraordinarily inept politicians of all parties, in Cork


    Airport management fear and loathe Ryanair, and in some respects with just cause. No other big airline will chance coming into Cork while Ryanair are unstoppable in their anti-competitive practises.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭Fabio


    But the thing is, a lot of business passengers with the larger companies in Cork do not use Ryanair. They use the legacy airlines which connect them to other flights. Could we tap into that instead? That way there isn't a need to fear Ryanair as you are going after a different type of passenger. Maybe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Mumha


    Fabio wrote: »
    But the thing is, a lot of business passengers with the larger companies in Cork do not use Ryanair. They use the legacy airlines which connect them to other flights. Could we tap into that instead? That way there isn't a need to fear Ryanair as you are going after a different type of passenger. Maybe.

    Look at what they've done though....Forced Easyjet out of Cork - Gatwick by putting on way more flights and loads of them were free or for half nothing. They did the same to Aer Arran on Cork - Dublin, and the same again to Wizzair to all those 5 Polish airports, not to even mention, nationally, trying to takeover Aer Lingus. I'm not saying Aer Lingus are saints in that regard (Avair and Jet Magic), but Ryanair are way bigger than most European Airlines and act like a bully without being touched by the EU.


  • Registered Users Posts: 542 ✭✭✭Nemanrio


    Mumha wrote: »
    There are a number of problems, before you consider the marketing of Cork.
    1. Ryanair will dump 1000s of free seats on a route to drive any competitor out. Completely anti competitive.
    2. 2. Utterly ineffectual CAA management...time watchers
    3. 3. Extraordinarily inept politicians of all parties, in Cork


    Airport management fear and loathe Ryanair, and in some respects with just cause. No other big airline will chance coming into Cork while Ryanair are unstoppable in their anti-competitive practises.

    As long as Ryanair provide good routes at a good price,that'll be enough for me & most people. Never had an issue with them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 526 ✭✭✭corkonion


    Nemanrio wrote: »
    As long as Ryanair provide good routes at a good price,that'll be enough for me & most people. Never had an issue with them.

    You are missing the point, Ryanair don't provide new routes in Cork at all, they only copy routes that have been already served by other airlines and they slash their prices until they force the competition out, then they reduce, eliminate or transfer the route to shannon, they have done this on many eastern european routes and the Cork/Dublin route. The only airline to have held tough in Cork is Aer lingus, but they have forced many others out. We have lost many servers such as wizz air, easyjet, BA, bmi, jet2, etc, and each one was pushed out in the same manner. Now for the first time in living memory no scheduled foreign airline flies in or out of Cork airport


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 542 ✭✭✭Nemanrio


    corkonion wrote: »
    You are missing the point, Ryanair don't provide new routes in Cork at all, they only copy routes that have been already served by other airlines and they slash their prices until they force the competition out, then they reduce, eliminate or transfer the route to shannon, they have done this on many eastern european routes and the Cork/Dublin route. The only airline to have held tough in Cork is Aer lingus, but they have forced many others out. We have lost many servers such as wizz air, easyjet, BA, bmi, jet2, etc, and each one was pushed out in the same manner. Now for the first time in living memory no scheduled foreign airline flies in or out of Cork airport

    Fair enough,but if ryanair actually kept these routes then that would be something.

    On another note, once ryanair has left,couldn't some of these carriers come back again?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,553 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Nemanrio wrote: »
    Fair enough,but if ryanair actually kept these routes then that would be something.

    On another note, once ryanair has left,couldn't some of these carriers come back again?

    Because Ryanair will continue to repeat the exercise until the foreign airlines realise this will happen every single time they attempt new flights into Cork.

    It is an anti-competitive practice and there should be some sort of law against it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 526 ✭✭✭corkonion


    Because Ryanair will continue to repeat the exercise until the foreign airlines realise this will happen every single time they attempt new flights into Cork.

    It is an anti-competitive practice and there should be some sort of law against it.

    Yes, but the opposite is the case in law, Ryanair cannot currently be prevented from doing this as to do so would be deemed to be anti competitive.....crazy!!

    Cork airport is in real trouble, Having its main competitor (Dublin Airport Authority) manage it is laughable, having inept politicians watch its continuous demise while subsidising other airports and air routes is a disgrace and allowing Ryanair to push every other carrier aside is madness, without some real meaningful intervention there is no hope of reviving this airports fortunes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,112 ✭✭✭notharrypotter


    without some real meaningful intervention

    Could you elaborate as to what you would consider "real meaningful intervention".

    I have followed this thread with interest.
    There are social realities and economic realities.

    Social realities accept that society will subsidize some of the more remote areas.

    Economic realities are more obvious but rarely nice.


    In aviation terms Donegal is in the first category, Kerry sort of makes it too.
    Cork airport is in real trouble,
    Not just Cork.
    Knock/Shannon/Cork/Waterford all in middle ground.
    Too close to the center to be deemed as needing artificial support.
    Any local politico attempting to artificially boost "their" airport will soon find themselves under investigation under the state aid rules.

    The EU has redefined what it views as acceptable for state aid for airports and it uses a sliding scale for how much the taxpayer can donate.

    There will be allowances where an airport is absolutely necessary for connectivity.
    This is the one that Knock will be hanging their future on.

    Ryanair is providing cheap connections to the airports it serves.
    This subtle point is lost on most people.

    If you are sharing the cost with 180 others then the average unit price is low.
    If not then the price increases pro-rata.
    Until a point is reached where it is not viable to provide a service at a price that people are willing to pay.

    This is the situation that we now find ourselves in.


    There will for the foreseeable future a service that the majority of the people want at a price they are willing to pay.
    There is just not going to be a service to every desirable destination simply for the reasons outlined above.

    Dublin is in a different league.


  • Registered Users Posts: 526 ✭✭✭corkonion


    Could you elaborate as to what you would consider "real meaningful intervention".

    I have followed this thread with interest.
    There are social realities and economic realities.

    Social realities accept that society will subsidize some of the more remote areas.

    Economic realities are more obvious but rarely nice.


    In aviation terms Donegal is in the first category, Kerry sort of makes it too.


    Not just Cork.
    Knock/Shannon/Cork/Waterford all in middle ground.
    Too close to the center to be deemed as needing artificial support.
    Any local politico attempting to artificially boost "their" airport will soon find themselves under investigation under the state aid rules.

    The EU has redefined what it views as acceptable for state aid for airports and it uses a sliding scale for how much the taxpayer can donate.

    There will be allowances where an airport is absolutely necessary for connectivity.
    This is the one that Knock will be hanging their future on.

    Ryanair is providing cheap connections to the airports it serves.
    This subtle point is lost on most people.

    If you are sharing the cost with 180 others then the average unit price is low.
    If not then the price increases pro-rata.
    Until a point is reached where it is not viable to provide a service at a price that people are willing to pay.

    This is the situation that we now find ourselves in.


    There will for the foreseeable future a service that the majority of the people want at a price they are willing to pay.
    There is just not going to be a service to every desirable destination simply for the reasons outlined above.

    Dublin is in a different league.


    It's absurd to say that local politicians cannot lobby for their local Airport.
    Real meaningful intervention would be to remove the Daa in every way from Cork Airport as they are direct competitors, The Daa insist on levying the same charges on Cork Airport as they do in Dublin and offer Airlines a fraction of the incentives Shannon offer to new Airlines (it costs every airline circa €28 per passenger landed in Cork or Dublin in Airport charges), we are the only second city in europe that charge the same as the Capital.
    Shannon currently offer new route providers 5 years of zero charges, Daa offer one year in Cork and Dublin thereafter increasing yearly over the next few years.
    Shannon is growing routes and passengers since independence while Cork is in decline, Shannon on gaining independence from Daa was relieved of it's €100 million of debt and gets an estimated €13 million in rent from Shannon Development properties. I believe Cork politicians should lobby for a similar deal.
    The other intervention should be to review our anti competition laws to stop companies that blatantly squeeze others out by foul means, not just Airlines but large multinational retailers that practise similar techniques.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭Fabio


    They should lobby for the damn debt, which was promised to be written off, to be written off!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,112 ✭✭✭notharrypotter


    Fabio wrote: »
    They should lobby for the damn debt, which was promised to be written off, to be written off!

    Just been doing a bit of research.

    I know that a political promise was made for the debt to be written off.

    Do you know how much the debt actually was?


  • Registered Users Posts: 573 ✭✭✭rebs23


    Could you elaborate as to what you would consider "real meaningful intervention".

    I have followed this thread with interest.
    There are social realities and economic realities.

    Social realities accept that society will subsidize some of the more remote areas.

    Economic realities are more obvious but rarely nice.


    In aviation terms Donegal is in the first category, Kerry sort of makes it too.


    Not just Cork.
    Knock/Shannon/Cork/Waterford all in middle ground.
    Too close to the center to be deemed as needing artificial support.
    Any local politico attempting to artificially boost "their" airport will soon find themselves under investigation under the state aid rules.

    The EU has redefined what it views as acceptable for state aid for airports and it uses a sliding scale for how much the taxpayer can donate.

    There will be allowances where an airport is absolutely necessary for connectivity.
    This is the one that Knock will be hanging their future on.

    Ryanair is providing cheap connections to the airports it serves.
    This subtle point is lost on most people.

    If you are sharing the cost with 180 others then the average unit price is low.
    If not then the price increases pro-rata.
    Until a point is reached where it is not viable to provide a service at a price that people are willing to pay.

    This is the situation that we now find ourselves in.


    There will for the foreseeable future a service that the majority of the people want at a price they are willing to pay.
    There is just not going to be a service to every desirable destination simply for the reasons outlined above.

    Dublin is in a different league.
    All we want is fair competition between all the Airports. The annual subventions to Kerry and Waterford Airports is unfair. We do not need 4 airports in Munster.
    Shannon has had a semi state agency set up to support it with a significant rent roll from state property to support it as well as 100 million of debt wiped out so that Shannon can afford to tell Airlines move your flights from Cork to Shannon and we won't charge you anything. That is unfair state aided competition with Shannon being propped up at the expense of Cork.
    I really don't understand what point you are trying to make or where you are coming from. I presume you want the airport to thrive in a fair competitive environment?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Mumha


    corkonion wrote: »
    Yes, but the opposite is the case in law, Ryanair cannot currently be prevented from doing this as to do so would be deemed to be anti competitive.....crazy!!

    Cork airport is in real trouble, Having its main competitor (Dublin Airport Authority) manage it is laughable, having inept politicians watch its continuous demise while subsidising other airports and air routes is a disgrace and allowing Ryanair to push every other carrier aside is madness, without some real meaningful intervention there is no hope of reviving this airports fortunes.

    1000% agree.

    What needs to happen is for Cork politicians to create a continuous stink about it. Make complaints to the Irish Competition Authority, the European Competition Authority, the Dept of Transport, the media etc. I'm surprised that no Government politician has taken this on as a crusade - this directly affects Cork jobs. Fianna Fail have zero credibility on this, since the DAA/Aer Rianta has been a FF closed shop for 60 years. One would have thought that those working at Cork Airport would be up in arms over this, but many are minding their jobs, especially the CAA management.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,112 ✭✭✭notharrypotter


    The annual subventions to Kerry and Waterford Airports is unfair.
    What is the annual subvention for Waterford/Kerry?
    We do not need 4 airports in Munster.
    2013 consultation paper for a national Aviation Policy; page 6
    Ireland has a relatively well developed airport infrastructure..... If we were to build our airports from scratch, we would not have as many and most of them would be located in a different place, connected to railway lines and motorways and more central to their catchment area.
    You are thinking too small.
    Probably needing 4 in the country is a stretch.

    Shannon has had a semi state agency set up to support it with a significant rent roll from state property to support it as well as 100 million of debt wiped out
    Go to google maps/street view and actually look at many of the buildings in the industrial estate beside Shannon. Most are old and decrepit. I suspect that most of the rent roll for the foreseeable future will be spent trying to make them suitable for the modern era. "Pig in a poke" I think.

    I did some research last night on the "debt waiver" that was promised.

    The problem seems that Cork was 220 million in a hole. This would have crippled the DAA at the time. So they wanted Cork Airport to assume some 100million, sharing the burden so to speak

    In real terms Cork was coming out ahead of Shannon by getting 120million wiped off.
    That is unfair state aided competition with Shannon being propped up at the expense of Cork.
    I think that you are missing the point that cork is currently being propped up by the DAA.
    One would have thought that those working at Cork Airport would be up in arms over this, but many are minding their jobs,
    Irish Indo 3 JUNE 2014 and

    Irish Examiner 3 JUNE 2014

    Leo Varadker.
    He added, however, that if Cork Airport secured its independence now, the airport "would immediately" be loss-making. Unlike Shannon Airport, Cork Airport's operating costs substantially exceed its revenues," he said.
    Ryanair operations are exactly the same as ALDI/LIDL/TESCO/DUNNES.

    If they want to build a store and bring lower prices people see this as a good thing.

    Meanwhile a load of small shops close and people bemoan their loss and the jobs that have gone. However ultimately the consumer has benefited by the lower prices and greater range of "OWN BRAND" products supplementing the usual named brands.
    In aviation terms the Ryanairs of this world will provide plenty of cheap seats to/from airports that they serve, "own brand" so to speak.



    Overall consumers are benefiting.

    This is the single market and competition at work.
    There will always be elements that people do not like and they are free to choose what they want.

    Kilmeaden hand cut cheddar 180g €2 [Aer Lingus to Heathrow]
    Own brand cheddar block 200g €1.80. [Ryanair to Stansted]
    Marys goats cheese with chives 150g €4. [Euromanx to Belfast]

    Consumer choice!




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 573 ✭✭✭rebs23


    What is the annual subvention for Waterford/Kerry?

    2013 consultation paper for a national Aviation Policy; page 6
    You are thinking too small.
    Probably needing 4 in the country is a stretch.


    Go to google maps/street view and actually look at many of the buildings in the industrial estate beside Shannon. Most are old and decrepit. I suspect that most of the rent roll for the foreseeable future will be spent trying to make them suitable for the modern era. "Pig in a poke" I think.

    I did some research last night on the "debt waiver" that was promised.

    The problem seems that Cork was 220 million in a hole. This would have crippled the DAA at the time. So they wanted Cork Airport to assume some 100million, sharing the burden so to speak

    In real terms Cork was coming out ahead of Shannon by getting 120million wiped off.
    I think that you are missing the point that cork is currently being propped up by the DAA.

    Irish Indo 3 JUNE 2014 and

    Irish Examiner 3 JUNE 2014

    Ryanair operations are exactly the same as ALDI/LIDL/TESCO/DUNNES.

    If they want to build a store and bring lower prices people see this as a good thing.

    Meanwhile a load of small shops close and people bemoan their loss and the jobs that have gone. However ultimately the consumer has benefited by the lower prices and greater range of "OWN BRAND" products supplementing the usual named brands.
    In aviation terms the Ryanairs of this world will provide plenty of cheap seats to/from airports that they serve, "own brand" so to speak.



    Overall consumers are benefiting.

    This is the single market and competition at work.
    There will always be elements that people do not like and they are free to choose what they want.

    Kilmeaden hand cut cheddar 180g €2 [Aer Lingus to Heathrow]
    Own brand cheddar block 200g €1.80. [Ryanair to Stansted]
    Marys goats cheese with chives 150g €4. [Euromanx to Belfast]

    Consumer choice!


    What are you on about, seriously?
    Cork Airport has not been allowed off with any debt, the key word in your own quote is the word "was". As for the DAA propping up Cork Airport, one of the reasons the DAA cannot in their opinion leave Cork on its own is because it would wipe out a significant "asset" on their accounts. So are you suggesting that the DAA should sell off Cork Airport? How about the DAA debt for T2 of around €1.6 bn.
    You are really being disingenuous with you asking about Kerry and Waterford airports as you obviously know they recieve annual grants.
    https://www.kildarestreet.com/wrans/?id=2014-03-13a.796 and a further list here in relation to capital grants which is shocking;
    http://www.independent.ie/business/irish/knock-top-of-the-pack-for-regional-airport-grants-26277115.html
    https://www.kildarestreet.com/debates/?id=2014-06-18a.318

    "Under the current contract, which ends in November, a total of almost €12 million will have been paid to Aer Arann-Stobart Air in respect of the Dublin to Kerry route"

    And then you go on about Aldi and free and fair competition.
    You really only seem to be interested in defending the indefensible and the great deal that Shannon Airport recieved.
    The issue in relation to the property that Shannon Airport now effectively owns is that there is a considerable rent roll from these state owned properties. Whether some of them need investment or not is irrelevant these properties have been simply been handed over to the semi state agency in control of Shannon Airport. So the State lets them off with over €100 million in debt and Shannon also gets a significant rent roll from state property that has simply been handed over to them. It is shocking stuff IMO.
    This is the issue for Cork Airport the massive amount of State support for Shannon, Kerry and Waterford airports which means the undermining of Cork Airport by state policy. This is the issue.
    Let us compete on the exact same basis in a free and open competitive environment with the other airports in our region.


  • Registered Users Posts: 195 ✭✭Pitcairn


    It should be noted Cork Airport makes an operating profit each year.
    It is the interest payments on the terminal and depreciation costs which mean they post a loss overall.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,112 ✭✭✭notharrypotter


    You are really being disingenuous with you asking about Kerry and Waterford airports as you obviously know they recieve annual grants
    I am well aware of the support's that they receive.
    My query related to a comment from "rebs23" post 208 and post229 which inferred that the support should be withdrawn from Waterford/Kerry and redirected to Cork.
    I was querying as to how much real difference this would make to Cork's operation.
    From Waterford forum 2013 passenger numbers in Waterford are roughly 30,000. Most of which would wind up using Dublin if Waterford closed.

    Regarding Kerry it will have a strong claim to continued funding in the short term due to the alleged peripheral nature of the county.
    From the dail quote
    It is expected that a limited budget of some €12 million per annum will be available for current and capital expenditure under the regional airports programme from 2015 onwards.
    This will be shared by Knock/Kerry/Waterford/Sligo/Donegal so its not a whole lot.


    Again quoting from rebs23 post 232
    Under the current contract, which ends in November, a total of almost €12 million will have been paid to Aer Arann-Stobart Air in respect of the Dublin to Kerry route"
    Only problem is that Kerry only benefits indirectly from this.
    The major benefit would accrue to Stobart Air and the DAA for 2 reasons.
    1 Stobart will get the lions share of the money and 2 the DAA will get the passengers.
    And then you go on about Aldi and free and fair competition.
    My point related to the fact that on average more people benefit while in some respects choice is actually being reduced.
    Let us compete on the exact same basis in a free and open competitive environment with the other airports in our region.
    Not quite you want a write off of 220 million and to take the asset free gratis.

    Pitcairn wrote: »
    It should be noted Cork Airport makes an operating profit each year.
    It is the interest payments on the terminal and depreciation costs which mean they post a loss overall.

    That's exactly what Leo Varadker said.

    one of the reasons the DAA cannot in their opinion leave Cork on its own is because it would wipe out a significant "asset" on their accounts
    From what I can see is that people wanted the "asset" free and the debt left with the DAA.

    Problem with this strategy was the value of what was left would not support the debt pile
    debt for T2 of around €1.6 bn.
    and further expansion at Dublin.

    Hence the DAA wanted some sharing of the load.


    However this is drifting off thread slightly.
    To drag things back on topic.
    Do I believe that there will be new routes in Cork?
    Yes.
    When will they be launched.
    No idea but I would suspect 2016 as a more realistic time frame.
    My belief is simply as the economy recovers so too will Aviation.
    Do I believe there will be a lot of new destinations?
    No.

    Do I believe that Cork/Shannon/Knock/Kerry/Waterford/Sligo/Donegal airports will all expand significantly?
    No.

    Main task for the afore mentioned group is to hold what they have and build on that.

    Core business for Cork/Shannon/Knock/Kerry will be sun routes and UK.

    Anything else would be most likely seasonal.

    BTW the indo link is for 2007 before the crash. Look for the "value for money" report which was done subsequent to that.
    Significant cuts were imposed to the plan.


  • Registered Users Posts: 573 ✭✭✭rebs23


    Can't figure out where you are coming from as you still are sidestepping the massive unfair competitive advantage that has been handed to Shannon from the state and having four airports in the one province is simply unsustainable. Cork Airport should be allowed compete on a fair basis. it remains a fact that Kerry airport receives a subsidy to keep it viable and Waterford received a capital grant last year for a runway extension.
    As for Cork Airport being for sun routes in the future that is simply insulting.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,112 ✭✭✭notharrypotter


    Can't figure out where you are coming from as you still are sidestepping the massive unfair competitive advantage that has been handed to Shannon from the state
    Not quiet I just don't think its all its cracked up to be.

    However you are disregarding the 220 million hand out Cork is getting from the DAA.
    having four airports in the one province is simply unsustainable
    Having 4 airports on the island is not sustainable, see my comment in post 231.
    it remains a fact that Kerry airport receives a subsidy to keep it viable and Waterford received a capital grant last year for a runway extension.
    I am well aware of those facts.

    As I said closing Waterford will make marginal savings to the exchequer and almost zero difference to Cork.
    Most passengers will simply go to Dublin.
    That been said the SAR helicopter is based in Waterford so no danger of it closing any time soon.

    Also Kerry is better positioned long term to use the peripheral card.

    As for Cork Airport being for sun routes in the future that is simply insulting
    Why? Do you not like going away on holidays?

    My actual comment is.
    Core business for Cork/Shannon/Knock/Kerry will be sun routes and UK.

    Anything else would be most likely seasonal.


  • Registered Users Posts: 573 ✭✭✭rebs23


    What 220 million handout are you talking about? That is seriously disingenuous to claim that! It simply has not occurred.
    Still again what is your point? Most people on this thread are making the strong point about theunfair competition facing Cork airport from the massive handout of free property and a debt write off worth over 100 million handed out to Shannon. We are also making the point about the annual subsidy to Kerry and Waterford Airports.
    You seem to agree in your last post but only disagree on the scale of the support.
    Therefore surely you would agree with our points that Cork Airports development and our ability to get new flights is being hindered by Shannon Airport able to offer zero passenger charges due to this debt write off while Cork has to charge 9 euro roughly per passenger.
    A lot of the new flights from Shannon were originally routes out of Cork airport. I mean seriously state property simply being handed over to the operators of Shannon Airport and here while we're at it we'll wipe out your debt.
    You seem to have a strong vested interest in this issue?


  • Registered Users Posts: 573 ✭✭✭rebs23




    Why? Do you not like going away on holidays?is.
    That comment says it all about you and whatever point you are trying to make. Sure us culchies down the country only use airports for going on holidays. :mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,112 ✭✭✭notharrypotter


    rebs23 wrote: »
    That comment says it all about you and whatever point you are trying to make. Sure us culchies down the country only use airports for going on holidays. :mad:

    You appear to be misunderstanding my post.
    My point is that for the airports outside Dublin the core market will be sun holidays and UK.

    Wishful thinking is not going to change this.

    Get your core market right and you have a solid base.

    Everything else then is a bonus.
    Shannon Airport able to offer zero passenger charges
    Any airport that doesn't charge for its facilities is going bust quickly.
    while Cork has to charge 9 euro roughly per passenger.
    Can anyone actually post a link to what each airport actually charges?
    You are quoting €9 while other say €28. Post 226 refers.

    From PPRUNE Cork forum 5113 and 5115 would appear to indicate that Cork's charges may be different to Dublin.

    The official DAA charges are here.

    All airports (Cork included) offer incentivised charges for new business.
    This is usually on a sliding scale over 3 to 5 years.
    DAA incentivised scheme 2014-2016.
    Cork version is here.

    A lot of the new flights from Shannon were originally routes out of Cork airport

    Stick around a year or so and Ryanair will move them to Kerry or Knock.
    What 220 million handout are you talking about?
    The cost of the new terminal and stuff in Cork which is currently being carried on the DAA balance sheet.
    the unfair competition facing
    I see both sides getting a bung here.
    We are also making the point about the annual subsidy to Kerry and Waterford Airports.
    You are getting hand out from the DAA.

    The natives in Kerry and Waterford would both feel aggrieved at an arm of the state supporting their competition.

    They would see the support from the government as facilitating necessary connectivity to they periphery of the island.

    The point I made was that both of those airports would have a strong public claim to need support.
    surely you would agree with our points that Cork Airports development and our ability to get new flights is being hindered by Shannon Airport able to offer zero passenger charges due to this debt write off while Cork has to charge 9 euro roughly per passenger.
    No I don't.

    The country is too small. Outside of Dublin there simply isn't the demand.

    My belief remains, based on the draft Aviation Policy proposal, that Cork/Shannon and Knock/Kerry will only grow marginally over the coming years.
    I mean seriously state property simply being handed over to the operators of Shannon Airport and here while we're at it we'll wipe out your debt.
    But yet this exactly what you want for Cork.
    You seem to have a strong vested interest in this issue?
    Nope I am not a jackeen but I am in a lucky position that when I can go on holidays I have a choice of airports.

    If one or more went I would be sad for the jobs that would be lost but that's it.

    I do notice that people get very possessive of "their" airport.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,172 ✭✭✭shnaek


    Not quite you want a write off of 220 million and to take the asset free gratis.

    But wasn't it the DAA who built that terminal? If Cork were independent from the start I doubt they would have spent such a ludicrous amount of money when an airport like HAHN would have worked perfectly and would have been much cheaper. The DAA seem very keen on spending money on massive terminals (1.6bn on Dublin) so perhaps it should be the CAA running Dublin instead of the other way around :cool:

    (BTW - I think they're all incompetent, for the record)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Mumha



    The cost of the new terminal and stuff in Cork which is currently being carried on the DAA balance sheet.
    I see both sides getting a bung here.

    You are getting hand out from the DAA.

    You're embarrassing yourself, you haven't a clue.

    The deal was, that the DAA (the former Aer Rianta) would take on the debt of the new Cork terminal, in return for them keeping all of the Great Southern hotels. Instead, the DAA did the dirt by flogging the GSH for €250m, and then reneging on the Cork Airport agreement, letting the €210m debt on the Cork balance sheet. Bertie wouldn't do anything for Cork Airport because he was only concerned with Dublin, and Dublin Airport was the Fianna Fail plaything.

    The DAA held all the aces, as the Cork Airport Authority only came into existence when the new terminal was handed over. They handed out all the gold plated contracts out to their buddies when the airport was being built, fitted out and tenanted. And then walked away.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement