Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

I Made A Complaint To The HSE

Options
  • 14-11-2013 8:02pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 272 ✭✭


    Following from a previous thread about smoking on campus I made a complaint to the HSE about the no smoking area in front of the Arts block.

    Last Tuesday they sent an inspector around. You might notice there are more HSE notifications in that area. They also contacted the University Safety Officer. Security will be beefed up in that area. New measures will be taken to insure compliance in the area and Follow up inspections will take place in the near future.

    I'm fairly happy with that.


«13

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6 cballrun


    Congratulations


  • Registered Users Posts: 891 ✭✭✭JPCN1


    UCDCritic wrote: »
    Following from a previous thread about smoking on campus I made a complaint to the HSE about the no smoking area in front of the Arts block.

    Last Tuesday they sent an inspector around. You might notice there are more HSE notifications in that area. They also contacted the University Safety Officer. Security will be beefed up in that area. New measures will be taken to insure compliance in the area and Follow up inspections will take place in the near future.

    I'm fairly happy with that.

    Says a great deal about you and it's not good.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭AndonHandon


    Smoking is slow suicide. Smokers are mentally ill.


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭bringupthebook


    I thought it was worse than ever yesterday. I walked into arts cafe stinking of smoke!


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    JPCN1 wrote: »
    Says a great deal about you and it's not good.

    Well, it is a valid complaint to be fair. However I would hope that proper procedure was followed and they didn't jump straight to the HSE. i.e. Formal complaint to building services, then the internal UCD councils etc.

    Personally have very little regard for those that jump the ladder of proper checks and balances i.e. Have a problem with a shop and go straight to the Small Claims Court without first trying to solve the issue at 'ground level' so to speak.

    Anyway, have no idea why you told us :confused: I doubt you are the only one and definitely not the first.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,880 ✭✭✭Raphael


    Fair play, I noticed during the open day there was a letter from the HSE next to all the signs, and a loud speaker telling people not to smoke there. On that day, at least, it was completely clear. It's always pissed me off royally how UCD just put signs up there and then ignored the fact that nothing had changed.
    ironclaw wrote: »
    Anyway, have no idea why you told us :confused: I doubt you are the only one and definitely not the first.

    I imagine because every second post UCDCritic makes elicts the response "Why not make a complaint about it then, instead of just complaining on boards"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 272 ✭✭UCDCritic


    JPCN1 wrote: »
    Says a great deal about you and it's not good.

    Why is it not good?
    ironclaw wrote: »
    However I would hope that proper procedure was followed and they didn't jump straight to the HSE. i.e. Formal complaint to building services, then the internal UCD councils etc.

    Personally have very little regard for those that jump the ladder of proper checks and balances i.e. Have a problem with a shop and go straight to the Small Claims Court without first trying to solve the issue at 'ground level' so to speak.

    Anyway, have no idea why you told us :confused: I doubt you are the only one and definitely not the first.

    In previous post I mentioned that I went to buildings services and they told me that they basically weren't going to enforce the no smoking rule.

    Anyway, if you read the notices it gives contact information where you can directly contact someone in the HSE. So you're entitled to go to the HSE directly if you wish.

    Why do some people see me posting about this as a negative. This is a forum for UCD. You should post UCD related stuff here.

    We should use this forum to communicate about UCD related issues and make UCD a better place.

    I personally find the SU exclusive and unfriendly. You can only get in there if you're already friends with the people already there.

    I'm not willing to try and fight my way in.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6 cballrun


    UCDCritic wrote: »
    Why is it not good?



    In previous post I mentioned that I went to buildings services and they told me that they basically weren't going to enforce the no smoking rule.

    Anyway, if you read the notices it gives contact information where you can directly contact someone in the HSE. So you're entitled to go to the HSE directly if you wish.

    Why do some people see me posting about this as a negative. This is a forum for UCD. You should post UCD related stuff here.

    We should use this forum to communicate about UCD related issues and make UCD a better place.

    I personally find the SU exclusive and unfriendly. You can only get in there if you're already friends with the people already there.

    I'm not willing to try and fight my way in.

    You absolutely did the right thing, and I wish there were more that are as civic minded as you.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    cballrun wrote: »
    You absolutely did the right thing, and I wish there were more that are as civic minded as you.

    Well, thats a thin line. Plenty of civic people here as can be shown by the various 'Can anyone tell me about X or what is course Y like' etc threads.

    Walking through the smoke outside Arts is the same as walking down the street and someone puffing away in front of you. Or walking into a pub and people smoking at the door. Only reason people have a problem with Arts is because there are signs you can't smoke there. I don't have an issue with it personally and I'm not a smoker. People smoking is a fact of life, as long as its outside I really don't care.

    So rather than address the issue i.e. Student Smokers attitude, some poor lad or lass in the Arts Building Services got it in the neck by the HSE. Doesn't seem too civic to me. People can be pretty brave writing a letter but unless they are willing to confront someone at the door of Arts, then put the pen away as its the same as being a keyboard warrior. I'm not saying stand outside with a sign and petition, but if you want to write a letter to the HSE you should have the guts to walk up to someone smoking and ask them to move. Don't be handing the problem off to someone else ;)

    Just my opinion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 272 ✭✭UCDCritic


    ironclaw wrote: »
    Walking through the smoke outside Arts is the same as walking down the street and someone puffing away in front of you. Or walking into a pub and people smoking at the door.

    That is absolute non sense.

    The area in front of the Arts cafe is surrounded on three sides by walls. No comparison to walking down the street or walking into a pub through smokers which would be an open area. The reason it's a no smoking area is because it's surrounded by three walls and a smoke cloud gathers there.
    ironclaw wrote: »
    So rather than address the issue i.e. Student Smokers attitude, some poor lad or lass in the Arts Building Services got it in the neck by the HSE. Doesn't seem too civic to me.

    You're twisting it now. How do you know someone got it in the neck? Do you work there? How can you verify your claim? You're writing non sense. I'm sure the HSE handled the issue professionally.
    ironclaw wrote: »
    People can be pretty brave writing a letter but unless they are willing to confront someone at the door of Arts, then put the pen away as its the same as being a keyboard warrior.

    As if any confrontation is going to take place. That's not how adults handle issues. You really think I have all day to speak to each individual who stands there. Get a grip. I went about the issue in the proper manner. As already stated, I or anyone else can contact the HSE directly if we wish.
    ironclaw wrote: »
    I'm not saying stand outside with a sign and petition, but if you want to write a letter to the HSE you should have the guts to walk up to someone smoking and ask them to move. Don't be handing the problem off to someone else ;)

    Just my opinion.

    I have plenty of guts, BELIEVE ME. Again, its about going about the issue in the proper manner. Perhaps you don't like bureaucracy but at least it stops confrontations and fighting which is a more civil way to live life.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 126 ✭✭Vorophobe


    I wish they'd just give the arts crowd a dedicated smoking area, in a place that was quick to get to and more appealing than the front of the building.

    Is that outside gardeny area between the arts blocks ever used? Put a few chairs down there and a small undercover area and I'm sure they'd use that


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,246 ✭✭✭✭Riamfada


    Yeah Id like to be able to sit at the wall and have some tea without getting fumigated. Surely UCD could hand out a few fines.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,193 ✭✭✭[Jackass]


    UCDCritic wrote: »
    Following from a previous thread about smoking on campus I made a complaint to the HSE about the no smoking area in front of the Arts block.

    Last Tuesday they sent an inspector around. You might notice there are more HSE notifications in that area. They also contacted the University Safety Officer. Security will be beefed up in that area. New measures will be taken to insure compliance in the area and Follow up inspections will take place in the near future.

    I'm fairly happy with that.

    Do you also make sure to mention to your lecturer that she forgot to give the class homework before the lecture is over?

    I get that people don't like smoke in that area, but it takes all of two seconds to walk past and is one of the only sheltered areas on the entire campus where a smoker can sit and smoke (whilst still freezing but at least dry). Are all the warm cafe's etc. not enough for the non smokers? It's one 20 x 20 foot area on a campus of hundreds of acres, and people are complaining to the HSE :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,880 ✭✭✭Raphael


    It's an enclosed area outside the main entrance to one of the busiest buildings on campus. While it's 'only' one small area, it's also a bottleneck that literally thousands of people go through multiple times daily. Given that 7% of the adult population suffers from asthma, I guarantee that there are people who have to detour around there to avoid giving themselves health problems.

    Your freedom to have a nice dry smoke should not trump peoples freedom to come and go from the building they work/study in without worrying for their health.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,193 ✭✭✭[Jackass]


    That's all fair enough, but smokers carry more than their fair share of the brunt for their habbit. Banned from almost every building on the Island, pay taxes well in excess of the cost of treating their smoking related ailments - tossed away, lonely and penniless, like a homeless lepper in the freezing cold and sweeping rain. Is it so unreasonable that we may infringe on your precious little space for a second and have a smoke!! :pac:

    Take issue with the college spending millions on a new lake (cause that's what was needed) and not providing adequete facilities for smokers - a substantial portion of the population also (more than 7%!) and if you don't agree with smoking, then I hope you are equally as disgusted by people who drink (and you don't drink yourself!) because drinkers kill a sh*t load more innocent third party people every year than smokers do!


  • Registered Users Posts: 934 ✭✭✭OneOfThem Stumbled


    [Jackass] wrote: »
    Take issue with the college spending millions on a new lake (cause that's what was needed) and not providing adequete facilities for smokers - a substantial portion of the population also

    This is the real salient bit.

    The arts block has recently spent money on re-fenestration, knocking down walls to make windows, recovering the flat roof, fake partition walls (for fire safety), whole-scale change of the basement, decking, a new lecture theatre, refurbished lavatories, replaced SUAS computers....

    AND A MEGAPHONE at the door to say "no smoking in this area"...

    and they couldn't "afford" to build a small shelter near the building? The most ideal area would actually be on the decking area, wouldn't be too hard to make it pretty, useful, easy walking for smokers, and simple to avoid for non-smokers.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,246 ✭✭✭✭Riamfada


    I think the thing here is that this is actually a non smoking area. Its not an area for contention or discussion. Its an area specifically stated that it is forbidden to smoke in. Yet people feel they can just ignore this and smoke away. Legally you may as well just stand inside the arts cafe and smoke because this is also a non smoking area.The college really need to do something about this.

    [Jackass] your arguments are sort of immature and do not make much sense. I don't think people would have an issue with you smoking in an area where it is permissible to smoke but actually smoking in a non smoking area should be punishable.

    Let me just throw out an hypothetical question, if you were in a building (abroad) and there was a no smoking sign would you stand in front of the no smoking sign smoking or would you light up somewhere else?

    I smoked for 10+ years by the way. Four of them by the arts cafe wall, admittedly before it was a non smoking section. I never really grasped how offensive and rude it was to smoke there until I came back to UCD as a non smoker.


  • Registered Users Posts: 614 ✭✭✭beardedmaster


    [Jackass] wrote: »
    That's all fair enough, but smokers carry more than their fair share of the brunt for their habbit.





    a777.gif?v11301bss2

    :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    Couldn't they solve the Arts Block porch smoking problem by building a canopy over that area of decking just to the left of the Arts Block porch?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    [Jackass] wrote: »
    That's all fair enough, but smokers carry more than their fair share of the brunt for their habbit. Banned from almost every building on the Island, pay taxes well in excess of the cost of treating their smoking related ailments - tossed away, lonely and penniless, like a homeless lepper in the freezing cold and sweeping rain. Is it so unreasonable that we may infringe on your precious little space for a second and have a smoke!! :pac:

    Take issue with the college spending millions on a new lake (cause that's what was needed) and not providing adequete facilities for smokers - a substantial portion of the population also (more than 7%!) and if you don't agree with smoking, then I hope you are equally as disgusted by people who drink (and you don't drink yourself!) because drinkers kill a sh*t load more innocent third party people every year than smokers do!

    Just two points on that:

    A smoking shelter benefits the minority that smoke. A green area benefits the entire student body. So an absolute mute point. Its countrywide policy that you can't smoke indoors, so the minority should not have to be accommodated with specialist facilities. Also, most corporate bodies don't provide such facilities on campus's, so its kinda a 'get use to it' sort of deal.

    Its a discretionary 'tax' because you smoke. If you don't want to pay it, then don't smoke. It boggles the mind how someone can part take in a habit that has an incredibly high probability of killing you or seriously harming your health :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,320 ✭✭✭Chet T16


    ironclaw wrote: »
    Just two points on that:

    A smoking shelter benefits the minority that smoke. A green area benefits the entire student body. So an absolute mute point. Its countrywide policy that you can't smoke indoors, so the minority should not have to be accommodated with specialist facilities. Also, most corporate bodies don't provide such facilities on campus's, so its kinda a 'get use to it' sort of deal.

    Its a discretionary 'tax' because you smoke. If you don't want to pay it, then don't smoke. It boggles the mind how someone can part take in a habit that has an incredibly high probability of killing you or seriously harming your health :confused:

    I can't understand why anyone would want an iphone. :pac:

    I smoked for about 10 years, its not a habit its a pretty horrible addiction. I feel sorry for people that smoke now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 934 ✭✭✭OneOfThem Stumbled


    ironclaw wrote: »
    Just two points on that:

    A smoking shelter benefits the minority that smoke. A green area benefits the entire student body. So an absolute mute point. Its countrywide policy that you can't smoke indoors, so the minority should not have to be accommodated with specialist facilities. Also, most corporate bodies don't provide such facilities on campus's, so its kinda a 'get use to it' sort of deal.


    Leaving aside all the other things pro and anti-smoking (because they aren't relevant here)

    I can't see how you think that that's an argument. Most students aren't postgraduates, therefore there shouldn't be any postgraduate study rooms.

    I mean... huh?

    Besides which, who mentioned green areas? A canopy in the decking area would be ideal. Mind you, that wood is starting to go a touch green.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 272 ✭✭UCDCritic


    Reading the comments I do feel sorry for the smokers.

    It reminds me of how in Holland they have a policy towards drug addicts that they are the victims, and so they treat them accordingly. They don't criminalize them. I'm not saying we are criminalizing the smokers but we should have more care for them.

    It would be nice for coverage to be set up for smokers away from entrances/exits.

    Maybe I'll leave my umbrella in the area, so one of them can pick it up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,880 ✭✭✭Raphael


    We could have a whipround and buy a few of these, bike lock them in place on the decking area.


  • Registered Users Posts: 107 ✭✭Dores


    It is not the same like a pub that you can choose to not go into or like a street where you can somehow manuewr to stay away from odour. It is space that you must pass to get inside the building to get education that you are entitled to without being poisoned every day.

    UCDCritic thank you for your time and effort.


  • Registered Users Posts: 107 ✭✭Dores


    UCDCritic wrote: »
    Reading the comments I do feel sorry for the smokers.

    It reminds me of how in Holland they have a policy towards drug addicts that they are the victims, and so they treat them accordingly. They don't criminalize them. I'm not saying we are criminalizing the smokers but we should have more care for them.

    It would be nice for coverage to be set up for smokers away from entrances/exits.

    Maybe I'll leave my umbrella in the area, so one of them can pick it up.

    Oh dear, maybe also leave a nice bottle of whisky for those who can't survive a day without it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,246 ✭✭✭✭Riamfada


    Could they not put up a security camera or two and then fine people accordingly? How does the smoking ban actually work?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 323 ✭✭hungry hippo 4


    Riamfada wrote: »
    Yeah Id like to be able to sit at the wall and have some tea without getting fumigated. Surely UCD could hand out a few fines.

    Does it have to be that wall. UCD is home to a massive campus! The pettiness here is incredible. I walk through where people smoke each day and never noticed the smoke as a problem! Its abit sad really that people are making an issue of this.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,572 ✭✭✭Canard


    Does it have to be that wall. UCD is home to a massive campus! The pettiness here is incredible. I walk through where people smoke each day and never noticed the smoke as a problem! Its abit sad really that people are making an issue of this.
    Walking through a cloud of smoke is disgusting if you don't smoke. The smell starts to linger when you walk through it multiple times per day. I also have asthma, but yeah, I'm being petty. Okay. Apply your own logic - why can't people smoke somewhere where you don't have to walk through the smoke just to get in the door?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,246 ✭✭✭✭Riamfada


    Does it have to be that wall. UCD is home to a massive campus! The pettiness here is incredible. I walk through where people smoke each day and never noticed the smoke as a problem! Its abit sad really that people are making an issue of this.

    If I was spilling my tea all over everyone in my vacinity, smelling obnoxiously and causing secondary tea induced illness to those around me in a non tea drinking area I would be more than happy to take my tea drinking elsewhere.


Advertisement