David Irving
Comments
-
John huston made a couple of documentaries on the war in the east. So? Hollywood was a big part of the US war effort, both in hearts and minds and used for expertise when documentary footage was required and lots of people from that industry waded in.
The film is shown as though it was a documentary but the people in it were being directed to act the part, trying to make it a more effective by playacting, it was shown afterwards as if it were reality but how much of it is faked or how much poetic license is used?
Its a small but important point, remember these films were shown throughout the world and are still shown without people knowing that at least some in the film are acting and are being directed etc.PS if Wilder wanted to gee up the Zionist angle why pick Buchenwald? There were as many Russians and other nationalities incarcerated there. It was an "international" camp.
Presumably he picked whichever camp was available/suitable for the job in hand. Remember also that many of the camps in the west were reputed/claimed to have been death camps and there were stories of gas chambers etc. Even today most people, I suspect, would think the western camps had gas chambers, I know I did until recently.0 -
Neutronale wrote: »Even today most people, I suspect, would think the western camps had gas chambers, I know I did until recently.
Given your comments to date on this forum I don't think anyone would be surprised.0 -
I kind of tend to disagree.
I think people of that ilk need to be called out and the ridiculousness of their assertions subject to scrutiny. They should post their 'evidence' for all to see, only then will they be seen for what they are.0 -
Neutronale wrote: »Are you going to confine your contribution to playing the man?Neutronale wrote: »Still cant resist the half-arsed insults :rolleyes:
You said you were finished ages ago...but you're still here...see u laterNeutronale wrote: »....
Join away, make sure you dont sneak back nowNeutronale wrote: »Aha, when you run out of arguments you turn to censorship, so much for free speech and democratic values :rolleyes:
There is a pattern in this thread as follows:
You make points that seem far fetched and link them loosely to comments on various right wing sites. There is no cohesion or even tentative links between most of your points. When numerous posters have pointed out some of the holes in your arguments you resort to throughaway shytogrophy like the comments quoted above. Due to the lack of any cohesive argument in your points I reckon you are trolling rather than actually misunderstanding what you are reading. You have a ban now for trolling for any of the above points. As it is your second ban due to repeat offence it will be made longer. I suggest you try reading some proper history lessons as your lack of knowledge in this subject shines through your half baked arguments.
Moderator0 -
Apologies to other forum users. I was away from computer for a few days and had not spotted the troll.
Maybe he would approve of my censorship!!!:pac:0 -
Advertisement
-
Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Join Date:Posts: 59075
Neutronale wrote: »The film is shown as though it was a documentary but the people in it were being directed to act the part, trying to make it a more effective by playacting, it was shown afterwards as if it were reality but how much of it is faked or how much poetic license is used?
Its a small but important point, remember these films were shown throughout the world and are still shown without people knowing that at least some in the film are acting and are being directed etc.jonniebgood1 wrote: »Given your comments to date on this forum I don't think anyone would be surprised.
Michael Bentine, him of the Goons and Potty time(for my peers ) wrote well IMHO on that particular abomination;
"Millions of words have been written about these horror camps, many of them by inmates of those unbelievable places. I've tried, without success, to describe it from my own point of view, but the words won't come. To me Belsen was the ultimate blasphemy.
After VE. Day I flew up to Denmark with Kelly, a West Indian pilot who was a close friend. As we climbed over Belsen, we saw the flame-throwing Bren carriers trundling through the camp – burning it to the ground. Our light Bf 108 rocked in the superheated air, as we sped above the curling smoke, and Kelly had the last words on it.
'Thank Christ for that,' he said, fervently.
And his words sounded like a benediction."
*EDIT*For me I like the irony of a Black West Indian bloke piloting a captured German aircraft over such a place. If ever there was a time that the "right side" won even with both good and ill on their part with it, this was the time. Yes there was Dresden et al, which many cite as war crimes and TBH I sympathise with that sentiment in many ways. However there was one clear difference. If Germany had surrendered then the Dresdens would have stopped and indeed they did. If Jews, Russians, Gypsies and all the rest had surrendered to the nazis the murder would have continued at an even faster pace.Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.
0 -
This kind of thread is sickening, Wibbs, but my guess is the name Belsen rings a bell with a lot of people in latter years because of the Sex Pistols, for example.
I haven't read back but did the banned one even mention Treblinka e.g. to claim it as a 'hoax'?
The reason I ask is this: do you have a summary of Gitta Sereny's work on the camps, not least on her clinical differentiation of different types of Lager?0 -
HansHolzel wrote: »I haven't read back but did the banned one even mention Treblinka e.g. to claim it as a 'hoax'?
[/I]?
The nature of irving in relation to this type of information is not to be so blatant. His message is usually concealed within well researched general information.0 -
Ireland's wannabe David Irving has had his 15 minutes of fame. From what I gather he has been banned off one thread, suspended off another for a week, one that he revived from the dead from 2009 incidentally!! and now he's off again. He was initially reluctant to post his opinions, I think I asked him for the 'one' that was the central doubt he had, but by God when he started he couldn't stop.
There was far too much jumping from one topic to another for anyone to be able to challenge him in any cohesive manner, and that was just the point. He bombarded the thread with multiple comments and questions as he just wasn't interested in engaging in educated discussions. How many more times will he be allowed to do this ? I'm a member of another History Forum an International one and Holocaust denial is not tolerated from the start. He needed to be ignored but it was hard to let him voice his lies without challenging them to set them straight. I fear we may not have heard the last from him0 -
Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Join Date:Posts: 59075
HansHolzel wrote: »This kind of thread is sickening, Wibbs, but my guess is the name Belsen rings a bell with a lot of people in latter years because of the Sex Pistols, for example.
What I find interesting about Bentine's quote above is that he sees Belson of all the camps "the ultimate blasphemy" and that was written a good while after the war ended. Yet today we'd likely put Auschwitz way ahead of it(of the surviving camps anyway).I haven't read back but did the banned one even mention Treblinka e.g. to claim it as a 'hoax'?
The reason I ask is this: do you have a summary of Gitta Sereny's work on the camps, not least on her clinical differentiation of different types of Lager?boomchicawawa wrote:How many more times will he be allowed to do this ? I'm a member of another History Forum an International one and Holocaust denial is not tolerated from the start.Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.
0 -
Advertisement
-
Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Join Date:Posts: 59075
On the point of the smaller details, with Belsen there are a couple of oddities. Belsen had no gas chambers, brutality, disease, starvation and overcrowding were the methods used. However one well known witness Shaul Ladany, who as a child was an inmate there claimed he actually went into the gas chamber in the camp, but was reprieved at the last moment. His testimony is repeated in many places, but it is clearly historically incorrect. He also claimed his family were "turned into soap" in Auschwitz. Also historically incorrect. Now he was a child at the time(under ten IIRC) so memories can play tricks at that age and he likely added in such details to an already incredibly traumatic time in his life*, but it can't be taken as historical fact.
*He then went on to survive the Munich Olympics massacre. Jesus.Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.
0 -
I agree 100% that trolls that won't engage should be taken out, but I think a blanket non discussion is not so good at all. No historical subject should be off limits or pickled forever as a given(in the details, not the overall of course), but that's just me.
I hear ye 'Wibbs' and I won't disagree because I'm torn on it myself, I do think that suppressing these people without airing the subject is wrong but as we've seen here, no matter what evidence you come up with, they will call black, white. Anything that's as plain as day to the majority was forged or falsified according to our 'friend'.
You could go around in circles all day with them. I know there were stories that have emanated over the last 70 years that have gone out in the public perception as true, but I'd prefer to leave it up to accredited historians to put these wrongs to right in a proper manner. I have read Jewish people bemoaning the fact that so many say they survived the camps that their numbers just don't add up. I know people have said this happened or that happened and they have been proved to be lying. But these stories will get ironed out in time.
Holocaust deniers have an agenda for many diverse reasons, many these days to use it as a stick to beat Israel with, they should have a voice if they are truly concerned with uncovering something they feel was untrue, but from our example here, it seems that our doubter has a shed load of things that he took exception too, meaning there was more of an agenda going on rather than a troubled soul who was just trying to uncover the truth.0 -
Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Join Date:Posts: 59075
boomchicawawa wrote: »I know there were stories that have emanated over the last 70 years that have gone out in the public perception as true, but I'd prefer to leave it up to accredited historians to put these wrongs to right in a proper manner. I have read Jewish people bemoaning the fact that so many say they survived the camps that their numbers just don't add up. I know people have said this happened or that happened and they have been proved to be lying. But these stories will get ironed out in time.Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.
0 -
What I find interesting about Bentine's quote above is that he sees Belson of all the camps "the ultimate blasphemy" and that was written a good while after the war ended. Yet today we'd likely put Auschwitz way ahead of it(of the surviving camps anyway).
But the Bergen-Belsen death toll was minuscule in comparison with Auschwitz-Birkenau and Treblinka, to give just two examples.0 -
I presume with Bentine it was the fact that he saw all the human suffering with his own eyes. There was a great drama made from the British Medical teams view about Belsen, even after the liberation they were losing 100's of inmates a day due to the disease and starvation that they had been subjected to. It took them a while to get the formula correct for the food as many could not digest properly anymore. I think the British were completely shocked to the core by what they saw there and it made them more aware that they really had been fighting evil.
In relation to the stories about the furniture and lampshades made out of human remains, would I be right in thinking the Martin Bormann's children had something to do with that account and it's be subsequently disputed ? I know my mother told me the 'soap' story when I was young, frightened the life out of me. These stories should be questioned and corrected In order that the deniers don't use them to prove their other half baked theories. Having seen the mountain of hair etc. at Auschwitz I can see how peoples imagination worked overtime to second guess perhaps what else was collected and for what purpose.0 -
Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Join Date:Posts: 59075
Oh yes but that was my point HH. That for someone of his generation Belsen was seen as above them*. Likely for the reason I gave earlier and what boomchicawawa notes above.
On the lampshade front it seems to have come from a few sources, but mostly hearsay and oft heard before the end of the war and the discovery of the reality of things. Ditto for the soap story. That had a long history attached to Germany. Even in the first world war a rumour went around that the Germans were boiling up allied corpses to make soap. It seems it regained legs in the second world war and that many people, even some Jewish witnesses add it into the accepted narrative then and after the events. When you see that someone that was hounded by and finally captured by the nazis would say they went into gas chambers that didn't even exist at the site it shows how such such "memes" can travel. At that stage of the war the rumours of such death camps were getting out and making their way back to other camps. So it's easy to see how a terrified child after hearing of such horrors would think he would be next if he ended up in an actual shower room. Plus given how he had experienced how Jews like him were hounded and murdered he'd hardly expect kindness in his captors. TBH I'd have thought the same.
I think this is where a lot of the deniers get their material too. From the war time rumours later winnowed out when the realities came to light. EG you'll see them say that originally the story was that Jews were killed by steam or even electrocution, so therefore(biiig leap) the rest of the story is false. But all those stories as far as I can see were wartime current rumours, that fell away when there were allied eyes on the ground and actual witnesses came forward.
*Even as a kid I knew of Belsen as a "thing". I clearly recall as a very young child my dad(who had been in the war) describing a chap he knew who was very sick as "the poor man looked like someone from Belsen". I couldn't have been more than five at the time. I'd say for me anyway the first I really heard of the actual death camps aimed at Jews was when the World at War documentary series came on the telly.Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.
0 -
I think the issue with Bergen-Belsen was that it was 'real' for the British - when they liberated the camp they saw terrible things and documented and recorded what they saw.
The had faces to put on the victims, names and personalities. The soldiers who liberated the camp experienced it through sight, sound and smell - compared to the Auschwitz complex where they were dealing with numbers, statistics and written accounts conveyed by others.
The circumstances surrounding its surrender must have been fairly intimidating, especially being told about the typhus - among soldiers typhus seems to have been particularly feared, so being told you have to go into an infected area must have been pretty sobering.
On the use of human skin - I think some of those stories originated from a Czech doctor who was incarcerated at Auschwitz and forced to carryout post-mortems on murdered inmates. The suggestion is he embellished his deposition as a way to 'get back' at the various people on trial.0 -
I think the issue with Bergen-Belsen was that it was 'real' for the British - when they liberated the camp they saw terrible things and documented and recorded what they saw.
The had faces to put on the victims, names and personalities. The soldiers who liberated the camp experienced it through sight, sound and smell - compared to the Auschwitz complex where they were dealing with numbers, statistics and written accounts conveyed by others.
Whilst the above is true the scenes at Belsen after liberation also gave a larger logistical problem given the massive population still there. Auschwitz had been evacuated to a large extent when uncovered by the Russians. It is also true that post war accounts of war and liberation in the Western sphere would be dominated by British and American accounts. These took preference in media space over translated accounts of Russian liberation particularly as the greater horrors witnessed on the Eastern front may have prepared the Russians for what they found at various concentration camps. one of the more prominent Russian accounts is 'the hell of Treblinka' written by a wartime correspondent Vasily Grossman: Copy here0 -
Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Join Date:Posts: 59075
jonniebgood1 wrote: »one of the more prominent Russian accounts is 'the hell of Treblinka' written by a wartime correspondent Vasily Grossman: Copy hereRejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.
0 -
Aside from being an excellent writer, Grossman is a good and genuinely reliable source. Any issues from his account stem from the fact that he was a journalist (and journalists, in any country at any time, are not historians) and not that he was Soviet
Incidentally, keep in mind that this was published in 1944 in sources independent of the West and already the gas chambers are being noted and their operation detailed0 -
Advertisement
-
Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Join Date:Posts: 59075
Aside from being an excellent writer,Grossman is a good and genuinely reliable source.Any issues from his account stem from the fact that he was a journalist (and journalists, in any country at any time, are not historians) and not that he was SovietIncidentally, keep in mind that this was published in 1944 in sources independent of the West and already the gas chambers are being noted and their operation detailed
Now before anyone gets confused here, I state quite clearly that I believe millions of Jews were transported to such camps and were brutalised and murdered there like livestock and it is one of the greatest stains on humanity's history and should never be forgotten or allowed to happen again. However it's the too many oft repeated as fact inconsistencies that still surround these horrific events that deserve questioning and clarity. All those murdered men, women and children deserve nothing less than knowing the whys and hows of how this horror came to be and was acted out. Plus and as a bonus it means we can reduce the deniers "arguments" to nothing once such questions are answered. As it is for me they have a little too much leverage as it is(even if it is nonsense)
*though given the scale involved it matters not morally or emotionally, but for the sake of accuracy.Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.
0 -
Maybe something is lost in the translation for me. I found it rambling and overbloen in the extreme
And Grossman is rated highly and not just by myself. His Everything Flows and Life and Fate (which were both banned in the USSR) are bona fide classics that rank up there with Bulgakov, Babel, Paltonov and other giants of early Soviet literature. He's very well regarded in both East and West. In short, I like himReally? He repeatedly gives a figure of three million dead for that one camp and suggests that this is probably too low a figure. Subsequent historians give the figure at one million*. He throws in stories of children being ripped apart by the bare hands of one of the guards(physical impossibility) and numerous other unreliable bits. As I said IMHO you have to pick through the hype and propaganda to glean the historical stuff. Given the reality doesn't need any hype...Have you read it RW? It's full of the Soviets are best and while the west was sleeping we are the liberators and all that. It couldn't be more soviet in it's vibe.
Even just skimming through it again now, it is quite restrained. Just a handful of mentions of fascism or Hitler, no word of invaders. In fact, just checking, my memory is correct: it ends on a pretty sober note and an extremely early variant of that philosophical question that would plague Europe for decades: how could this have happened?0 -
Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Join Date:Posts: 59075
As I said: journalist writing in the immediate aftermath. Do I believe that there was a dog trained to bite people's genitals off? Possibly, this was a place of horrors, but I'd be certain that someone told Grossman this; ie it was more than an invention or propagandaAdmittedly it's been a while but I don't recall any of that triumphalism in the piece. Is there a particular passage that you have a problem with?Even just skimming through it again now, it is quite restrained.Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.
0 -
“I used to think freedom was freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of conscience. But freedom is the whole life of everyone. Here is what it amounts to: you have to have the right to sow what you wish to, to make shoes or coats, to bake into bread the flour ground from the grain you have sown, and to sell it or not sell it as you wish; for the lathe operator, the steelworker, and the artist it’s a matter of being able to live as you wish and work as you wish and not as they order you to. And in our country there is no freedom – not for those who write books nor for those who sow grain nor for those who make shoes.” (Vasily Grossman, Everything Flows, p. 99)
Another thing, I think Gogol would would have got a lot of inspiration on Boards.0 -
“We leafed through a series of the [1941 Soviet] Front newspaper. I came across the following phrase in a leading article: 'The much-battered enemy continued his cowardly advance'.”
― Vasily Grossman, A Writer at War: Vasily Grossman with the Red Army0 -
Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Join Date:Posts: 59075
HansHolzel wrote: »'The much-battered enemy continued his cowardly advance'[/I]Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.
0 -
As solid history it leaves much to be desired IMH.Aye, but in reading that account one has to wade through the soviet style hyperbole, exaggeration and propaganda to pick at the truth beneath.0
-
Many of the descriptions are decidedly purple, but again no real problem with that, as you say he was a journalist. The problem I have with him is describing him as a good and genuinely reliable source. He's not. It's one source, an interesting and valuable source, but thank god there are others, because if it was just this as a source actual history would suffer.
Give an example of a similar first hand account that you find fills the criteria better regarding the concentration camps?0 -
Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Join Date:Posts: 59075
jonniebgood1 wrote: »Its a first hand account and as such should be treated as a raw report by a journalist with all that entailsAs opposed to the usual Anglo American style hyperbole... just sayingGive an example of a similar first hand account that you find fills the criteria better regarding the concentration camps?Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.
0 -
Advertisement
-
Primo Levi, The Drowned and the Saved, is essential reading. For me anyway.0