Chelsea vs Liverpool

machiavellianme

Great run from raheem

GavRedKing

Another free

Turtyturd

BNMC wrote: »

Says it all .

Pace yourself kid.

Darkglasses

Really enjoying this game, just dying for for a Liverpool equalizer. A reallllly dodgy one

mike65

Terry like a rash

Timmyctc

A lot of soft frees recently

Utopia Parkway

BNMC wrote: »

Says it all.

Sell him. he's crap.

GavRedKing

mike65 wrote: »

Terry like a rash

Taking a leaf out of Skrtels book :pac:

Should've been a penalty.

Timmyctc

Shoulda been a pen against Terry, mind you its not much different to what Skrtl does from basically every corner :P

A Dub in Glasgo

That should have been a penalty against Terry

citytillidie

That should have been a pen

The_Kew_Tour

Liverpool will score

livinginkorea

Definitely a peno, Terry all over Suarez

niallo27

blueser wrote: »

Just seen an interesting stat on Suarez;

16 goals against the bottom seven teams and 3 goals against the top thirteen teams with two of them against Spurs.

Ya 19 goals before the new year. It's ****en incredible strike rate. Your right.

Thanx 4 The Fish

What was that for? That was definitely a pen by Terry on Suarez or at least should have been. Then the free against Smith for trying to block the ball. Ref is making some strange decisions.

Utopia Parkway

A Dub in Glasgo wrote: »

That should have been a penalty against Terry

Probably but refs always seem very reluctant to give those.

jamaamaj

Peno for sure, Terry got away with it

Lukker-

Chelsea should have had one in the first half. These things balance out.

mada999

Courtesy Flush wrote: »

Never heard of him. We have a barethread squad and its starting to show

thought Rossiter was on his way on, could well be..

SweepTheLeg

Johnson is dire

mike65

I WILL THROTTLE JOHNSONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN! :mad:

livinginkorea

Johno asleep again

DazMarz

Chelsea have taken the foot off the gas and Liverpool are going for it. This is getting hideously ugly now for Chelsea.

happyoutscan

F*ck off Johnson

blueser

niallo27 wrote: »

Ya 19 goals before the new year. It's ****en incredible strike rate. Your right.

My right what?

GavRedKing

Liverpool on top now bat the Eto'o chance

Pyjamarama

Bit better in general but Johnson has been so so poor...

Sterling playing pretty well but seriously, what does Johnson have on his mind today? It ain't this match anyway.

machiavellianme

Good lord what is your gameplan Glen?
Even Smith has had more useful touches

Barr

Luiz to blast this

niallo27

blueser wrote: »

My right what?

It's a great stat, pointing out he has scored 19 goals.

Thanx 4 The Fish

So how was that a free there and the Terry one not? There was less contact, difference, ref does not want to give a pen.

GTR63

GavRedKing wrote: »

Taking a leaf out of Skrtels book :pac:

No when he grabs he still doesn't have control of them

Skylinehead

niallo27 wrote: »

It's a great stat, pointing out he has scored 19 goals.

It was an interesting stat, no need to jump all over him for it.

SherlockWatson

blueser wrote: »

My right what?

He got the better of you, coming back like a Grammar Nazi makes you look stupid.

niallo27

Chelsea sitting deeper and deeper.

cson

If Liverpool qualify for Europe this year they'll need blinders of transfer windows in January and the Summer to be able to cope with the extra games Europe brings.

A nice dilemma all things considered though.

mada999

DazMarz wrote: »

Chelsea have taken the foot off the gas and Liverpool are going for it. This is getting hideously ugly now for Chelsea.

no i think Lampard is a big miss there, he was good in the first half on the ball

kryogen

niallo27 wrote: »

It's a great stat, pointing out he has scored 19 goals.

While also illustrating that he is fantastic at putting the weakest to the sword and not as effective against the better to great

Lukker-

Sums up Oscar.

Royal Legend

Johnson is sh iiiiii te

Utopia Parkway

kryogen wrote: »

While also illustrating that he is fantastic at putting the weakest to the sword and not as effective against the better to great

All goals count. No striker scores more against the better sides. Especially away from home.

GavRedKing

Close him down ffs

livinginkorea

Great shot!

SherlockWatson

Skylinehead wrote: »

It was an interesting stat, no need to jump all over him for it.

kryogen wrote: »

While also illustrating that he is fantastic at putting the weakest to the sword and not as effective against the better to great

There's only one purpose of posting that stat in here, and FWIW, the stat is wrong anyway.

Strongbow10

Three £7million signings available for selection today, 2 on the bench and another in the stand

Thanx 4 The Fish

Need a goal here, no use pushing and huffing and puffing with nothing to show for it.

kryogen

Utopia Parkway wrote: »

All goals count. No striker scores more against the better sides. Especially away from home.

Im not using it as a stick to beat him, it was an interesting stat all the same though, no need for anyone to get into a heap and defensive about it.

blueser

Skylinehead wrote: »

It was an interesting stat, no need to jump all over him for it.

Not at all. I actually pointed out that he had actually scored 19 goals (read the post again; 16+3=19). All I was saying was that the bulk of those goals have been scored against the so-called weaker sides in the division, which is unquestionably correct (again, read the post). As for my admittedly petty grammar point; well, I apologise for THAT.