Liverpool v Aston Villa 17.30 hrs Sky Sports 1

Patser

Well speaking as a Villa fan, i think my part of this thread is over. Time to leave it for the Pool Utd fans to have a pi$$ing match

hadepsx

if any positives are to be taken out of this feckin draw its that gerrard is not a dm/ deep lying playmaker. his legs are gone and his reactions arent what they used to be. seems too slow when getting any tye of pressure put on him

Liamalone

Hoe the FA take action against Sturridge for punching poor Bacuna

supersean1999

The best team Drew

jamaamaj

Rayne Wooney wrote: »

What does that have to do with my post?

You mentioned that spurs will be on level points with liverpool in the fight for 4th, so i mentioned if man u lose they will be 6 points off

COYVB

jamaamaj wrote: »

You mentioned that spurs will be on level points with liverpool in the fight for 4th, so i mentioned if man u lose they will be 6 points off

And if they win they'll only be 3 points off. That's almost unbelievable given that they've been so poor

tayto lover

Caspian Thundering Vegetarianism wrote: »

A stupid analogy, one if the drivers could still be prosecuted for dangerous driving if seen by a guard for instance..... The keeper flying out illegally interferes with suarezs run. It should be a peno in this situation even if the player jumps the challenge from the keeper but it won't be given so the right thing to do is take a small bit of the contact and go down.

There was contact, people saying there wasn't are blind.

Ha ha and you call my analogy stupid.
There was no contact except when Suarez jumped into the keeper after he lost control of the ball.

hadepsx

sturridge punch!!! haha. fore arm at the most. straws.clutching.

COYVB

hadepsx wrote: »

sturridge punch!!! haha. fore arm at the most. straws.clutching.

I think he was being sarcastic

Fuhrer

Caspian Thundering Vegetarianism wrote: »

There was contact, people saying there wasn't are blind.

Heres a short gif

http://cdn3.sbnation.com/assets/3880489/SuarezDive.gif


Tell me exactly where you see the contact

jamaamaj

COYVB wrote: »

And if they win they'll only be 3 points off. That's almost unbelievable given that they've been so poor

True.

Liamalone

COYVB wrote: »

I think he was being sarcastic

I was gonna add 'in the face' but thought better of it lol

Utopia Parkway

weldoninhio wrote: »

I'd be delighted if Suarez left and Liverpool won the title next year without him, but he is a cheat. So i hope he's gone at the end of the season.

If it's cheats you want out of the league then there would be a fair few plane loads joining him.

Jelle1880

Fuhrer wrote: »

Heres a short gif

http://cdn3.sbnation.com/assets/3880489/SuarezDive.gif


Tell me exactly where you see the contact

Anyone looking at that and still claiming there was contact is either blind or deliberately obtuse about it.

Can't wait for the next incident where Suarez actually does get fouled and gets nothing, the outrage will be delicious.

Skylinehead

Caspian Thundering Vegetarianism wrote: »

A stupid analogy, one of the drivers could still be prosecuted for dangerous driving if seen by a guard for instance..... The keeper flying out illegally interferes with suarezs run. It should be a peno in this situation even if the player jumps the challenge from the keeper

Jaysis...it should be a penalty even if there's zero contact? What?

tayto lover

tayto lover wrote: »

Ha ha and you call my analogy stupid.
There was no contact except when Suarez jumped into the keeper after he lost control of the ball.

Suarez turned away from the challenge. Are you not watching it being replayed now. It's stone wall.

jamaamaj

Fuhrer wrote: »

Heres a short gif

http://cdn3.sbnation.com/assets/3880489/SuarezDive.gif


Tell me exactly where you see the contact

Clearly guzan's left elbow/arm brings Suarez down.

listermint

monkey9 wrote: »

It's definitely two points dropped in terms of the fixture. We should be beating the likes of Aston Villa at home. Didn't deserve to win though.

Sorry what ?


We beat you at home last season 3-1 ....

tayto lover

Caspian Thundering Vegetarianism wrote: »

Suarez turned away from the challenge. Are you not watching it being replayed now. It's stone wall.

No i'm watching the diving on the other channel.

Jelle1880

jamaamaj wrote: »

Clearly guzan's left elbow/arm brings Suarez down.

The elbow that doesn't touch Suarez ?

COYVB

jamaamaj wrote: »

Clearly guzan's left elbow/arm brings Suarez down.

So why does Suarez's opposite leg do the flying from under him?

murpho999

All Sky analysts calling it a definite penalty with contact.


How can that be when an obvious and well known odious cheat is involved?

tayto lover

jamaamaj wrote: »

Clearly guzan's left elbow/arm brings Suarez down.

Ha ha. You're not from Ballinspittle by any chance?

Fuhrer

murpho999 wrote: »

All Sky analysts calling it a definite penalty with contact.


How can that be when an obvious and well known odious cheat is involved?

Its odd that Ex-Liverpool player Jamie Redknapp thinks that, isnt it...

Gavlor

tayto lover wrote: »

So if 2 cars are on collision course and one moves out of the way is it a crash?

very good!

In fairness most of the sensible Liverpool fans will admit it wasn't a pen. Imagine if it happened down the other end? Though holt would more than likely give away a free kick for fouling the keeper! Man he's poor.

Skylinehead

Skylinehead wrote: »

Jaysis...it should be a penalty even if there's zero contact? What?

Free are often given when players jump wild challenges with no contact. Players get sent of for dangerous challenges where there is no contact. It's nothing new.

In any case if you are watching the sky sports now you will see exactly why it is a penalty, as there is contact between the keepers me suarez foot.

You don't hear the people in the studio saying it isn't, even petrov who obviously massively favours villa.

COYVB

murpho999 wrote: »

All Sky analysts calling it a definite penalty with contact.

Funny that, because the danish and italian coverage are both calling it a blatant dive

murpho999

Fuhrer wrote: »

Its odd that Ex-Liverpool player Jamie Redknapp thinks that, isnt it...

He was only agreeing with ex Villa player Petrov

Rayne Wooney

jamaamaj wrote: »

You mentioned that spurs will be on level points with liverpool in the fight for 4th, so i mentioned if man u lose they will be 6 points off

The point I was making was Liverpool have been good this season, and if you ask someone how Spurs have been you'll probably be told they are poor. And yet this time tomorrow both could be on the same amount of points.

It looked like you were taking a pop with that post in fairness, apologies if I misinterpreted.

You're right a loss tomorrow and United will be 6 points off 4th, a win and it's only 3 points. Amazing really when you think about it and all the guff Moyes has got.

Still United need to start playing well before even thinking about 4th, fully deserve to be where they are now.

jamaamaj

tayto lover wrote: »

Ha ha. You're not from Ballinspittle by any chance?

I don't know, but i hate tayto

batistuta9

D'Agger wrote: »

Fair dues to Gerrard for openly admitting it wasn't a good 45mins for him in the DM role, he said he was swamped but tbh he's had two games there where he's not looked the part

Jamie Redknapp - '4th in the league now Stevie, if I offered you that at the end of the season would you take it'

^ He's not the full schilling, mother of god, 'Hey there Steven, y'know that competition you haven't played in for about 5 years...would you play in that again if I offered you a place there now?'

Well done Jamie. Well done

or you can look at it like "steven, do you think 4th is the best you're able to achieve this season, so just sign for it now as you've no chance of the title"

that's what he's asking him

murpho999

COYVB wrote: »

Funny that, because the danish and italian coverage are both calling it a blatant dive

Yes right. We're all watching three streams in 3 different languages at the same time.

Anyone who can't see the contact there when it's blown up and slowed down is blind.

jamaamaj

Rayne Wooney wrote: »

The point I was making was Liverpool have been good this season, and if you ask someone how Spurs have been you'll probably be told they are poor. And yet this time tomorrow both could be on the same amount of points.

It looked like you were taking a pop with that post in fairness, apologies if I misinterpreted.

You're right a loss tomorrow and United will be 6 points off 4th, a win and it's only 3 points. Amazing really when you think about it and all the guff Moyes has got.

Still United need to start playing well before even thinking about 4th, fully deserve to be where they are now.

Was not taking a pop at all.

The battle for 4th is on, may the better team finish there at the end of the season.

tayto lover

Caspian Thundering Vegetarianism wrote: »

Anyone who can't see the contact there when it's blown up and slowed down is blind.

:rolleyes:

listermint

Diplomatic from lambert

AdamD

Whats with this 'neutrals' ****?


Nobody is pretending to be a neutral, fans enjoy watching their rivals drop points. Cop on to yourselves, seeing this **** in every Liverpool match thread.

dfx-

hadepsx wrote: »

hope all you neutrals enjoy losing tomorrow

Again, everyone - this will be carded from now on, regardless of who it is aimed at. There will be no entertainment of excuses and posts will be deleted and carded as necessary.

Discuss the game, not who is posting. It is not very difficult.

batistuta9

AdamD wrote: »

Whats with this 'neutrals' ****?


Nobody is pretending to be a neutral, fans enjoy watching their rivals drop points. Cop on to yourselves, seeing this **** in every Liverpool match thread.

:pac::pac::pac:

i hope l'pool don't get CL and arsenal get saurez

Laois_Man

That penalty

I hear Jamie Redknapp said on Sky it has to be a penalty coz he saw mud fly up.....:D

mike65

batistuta9 wrote: »

i hope l'pool don't get CL and arsenal get saurez

You know perfectly well he'll be off to a non PL club.

Well deserved by Villa.

Rodgers got the tactics ridiculously wrong first half.

fullstop

AdamD wrote: »

Whats with this 'neutrals' ****?


Nobody is pretending to be a neutral, fans enjoy watching their rivals drop points. Cop on to yourselves, seeing this **** in every Liverpool match thread.

It's just another variation of haterzz. Cringeworthy tbh.

Turtyturd

mike65 wrote: »

You know perfectly well he'll be off to a non PL club.

Fairly sure they might get Saurez....think he was the big evil in the Lord of the Rings.

RasTa

Laois_Man wrote: »

That penalty

I hear Jamie Redknapp said on Sky it has to be a penalty coz he saw mud fly up.....:D

Yeah that was odd, he tried to highlight the mud flying up too.

However I don't see Brad getting a touch on the ball so peno for me.

tayto lover

mike65 wrote: »

You know perfectly well he'll be off to a non PL club.

What? In a swap for Andy Carroll again?

It was a definite penalty btw. Is that even up for debate?

AdamD

rarnes1 wrote: »

It was a definite penalty btw. Is that even up for debate?

If that's a definite penalty:




I hear they're doing one way flights to Mars...

double GG

Only seeing this now but to be 100% fair to Suarez it was a cracking dive, arguably one of his best yet.

The fall was very realistic.

tayto lover

rarnes1 wrote: »

It was a definite penalty btw. Is that even up for debate?

It was a penalty because it was awarded.
It was a clear dive though.