Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ukraine on the brink of civil war. Mod Warning in OP.

Options
12930323435134

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7


    We've had Iraq, Syria, now we move into WW2.. just waiting for someone to go full Michael Moore and all the way back to the native Americans..

    In other more recent, relevant news, a group of European OSCE observers have just been seized in Ukraine and are being held by the same militants who nabbed the Vice reporter, who claims they are holding up to a dozen other people captive, including journo's and a deputy councilman, every time the Ukrainians try to tackle this issue - it's a trigger-point for the tens of thousands of Russian troops massing on the other side of the border


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭sopretty


    Jonny7 wrote: »
    We've had Iraq, Syria, now we move into WW2.. just waiting for someone to go full Michael Moore and all the way back to the native Americans..

    In other more recent, relevant news, a group of European OSCE observers have just been seized in Ukraine and are being held by the same militants who nabbed the Vice reporter, who claims they are holding up to a dozen other people captive, including journo's and a deputy councilman, every time the Ukrainians try to tackle this issue - it's a trigger-point for the tens of thousands of Russian troops massing on the other side of the border

    Russians. They'll invade your country, pretending they're Irish Ukrainians. Then, when you try to fight them, they'll declare that you have declared war. Therefore, they'll plead legitimate war......... And nobody believes them lol.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭sopretty


    Diplomacy is lost on Putin. He doesn't give two f*cks. He's like the honey badger (look it up on youtube). Europe know what's going on. America is like the beef-head ready to wade in. Europe is a lot quieter about their proposed tactics.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,753 ✭✭✭comongethappy


    Jonny7 wrote: »
    lol

    In fairness, the Soviet peoples sacrifice was considerable, in the face of a strong enemy & a comically inept Soviet leadership.

    Anyway, there is a whole forum elsewhere devoted to WW2.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,071 ✭✭✭Conas


    Course.

    Sure they begged Japan to attack Pearl Harbour, didn't they?

    Not begged, but without question provoked.

    If you look beyond Hollywood, your secondary school history textbook (written by the victors) and carefully produced WW2 documentaries. Roosevelt cut off oil, and gas to Japan. Not to mention Churchill's attacks on innocent German civilians, all omitted of course.

    The only thing Roosevelt was good at doing, was signing the declaration of war. Hard to believe he's ranked in the top three best US Presidents ever. lol


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭Red Nissan


    sopretty wrote: »
    Europe has been at the centre of two world wars while Russia and the US were on the periphery. Europe DOES care about another war breaking out - which is why they will use diplomacy to the level end. The US is quite far removed geographically. They have financial interests (surprise surprise). They're more inclined towards aggression than Europe. The American civil war is the last time they saw or experienced war. 9/11 is their only other measure of what it's like.

    Russia has form for being an aggressive and oppressive regime. It is not in anyone's best interests to allow Putin to reek havoc on neighbouring countries.

    Russia lost more men and civilians than ALL other nations put together, dwarfing the Jewish holocaust, Russia saved Europe, Russia stormed Berlin, read it up.

    9/11 was a hoax, in time we will have a criminal conviction on this one, there are no terrorists, believe me, the USA is within 30 minutes of direct strike nuclear weapons from an increasing alliance.

    Threats have already been made on New York, the capability exists, and the defenders are serious.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭Red Nissan


    Conas wrote: »
    Not begged, but without question provoked.

    No, more like facilitated. They knew an attack was coming, they could have gone to sea and destroyed the Japanese fleet, or as some suggest be destroyed, nonetheless, America SACRIFICED a battleship's accompaniment and a few tired junk ships.

    Apparently the reason the Japanese commander did not 'finish' the attack was that he had already seen through it and realised it was a trap.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 439 ✭✭Harold Weiss


    Jonny7 wrote: »
    We've had Iraq, Syria, now we move into WW2.. just waiting for someone to go full Michael Moore and all the way back to the native Americans..

    You deride the suffering of Syrians, Libyans, Afghans, Iraqis, Vietnamese and Iranians due to American Foreign policy.

    What a lovely fella you must be.

    You probably think it was okay to sodomize young Iraqi boys while video taping it, raping Iraqi women while taping it and torturing Iraqi men...yes, it's hilarious stuff, jonny7

    MOD: 3-day ban.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 974 ✭✭✭realweirdo


    Conas wrote: »
    Not begged, but without question provoked.

    If you look beyond Hollywood, your secondary school history textbook (written by the victors) and carefully produced WW2 documentaries. Roosevelt cut off oil, and gas to Japan. Not to mention Churchill's attacks on innocent German civilians, all omitted of course.

    The only thing Roosevelt was good at doing, was signing the declaration of war. Hard to believe he's ranked in the top three best US Presidents ever. lol

    So the japanese didnt murder, rape and pillage their way across most of south east asia? It was all a fiction made up by western historians?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 974 ✭✭✭realweirdo


    Red Nissan wrote: »
    Russia lost more men and civilians than ALL other nations put together, dwarfing the Jewish holocaust, Russia saved Europe, Russia stormed Berlin, read it up.

    Russia could have defeated the germans relatively easily in 1941 or at least have held them to an early stalemate if it wasnt for the fact that 1. Stalin had purged most of the red army officer corp and 2. Refused to properly prepare his defences for a german invasion even though he was repeatedly warned it was on the way. There were several other factors that led to soviet victory in the east one being lend lease which turned the red army from being an army that went to war on foot to one that went to battle in american trucks by wars end. The other factor was Hitlers interference and disastrous military leadership which all but condemned the germans to defeat.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭Red Nissan


    realweirdo wrote: »
    Russia could have defeated the germans relatively easily in 1941

    No she could not and she did not.

    Western aid was miniscule, at best a delay or a defense of an unimportant city.

    Russia came back from China.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 974 ✭✭✭realweirdo


    Red Nissan wrote: »
    He sure did. It has taken me nearly 60 years to understand him, I'm one of those 50's brainwashed children where the USA are our saviours, it's akin to faith, hard to realise it's not actually correct.

    So remove the US from the equation, pretend it never existed but Russia or lets say the Soviet Union exists. Can you tell us what kind of world it would be?

    Like many people you fall into the trap of believing that the world was perfect before the foundation of the US in 1776. It wasnt. The french and english fought a 100 years war ffs! And two world wars were started in europe. The wars and genocides carried out by european powers make anything the americans have done look like small fry.

    I'm glad i'm living in an era when the US is the dominant world power and not the British Empire!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 974 ✭✭✭realweirdo


    Red Nissan wrote: »
    No she could not and she did not.

    Western aid was miniscule, at best a delay or a defense of an unimportant city.

    Russia came back from China.

    Western aid was not miniscule. This has been covered in other threads but in summary the leading russian general of the war admitted they probably wouldnt have won without western aid which in truth proved a huge factor in the soviet turnaround.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,071 ✭✭✭Conas


    realweirdo wrote: »
    So the japanese didnt murder, rape and pillage their way across most of south east asia? It was all a fiction made up by western historians?

    No doubt they did, but look at what the Soviets did to innocent German women, they raped nearly 2 million. You see there is always two sides to every story, but we are always fed only the one side.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 974 ✭✭✭realweirdo


    Conas wrote: »
    No doubt they did, but look at what the Soviets did to innocent German women, they raped nearly 2 million. You see there is always two sides to every story, but we are always fed only the one side.

    Two wrongs certainly dont make a right. The japanese were not the purely innocent victims of american aggression is the main point. If they felt the need to fight a war to achieve strategic and economic means fair enough. But did they really have to committ mass arocities and treat their pows as slave labour to be worked to death? Again there are the usual american haters who'd prefer to have seen the soviet union survive, the japanese empire or even nazi germany than see america come out on top. You leave them long enough and they will tell you hitler was an innocent victim of american agression, a nice guy just trying to do his best for his people.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,580 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    S.R. wrote: »
    Only a single theater?!?!!?

    www.theguardian.com/world/2005/may/06/russia.secondworldwar

    "Few paid public tribute to the relief that swept through all of Europe with the victory of Stalingrad in 1943, bringing for the first time a sense that the fascist tide had turned. How many European or American politicians, let alone school textbooks, admit the Red Army inflicted 80% of the Nazi war machine's casualties, or that at the D-day landings the allied troops faced 58 German divisions in the west while Soviet forces had to overcome 228 divisions in their march to Berlin - and did?"


    DON'T F*CKING TELL ME ABOUT PERIPHERY!!!

    Sorry man, didn't realise you were there.

    About 90,000 Axis prisoners were taken at Stalingrad. A few months after Stalingrad in early 1943, 275,000 Axis prisoners were taken by the allies at the fall of Tunisia plus all their equipment. That just on a single campaign that Soviets probably never even heard of. In the Falaise Pocket the Allies captured 50,000 Axis troops and their equipment.

    The Allies had to fight in Europe, North Africa, the Pacific and Asia, on the sea and in the air practically simultaneously whilst the Soviets contended with a single front. The Soviets were just better at propaganda and less willing to extend any credit at all to their supposed allies. This was happily absorbed by the left during the Cold War (no surprise your source is the Guardian), and its now laughably assumed that the Soviets won the war single-handed, with some minor sidekick role for the USA and the UK.

    The Soviets did play a role in the ultimate defeat of the Axis, and suffered greatly for several years - but perhaps they would have had a better time if they had not been allied to Hitler whilst he was fighting the Allies? That Guardian article is pretty funny too - it devotes a fair bit of time to arguing that Stalin and the Soviets weren't a bad bunch of lads compared to Hitler and the Nazis. Brilliant.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭Red Nissan


    realweirdo wrote: »
    I'm glad i'm living in an era when the US is the dominant world power and not the British Empire!

    The British taught the US everything they know, so effectively, the world is in fact run more from the British perspective than you apparently realise.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,071 ✭✭✭Conas


    realweirdo wrote: »
    Two wrongs certainly dont make a right. The japanese were not the purely innocent victims of american aggression is the main point. If they felt the need to fight a war to achieve strategic and economic means fair enough. But did they really have to committ mass arocities and treat their pows as slave labour to be worked to death? Again there are the usual american haters who'd prefer to have seen the soviet union survive, the japanese empire or even nazi germany than see america come out on top. You leave them long enough and they will tell you hitler was an innocent victim of american agreesion, a nice guy just trying to do his best for his people.

    Hitler is an easy scapegoat for everybody including yourself. I suppose you can't see through all the photoshopped, and manipulated images of him that get released in books of his like Mein Kampf. I'm guessing you probaly think it's a genuine and real picture on the front cover of that book. Wow Hitler looks evil, and demonic would be the first thing that would hit your brain when you see it. Ever think to yourself, that it's intentionally manipulated that way? People are easily fooled.

    I'm sure you probaly think someone like Joseph Goebbels is the only propagandist who ever existed. Yet someone like Rupert Murdoch isn't a propagandist.

    I can see why America is easily duped into war.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,170 ✭✭✭jimeryan22


    Conas wrote: »
    Hitler is an easy scapegoat for everybody including yourself. I suppose you can't see through all the photoshopped, and manipulated images of him that get released in books of his like Mein Kampf. I'm guessing you probaly think it's a genuine and real picture on the front cover of that book. Wow Hitler looks evil, and demonic would be the first thing that would hit your brain when you see it. Ever think to yourself, that it's intentionally manipulated that way? People are easily fooled.

    I'm sure you probaly think someone like Joseph Goebbels is the only propagandist who ever existed. Yet someone like Rupert Murdoch isn't a propagandist.

    I can see why America is easily duped into war.

    Surely your not suggesting hitler was a good man..?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 47,251 CMod ✭✭✭✭Black Swan


    You deride the suffering of Syrians, Libyans, Afghans, Iraqis, Vietnamese and Iranians due to American Foreign policy.

    What a lovely fella you must be.

    You probably think it was okay to sodomize young Iraqi boys while video taping it, raping Iraqi women while taping it and torturing Iraqi men...yes, it's hilarious stuff, jonny7

    MOD: Way below standards, too personal, abusive, and highly trollish. Banned 3-days.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭Red Nissan


    realweirdo wrote: »
    But did they really have to committ mass arocities and treat their pows as slave labour to be worked to death?

    It's a cultural thing and an honour code, the Japanese believed in a Deity on earth for instance and thought others did too, so their enemy soldiers surrendering offended their Deity on earth and were thought of as sub human and a lower lifeforms than animals.

    They were doings their Deity's work, it's not a new concept and history has seen mass slaughters in the name of other earthy gods in past history.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7


    Well it's happened, the G7 nations have agreed on more sanctions.. likely targeted individuals and institutions, mainly symbolic

    Don't think anyone knows Putin's real intentions - been speculated he's just creating as much of a distraction in the East of the country, so he can fully take all the heat off Crimea, and thus fully secure it - there's already a problem with one of the main water sources, which flows through Ukraine, so that's already another flashpoint


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭sopretty


    Pro Russian militants have taken 8 German OSCE observers, accusing them of being NATO spies.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭Wurzelbert


    Conas wrote: »
    [...]You see there is always two sides to every story, but we are always fed only the one side.

    very true...sadly…calling most people “brainwashed” wouldn’t be much of on exaggeration…


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7


    Conas wrote: »
    You see there is always two sides to every story, but we are always fed only the one side.

    We have more choice than ever before, including online access to virtually every world station and sources of information

    During the Arab spring personally I followed almost a dozen outlets, via TV and online, ranging from European to Middle Eastern

    On top of all this, most countries have a free press, with a layer of regulation and oversight, including competition with other media outlets.. hundreds of them across the globe, many of the largest sending journalists and reporters directly to the scene - including the phenomenon of smart phones being able to record many events as they happen live

    If people in free countries chose to pigeon-hole themselves by solely choosing one source or outlet, or those of dubious agenda for bias confirmation it's their own fault entirely


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭Wurzelbert


    Jonny7 wrote: »
    Take my bank manager analogy and apply it to investing, lending or crediting millions.. or billions of euros. Rating agencies and internal ratings function on facts, figures, information, experience, etc.. so, much like your personal credit rating, they make the same analysis, and apply the same criteria - just on a much larger scale

    These are guideline ratings, and they are taken seriously, by Russian banks (e.g. VTB) as much as anyone else. When S&P downgraded France, I can guarantee that Russian investors got rates to reflect that increased risk

    At the end of the day, it's all about risk, and if X country is faced with imminent sanctions, large capital flight, international isolation and a stagnant economy they are definitely going to provide lenders and investors a higher rate of return.. something we know well about


    my point is that while it may make perfect sense within the (american run) financial system of our time, the whole credit rating thing is also an economic weapon wielded by a few guys in some offices near wall street on behalf of the usa and its vassals against any “hostile” nations in order to destabilise them economically…


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭Wurzelbert


    realweirdo wrote: »
    So remove the US from the equation, pretend it never existed but Russia or lets say the Soviet Union exists. Can you tell us what kind of world it would be?
    [...]

    we certainly wouldn’t all be slaves to shareholder value and a few creeps at wall street…though having said that, i too would not really want to live in a ussr like world either…


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,071 ✭✭✭Conas


    jimeryan22 wrote: »
    Surely your not suggesting hitler was a good man..?

    Well since I wasn't alive then, and didn't know Hitler personally I can't judge him on whether he was or was not.

    But when you see two American Presidents writing the following, it has to make you wonder sometimes if there's more to Hitler than we are told:

    'The Germans really are too good - therefore people have ganged up on them to protect themselves", John F Kennedy (August 21st 1937)

    '....within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived. He had boundless ambition for his country, which rendered him a menace to the peace of the world, but he had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made'. John F Kennedy (Summer 1945)

    Harry Truman wrote:

    'The Jews, I find, are very, very selfish. They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated as misplaced persons, as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial or political neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the under dog. Put an underdog on top and it makes no difference whether his name is Russian, Jewish, Negro, Management, Labor, Mormon, Baptist he goes haywire. I've found very, very few who remember their past condition when prosperity comes."

    Now those are the words of two former Presidents. We think of Hitler has an evil, psychopath, but to say Hitler was hated by all back then would be false.

    We also hear of Hitler being a raving antisemite. Yet during the Olympic Games of 1936, African-American athlete Jesse Owens, was treated better by the Germans, and in Germany than he was in America. Hitler never snubbed him, Roosevelt was the one who treated him like dirt. Hitler even sent him a commemorative inscribed cabinet. Yet the media in America twisted that around like they always do, and lied to the American people.

    Always remember Hitler's favourite athlete at the 1936 Olympic games was an Egyptian Arab weightlifter called Khadr El-Touni. Hitler said to him ''Egypt should be proud of you. I wish you were German. I hope you consider Germany your second home', so impressed he even named a street in Germany after him. Khadr El-Touni being an Egyptian, was also a Semite. ;)

    Never believe what you are told. Always go deeper, because you'd be very suprised how easily you can be mislead, and duped.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,170 ✭✭✭jimeryan22


    Conas wrote: »
    Well since I wasn't alive then, and didn't know Hitler personally I can't judge him on whether he was or was not.

    But when you see two American Presidents writing the following, it has to make you wonder sometimes if there's more to Hitler than we are told:

    'The Germans really are too good - therefore people have ganged up on them to protect themselves", John F Kennedy (August 21st 1937)

    '....within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived. He had boundless ambition for his country, which rendered him a menace to the peace of the world, but he had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made'. John F Kennedy (Summer 1945)

    Harry Truman wrote:

    'The Jews, I find, are very, very selfish. They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated as misplaced persons, as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial or political neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the under dog. Put an underdog on top and it makes no difference whether his name is Russian, Jewish, Negro, Management, Labor, Mormon, Baptist he goes haywire. I've found very, very few who remember their past condition when prosperity comes."

    Now those are the words of two former Presidents. We think of Hitler has an evil, psychopath, but to say Hitler was hated by all back then would be false.

    We also hear of Hitler being a raving antisemite. Yet during the Olympic Games of 1936, African-American athlete Jesse Owens, was treated better by the Germans, and in Germany than he was in America. Hitler never snubbed him, Roosevelt was the one who treated him like dirt. Hitler even sent him a commemorative inscribed cabinet. Yet the media in America twisted that around like they always do, and lied to the American people.

    Always remember Hitler's favourite athlete at the 1936 Olympic games was an Egyptian Arab weightlifter called Khadr El-Touni. Hitler said to him ''Egypt should be proud of you. I wish you were German. I hope you consider Germany your second home', so impressed he even named a street in Germany after him. Khadr El-Touni being an Egyptian, was also a Semite. ;)

    Never believe what you are told. Always go deeper, because you'd be very suprised how easily you can be mislead, and duped.

    Sorry, you still won't convince me hitler has been made some sort of scapegoat for the atrocities he was part of... I've seen plenty of his speeches to know he was a complete lunatic.. As for Kennedy saying those things, I personally was never aware he had.. But, you learn something every day.. And at the end of it, if your swinging to the hitler was misunderstood, that's pretty worrying in itself..


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭sopretty


    Conas wrote: »
    Well since I wasn't alive then, and didn't know Hitler personally I can't judge him on whether he was or was not.

    But when you see two American Presidents writing the following, it has to make you wonder sometimes if there's more to Hitler than we are told:

    'The Germans really are too good - therefore people have ganged up on them to protect themselves", John F Kennedy (August 21st 1937)

    '....within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived. He had boundless ambition for his country, which rendered him a menace to the peace of the world, but he had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made'. John F Kennedy (Summer 1945)

    Harry Truman wrote:

    'The Jews, I find, are very, very selfish. They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated as misplaced persons, as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial or political neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the under dog. Put an underdog on top and it makes no difference whether his name is Russian, Jewish, Negro, Management, Labor, Mormon, Baptist he goes haywire. I've found very, very few who remember their past condition when prosperity comes."

    Now those are the words of two former Presidents. We think of Hitler has an evil, psychopath, but to say Hitler was hated by all back then would be false.

    We also hear of Hitler being a raving antisemite. Yet during the Olympic Games of 1936, African-American athlete Jesse Owens, was treated better by the Germans, and in Germany than he was in America. Hitler never snubbed him, Roosevelt was the one who treated him like dirt. Hitler even sent him a commemorative inscribed cabinet. Yet the media in America twisted that around like they always do, and lied to the American people.

    Always remember Hitler's favourite athlete at the 1936 Olympic games was an Egyptian Arab weightlifter called Khadr El-Touni. Hitler said to him ''Egypt should be proud of you. I wish you were German. I hope you consider Germany your second home', so impressed he even named a street in Germany after him. Khadr El-Touni being an Egyptian, was also a Semite. ;)

    Never believe what you are told. Always go deeper, because you'd be very suprised how easily you can be mislead, and duped.

    In the vein of never believing what I'm told, do you have credible links to all of the above claims and quotes?

    Furthermore:
    Well since I wasn't alive then, and didn't know Hitler personally I can't judge him on whether he was or was not.

    I presume you haven't met either Roosevelt, Kennedy nor Truman. Yet, you can judge THEM.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement