Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Kennedy Wilson and Owner Management Companies

Options

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,027 ✭✭✭Lantus


    Its hard to say exactly what he means by this but I would imagine he is referring to developments where the OMC is defunct and not operating properly or where the entire block is in nama or up for sale. What he wants is to buy the property to generate rental income primarily, not just take over the OMC. Control of the OMC gives him control of the total development allowing investment and control to ensure that the highest rental yields can be achieved.

    Residents should have control over director appointment's (although in some cases they don't until all units have been sold or the transfer of common areas is complete) so Kennedy Wilson wont be taking over just like that and of course he wouldn't personally be doing anything!


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,089 ✭✭✭✭P. Breathnach


    My guess that he meant developments where there would be other owners in addition to Kennedy Wilson. I looked at an apartment in a block where most of the units were held by NAMA. In my opinion, that was a good thing. A major financial institution might be a better co-owner than somebody in NE and struggling financially.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,328 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    The article is odd; I don't think that they can control OMCs through multiple unit ownership or is it only the original developer whose voting power is limited to a single vote under MUD Act. In the Gasworks block they own (the Alliance, the old gasometer shell), they have to work with the OMC for the entire development up to and including the common areas of the building itself. They seem to do so based on my experience as a 5 year tenant. I can see them looking to split apart from the overall management scheme where practicable to do so (eg where apt residents from other blocks don't require common area access). Otherwise I can't see them being minority occupant s - it hits against their business model.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,089 ✭✭✭✭P. Breathnach


    My understanding of the MUD Act is that it is one unit, one vote. Accordingly, if one person owns 22 units, that person has 22 votes.


Advertisement