Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ireland Team Talk/Gossip/Rumour Thread III

13567201

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Ferris not that much of an athlete? Oh lord jesus

    The man is a freak

    Ferris isn't an athlete. You have to be a mere mortal to be an athlete. ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,997 ✭✭✭Grimebox


    Strange discussion... surely athlete is binary, either you are or aren't


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭shaka


    Ferris not that much of an athlete? Oh lord jesus

    The man is a freak

    Obviously when FIT he is a freak, he is probably no1 blindside around when fit but if someone can't stay fit then how could one be described as the greatest athlete ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,933 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    Grimebox wrote: »
    Strange discussion... surely athlete is binary, either you are or aren't
    Yes, so long as you aren't unlucky enough to get injured. If you're an athlete and get injured you aren't an athlete apparently. I thought I had strayed into a schoolboy forum for a while and then I realised this balls was being posted by grown men.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭shaka


    jacothelad wrote: »
    Yes, so long as you aren't unlucky enough to get injured. If you're an athlete and get injured you aren't an athlete apparently. I thought I had strayed into a schoolboy forum for a while and then I realised this balls was being posted by grown men.

    No one said he wasn't an athlete I suggest you read The posts


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,933 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    shaka wrote: »
    I think it does, an athlete not only needs to be fast, strong etc also needs to be durable. Someone isn't a good athlete if they can't play and same goes for any sport
    shaka wrote: »
    No one said he wasn't an athlete I suggest you read The posts

    Asked and answered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭shaka


    jacothelad wrote: »
    Asked and answered.

    Best effort ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,870 ✭✭✭✭mfceiling


    Who's the better athlete?

    Adam jones or Stephen ferris?

    I think most of us know the answer to this. Fez is an unbelievable athlete. He is one of the Irish players to have the "fast muscle fibre twitch" that is prevalent in the SH players. Watch any of the montage of him on YouTube...magnificent.

    Yes he's been plagued with injury this last 2 years but you need to look up the definition of athlete to see that ferris sits comfortably in that category.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,699 ✭✭✭The Pheasant2


    Ferris is only so injury prone BECAUSE he's an athlete - the way he puts his body on the line you'd have to Zeus himself to avoid injury


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    Gonna be a tough call for Schmidt whether to go for Marshall or D'Arcy.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭danthefan


    Hagz wrote: »
    Gonna be a tough call for Schmidt whether to go for Marshall or D'Arcy.

    I'd stick with Marshall for the time being. Thought his defence was very good, I don't see a reason to drop him tbh.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭Tox56


    Hagz wrote: »
    Gonna be a tough call for Schmidt whether to go for Marshall or D'Arcy.

    Tough considering what Marshall could potentially bring in attack, but I don't think Marshall forced Schmidt's hand enough today, didn't really do enough. Another big NZ-type effort for Darce against Wales I think, not missing tackles is going to be absolutely crucial although Marshall is a great defender too, but then D'Arcy has that relationship with BOD. Very very tough decision. Fitzgerald being back would be a huge boost


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    danthefan wrote: »
    I'd stick with Marshall for the time being. Thought his defence was very good, I don't see a reason to drop him tbh.

    Don't think his distribution was there tonight imo. Couple of times BOD seemed to line out at 12 to make sure the distribution was right.

    He wasn't bad, don't get me wrong, but I'd have D'Arcy back for the Welsh game. Just think D'arcy is playing better right now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    I think the Jamie Roberts factor will play a big part in the selection decision.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭danthefan


    .ak wrote: »
    Don't think his distribution was there tonight imo. Couple of times BOD seemed to line out at 12 to make sure the distribution was right.

    He wasn't bad, don't get me wrong, but I'd have D'Arcy back for the Welsh game. Just think D'arcy is playing better right now.

    Fair enough, I'm not going to lose sleep over it, one of those selections where I don't really care who gets picked tbh. Was just thinking Marshall did fairly well, he's so young and inexperienced that every big game will stand to him. But I accept your point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    Injuries permitted, I'd hope to have this team for next week.

    Healy
    Best
    Ross
    POC
    Toner
    POM
    Henry
    Heaslip
    Murray
    Sexton
    Fitzgerald
    D'Arcy
    BOD
    Trimble
    Kearney

    Cronin
    McGrath
    Moore
    Touhy
    TOD/Ruddock
    Reddan
    Jackson
    McFadden

    Only question mark for me is the 20 jersey. TOD was outstanding today, but I'd rather Ruddock if it was a tight game, and also because POM seems to be the one to hit the bench first, always empties his tank, and Ruddock is the more natural 6 and is a tight game player.


  • Registered Users Posts: 817 ✭✭✭Kayless


    One thing we do have going for us next weekend is the fact that Darcy, POC and Fitz haven't played and thus won't be affected by the 6 day turnaround.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    The rumour is that Fitz won't be ready for the Welsh game. Personally I'd swap Trimble for McFadden, but I know that's an unpopular call.

    I also think we could see Madigan come in for Jackson on the bench. That's not a comment on Jackson's performance today, I would have said the same prior to kick-off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    Hagz wrote: »
    The rumour is that Fitz won't be ready for the Welsh game. Personally I'd swap Trimble for McFadden, but I know that's an unpopular call.

    I also think we could see Madigan come in for Jackson on the bench. That's not a comment on Jackson's performance today, I would have said the same prior to kick-off.

    I think Jackson will keep his place, kick aside he had a good game.

    I'd keep Trimble if Fitz isn't fit, although I'm hoping he is because we need someone like him against Wales, but still I'd drop Dave Kearney for McFadden if that's the case. Trimble did well today, tackled well, gathered well and ran well. Dave was caught a couple of times and made a few judgement errors.

    Hard to drop either really when neither did nothing wrong, it's just the 80 minute factor and the fact we're playing Wales may cause Schmidt to make a couple of changes there.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    I'd have concerns over Trimble's ability to contain North tbh. A couple of times today he chased well but didn't follow it up with the tackle and if that happens against North the punishment will be much more severe.

    I'd have similar concerns regarding Dave, but I don't think Cuthbert is as much of a threat as North (though I do think he's a better finisher). And Dave handled North well enough when he faced him this year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,264 ✭✭✭✭Fireball07


    I wouldn't think that Joe will be scared of making changes.


    POC has to start if he's fit.
    Luke has to start if he's fit.
    I'd probably start McFadden ahead of Kearney if not. Kearney was decent but McFadden look hungry when he came on.
    D'Arcy V Marshall is a very close call.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭Hype710


    Hagz wrote: »
    I think the Jamie Roberts factor will play a big part in the selection decision.

    I assume you mean in favour of D'arcy's selection? I'm not sure, Marshall seems better equipped to handle the Welsh backs on the gain line. His upper body strength is incredible. Yes D'arcy is experienced and playing well but he was poor in the corresponding fixture in 2012. I'd marginally favour Marshall and possibly bring D'arcy back in for Twickenham.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    Tox56 wrote: »
    Tough considering what Marshall could potentially bring in attack, but I don't think Marshall forced Schmidt's hand enough today, didn't really do enough. Another big NZ-type effort for Darce against Wales I think, not missing tackles is going to be absolutely crucial although Marshall is a great defender too, but then D'Arcy has that relationship with BOD. Very very tough decision. Fitzgerald being back would be a huge boost

    I don't mind. Much of a muchness. Don't think Darcy v Marshall will decide the fortunes of the Wales match. Please let Fitz be fit though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22 quickcatch


    Any back is hoping to look good when they come on for the last 10 mins of a match because they are fresh up against tired legs


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    I'm warming to the idea of 6. Ruddock 7. O'Mahony 8. Heaslip with Henry on the bench.

    It won't happen though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Ferris is only so injury prone BECAUSE he's an athlete - the way he puts his body on the line you'd have to Zeus himself to avoid injury

    Or Heaslip. Zeus or Heaslip.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭danthefan


    Fireball07 wrote: »
    I wouldn't think that Joe will be scared of making changes.


    POC has to start if he's fit.
    Luke has to start if he's fit.
    I'd probably start McFadden ahead of Kearney if not. Kearney was decent but McFadden look hungry when he came on.
    D'Arcy V Marshall is a very close call.

    POC will start. He had a chest infection and I can remember when I had one, the absolute worst thing about it was that I wasn't able to sleep with the high temperature and non-stop coughing, and that's exactly was Schmidt said about POC after the game. He'll be on a course of anti-biotics and back in full training early next week, no bother to make the Wales game.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    If Fitz is fit the team I'd go for
    1. Cian Healy
    2. Rory Best
    3. Mike Ross
    4. Devin Toner
    5. Paul O'Connell ©
    6. Peter O'Mahony
    7. Chris Henry
    8. Jamie Heaslip
    9. Conor Murray
    10. Jonathan Sexton
    11. Luke Fitzgerald
    12. Gordon D'Arcy
    13. Brian O'Driscoll
    14. Dave Kearney
    15. Rob Kearney

    16. Sean Cronin
    17. Jack McGrath
    18. Martin Moore
    19. Dan Tuohy
    20. Rhys Ruddock
    21. Eoin Reddan
    22. Paddy Jackson
    23. Fergus McFadden


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,313 ✭✭✭Molester Stallone


    I'd parachute Zebo straight in for the Wales game, 60 mins of him running at the Welsh line would cause a little consternation in their numbers & perhaps let our other backs come into the game more


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,796 ✭✭✭✭Pudsy33


    I'd parachute Zebo straight in for the Wales game, 60 mins of him running at the Welsh line would cause a little consternation in their numbers & perhaps let our other backs come into the game more

    I'd rather McFadden, Bowe or Fitzgerald personally.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,309 ✭✭✭former legend


    Zebo will not be brought into the squad for the Wales game. He just won't.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭danthefan


    Zebo will not be brought into the squad for the Wales game. He just won't.

    Yeah, rightly or wrongly it won't happen. The 34 man squad named the other week is what's going to cover the first two games. He might be back in for the third game.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭Hype710


    Kearney, Trimble, O'Driscoll, Marshall, Fitzgerald/Kearney, Sexton, Murray, Healy, Best, Ross, Tuohy, O'Connell, O'Mahony, Henry, Heaslip.
    Cronin, McGrath, Moore, Toner, Ruddock, Boss, Jackson, McFadden.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,796 ✭✭✭✭Pudsy33


    I reckon Touhy will make way for Toner. I'd rather have Toner starting with Touhy coming on to add physicality.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭Hype710


    I'd rather take Wales on in the tight where I think Tuohy is slightly better but Toner has improved massively in that area so I'd have no qualms about him starting (and expect him to).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,377 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I'd parachute Zebo straight in for the Wales game, 60 mins of him running at the Welsh line would cause a little consternation in their numbers & perhaps let our other backs come into the game more

    That just won't happen, Zebo has zero gametime behind him since Joe dropped him to get match fit.

    If Joe was considering using Zebo in either of the first two games Zebo would have started in the Wolfhounds game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,246 ✭✭✭trackguy


    Marshall fronted up big-time in defence today. I would have no concerns about him playing against Wales. He also needs to be given a run of games in the team.

    Our lack of wingers is a worry going into next week. If Fitz is out, it's still 2 from the same 3 isn't it? Trimble, D Kearney and McFadden. Unfortunately, there's no way to spin it in Ireland's favour when our wingers are compared to North & Cuthbert.

    I'd love to Henshaw on the bench. He could have an incredible impact.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    trackguy wrote: »
    Marshall fronted up big-time in defence today. I would have no concerns about him playing against Wales.

    I have to admit I'd be worried about him against Wales. I think Roberts would immediately target him and he runs with more power than Dunbar. And then North and Cuthbert will undoubtedly come of their wings and ask questions of him.

    I've no doubt Marshall won't take a step back, but I don't know how much punishment he can take. In fairness, the only way to know if he can swim is to chuck him in the deep end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,246 ✭✭✭trackguy


    Hagz wrote: »
    I have to admit I'd be worried about him against Wales. I think Roberts would immediately target him and he runs with more power than Dunbar. And then North and Cuthbert will undoubtedly come of their wings and ask questions of him.

    I've no doubt Marshall won't take a step back, but I don't know how much punishment he can take. In fairness, the only way to know if he can swim is to chuck him in the deep end.

    I always worry about him being concussed now, which is probably unfounded.

    He's never going to be a top class 12 if he can't play against the likes of Roberts/ Tuilagi/ Basteraud.

    If Marshall plays and gets injured.... I presume McFadden goes to 12?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    trackguy wrote: »
    I always worry about him being concussed now, which is probably unfounded.

    He's never going to be a top class 12 if he can't play against the likes of Roberts/ Tuilagi/ Basteraud.

    If Marshall plays and gets injured.... I presume McFadden goes to 12?

    Yep.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,699 ✭✭✭The Pheasant2


    My sources say Fitz won't be ready by Saturday :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    My sources say Fitz won't be ready by Saturday :(

    Well you weren't wrong last time.

    Hopefully you are this time!

    Absolutely gutted for Fitzgerald, and for Ireland. Has been in the form of his life almost.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,699 ✭✭✭The Pheasant2


    .ak wrote: »
    Well you weren't wrong last time.

    Hopefully you are this time!

    Absolutely gutted for Fitzgerald, and for Ireland. Has been in the form of his life almost.

    I hope I'm wrong too! He's just been so unlucky...like to pick up a knock in training as well without getting a run out in green


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    Without Fitz it's difficult to see where our attacking spark is going to come from to be honest.

    We need Heaslip and Healy to have break-out performances, and we need Sexton to get a lot of touches on the ball me thinks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,313 ✭✭✭Molester Stallone


    phog wrote: »
    That just won't happen, Zebo has zero gametime behind him since Joe dropped him to get match fit.

    If Joe was considering using Zebo in either of the first two games Zebo would have started in the Wolfhounds game.

    It most probably won't, but our back line could do with his spark for the Welsh game.
    Our pack so have to be on top of their game & not give any penalties away or else HalfP could destroy us


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭ScissorPaperRock


    Apparently Tomas O'Leary is suing the IRFU for an incident during training prior to an England game in the 2011 Six Nations.

    Most of the article is behind a paywall.

    http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/ireland/article1370954.ece?CMP=OTH-gnws-standard-2014_02_01


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Wasn't TOL considered lucky not to have lost an eye when that machine hit him in the face?


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 6,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭dregin




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    I'm just thinking out loud here I've no facts what so ever but don't the IRFU have a clause that if you're injured for a % of the season they can reduce your pay?

    TOL was injured alot around then so if they did do this and it was a poorly operating training machine was one of the reasons why he was out injured you can see why he would want to take them to court.

    I can't see him wanting to come back to an Irish team again either.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,654 ✭✭✭The Rooster


    trackguy wrote: »
    Marshall fronted up big-time in defence today. I would have no concerns about him playing against Wales. He also needs to be given a run of games in the team.

    Our lack of wingers is a worry going into next week. If Fitz is out, it's still 2 from the same 3 isn't it? Trimble, D Kearney and McFadden. Unfortunately, there's no way to spin it in Ireland's favour when our wingers are compared to North & Cuthbert.

    I'd love to Henshaw on the bench. He could have an incredible impact.
    With Luke out, its going to be Kearney-D'Arcy-Dric-McFadden from 11 to 14, with Marshall on the bench. Trimble loses out.

    I believe he's going to rotate the outhalf bench spot, and Madigan will get the nod for Wales.

    I'm sure Tuohy will get at least one more start. Maybe not against Wales, but I'd bet he will be back for the English.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement