Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2013/14 Mod warning post#7005

MaxPower89

Who said anything about a free? He "had" the ball means he was in control of the ball, as we are talking past tense here. 99% of people will read it as that.

googled eyes

5starpool wrote: »

Stevie - Lovely tackle mate, that should see Jack out for a few weeks

Agger - Any time boss


:P

Paulegend

Agueroooo wrote: »

do you just look for something to 'go against' in every thread????

no one said it was anyone's fault

what the f*ck am i looking to go against?? what have i possibly disagreed with???

i said agger had the ball. did agger have the ball but lose it? yes. did agger or jack get the ball in the challenge? agger did

Turtyturd

Injuring Jack the lad has probably done them more favours than us.

Anyone

Agueroooo wrote: »

no one said it was anyone's fault

Well, I did say a prayer that our league opponents players would get injured and that ours would come back injury free. Didnt think it would happen though. Kind of regret it now, I could have prayed for something else instead.

Vicxas

Turtyturd wrote: »

Injuring Jack the lad has probably done them more favours than us.

How so?

He was another midfield linchpin really.

Dickerty

Anyone wrote: »

Well, I did say a prayer that our league opponents players would get injured and that ours would come back injury free. Didnt think it would happen though. Kind of regret it now, I could have prayed for something else instead.

You had ONE chance, and you BLEW IT!!!

Glico Man

Agueroooo wrote: »

no one said it was anyone's fault

And? I wasn't exactly quoting anyone when I said it... You kick someone else's foot, you're gonna get hurt and it's his fault for doing so.

Knex*

Anyone wrote: »

Well, I did say a prayer that our league opponents players would get injured and that ours would come back injury free. Didnt think it would happen though. Kind of regret it now, I could have prayed for something else instead.

Dickerty wrote: »

You had ONE change, and you BLEW IT!!!

Ah see, that's not how it works.

You do what you want, then you pray for forgiveness after. The only foolproof way!

When I was a little boy, I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I realised, the Lord, in his wisdom, doesn't work that way. So I just stole one and asked Him to forgive me.

- Emo Philips

googled eyes

:pac::pac::pac::pac::pac::pac::pac::pac::pac::pac:

LuckyLloyd

Fake. Surely?

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

googled eyes wrote: »

:pac::pac::pac::pac::pac::pac::pac::pac::pac::pac:

Sam Navret.... have I heard that name before somewhere...?

Turtyturd

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

Sam Navret.... have I heard that name before somewhere...?

He is probably behind free Suarez.

Turtyturd

Vicxas wrote: »

How so?

He was another midfield linchpin really.

He's been fairly sh*t for a while now (bout 3 years :pac:) More interest in rolling around the ground or trying to injure other players.

googled eyes

LuckyLloyd wrote: »

Fake. Surely?

Has to be. Still funny

rob316

Turtyturd wrote: »

He is probably behind free Suarez.

Ya same guy, the part this idiot forgot is Suarez signed a new contract so his old one is null and void anyway.

Apparently he started this because his dad is a lawyer and said what LFC done was illegal and he should be able to transfer to Arsenal for free due to breach of contract. Wouldn't fancy this guy arguing my defence!

Vicxas

Hmmmm so Wilshire kicks Agger and they want him to be investigated :P

Utopia Parkway

How the league would look if only goals scored by English players counted.

Augmerson

lol Newcastle

Augmerson

Augmerson wrote: »

lol Newcastle

man city!

LuckyLloyd

Utopia Parkway wrote: »

How the league would look if only goals scored by English players counted.

Of all the useless angular statistical looks, this is easily the worst.

LiamoSail

K-9 wrote: »

I'm not sure how focused it is on actual debt, seems to be more losses to me. So we'll have to cut our losses from the last few years accounts, which we have done. I suppose it stops City or Chelsea running up huge losses because of massive wage bills bigger than actual turnover, and rich owners subsidising it.
.

The issue there could again be clubs accruing massive losses in one year, only to benefit from those losses in following years. For arguments sake, Aston Villa could go out and spend £300m on players/ signing on fees this summer. The repercussion being a ban from Europe next year or the year after that. But what in two years, when they're still benefiting from money spent on fees, and no longer banned from Europe?

The issue of the additional wage burden associated in signing expensive players could be got around by inflated initial signing on fees, leaving them compliant there after. The fair method, I would assume would be to account for the total cost of a player, fee and salary, over the length of his contract, hence And Carroll would not appear as a £35m fee in 2011, but as a £7m per year expense over the five years of his contract, with signing on fee & wages treated similarly

OwaynOTT

Knex. wrote: »

Ah come on!

Kate Cohen, the ultimate meme on this thread?

The lads repeated the same Donut joke, seemingly another meme in this thread.

I just referenced one with the other

That's a delicate balance, is cross referencing.
Observe - I can see Kate Cohen in your fishy hole.

Donuts, salmons and Kates don't mix

Agueroooo

LuckyLloyd wrote: »

Of all the useless angular statistical looks, this is easily the worst.

Nah that title goes to super stat...

"If the league started in January" table.

Turtyturd

Doni-nuts.

LiamoSail

rarnes1 wrote: »

I hope he kung kicks Hodgson in the face at fulltime after scoring two hatricks to destroy England.

England out, Suarez banned. Win win

Never mind Hodgson, aim for Del Bosque, a Real legend. I'm sure Spain would be less appealing to Suarez, and Suarez less so to Madrid if he gave the Soanish manager a round house to the face. Better off having the Spanish media, then the English media on his back if we want him to stay

Knex*

Turtyturd wrote: »

Doni-nuts.

Myth busted, OwaynOTT. :pac:

LiamoSail

rob316 wrote: »

Ya same guy, the part this idiot forgot is Suarez signed a new contract so his old one is null and void anyway.

While that clown obviously has no case, I'd imagine Suarez could still have a case. Irrespective of the contract no longer being valid, there was breach within the lifetime of the contract.

The Bosman case was won long after the contract ceased, and damages awarded when breach of contract was found

Turtyturd

Knex. wrote: »

Myth busted, OwaynOTT. :pac:

I thought I was furthering his point. :pac:

Knex*

Turtyturd wrote: »

I thought I was furthering his point. :pac:

Not in my book. A+ :pac:

klose

We should start a petition to end stupid football related petitions

LiamoSail

klose wrote: »

We should start a petition to end stupid football related petitions

Petitions like that, and the vast numbers that sign them illustrate well the issues with democracy

Knex*

klose wrote: »

We should start a petition to end stupid football related petitions

Lets not get a head of ourselves before we start that petition.

Probably need a vote first to decide, or perhaps even a petition...

Petitception.

Knex*

LiamoSail wrote: »

Petitions like that, and the vast numbers that sign them illustrate well the issues with democracy

Wonder could we ever get them to include in the small print; "I also hereby sign up for sterilization for the future benefit of man kind".

OwaynOTT

Knex. wrote: »

Lets not get a head of ourselves before we start that petition.

Probably need a vote first to decide, or perhaps even a petition...

Petitception.

We will have to set up a committee first to discuss how we will go about mapping the parameters of the situation and the implications, so we will need to set up a commission to investigate and then in we can consider the findings before we can even move onto a vote

Vicxas

Wait, I'm confused.


So internal affairs were in on it all along?

K-9

OwaynOTT wrote: »

We will have to set up a committee first to discuss how we will go about mapping the parameters of the situation and the implications, so we will need to set up a commission to investigate and then in we can consider the findings before we can even move onto a vote

Haven't watched it in ages, that's my evening sorted. Ideal committee for Hacker's Dept. Of Administrative Affairs.

augustus gloop

Lads, need a bit of help please, as I posted a few pages ago the wife has passed the motion to go see the Liverpool Chelsea game while we are on honeymoon back in Ireland. We are only home for 2 weeks and this is the only game which suits us. I have started to hunt down a few tickets but can't find any:(
If anyone has any links/leads or advice I would be grateful.
I really want to be there the day we win the title:pac:

OwaynOTT

K-9 wrote: »

Haven't watched it in ages, that's my evening sorted. Ideal committee for Hacker's Dept. Of Administrative Affairs.

Might watch it myself. You can keep your Veep and In the Thick of It, Ues Minister is where it is at.

mike65

Luis Suarez year on year

http://eplindex.com/50392/improved-luis-suarez-player-of-the-year-stats-12-13-vs-13-14.html

Suarez 23 Game Creativity Comparisons:

12/13 Mins Per Chance Created: 32 mins
13/14 Mins Per Chance Created: 31 mins

12/13 Mins Per Clear-Cut Chance Created: 207 mins
13/14 Mins Per Clear-Cut Chance Created: 115 mins

while on strikers Daniel Sturridge goals/shots rate is 1/3 which is PDG!

Kerrigooney

Just catching up on today's posts...easy knowing there's an international break cos it seems everyone has gone bat**** ****ing mental...fair play.

Knex*

Kerrigooney wrote: »

Just catching up on today's posts...easy knowing there's an international break cos it seems everyone has gone bat**** ****ing mental...fair play.

You can always rely on me, good Sir. :cool:

OwaynOTT

Kerrigooney wrote: »

Just catching up on today's posts...easy knowing there's an international break cos it seems everyone has gone bat**** ****ing mental...fair play.

We are kids fumbling around compared to the Rooney thread.

Knex*

OwaynOTT wrote: »

We are kids fumbling around compared to the Rooney thread.

I suppose that's more in the granny territory?

Kerrigooney

OwaynOTT wrote: »

We are kids fumbling around compared to the Rooney thread.

Oh I haven't seen that yet...I'm off for a look. Thanks.

Kerrigooney

OwaynOTT wrote: »

We are kids fumbling around compared to the Rooney thread.

Kerrigooney wrote: »

Oh I haven't seen that yet...I'm off for a look. Thanks.

Wish I hadn't bothered....so much facepalm...

Bandana boy

Kerrigooney wrote: »

Wish I hadn't bothered....so much facepalm...

Sometimes I wish we could disown a fellow pool fan when I see them spouting rubbish like that

Kerrigooney

Bandana boy wrote: »

Sometimes I wish we could disown a fellow pool fan when I see them spouting rubbish like that

Careful now or you'll feel his wrath as well.

Vicxas

Ah paullegend

You loveable scamp

BenEadir

LiamoSail wrote: »

While that clown obviously has no case, I'd imagine Suarez could still have a case. Irrespective of the contract no longer being valid, there was breach within the lifetime of the contract.

The Bosman case was won long after the contract ceased, and damages awarded when breach of contract was found

Nah, it's standard stuff that the new contact includes a clause that all previous contracts are rescinded and the parties confirm that they forego any claims they may have had under the old contract.

It's not an issue any more.