Liverpool v Spurs. Sun March 30th KO 16:00 SS1

mike65

Should have been three, great save.

Washington Irving

Thought it was in

Grayditch

Ah, shiiiiii

Lucas Hood

Anyone notice the ref looking at his watch to see if it was a goal. First time I've seen that.

Agueroooo

Was that a save?..some save!

efb

Imagines if Arsenal had put in a realistic bid for Suarez...

Paully D

Save of the season.

Lapin

Thats the 24th time Liverpool have hit the woodwork this season.

Far more than any other team.






Rogers out !

blueser

Turtyturd wrote: »

Someone tell Soldado he can't score from more than 12 yards out.

Someone tell him he can't score, period.

Knex*

That was ridiculous. Swore it was in!

Paully D

efb wrote: »

Imagines if Arsenal had put in a realistic bid for Suarez...

£40m is pretty realistic to be fair.

Bacchus

Paully D wrote: »

£40m is pretty realistic to be fair.

It's really not.

mike65

Unlucky "hand ball"

Damien360

Paully D wrote: »

£40m is pretty realistic to be fair.

for a striker with 29 goals ???

are you mad

kingshankly

Wish Suarez would stop taking free kicks

citytillidie

What was that free kick for?

michael999999

Luis looks like he's been playing rugby on a spud farm in Callinafercy!

Paully D

Bacchus wrote: »

It's really not.

£40m for a player who said himself he wanted to leave was a realistic bid.

Damien360 wrote: »

for a striker with 29 goals ???

are you mad

He had scored 29 goals in July, had he?

Dempsey

Paully D wrote: »

£40m is pretty realistic to be fair.

Seriously?!

Liverpool would be foolish to accept anything under £100m for him given his contract, age & form

davycc

Turtyturd wrote: »

Someone tell Soldado he can't score from more than 12 yards out.

he can just Timmay wont play to his strengths- sooner the summer comes and tatics timmay fecks off the better

DrumSteve

Paully D wrote: »

£40m is pretty realistic to be fair.

+£1.

darced

This post has been deleted.

Turtyturd

Sponsored stoppage time, that's a new one.

kingshankly

Skirtel has been immense

michael999999

Turtyturd wrote: »

Sponsored stoppage time, that's a new one.

Not really, fergie was sponsoring it for decades!

Paully D

Dempsey wrote: »

Seriously?!

Liverpool would be foolish to accept anything under £100m for him given his contract & age.

They would now. Far less so in July 2013 when the player himself wanted out. Liverpool didn't sell and are reaping the rewards now, but the bid of £40m last summer was realistic.

Washington Irving

Paully D wrote: »

£40m for a player who said himself he wanted to leave was a realistic bid.



He had scored 29 goals in July, had he?

Paully D wrote: »

£40m is pretty realistic to be fair.

You probably should have said 'was' rather than 'is'.

Heisenberg1

Is it me or has Flanno got a very very similar running style as Carra

LiamoSail

Paully D wrote: »

£40m is pretty realistic to be fair.

Not in an era when a player like Gareth Bale is going for £86m.

Shearer went for £15m and Ronaldo for £80m, both records at the time. Suarez is matching their goal scoring records and could well exceed them, while his overall contribution is substantial. If he does go, it'll be for a record fee

Edit: just saw you were referring to last summer as oppose to now

mike65

kingshankly wrote: »

Skirtel has been immense

Like a tattooed salmon leaping forward to beat the weir.

Dempsey

Paully D wrote: »

They would now. Far less so in July 2013 when the player himself wanted out. Liverpool didn't sell and are reaping the rewards now, but the bid of £40m last summer was realistic.

Realistic but undervalued. Despite the strop he was worth £50-60m last summer imo, £100m+ now because he signed a new contract & upped his game.

klose

Another second half like that please, awesome stuff.

davycc

need dembele and sandro on for the 2nd half

Bacchus

Paully D wrote: »

£40m for a player who said himself he wanted to leave was a realistic bid.

He had scored 29 goals in July, had he?

Letting a player leave for less money just cause he flirts with Real Madrid is a weak position to take. It was a cheeky bid from Arsenal and nowhere near where Liverpool valued him. Something they have been proved right on, many times over.

Even last summer £40m was not a realistic bid and fans were appalled that his release clause was only that. Particularly when you consider the money we paid for him, the money Torres went for, the money Bale went for last summer etc.

davycc

Heisenberg1 wrote: »

Is it me or has Flanno got a very very similar running style as Carra

he does indeed:D

billymitchell

We really need to get a third though, Spurs are far from out of this yet.

Francie Barrett

billymitchell wrote: »

We really need to get a third though, Spurs are far from out of this yet.

It's hard to see them coming back, they're totally on the ropes and one more from us would finish them off.

Paully D

Bacchus wrote: »

Letting a player leave for less money just cause he flirts with Real Madrid is a weak position to take. It was a cheeky bid from Arsenal and nowhere near where Liverpool valued him. Something they have been proved right on, many times over.

Even last summer £40m was not a realistic bid and fans were appalled that his release clause was only that. Particularly when you consider the money we paid for him, the money Torres went for, the money Bale went for last summer etc.

Definitely agree that it is a weak position to take and I've long been an advocate of clubs exercising their power when a player is under contract, but the amount of teams who do the opposite is staggering.

Liverpool should be commended for not bowing to player pressure and they are reaping the rewards now. That said, many clubs would have just took the money and £40m was, IMO, a realistic offer to make for an unhappy player who wanted out at the time.

Super-Rush

Can't believe they are playing Gundi Bergsson in midfield.

emo72

i wonder what odds for liverpool to score within 5 minutes of restart?

efb

Remember what Liverpool paid for pony tail

Great first half. Crowd terrific too.

I think we'll need another 3 to win this.

Morzadec

Fantastic application and hunger from each and every player.

Coutinho and Sterling both justifying their joint inclusion.

Crowd are playing their part too

Lapin

After watching that half it's surprising that Liverpool only scored once despite all that intensity.

Jesus Wept

Paully D wrote: »

They would now. Far less so in July 2013 when the player himself wanted out. Liverpool didn't sell and are reaping the rewards now, but the bid of £40m last summer was realistic.

Paully D wrote: »

Definitely agree that it is a weak position to take and I've long been an advocate of clubs exercising their power when a player is under contract, but the amount of teams who do the opposite is staggering.

Liverpool should be commended for not bowing to player pressure and they are reaping the rewards now. That said, many clubs would have just took the money and £40m was, IMO, a realistic offer to make for an unhappy player who wanted out at the time.

I wouldn't have accepted less than £100m then.
Then again, I am a visionary.

Chancer3001

So spurs sell bale for almost 100 million, reinvest that money in new players.

And end up with a team that would have lost to the old spurs team without bale.

Fizman

A nice early goal again would really make Spurs heads drop.

Agueroooo

Our Year wrote: »

I wouldn't have accepted less than £100m then.
Then again, I am a visionary.

and a dam good glazier as well ; )

billymitchell

Lapin wrote: »

After watching that half it's surprising that Liverpool only scored once despite all that intensity.

Did they not score twice??

MonkeyTennis

More of the same please. Also feel we need more goals though