Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Post a picture of your car here Part 4 (quote a picture, get a 24h ban!!)

1259260262264265316

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,598 ✭✭✭rizzodun


    vintagevrs wrote: »
    It also does this if you like :o (I usually get 27mpg)



    I'll race ya!! :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 939 ✭✭✭chriity139


    Vintagevrs: those r's can really launch off the line. Wasn't expecting them to be that quick


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,300 ✭✭✭Supergurrier


    If you tried to do that with a modified ST with similar bhp you would be going back 2 minutes later to pick bits of driveshaft off the road :p


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    rizzodun wrote: »
    If you're sneaky enough you can make the MPG show whatever you want...Not bad from a 1.5 Almera :D

    That's nowt. I got 0.1L/100km which is 2,825 MPG this week!





    (Going from the top of Howth hill to the bottom in gear ;))


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,339 ✭✭✭brembo26


    Nearly throw back Thursday!

    I miss this lady :(

    10366082_10154081654025123_7216975826323603201_n.jpg?oh=cf321c34a7e5a6c692dd9f4cb01202a7&oe=56B2332B
    10270652_10154081654425123_3134516700367549474_n.jpg?oh=99f4c5c6d1d2738b95f905480eaef24e&oe=5686DAF2
    10245339_10154081654480123_2903787086069191636_n.jpg?oh=2a5be871f71ceeab0ed377df91d6e14b&oe=56B61B93


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,468 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Jesus. wrote: »
    That's nowt. I got 0.1L/100km which is 2,825 MPG this week :)

    jesus%20saves%20slm.jpg?1339064139


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,809 ✭✭✭✭smash


    chriity139 wrote: »
    3/4 of a tank in my 535. Not a bad range for a 320-340ish bhp car bt:)

    Remapped?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭Toyotafanboi


    throwback thursday?

    diesel focus, just looking back on the photos, definitely one of the most influential (to me) cars i've owned. really enjoyed it.
    2rorecw.jpg
    ju70ip.jpg
    53psfk.jpg

    diesel vectra!
    photo0042rg.jpg
    photo0034b.jpg
    photo0039mfb.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,854 ✭✭✭✭MetzgerMeister


    smash wrote: »
    Remapped?

    Yep, they're 286 bhp stock.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,157 ✭✭✭✭Alanstrainor


    Always liked the mk1 focus, it was the first car I learned to drive in, thrashed it around the place... I'm almost glad the 1.4 was as gutless as it was!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,809 ✭✭✭✭smash


    Yep, they're 286 bhp stock.
    I know, it's why I asked. I know someone who got a 535 remapped and got some crazy torque figures from it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,854 ✭✭✭✭MetzgerMeister


    If you knew it was remapped then why did you ask? :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,809 ✭✭✭✭smash


    If you knew it was remapped then why did you ask? :P
    I knew it was between 268 - 290ish stock depending on the year. I didn't know it was remapped and just wanted to make sure someone wasn't pulling figures out their arse :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,129 ✭✭✭bennyx_o


    Shamelessly borrowed from Facebook. Treated the Lupo to a Polish.

    12141587_896540320381955_3026700831319209101_n_zps0iz3ijf6.jpg

    12193830_896540203715300_2253987956135550483_n_zpsqpkageww.jpg

    12191798_896540233715297_1138725403230638801_n_zpsh2xhlxn4.jpg


    12189970_896540457048608_9057184329109275773_n_zpshh9z0a3u.jpg

    12096199_896540360381951_4666824202087346497_n_zps47kcacpo.jpg

    12189737_896540400381947_5270460672176242626_n_zpszmq02brq.jpg

    12115880_896540433715277_5149115393850584424_n_zpslhv7k1fa.jpg

    Others have said it on here, but Ian is a true professional, and went above and beyond what I had asked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,129 ✭✭✭bennyx_o


    I must say it does look great. The paint was already in good condition (for a 13 year old car) but I've never seen it this glossy before


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,809 ✭✭✭✭smash


    bennyx_o wrote: »
    I must say it does look great. The paint was already in good condition (for a 13 year old car) but I've never seen it this glossy before
    Now put a few drops of water on the roof and enjoy the beading!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,129 ✭✭✭bennyx_o


    Had a few coats of CG Black Wax which I put on back in March, but the beading wasn't as good (obviously) as when it was first applied. Beading nicely again now


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭AMGer


    chriity139 wrote: »
    Vintagevrs: those r's can really launch off the line. Wasn't expecting them to be that quick

    doesn't launch control make s**t of the car though?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,381 ✭✭✭vintagevrs


    It's in the manual and makes no reference to limiting the number of times you do it etc.

    That's not to say it does't put the car under a bit of extra stress, but no more so than dropping the clutch on a manual from a few 1000 rpm when you need to move off the line fast.

    The car is normally not 4wd, and only engages rear wheel drive when it feels it needs it. I think with launch, it knows it's going to need it so it doesn't wait for the fronts to spin and move the power to the back. It feels like all 4 wheels are powered from the word go which helps it get away quickly.

    Having said that, it's been weeks since iv used it. Most times I did was with a passenger interested in seeing it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭AMGer


    vintagevrs wrote: »

    Having said that, it's been weeks since iv used it. Most times I did was with a passenger interested in seeing it.

    I have a new motor arriving next week & it has a launch control function, certainly wont be using it in the run in period and probably very sparingly after that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,381 ✭✭✭vintagevrs


    What are you getting? Username a hint?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭AMGer


    vintagevrs wrote: »
    Username a hint?

    it sure is :D

    I'll throw up a photo when it's here


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,907 ✭✭✭power pants


    Always liked the mk1 focus, it was the first car I learned to drive in, thrashed it around the place... I'm almost glad the 1.4 was as gutless as it was!

    Im definitely in the minority as most people really like the mark 1 and won so many awards in its day but I never liked the design. Reminds of a car out of the flintstones, almost shaped like a wooden pencil.

    Was quite disappointed seeing it and preferred the escort which is saying something

    just think they are horrible


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,845 ✭✭✭Noccy_Mondy


    just think they are horrible


    Whisht, get out of it! :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,079 ✭✭✭✭Duke O Smiley


    DSC_000001_zps7lqtmx56.jpg

    She was never abused mint car sir


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,657 ✭✭✭CIP4


    I didn't think the mk 1.5 was too bad looking from the outside but the to me anyway the mk1 is a horrid looking car I thought that even when they were a lot newer. Now the shape and design looks ancient. If I had to have a car like that I'd probably take anything in the segment before the focus. The mk2 wasn't too bad looks wise and still looks somewhat fresh looking but there still only ok looking. I like the shape of the newest model.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,079 ✭✭✭✭Duke O Smiley


    CIP4 wrote: »
    I didn't think the mk 1.5 was too bad looking from the outside but the to me anyway the mk1 is a horrid looking car I thought that even when they were a lot newer. Now the shape and design looks ancient. If I had to have a car like that I'd probably take anything in the segment before the focus. The mk2 wasn't too bad looks wise and still looks somewhat fresh looking but there still only ok looking. I like the shape of the newest model.

    The updated headlights on the newest model did it wonders imo


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,657 ✭✭✭CIP4


    The updated headlights on the newest model did it wonders imo

    Ye definitely I really like the front of them I think it works well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,532 ✭✭✭JohnBoy26


    CIP4 wrote: »
    I didn't think the mk 1.5 was too bad looking from the outside but the to me anyway the mk1 is a horrid looking car I thought that even when they were a lot newer. Now the shape and design looks ancient. If I had to have a car like that I'd probably take anything in the segment before the focus. The mk2 wasn't too bad looks wise and still looks somewhat fresh looking but there still only ok looking. I like the shape of the newest model.

    The mk2 pre facelift is very dated now I think. The facelift looks well enough though.

    I think the mk1 and the focus in general is very overrated in terms of the way it drives. They are nowhere near as exciting to drive as the Motoring journos make them out to be.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,480 ✭✭✭YbFocus


    Have it nearly ready for Saturday, all the ghey looking essentials hooked up!

    367044.jpg


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement