Chelsea v Sunderland, 5:30 k/o, SS1

LightningBlue

Hopefully we bring on Lamps for Ramires at half time.
Rambo's become a total liability of late.
He's likely to miss the last three games now as well become of his stupid reaction to Larsson.

googled eyes

Lads that's outrageous :eek:

Richard Hillman

Ramires will be a big loss against Liverpool. He is one of Chelsea's most clutch players. A big game player and a scorer of big goals.

MaroonAndGreen

No way do I want Ramires taken off.

Hes been good this half had some great breaks and turns and his passing has been grand. I think hes playing quite well.

The ref will probably see that at halftime and if Ramirez puts in any bad tackle he'll be in trouble.

Wtf was he at!

GavRedKing

Ramires :rolleyes:

S**t half as usual from us.

Said it would be a nervy 2-1 but we dont look like scoring again though weve f**ked up to many half chances.

murpho999

Still wondering how the ref did not see the Ramires slap, he was right there.

LightningBlue

The ref saw it - he's more than likely taking the convenient way out by leaving it to the Review committee to decide on the punishment.

Eight Ball

googled eyes wrote: »

Lads that's outrageous :eek:

Ref didn't book him so FA will have to look at it. Can see a three match ban on the cards.

keano_afc

Ramires really is " that type of player". An out and out thug.

Eight Ball

LightningBlue wrote: »

The ref saw it - he's more than likely taking the convenient way out by leaving it to the Review committee to decide on the punishment.

He couldn't have seen it as he didn't even book him.

LightningBlue

Ah jesus Eto'o - that's probably the best chance we'll get.
Sunderland were all over the shop.

Grayditch

It's just a matter of time before Chelsea score at this stage, so Sunderland need to make the most of everything they get up the other end.

LightningBlue

Eight Ball wrote: »

He couldn't have seen it as he didn't even book him.

If he books him and the incident required a red the FA can't change the decision.
If he leaves it to the FA to decide the punishment they can correctly give Ramires a 3 match ban for violent conduct.

Grayditch

Eto is like a cartoon character sometimes.

niallo27

How does skertel get away with that every week.

Grayditch

Azpilicueta into the safe hands of Mannone

That_Guy

Cattermole deserves a booking for the way he tucks in his jersey alone. :pac:

klose

Unreal, cattermole gets paid for that haha

Darkglasses

There is no exemption for Ramires in the abuse section of our charter. Warnings likely to follow.

Thanx 4 The Fish

LightningBlue wrote: »

If he leaves it to the FA to decide the punishment they can correctly give Ramires a 3 match ban for violent conduct.

If he does that though then he needs to be dropped from reffing top flight football or any for that matter. No way you can let a player away with that if he has seen it.

Paully D

That_Guy wrote: »

Cattermole deserves a booking for the way he tucks in his jersey alone. :pac:

Johner

Not going to happen for us today.

Paully D

So frustrating seeing Ramires bursting forward from midfield to help in their attacks when he shouldn't even be on the pitch :mad:

I'm just waiting for John Terry to signal for a Chelsea penalty. Matter of time before they get something soft if they need it.

That_Guy

Darkglasses wrote: »

There is no exemption for Ramires in the abuse section of our charter. Warnings likely to follow.

What falls under abuse though? Is "Ramires is a filthy player" deemed as abuse? Just wondering is all.

EDIT: Nevermind, just read the charter. Curiosity satisfied.

Skylinehead

Paully D wrote: »

So frustrating seeing Ramires bursting forward from midfield to help in their attacks when he shouldn't even be on the pitch :mad:

I'm just waiting for John Terry to signal for a Chelsea penalty. Matter of time before they get something soft if they need it.

Arguably Larsson shouldn't be on either...

Thanx 4 The Fish

That is a shocking, shocking miss from Ba there.

Grayditch

Slippy stuff, out there.

Duck Soup

Bollix. Ba should have buried it.

Rayne Wooney

Ba :pac:

LightningBlue

Great move, Ba had more time than he thought.

davycc

cue rameres scoring the dirty winner when he chelsae should be down to 10men:(

GavRedKing

Horrible horrible half so far.

Sideshow Mark

Ba's proof Chelsea don't have a striker.

Washington Irving

Chelsea goal inevitable.

Dubliner28

Super sub on now..Chelsea to win 2-1

That_Guy

Schurrle it won't end 1-1

Yep, I went there.

klose

Here comes USMNT hero jozy altidore to not save the say. Chelsea win.

Darkglasses

That_Guy wrote: »

What falls under abuse though? Is "Ramires is a filthy player" deemed as abuse? Just wondering is all.

EDIT: Nevermind, just read the charter. Curiosity satisfied.

Fair enough, also please PM a mod when you have a question, as it can drag the thread off-topic

niallo27

Longest half of football in my life.

That_Guy

Mannone. Bloody hell. Looked a sore one.

Grayditch

Horrible fall there.

murpho999

Looking at the football Sunderland play, it's sad and mystifying to see they're in a relegation battle.

Thanx 4 The Fish

Routeonetastic.

Mannone took a bad knock there, off maybe?

Paully D

niallo27 wrote: »

Longest half of football in my life.

And mine. Even though a draw isn't much good it would be nice to play spoiler in the title race. And all those nights with their girlfriends the lads on the Liverpool thread promised me if we took something from Chelsea....:pac:

Johner

We have been shocking.

Paully D

murpho999 wrote: »

Looking at the football Sunderland play, it's sad and mystifying to see they're in a relegation battle.

1 reason and 1 reason only mate - no striker. Well, we seem to have had one all along but not played him for 30 odd weeks. :rolleyes:

We scored 0 goals in total from home games against Palace, Hull, Villa, Norwich and Fulham.

razorblunt

murpho999 wrote: »

Looking at the football Sunderland play, it's sad and mystifying to see they're in a relegation battle.

Well, thems the breaks with Altidore up front and fletcher injured for a good portion of the season.
They do play decent football though.

Washington Irving

His armband proved he was a red...

murpho999

Paully D wrote: »

1 reason and 1 reason only mate - no striker. Well, we seem to have had one all along but not played him for 30 odd weeks. :rolleyes:

We scored 0 goals in total from home games against Palace, Hull, Villa, Norwich and Fulham.

Chelsea have no striker either and are chasing the title!

I know what you mean though.