breaking: Gerry Adams Arrested in connection to McConville - MOD WARNING First Post

WilyCoyote · 05-05-2014 4:19pm

Jawgap wrote: »

Sounds like he has a good case for suing for wrongful imprisonment.

He should get these people on the case......

http://www.falselyaccused.co.uk/

You've got it wrong again. He was questioned for that length of time. Not falsely accused ......... except by the Brit-loving jury on boards.ie

Just another example of confused thinking among the ranks of the Anti Republican movement.

The Diabolical Monocle · 05-05-2014 4:20pm

ryan101 wrote: »

What's Jarry been up to today ?

Last I heard he was down the karaoke.

Singing freebird .... or was it mc hammer.

martinedwards · 05-05-2014 4:20pm

he wasn't wrongly imprisoned. he was held for questioning.

twowheelsgood · 05-05-2014 4:21pm

ryan101 wrote: »

What's Jarry been up to today ?

Eatin' I'd day after the supposedly poor fare served up in the nick.

Fairly civic minded of him to so the press conference immediately after being sprung! I'd have detoured for a snackbox myself.

martinedwards · 05-05-2014 4:21pm

ryan101 wrote: »

What's Jarry been up to today ?

I heard he went for a walk on a beach in Louth

ryan101 · 05-05-2014 4:22pm

WilyCoyote wrote: »

You really believe that the IRA deliberately set out to kill civilians?
Then that answers my question. Thanks.

Absolutely, its the no. 1 tactic of terrorism, they would not have been very good terrorists if they did not kill lots of civilians, they killed far more civilians than they did military or police personnel. I can't believe someone living today does not know this. Shocking really.

Jawgap · 05-05-2014 4:24pm

WilyCoyote wrote: »

You've got it wrong again. He was questioned for that length of time. Not falsely accused ......... except by the Brit-loving jury on boards.ie

Just another example of confused thinking among the ranks of the Anti Republican movement.

Never said he was........the site in question deals with wrongful imprisonment / detention......

.......just another example of people on boards.ie not reading what's posted, rather than what they wished was posted;)

Jawgap · 05-05-2014 4:27pm

twowheelsgood wrote: »

Eatin' I'd day after the supposedly poor fare served up in the nick.

Fairly civic minded of him to so the press conference immediately after being sprung! I'd have detoured for a snackbox myself.

Here he is just after being released.......

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KjBGdkb0NA

The Diabolical Monocle · 05-05-2014 4:28pm

Jawgap wrote: »

Never said he was........the site in question deals with wrongful imprisonment / detention......

.......just another example of people on boards.ie not reading what's posted, rather than what they wished was posted;)

Massive irony overload.

Karl Stein · 05-05-2014 4:28pm

ryan101 wrote: »

they killed far more civilians than they did military or police personnel.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3y3QoFnqZc

I can't believe someone living today does not know this. Shocking really.

*facepalm*

twowheelsgood · 05-05-2014 4:29pm

Jawgap wrote: »

Here he is just after being released.......

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KjBGdkb0NA

Now there's a man with his priorities right! :pac:

WilyCoyote · 05-05-2014 4:30pm

twowheelsgood wrote: »

What agreement was broken when Adams was arrested?

And do you accept that SF (well MMcG anyway) was threatening to withdrawing support for the PSNI if Adams was charged?

Ever heard of the Good Friday agreement?

Martin McGuinness is pretty eloquent. He did not threaten anything in a veiled way. Your perception is akin to the paranoia that pervades the northern Unionist's psyche.
And why would you rather believe First Minister Peter Robinson's accusation of "Sinn Fein's bully boy tactics"?

bumper234 · 05-05-2014 4:37pm

WilyCoyote wrote: »

You really believe that the IRA deliberately set out to kill civilians?
Then that answers my question. Thanks.

Well for a terrorist group.that supppsedly didn't set out to kill innocent civilians they sure as **** got very good at it.

JohnInDublin59 · 05-05-2014 4:37pm

WilyCoyote wrote: »

You really believe that the IRA deliberately set out to kill civilians?
Then that answers my question. Thanks.

According to Wiki – ‘The Troubles’ –

‘Approximately 60% of the dead were killed by republicans, 30% by loyalists and 10% by British security forces’

Of’ those killed by republican paramilitaries:
• 1080 (~52%) were members of the British security forces
• 728 (~35%) were civilians’

728 is an awful lot of ‘accidents’.

Like for example all those people who were ‘accidentally’ murdered in the Birmingham bombings...

ryan101 · 05-05-2014 4:38pm

Terrorists deliberately target civilans that's what terrorism is

bumper234 · 05-05-2014 4:39pm

end of the road wrote: »

so you admit the BA were terrorists then? thanks, finally you have admitted it

SHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

twowheelsgood · 05-05-2014 4:40pm

WilyCoyote wrote: »

Ever heard of the Good Friday agreement?

I did. What part of it do you think was broken when the PSNI arrested Adams?

WilyCoyote wrote: »

Martin McGuinness is pretty eloquent. He did not threaten anything in a veiled way. Your perception is akin to the paranoia that pervades the northern Unionist's psyche.

(SF) will reflect and review its support for policing in the region if Mr Adams is charged.
You honestly do not see a threat there?
Hypothetically, if the British government said they would reflect and review its support for the NI assembly unless SF took a particular course of action, would you not interpret that as a threat?

WilyCoyote wrote: »

And why would you rather believe First Minister Peter Robinson's accusation of "Sinn Fein's bully boy tactics"?

I didn’t mention Robinson, only what McGuinness said.

WilyCoyote · 05-05-2014 4:40pm

Jawgap wrote: »

Sounds like he has a good case for suing for wrongful imprisonment.

He should get these people on the case......

http://www.falselyaccused.co.uk/

WilyCoyote wrote: »

You've got it wrong again. He was questioned for that length of time. Not falsely accused ......... except by the Brit-loving jury on boards.ie

Just another example of confused thinking among the ranks of the Anti Republican movement.

Jawgap wrote: »

Never said he was........the site in question deals with wrongful imprisonment / detention......

.......just another example of people on boards.ie not reading what's posted, rather than what they wished was posted;)

You got it wrong by linking an inappropriate site.

You never said he was yet you link www.falselyaccused.co.uk.

Falsely accused does not equal questioning.

Unless YOU think it does!

The Diabolical Monocle · 05-05-2014 4:40pm

ryan101 wrote: »

Terrorists deliberately target civilans that's what terrorism is

And thats what happened on bloody Sunday.

Phoebas · 05-05-2014 4:40pm

WilyCoyote wrote: »

You really believe that the IRA deliberately set out to kill civilians?

Of course they did. What else would you call it when they explode bombs in shopping streets - a mishap?

bumper234 · 05-05-2014 4:42pm

twowheelsgood wrote: »

Eatin' I'd day after the supposedly poor fare served up in the nick.

Fairly civic minded of him to so the press conference immediately after being sprung! I'd have detoured for a snackbox myself.

I believe Mary Lou provided that later in the evening.

RandomName2 · 05-05-2014 4:42pm

Karl Stein wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3y3QoFnqZc

*facepalm*

The quality of your posts is going downhill - which really is a remarkable feat.

British Security killed: 363 people total
Republican Paramilitaries killed: 2058 people total

Of the deaths caused by Republican Paramilitaries 868 were civilian.

Source: CAIN Web Service - Conflict and Politics in Northern Ireland

FACEPALM

Phoebas · 05-05-2014 4:43pm

WilyCoyote wrote: »

Ever heard of the Good Friday agreement?

They broke the GFA when they arrested Adams? What section?

ryan101 · 05-05-2014 4:45pm

The Diabolical Monocle wrote: »

And thats what happened on bloody Sunday.

yes, but you'll find the IRA deliberately killed far more civilians than the BA ever did.

The Diabolical Monocle · 05-05-2014 4:47pm

ryan101 wrote: »

yes, but you'll find the IRA deliberately killed far more civilians than the BA ever did.

Thus redefining the word terrorism in the dictionary.

Seaneh · 05-05-2014 4:48pm

RandomName2 wrote: »

The quality of your posts is going downhill - which really is a remarkable feat.

British Security killed: 363 people total
Republican Paramilitaries killed: 2058 people total

Of the deaths caused by Republican Paramilitaries 868 were civilian.

Source: CAIN Web Service - Conflict and Politics in Northern Ireland

FACEPALM

The post Karl replied to states that "they killed far more civilians than they did military personal".

From your own stats, that is plainly wrong.

wrong, wrong, wrong, you're wrong, etc.

ryan101 · 05-05-2014 4:49pm

The Diabolical Monocle wrote: »

Thus redefining the word terrorism in the dictionary.

no, just the IRA being the cowardly terrorists that they are, blowing up kids out shopping and pregnant women.

The Diabolical Monocle · 05-05-2014 4:51pm

ryan101 wrote: »

no, just the IRA being the cowardly terrorists that they are, blowing up kids out shopping and pregnant women.

Yeah but theres a clause now in the dictionary that says :

*except the BA cause they didn't kill as many as the RA

WilyCoyote · 05-05-2014 4:54pm

JohnInDublin59 wrote: »

According to Wiki – ‘The Troubles’ –

‘Approximately 60% of the dead were killed by republicans, 30% by loyalists and 10% by British security forces’

Of’ those killed by republican paramilitaries:
• 1080 (~52%) were members of the British security forces
• 728 (~35%) were civilians’

728 is an awful lot of ‘accidents’.

Like for example all those people who were ‘accidentally’ murdered in the Birmingham bombings...

Coded bomb warnings were issued. The police were more interested in looking through the upper levels of The Rotunda building and extremely slow in clearing a pretty average size basement pub (Tavern In The Town) in New St when they bombs went off.
Just think. If you get a coded bomb warning (ie one that has a pre-ordained name attached) .......... the practice would be to get all people away from the area mentioned. No?

umop.episdn · 05-05-2014 4:57pm

Ah! I understand. It's the cops fault that the ira blew people up!

breaking: Gerry Adams Arrested in connection to McConville - MOD WARNING First Post

Comments