Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Piercings & Chiropractors?!

Options
2»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-end-of-chiropractic/

    What’s the evidence? In the 114 years since chiropractic began, the existence of chiropractic subluxations has never been objectively demonstrated. They have never been shown to cause interference with the nervous system. They have never been shown to cause disease. Critics of chiropractic have been pointing this out for decades, but now chiropractors themselves have come to the same conclusion.
    In “An epidemiological examination of the subluxation construct using Hill’s criteria of causation” Timothy A. Mirtz, Lon Morgan, Lawrence H. Wyatt, and Leon Greene analyze the peer-reviewed chiropractic literature in the light of Hill’s criteria, the most commonly used model for evaluating whether a suspected cause is a real cause. They ask whether the evidence shows that chiropractic subluxations cause interference with the nervous system and whether they cause disease. The evidence fails to fulfill even a single one of Hill’s nine criteria of causation. They conclude:

    There is a significant lack of evidence in the literature to fulfill Hill’s criteria of causation as regards chiropractic subluxation. No supportive evidence is found for the chiropractic subluxation being associated with any disease process or of creating suboptimal health conditions requiring intervention. Regardless of popular appeal this leaves the subluxation construct in the realm of unsupported speculation. This lack of supportive evidence suggests the subluxation construct has no valid clinical applicability.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    N8 wrote: »
    No there actually is a definition to petulant which summed up the tone and content of your reply when you had no answer other than to attack the player and not the ball.

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/petulant


    still seeming pretty petulant :)

    and probably a chiropractor....


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,123 ✭✭✭✭Star Lord


    This is not the forum for a discussion on the validity of alternative medicines, back on topic please folks.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,657 ✭✭✭Day Lewin


    <Mod snip>

    READ THE WARNING ABOVE.


Advertisement