Chelsea v Norwich, 4/5/14 k/o 4pm SS1

Johner

Torres to the rescue.

upstairs for coffee

Would love if Norwich won.

Augmerson

Nando on now, game over Norwich.

kev1.3s

Let off there

Lapin

Feck ya Snodgrass.

BarcodeMuncher

Sick of us getting frustrated by the smaller teams, pointless beating the rivals if ya can't get a fart past Norwich

LightningBlue

Great through ball by Redmond. Snodgrass should have done better. The counter attack is there for Norwich.

kev1.3s

That's an attacking substitution

LightningBlue

Very strange change. Matic is the one player who can sweep up in midfield and pick a pass.

Can't rely on Luiz for either.

I'd have preferred to take off Cole and gone 3 at the back.

kev1.3s

LightningBlue wrote: »

Very strange change. Matic is the one player who can sweep up in midfield and pick a pass.

Can't rely on Luiz for either.

I'd have preferred to take off Cole and gone 3 at the back.

Matic hasn't had his best game in blue either tho.

LightningBlue

kev1.3s wrote: »

Matic hasn't had his best game in blue either tho.

True but he did create our only clear chance so far.

I can see Norwich nicking a goal now with him off.

Luiz hasn't the discipline of Matic in that role.

Lapin

Good save that.

Could have gone awkwardly for him though.

kev1.3s

He was also directly responsible for the Norwich penalty call.

Lapin

Ivanovic lucky to be still on the field.

happyoutscan

If Chelsea don't win and FC Copenhagen win later Chelsea will have cost me €550 in an accu

blueser

Lapin wrote: »

Ivanovic lucky to be still on the field.

Shirt pulling is a yellow card, isn't it? And he's already been booked.

mike65

Come on Chelsea!

Augmerson

The cheek of Norwich not to just roll over and die here, unreal. How dare they.

kev1.3s

happyoutscan wrote: »

If Chelsea don't win and FC Copenhagen win later Chelsea will have cost me €550 in an accu

Foolish to bet on chelsea in a relegation scrap!

LightningBlue

blueser wrote: »

Shirt pulling is a yellow card, isn't it? And he's already been booked.

He also kicked the ball away. He was very lucky not to get a second yellow.

Crackle

Augmerson wrote: »

The cheek of Norwich not to just roll over and die here, unreal. How dare they.

Who's complaining about Norwich?

mike65

Lapin

Hon the Villa on Wednesday

LightningBlue

Take your point Ivan that's it.

Moneymaker

Chelsea are absolute garbage tbh.

mike65

3 minutes! Everyone up!

LightningBlue

We've lost all shape since Matic went off. We haven't created anything all day long anyway.

Credit to Norwich defensively, they've been solid.

We've been ****e.

Lapin

Good result for Norwich but I'm afraid it won't be enough for them.

Goes to show how crucial that win for Sunderland was yesterday.

monkey9

Masterclass from Neil Adams. Genius. Well done Norwich.

ricero

mouriniho out !

Crackle

Pretty pathetic effort from Chelsea today.

BarcodeMuncher

Teams in the relegation zone must love playing us

Chelsea booed off. Resorted to long balls into the box.

Hazard should have started as he was lively when he came on

Neeson

Did Mourinho go straight down to tell the wife they drew there?

Will I Amnt

Another team in the hunt for the title and not looking anything like it. Strange end to the season at the top.

Andersonisgod

A team without a striker is a team that cannot win a league over 38 games, it's really that simple.

RayCon

Maureen .....

Andersonisgod

Andersonisgod wrote: »

A team without a striker is a team that cannot win a league over 38 games, it's really that simple.

So why didn't Chelsea win it?

Paully D

Thanks for nothing Chelsea :mad: :pac:

klose

Tactical masterclass from neil adams really in truth

blueser

Andersonisgod wrote: »

A team without a striker is a team that cannot win a league over 38 games, it's really that simple.

Taking that into account, I suppose credit is due to them for staying in the hunt up until the last week of the season. It'll be interesting to see if Costa will shake things up for them upfront.

klose

Andersonisgod wrote: »

A team without a striker is a team that cannot win a league over 38 games, it's really that simple.

I think you will find that ye actually have 3 strikers as well as schurlle who is able to play up top

rob316

Andersonisgod wrote: »

A team without a striker is a team that cannot win a league over 38 games, it's really that simple.

Ye have 3. It's not there fault they can't play in this needlessly negative rigid system.
A system that stems any flair of its players.

Lapin

Does Mourinho ever shake hands with an opposing manager when a result doesn't go his way?

Bad form that.

Diabhal Beag

Mourinho's wife joke

Sanity_Saviour

Deleted User wrote: »

So why didn't Chelsea win it?

A TEAM WITHOUT A STRIKER IS A TEAM THAT CANNOT WIN A LEAGUE OVER 38 GAMES IT'S REALLY THAT SIMPLE

blueser

Paully D wrote: »

Thanks for nothing Chelsea :mad: :pac:

You lot are safe; 1 point from your last two games, with the run you're on? Piece of p1ss. You're probably safe now; Arsenal will almost definitely turn Norwich over next weekend.

Turtyturd

Chelsea, a team without a striker?

Lol.

Sanity_Saviour

Sanity_Saviour wrote: »

A TEAM WITHOUT A STRIKER IS A TEAM THAT CANNOT WIN A LEAGUE OVER 38 GAMES IT'S REALLY THAT SIMPLE

Aye, Mourinho has a lot to answer for.

monkey9

Sanity_Saviour wrote: »

A TEAM WITHOUT A STRIKER IS A TEAM THAT CANNOT WIN A LEAGUE OVER 38 GAMES IT'S REALLY THAT SIMPLE

Not when you's have strikers.