Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Promotion/Relegation Playoffs

  • 21-05-2014 9:39pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,852 ✭✭✭✭


    I know it isn't the most exciting topic but I was just curious nonetheless about why these actually are still around in football and if they are considered fair or not?

    Not that I watched it, but it looks like Hibs will comfortably stay up in the Scottish Prem League taking a 2-0 lead into the second leg against Hamilton (who came second in their division).

    Similar in Germany, Hamburg survived their relegation scare by winning on away goals against Greuther Furth (who came third in their division)

    There are probably numerous other league that do this that I'm not aware of but these were the two that I know of anyway.

    What is the benefit of the playoff over normal promotion/relegation?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,424 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    Hibs target of winning the CL in 2016 is back on track


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,375 ✭✭✭✭Oat23


    callaway92 wrote: »
    What is the benefit of the playoff over normal promotion/relegation?

    Excitement. Extra revenue for the league/clubs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    They're a load of bollocks aimed at ensuring if a bigger team somehow (like Hibernian in this situation, or Hamburg in Germany as mentioned) gets into relegation trouble that they've got an extra lifeline to stay up, which they usually will do considering they play against an (often far) weaker team in the playoff.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,213 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    callaway92 wrote: »
    I know it isn't the most exciting topic but I was just curious nonetheless about why these actually are still around in football and if they are considered fair or not?

    Not that I watched it, but it looks like Hibs will comfortably stay up in the Scottish Prem League taking a 2-0 lead into the second leg against Hamilton (who came second in their division).

    Similar in Germany, Hamburg survived their relegation scare by winning on away goals against Greuther Furth (who came third in their division)

    There are probably numerous other league that do this that I'm not aware of but these were the two that I know of anyway.

    What is the benefit of the playoff over normal promotion/relegation?

    They don't always stay up. Hertha Berlin were beaten by Fortuna Dusseldorf in 2012 and Nurnberg relegated Energie Cottbus in 2010.

    Personally I'd prefer to see straight 3 up 3 down (I don't like the football league playoffs either), but as said by Oat it's all about the money.


  • Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 23,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭GLaDOS


    Definitely not fair, but definitely exciting. Brings in the mulah.

    Cake, and grief counseling, will be available at the conclusion of the test



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,516 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Automatically relegating 2 from 12 would be a bit too many imo (would be a highter percentage than the EPL or La Liga or most other top flights).
    And 1 from 12 would be too little.

    Effectively 1.5 teams relegated seems a reasonable alternative.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭dan1895


    Definitely not fair, but definitely exciting. Brings in the mulah.

    How is it not fair? Everyone knows the rules before a ball is kicked at the start of the season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,281 ✭✭✭✭ben.schlomo


    In the Dutch Eredivisie/Eerste Playoffs this season both NEC and RKC Waalwijk were relegated.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,213 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    In the Dutch Eredivisie/Eerste Playoffs this season both NEC and RKC Waalwijk were relegated.

    Now thats one fcuked up complicated play off system. The team that finished 16th in the second division was in the promotion play off!


  • Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 23,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭GLaDOS


    dan1895 wrote: »
    How is it not fair? Everyone knows the rules before a ball is kicked at the start of the season.

    In the sense that the best 3 performing teams over the season mightn't be the ones to get promoted

    Cake, and grief counseling, will be available at the conclusion of the test



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭Omackeral


    Dublin City FC (with their fanbase of circa 100) relegated Shamrock Rovers by this method going back a few years. Found that one a tad funny. Great system :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭Paz-CCFC


    I think it's fair enough, provided the team in the higher league aren't given advantages by virtue of having played the past season in that higher league (eg, having a one legged tie at home or having the second leg at home). If anything, they should be put at a disadvantage, but having a coin-toss deciding home/away legs it is fair enough, too. It let's the lower league team test their abilities against the higher league team, too. If they're good enough, they'll probably win out, but if they get easily beaten against a team that finished second from bottom, they would be unlikely to do very well in that division. It doesn't really help anyone to have a team that's whipped week in, week out. Even though that's also possible with the champions (Athlone Town this season), it's fair to have at least one automatic place.

    I quite like the play-off system in the Italian Serie B. You have the potential to have 8 teams in the play-off, but they must finish within 14 points of 3rd place. And 4th place has to be less than 9 points behind 3rd, otherwise 3rd is promoted automatically. It gives a fair opportunity to more of the league to qualify, whilst, at the same time, not giving a reprieve to teams who finished way behind 3rd.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭dan1895


    Paz-CCFC wrote: »
    I think it's fair enough, provided the team in the higher league aren't given advantages by virtue of having played the past season in that higher league (eg, having a one legged tie at home or having the second leg at home). If anything, they should be put at a disadvantage, but having a coin-toss deciding home/away legs it is fair enough, too. It let's the lower league team test their abilities against the higher league team, too. If they're good enough, they'll probably win out, but if they get easily beaten against a team that finished second from bottom, they would be unlikely to do very well in that division. It doesn't really help anyone to have a team that's whipped week in, week out. Even though that's also possible with the champions (Athlone Town this season), it's fair to have at least one automatic place.

    I quite like the play-off system in the Italian Serie B. You have the potential to have 8 teams in the play-off, but they must finish within 14 points of 3rd place. And 4th place has to be less than 9 points behind 3rd, otherwise 3rd is promoted automatically. It gives a fair opportunity to more of the league to qualify, whilst, at the same time, not giving a reprieve to teams who finished way behind 3rd.
    Seems like a good compromise.


Advertisement