How long will Suarez's ban be? Mod warning in OP and post#455

LuckyLloyd

Over 10 matches

quarryman wrote: »

He got off light here. He really did.

Good to see he got a club ban too. Cannot understand the logic of Liverpool fans saying it should have just been an international one...

You can't understand the logic of fans indicating that FIFA shouldn't set a brand new precedent for the incident? I don't really think that's true.

salmocab

Well Im surprised at this FIFA doing the right thing.

ronjo

LuckyLloyd wrote: »

You can't understand the logic of fans indicating that FIFA shouldn't set a brand new precedent for the incident? I don't really think that's true.

Is this the first time such a ban has happened for an incident on the pitch?

Knex*

7 matches

Will this stop clubs from releasing players for International Friendlies if there is a chance that players suspensions can now be carried over to Club games?

Ranchu

LuckyLloyd wrote: »

You can't understand the logic of fans indicating that FIFA shouldn't set a brand new precedent for the incident? I don't really think that's true.

I think Suarez set the brand new precedent in this case. FIFA reacted to it.

c_o_ck p_i_ss chillage

Liverpool should not turn their back on anyone who is allegedly mentally ill. That's my opinion as a Liverpool supporter.

Nerdlingr

M!Ck^ wrote: »

Unreal stuff lol :pac:

One more time to make it clear for you.

Fan this that and the other I don't give a ****....I clearly said that I personally do not applaud it. The end.

Your continuous nonsense excuse for arguments is exhausting.

Have a nice day.

Ha ha, good man mystic Mick . Proving my point once again. You're some laugh. :pac::D:D

Ravenid

7 matches

For everyone saying that Liverpool cant appeal Liverpool can and most probably will take this to the Court of Arbitration for Sport as they are being penalised for something they had nothing to do with.

Suarez was on International Duty. He was not representing Liverpool, he was representing Uruguay. It was up to Óscar Tabárez his and coaches to keep Suarez in check not Brendan Rogers.

TimeToShine

7 matches

c_o_ck p_i_ss chillage wrote: »

Liverpool should not turn their back on anyone who is allegedly mentally ill. That's my opinion as a Liverpool supporter.

Join date.

foggy_lad

I don't follow these soccer forum much and don't watch many games but I feel that along with a 2-3year global ban there should also be criminal charges brought against any player for assault causing harm to another person for a biting incident.

The fact that this is not a first "biting" offence I would ban him from ever playing in or coaching or even attending any match for the rest of his life.

citytillidie

Knex. wrote: »

Will this stop clubs from releasing players for International Friendlies if there is a chance that players suspensions can now be carried over to Club games?

Mystery injuries before international games now for star players

JONJO THE MISER

He is a savage simple as that, should of been banned for a year.
Big time chip on his shoulder just because he grew up poor.

citytillidie

foggy_lad wrote: »

I don't follow these soccer forum much and don't watch many games but I feel that along with a 2-3year global ban there should also be criminal charges brought against any player for assault causing harm to another person for a biting incident.

The fact that this is not a first "biting" offence I would ban him from ever playing in or coaching or even attending any match for the rest of his life.

What about those who throw punches, kick out and headbutt?

c_o_ck p_i_ss chillage

TimeToShine wrote: »

Join date.

1973

Dr.Winston O'Boogie

Ravenid wrote: »

For everyone saying that Liverpool cant appeal Liverpool can and most probably will take this to the Court of Arbitration for Sport as they are being penalised for something they had nothing to do with.

Suarez was on International Duty. He was not representing Liverpool, he was representing Uruguay. It was up to Óscar Tabárez his and coaches to keep Suarez in check not Brendan Rogers.

Liverpool just have just to swallow it, the same as if he broke his leg on international duty.

Also an international ban wasn't sufficient considering he has done it 3 times now, only the player to blame not FIFA.

Utopia Parkway

1 match

foggy_lad wrote: »

I don't follow these soccer forum much and don't watch many games but I feel that along with a 2-3year global ban there should also be criminal charges brought against any player for assault causing harm to another person for a biting incident.

The fact that this is not a first "biting" offence I would ban him from ever playing in or coaching or even attending any match for the rest of his life.

Thank you Danny Mills.

Dubliner28

Does he still get paid ?

Paul Tergat

Uruguay FA to appeal it

also from adidias: 'Adidas "fully supports FIFA’s decision...will discuss all aspects of our future partnership directly with Suarez following the World Cup”.'

Da Shins Kelly

Surprised at the severity of the ban, thought they'd be more lenient. I think it's just though. It's about time he started learning some serious lessons. It's not normal behaviour. He needs to get help for this, because at the moment he's just a terrible case of self-sabotage. Great footballer, but completely lacking in discipline. He's turning himself into a liability. Hope he can get it together.

foggy_lad

citytillidie wrote: »

What about those who throw punches, kick out and headbutt?

Why not the same punishment? Most players at that level are able to play the game without resorting to thuggish behaviour so stop the few who can't in their tracks and stop them infecting young kids with such notions. Send out a clear unambiguous statement that violence is never acceptable and will not be tolerated.

Agueroooo

Dubliner28 wrote: »

Does he still get paid ?

I would be extremely surprised if his new contract does not include something about salary whilst suspended giving his track record.

somebody earlier estimated he would have been paid close to £5mil whilst suspended.

Ravenid

7 matches

foggy_lad wrote: »

I don't follow these soccer forum much and don't watch many games but I feel that along with a 2-3year global ban there should also be criminal charges brought against any player for assault causing harm to another person for a biting incident.

The fact that this is not a first "biting" offence I would ban him from ever playing in or coaching or even attending any match for the rest of his life.

I can see the case now.

Judge after 3 drunken brawls, a drunk driving,2 stabbings and an attempted murder.

Next Case?

"Your honour he bit me!! "

I'm all for punishing the guilty, but for god sake that's the dumbest idea I've heard in a long time.

Cjs21

1 match

So Uruguay are appealing? Wonder will anything become of that.

alchemist33

Over 10 matches

Alan Hansen:

"It's terribly sad for Suarez, who after the Branislav Ivanovic incident, won the hearts of everybody in United Kingdom with the way he played. But it's a case of: 'Here we go again.'"

Well, he's only Princess Diana now

dundalkfc10

foggy_lad wrote: »

I don't follow these soccer forum much and don't watch many games but I feel that along with a 2-3year global ban there should also be criminal charges brought against any player for assault causing harm to another person for a biting incident.

The fact that this is not a first "biting" offence I would ban him from ever playing in or coaching or even attending any match for the rest of his life.

Why just a biting incident? Is Biting worse than stamping, elbowing etc.... which cause alot more damage than a few teeth marks or is it just because its Suarez

Da Shins Kelly

Uruguay would do well to just accept what's happened and get on with it. He's not going to be brought back for the rest of the World Cup, and I don't think they're doing themselves any favours with all the whinging in the face of clear evidence.

Hyzepher

7 matches

foggy_lad wrote: »

Why not the same punishment? Most players at that level are able to play the game without resorting to thuggish behaviour so stop the few who can't in their tracks and stop them infecting young kids with such notions. Send out a clear unambiguous statement that violence is never acceptable and will not be tolerated.

Maybe FIFA will start to dish out the same in the future?

foggy_lad

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

Why just a biting incident? Is Biting worse than stamping, elbowing etc.... which cause alot more damage than a few teeth marks or is it just because its Suarez

Biting someone is such a filthy dirty disgusting thing to do. Why would any player go and deliberately bite another player like that? This chap is obviously deranged and should be locked away in an asylum instead of being kept on any soccer team.

cournioni

Very, very lenient ban. Should have got at least a year.

c_o_ck p_i_ss chillage

foggy_lad wrote: »

Biting someone is such a filthy dirty disgusting thing to do. Why would any player go and deliberately bite another player like that? This chap is obviously deranged and should be locked away in an asylum instead of being kept on any soccer team.

That's a lovely way to deal with someone who is allegedly mentally ill.

efb

5 matches

Slow clap to the 35 that voted 9 after the ban was announced...

Agueroooo

12 month global ban

Agueroooo wrote: »

no disrespect Mick but reading post correctly seems to be a problem with you.
Im guessing its not down to stupidity as you seem a smart enough lad, but something more deliberate.

What exactly is deliberate? If I interpret a post one way and you interpret it another does that make you automatically correct? Are you the internet police?

I might suggest that you don't always need to be so sneaky with your posts. Man up.

DARK-KNIGHT

cournioni wrote: »

Very, very lenient ban. Should have got at least a year.

hopefully when appeal fails fifa will hand him another 4 months

Agueroooo

M!Ck^ wrote: »

What exactly is deliberate? If I interpret a post one way and you interpret it another does that make you automatically correct? Are you the internet police?

I might suggest that you don't always need to be so sneaky with your posts. Man up.

Mick nothing sneaky but I will make it easy for you.


We.
are.
defending.
Liverpool Football Club.
not.
Luis Suarez

If you cant decipher the above then there is no hope.

cournioni

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

Why just a biting incident? Is Biting worse than stamping, elbowing etc.... which cause alot more damage than a few teeth marks or is it just because its Suarez

I'm not sure you fully realise the dangers of what can happen if you get an infection following a bite that breaks the skin.

Peist2007

FIFA have banned Suarez. Not Liverpool. There will be a locus standi issue with any argument Liverpool make should they go before the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

Royal Irish

12 month global ban

Agueroooo wrote: »

Mick nothing sneaky but I will make it easy for you.


We.
are.
defending.
Liverpool Football Club.
not.
Luis Suarez

If you cant decipher the above then there is no hope.

What has Liverpool got to do with it?

Hyzepher

7 matches

Regardless of what you think of FIFA's decision, Suarez has more or less given LFC, Uruguay and football the two fingers. He takes no responsibility for his actions and couldn't care what the fallout is.

Suarez is the villain here, no one else. Not even FIFA

ArielAtom

18 month global ban

I'm loving the supporters of other clubs rejoicing in the ban. Some saying Liverpool should get rid of him as "their" club would. Yeah just like Cantona, Ferdinand and Keane were jettisoned for their behaviour!!!

It's times like this I'm glad I support another club.

Will I Amnt

8 matches

Agueroooo wrote: »

Mick nothing sneaky but I will make it easy for you.


We.
are.
defending.
Liverpool Football Club.
not.
Luis Suarez

If you cant decipher the above then there is no hope.

That's exactly what he means by sneaky. You insult people's intelligence by wording your posts like that.

Agueroooo

12 month global ban

Agueroooo wrote: »

Mick nothing sneaky but I will make it easy for you.


We.
are.
defending.
Liverpool Football Club.
not.
Luis Suarez

If you decipher the above then there is no hope.

Who exactly suggested you specifically are defending him in this thread?

Sounds like you posting for more that one if your saying;

"We.
are.
defending.
Liverpool Football Club.
not.
Luis Suarez"

And what exactly is there no hope of?

Peist2007

M!Ck^ wrote: »

Who exactly suggested you specifically are defending him in this thread?

Sounds like you posting for more that one if your saying;

"We.
are.
defending.
Liverpool Football Club.
not.
Luis Suarez"

So, no t-shirts this time?

ArielAtom

18 month global ban

cournioni wrote: »

I'm not sure you fully realise the dangers of what can happen if you get an infection following a bite that breaks the skin.

Agreed, infection is possible. Drug taking can present that possibility too.

Amirani

6 month global ban

alchemist33 wrote: »

And what constitues a stadium? If Sligo Rovers buy him, could he play in the Showgrounds? Or could he play in the 5-a-side down in McMahon's Astropark?

Obviously he couldn't play at the Showgrounds, but he could play at McMahon's Astropark. Fixtures at just one of these are Fifa sanctioned.

Agueroooo

M!Ck^ wrote: »

Who exactly suggested you specifically are defending him in this thread?

M!Ck^ wrote: »

So your proud for a player acting the way he does to wear the Liverpool jersey regardless?

.

Agueroooo

12 month global ban

Agueroooo wrote: »

.

Yes I said that to another poster. Not you.

And you still didn't answer the other question?

Agueroooo

Will I Amnt wrote: »

That's exactly what he means by sneaky. You insult people's intelligence by wording your posts like that.

you're right.

that came after numerous attempts by a couple of posters to work out what he was trying to say/understand, as it got a weird to see so many posts taken up incorrectly.

Peist2007

Aguerro is a Liverpool fan?!

Hulk Hands

ArielAtom wrote: »

I'm loving the supporters of other clubs rejoicing in the ban. Some saying Liverpool should get rid of him as "their" club would. Yeah just like Cantona, Ferdinand and Keane were jettisoned for their behaviour!!!

It's times like this I'm glad I support another club.

Why do these United players keep coming up again and again? They all had one major bad incident each. Suarez has had 3/4 terrible ones, and contributed massively in getting a club legend fired by lying to him, and tried to instigate a move and even suggested he could sue the club. Cantona and Keane are a retarded comparison

niallo27

1 match

Hulk Hands wrote: »

Why do these United players keep coming up again and again? They all had one major bad incident each. Suarez has had 3/4 terrible ones, and contributed massively in getting a club legend fired by lying to him, and tried to instigate a move and even suggested he could sue the club. Cantona and Keane are a retarded comparison

People keep mentioning utd players are we are responding to utd posters and these utd supporters can relate to the situation. If we mentioned di canio or someone it would not have the same affect.