Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Revised Focus ST gets diesel option.

245

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    listermint wrote: »
    I disagree, I think your swallowing the whole 'everything has to be bigger in the US' myth. Something which they are slowly realising now with the whole ... em lack of gas thing thats coming up.

    No mate, I can assure you I'm not. Everything in the US is generally too big but even taking that into consideration, you think that average Irish cars would be perfectly suitable to US driving conditions?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,216 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Jesus. wrote: »
    No mate, I can assure you I'm not. Everything in the US is generally too big but even taking that into consideration, you think that average Irish cars would be perfectly suitable to US driving conditions?

    A 2.0Tdi Passat ?

    a BMW 520D ?


    Yes, yes i do. They would have zero issues in the US and driving conditions over there.


    Im unsure what point you are trying to prove, i also think you have some romantic notions of 6Litre Hummers.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    jimgoose wrote: »
    I know you didn't ask me and I don't care. I personally find 1.4 and 1.6 cars underpowered and under-geared for motorways here. I should imagine they'd properly annoy me on the vast plains of the USA.

    Absolutely they are. I find my 1.6 petrol to be not suited to a Motorway at all. But we get away with it here because with it being such a small Country, we generally don't stay on Motorways for long. With the odd cross-Country trip thrown in, most people get by just fine with their little 1.4's and one sixes. In the States though, you wouldn't last long with one and you'd soon get rid for something that you can cruise in in comfort.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,856 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    Jesus. wrote: »
    Really? Fair enough. I don't agree though.

    It you who said the average power of Irish cars is probably less than 100 bhp. If the US fleet was magically transformed into that overnight, 1.4 and 1.6 liter small engine cars, do you think such a fleet would be suitable and perfectly adequate for that vast Country and all the other factors that make it a considerably different environment in which to drive?

    Americans have bigger heavier and thirstier cars primarily because they are bigger and heavier people, and pay a lot less for fuel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,216 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Jesus. wrote: »
    Absolutely they are. I find my 1.6 petrol to be not suited to a Motorway at all. But we get away with it here because with it being such a small Country, we generally don't stay on Motorways for long. With the odd cross-Country trip thrown in, most people get by just fine with their little 1.4's and one sixes. In the States though, you wouldn't last long with one and you'd soon get rid for something that you can cruise in in comfort.

    Are these the average cars you are harping about?

    What are your stats on engine size and bhp for cars in ireland ?

    Most familys i know have Mid range diesel engines. With a city run about as back up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,194 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    Jesus. wrote: »
    Absolutely they are. I find my 1.6 petrol to be not suited to a Motorway at all. But we get away with it here because with it being such a small Country, we generally don't stay on Motorways for long. With the odd cross-Country trip thrown in, most people get by just fine with their little 1.4's and one sixes. In the States though, you wouldn't last long with one and you'd soon get rid for something that you can cruise in in comfort.

    It's not just a power thing, though. I drove a 1989 Mercedes 230E up and down the M8 some months back and while she had plenty engine, I was appalled that the old style four-cogger gave me the same cruising gear-ratio as with Mrs. Goose's five-speed Xsara. It seemed so wrong, revving the ballacks off a big, wallowy, comfy old Merc just to cruise at 90. So I didn't. :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    listermint wrote: »
    A 2.0Tdi Passat ?a BMW 520D ?Yes, yes i do. They would have zero issues in the US and driving conditions over there.Im unsure what point you are trying to prove, i also think you have some romantic notions of 6Litre Hummers.

    Ah for God's sake mate, since when were 2 liter Passats and 5 Series' the "average" Irish car driven around? They're physically bigger than the average Irish car and more powerful too. The average Irish car would be a 1.4 or 1.6 Corolla or Golf or something. The cars you mention would be fine in the States because they're toward the bigger end in this Country (even though they'd only be considered midsize over there).

    I have no notions about 6 liter Hummers. But I do know I wouldn't last long in a 90bhp econobox in the middle of Arizona!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    Americans have bigger heavier and thirstier cars primarily because they are bigger and heavier people, and pay a lot less for fuel.

    Those are big factors of course but surely a guy like you who's driven over there can't discount the other big factors like the roads, distances covered, the straight line nature of the driving and extreme environmental conditions?
    listermint wrote: »
    Are these the average cars you are harping about?
    What are your stats on engine size and bhp for cars in ireland ?Most familys i know have Mid range diesel engines. With a city run about as back up.

    I don't have any stats and nor probably do you. I just have my eyes. Henry Ford said the average Irish car probably has less than 100 bhp and I'd say he's probably right.

    Would you disagree with this?


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,856 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    Jesus. wrote: »
    Ah for God's sake mate, since when were 2 liter Passats and 5 Series' the "average" Irish car driven around? They're physically bigger than the average Irish car and more powerful too. The average Irish car would be a 1.4 or 1.6 Corolla or Golf or something. The cars you mention would be fine in the States because they're toward the bigger end in this Country (even though they'd only be considered midsize over there).

    I have no notions about 6 liter Hummers. But I do know I wouldn't last long in a 90bhp econobox in the middle of Arizona!

    We're going wildly off topic here but I recall reading that mosts Americans don't travel - relatively few have passports, and many have not even left their home state.

    I think this notion of coast to coast cruising in huge powerful land yachts is fancyful at best.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,915 ✭✭✭GTE


    Jesus. wrote: »
    No mate, I can assure you I'm not. Everything in the US is generally too big but even taking that into consideration, you think that average Irish cars would be perfectly suitable to US driving conditions?

    Yup, it is not another world or anything as drastic as being made out from behind a keyboard. There is a big enough TDI brigade over there happily cruising along with their 1Z, AGR and ALH "Paddy" spec VWs to show that.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,856 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    Jesus. wrote: »
    Those are big factors of course but surely a guy like you who's driven over there can't discount the other big factors like the roads, distances covered, the straight line nature of the driving and extreme environmental conditions?


    Their roads are frequently very poorly surfaced - extremes of weather are pretty hard on tarmac and concrete.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,593 ✭✭✭tossy


    Jesus. wrote: »
    Absolutely they are. I find my 1.6 petrol to be not suited to a Motorway at all. But we get away with it here because with it being such a small Country, we generally don't stay on Motorways for long. With the odd cross-Country trip thrown in, most people get by just fine with their little 1.4's and one sixes. In the States though, you wouldn't last long with one and you'd soon get rid for something that you can cruise in in comfort.

    I don't think you realise it but there are people in this country doing 1000's of miles a week on motorways, in modern rep mobiles (with relatively low BHP and torque figures), these cars would be as equally capable and as comfortable doing that mileage on any continent in the world. Just because you don't spend much times on motorways doesn't mean others don't.

    You average Irish motorway is also far superior to the average freeway or even UK motorway, so i don't think the american thing was a good angle to take. Not to mention the ridiculous nanny state speed limits that would make any fun car redundant.

    I honestly believe that choosing a car based on the size of a country or width or length of it's roads is naive.

    This whole America thing you've kept pushing in this thread is a little weird to be honest, not sure what it's about. At a guess i would say you went on holidays there once and rented a big boring yank tank and have been prattling on about it since :D (joke). Is it the motoring version of "Cold ? You don't know cold" when you mistakenly mention it's cold out to someone who spent a stag weekend in Norway in January once :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,293 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    Jesus. wrote: »
    Ah for God's sake mate, since when were 2 liter Passats and 5 Series' the "average" Irish car driven around? They're physically bigger than the average Irish car and more powerful too. The average Irish car would be a 1.4 or 1.6 Corolla or Golf or something. The cars you mention would be fine in the States because they're toward the bigger end in this Country (even though they'd only be considered midsize over there).

    I have no notions about 6 liter Hummers. But I do know I wouldn't last long in a 90bhp econobox in the middle of Arizona!

    You'd be grand, max speed limit in the US is 55mph (or 45mph in a lot of places) which is lower than here so that kind of rubbishes your argument that yanks need bigger cars than we do in Ireland.

    How long has it been since you've driven in the US? Small diesels are starting to become a bit more popular, granted still a tiny minority. Things are changing over there, petrol prices are only going one way.


    Anyway back on topic. This looks like a grand car, but doesn't deserve the ST badge imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,302 ✭✭✭Supergurrier


    You would never catch me admitting to having an STD thats for sure


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,194 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    MadYaker wrote: »
    You'd be grand, max speed limit in the US is 55mph (or 45mph in a lot of places)...

    No, it isn't. Speed limits in the USA are set by state, and are usually 70mph on rural freeway. These days 65mph is more common on urban freeway. In Utah, the limit is 80mph on certain highway sections, and they also have a minimum speed limit of 45mph on Interstates, conditions permitting.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,593 ✭✭✭tossy


    You would never catch me admitting to having an STD thats for sure

    ...probably admit to having an STD before admitting to having a diesel ST :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,302 ✭✭✭Supergurrier


    tossy wrote: »
    ...probably admit to having an STD before admitting to having a diesel ST :D

    An STD atleast you would have had fun at some stage lol, an ST Diesel is just a remapped 2.0 TDCI with a performance badge stuck on it.

    But if thats what sells...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    We're going wildly off topic here but I recall reading that mosts Americans don't travel - relatively few have passports, and many have not even left their home state.I think this notion of coast to coast cruising in huge powerful land yachts is fancyful at best.

    Passports are totally irrelevant as I'm talking about within the US. Nobody said anything about coast to coast or indeed "huge powerful land yachts". You're making things up here Henry.

    They drive more distances than we do. Almost all their roads are bigger, wider and very much straighter than ours. A comfortable cruiser is much more important to have over there than here where most of our roads are still windy, narrow and quite hilly and the emphasis is more on handling. The two environments are like chalk and cheese IMO.

    I'm surprised having driven over there you've reached that conclusion. Still, its good having differing opinions :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,509 ✭✭✭Donnelly117


    You would never catch me admitting to having an STD thats for sure

    Finally, a mention of the car this post was made to discuss!!! The number of Americans who have left their home state in a 520d debate is slightly off topic! :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,302 ✭✭✭Supergurrier


    The only arguement for a Diesel hot hatch is to bamboozle the alternate arguement with pointless drivel.

    See above etc


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    bbk wrote: »
    Yup, it is not another world or anything as drastic as being made out from behind a keyboard. There is a big enough TDI brigade over there happily cruising along with their 1Z, AGR and ALH "Paddy" spec VWs to show that.

    Is that a reference to what I've been saying???!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,216 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Jesus. wrote: »
    Those are big factors of course but surely a guy like you who's driven over there can't discount the other big factors like the roads, distances covered, the straight line nature of the driving and extreme environmental conditions?



    I don't have any stats and nor probably do you. I just have my eyes. Henry Ford said the average Irish car probably has less than 100 bhp and I'd say he's probably right.

    Would you disagree with this?


    Published last year

    http://www.cartell.ie/2013/03/19947/

    Average size is 2.0 and 1.6

    I dont see how newer Diesel 1.6 and 2.0 vehicles would 'struggle' on US roads.

    But as stated above this is going wildy off topic.

    I still think you are romanticising the American road experience and as above the fact that alot of Americans never even leave their state.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,856 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    MadYaker wrote: »
    You'd be grand, max speed limit in the US is 55mph (or 45mph in a lot of places) which is lower than here so that kind of rubbishes your argument that yanks need bigger cars than we do in Ireland.....

    55mph federal limit was abolished in 1987.

    Limits are now 60 - 85mph (parts of Texas).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,216 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Jesus. wrote: »
    Passports are totally irrelevant as I'm talking about within the US. Nobody said anything about coast to coast or indeed "huge powerful land yachts". You're making things up here Henry.

    They drive more distances than we do. Almost all their roads are bigger, wider and very much straighter than ours. A comfortable cruiser is much more important to have over there than here where most of our roads are still windy, narrow and quite hilly and the emphasis is more on handling. The two environments are like chalk and cheese IMO.

    I'm surprised having driven over there you've reached that conclusion. Still, its good having differing opinions :)

    Complete 'Opinion'. nothing more nothing less.


  • Posts: 24,714 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    What about someone who wants all the aspects of the ST except, by choice or necessity, also want a diesel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,194 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    ...85mph (parts of Texas).

    <Grabs Stetson, pair of six-shooters and 1976 El Dorado> See y'all there, boy! :cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    tossy wrote: »
    I don't think you realise it but there are people in this country doing 1000's of miles a week on motorways, in modern rep mobiles (with relatively low BHP and torque figures), these cars would be as equally capable and as comfortable doing that mileage on any continent in the world. Just because you don't spend much times on motorways doesn't mean others don't.

    Oh for the love of God, I said "AVERAGE" "AVERAGE"

    FFS
    tossy wrote: »
    You average Irish motorway is also far superior to the average freeway or even UK motorway, so i don't think the american thing was a good angle to take. Not to mention the ridiculous nanny state speed limits that would make any fun car redundant.

    Its not applicable because again, the average Irish motorist doesn't spend that long on our Motorways. Very very few whizz across the Country on them every day and those that do do high miles on them would generally have more than a 90 or 100 bhp petrol car. The Rep crowd probably drive 2 liter TDI's etc which are perfect for that kind of travelling.
    tossy wrote: »
    I honestly believe that choosing a car based on the size of a country or width or length of it's roads is naive.

    Never said such a thing. Once again, I repeat: A car that might have adequate power for Ireland and our roads might not be adequate for the US. I've given many reasons for this so there's no point in repeating it.
    tossy wrote: »
    This whole America thing you've kept pushing in this thread is a little weird to be honest, not sure what it's about. At a guess i would say you went on holidays there once and rented a big boring yank tank and have been prattling on about it since :D (joke). Is it the motoring version of "Cold ? You don't know cold" when you mistakenly mention it's cold out to someone who spent a stag weekend in Norway in January once :D

    Don't give up the day job and become a Detective whatever you do! I actually lived over there some years ago. I still go back once or twice a year but don't rent out cars.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,795 ✭✭✭Neilw


    Jesus. wrote: »
    Passports are totally irrelevant as I'm talking about within the US. Nobody said anything about coast to coast or indeed "huge powerful land yachts". You're making things up here Henry.

    They drive more distances than we do. Almost all their roads are bigger, wider and very much straighter than ours. A comfortable cruiser is much more important to have over there than here where most of our roads are still windy, narrow and quite hilly and the emphasis is more on handling. The two environments are like chalk and cheese IMO.

    I'm surprised having driven over there you've reached that conclusion. Still, its good having differing opinions :)

    I think you're contradicting yourself there. To cruise on a motorway doesn't take or need much power, a long top gear so the revs are low would make things more comfortable...where diesels are good.

    Do you not think you would need more power where there are narrow roads, hill, corners where you would be accelerating a lot more than just driving at a constant speed?
    Also I think a more powerful car suits itself to ireland with our limited overtaking opportunities and single lane roads, an overtake can be executed far more safely with a powerful car. Less time needed to make a run up or be on the opposite side of the road exposed to potential danger.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,865 ✭✭✭✭MuppetCheck


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    Proper way to do it is have them as a stand alone model like an ST but not taking away from them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    listermint wrote: »
    Complete 'Opinion'. nothing more nothing less.

    So you disagree with this???

    "Almost all their roads are bigger, wider and very much straighter than ours. A comfortable cruiser is much more important to have over there than here where most of our roads are still windy, narrow and quite hilly and the emphasis is more on handling."

    I would have thought that that's fact :confused:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    Neilw wrote: »
    I think you're contradicting yourself there. To cruise on a motorway doesn't take or need much power, a long top gear so the revs are low would make things more comfortable...where diesels are good..

    Ah look don't you start. In my very first post I said torque is where its at. I've been singing from that song book since I joined here. I even started a thread about bhp v torque and it ran for pages and pages!

    BHP and torque.

    Anyway, I'm off to work. Nice debating with yis fellas :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,795 ✭✭✭Neilw


    Jesus. wrote: »
    Ah look don't you start. In my very first post I said torque is where its at. I've been singing from that song book since I joined here. I even started a thread about bhp v torque and it ran for pages and pages!

    BHP and torque.

    Anyway, I'm off to work. Nice debating with yis fellas :)

    Yay, I won :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,865 ✭✭✭✭MuppetCheck


    Neilw wrote: »
    Yay, I won :D

    I don't care so long as it's over:pac:


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,856 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    ST name is relatively new I think. Late 1990's ST Mondeo perhaps?

    The sub brand sits above standard models and below RS models (which date way back - Mk I Escort RS1600 of 1970 iirc).

    So ST to me at least is a "warm" model variant (MkII 2.5l Focus ST and current Fiesta ST are very warm) whereas the RS models are really quick.

    With all that in mind the new Focus ST diesel fits the brand.

    If they ever introduced an RS diesel I'd be conflicted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,593 ✭✭✭tossy


    Jesus. wrote: »
    You're finding it hard to grasp for some reason bro.
    Jesus. wrote: »
    Ah for God's sake mate
    Jesus. wrote: »
    You're making things up here Henry.
    Jesus. wrote: »
    Oh for the love of God

    FFS

    Your attitude wouldn't be great,that attitude might work in America with it's big open spaces and wide canyons but over here, you'd want to scale it down it a bit. :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    Like it Tossy :pac::D:p


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,795 ✭✭✭Neilw


    tossy wrote: »
    Your attitude wouldn't be great,that attitude might work in America with it's big open spaces and wide canyons but over here, you'd want to scale it down it a bit. :D

    Someone needs to TCB this thread....take care of business.....as they say in the States:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 373 ✭✭Spike Witwicky


    Its not like its the first ST diesel. The Mondeo had a fairly underpowered 155hp lump for a 2.2.

    At least this STD is quick, and chape ta tax. Pity it looks like an angry trout.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    What about someone who wants all the aspects of the ST except, by choice or necessity, also want a diesel.

    What about if somebody wants ferrari to make a sportscar thats under 25 grand new,
    Or bentley to make a bog spec continental with a towbar and cloth seats as standard. Or What about if somebody wants a micra with racing stripes thats done up to look like some sort of retarded formula one monstrosity

    modified_sporty_nissan_march_113407.jpg

    Just because somebody wants something doesn't mean it should be possible.

    Driving an ST diesel , GT-TDI or other smoke-hatches is basically the same as the young lad putting a glanza kit on his 1.0 starlet , or fitting a huge spoiler to a bog spec mitsubishi colt. These are for people who want so desperatly to live out their 'fast and furious' dreams while real car enthusiasts point and laugh.

    If you can only afford a diesel , don't pretend its a racecar.

    Something to do with silk purses and pigs ears come to mind.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,856 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    Its not like its the first ST diesel. The Mondeo had a fairly underpowered 155hp lump for a 2.2.

    At least this STD is quick, and chape ta tax. Pity it looks like an angry trout.

    That 2.2 was plenty quick enough for it's time.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,856 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    ....Driving an ST diesel , GT-TDI or other smoke-hatches is basically the same as the young lad putting a glanza kit on his 1.0 starlet , or fitting a huge spoiler to a bog spec mitsubishi colt. These are for people who want so desperatly to live out their 'fast and furious' dreams while real car enthusiasts point and laugh.

    If you can only afford a diesel , don't pretend its a racecar.

    Something to do with silk purses and pigs ears come to mind.

    Ya

    1395758192.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭The Dagda


    What about if somebody wants ferrari to make a sportscar thats under 25 grand new,
    Or bentley to make a bog spec continental with a towbar and cloth seats as standard. Or What about if somebody wants a micra with racing stripes thats done up to look like some sort of retarded formula one monstrosity

    modified_sporty_nissan_march_113407.jpg

    Just because somebody wants something doesn't mean it should be possible.

    Driving an ST diesel , GT-TDI or other smoke-hatches is basically the same as the young lad putting a glanza kit on his 1.0 starlet , or fitting a huge spoiler to a bog spec mitsubishi colt. These are for people who want so desperatly to live out their 'fast and furious' dreams while real car enthusiasts point and laugh.

    If you can only afford a diesel , don't pretend its a racecar.

    Something to do with silk purses and pigs ears come to mind.

    Do you feel a BMW 535d with the M Sport kit is a sow's ear too?

    car_photo_411790_7.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,593 ✭✭✭tossy


    Ya

    1395758192.jpg

    Driving a diesel car and comparing it to one of them,is like fapping to Cameron Diaz and going for dinner with Susan Boyle.

    That car has as much in common with a road going diesel car as an F1 car has in common with a road going petrol car, it's a stupid argument as beyond a seat, internal combustion and wheels it's like comparing a space shuttle to a Cessna.
    The Dagda wrote: »
    Do you feel a BMW 535d with the M Sport kit is a sow's ear too?

    [IMG][/IMG]

    The 535d is an executive saloon, that poster was talking about the hot hatch segment of the market (as is this thread) :rolleyes:

    The diesel fan boys are reaching this morning :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 916 ✭✭✭Joe 90


    ST stands for Sports Technology and the chassis, steering, suspension, brakes, seats, equipment - infact everything that made the existing ST what is is have all been retained. A powerful diesel engine is the only difference.

    Subject to correction but RS/Cosworth have never had diesel powerplants.

    p.s. Diesels have won at Le Mans for years. Re Audi and Peugeot to be rebuked for that too?
    Not Audi or Peugeot, but the rulemakers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭The Dagda


    tossy wrote: »
    Driving a diesel car and comparing it to one of them,is like fapping to Cameron Diaz and going for dinner with Susan Boyle.

    That car has as much in common with a road going diesel car as an F1 car has in common with a road going petrol car, it's a stupid argument as beyond a seat, internal combustion and wheels it's like comparing a space shuttle to a Cessna.

    In fairness the "car enthusiast" :rolleyes: has compared wanting a Focus ST with a diesel engine to wanting a cheap Ferrari or a "bog spec" Bentley Continental, so hyperbole is relevant.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭The Dagda


    tossy wrote: »
    The 535d is an executive saloon, that poster was talking about the hot hatch segment of the market (as is this thread) :rolleyes:

    The diesel fan boys are reaching this morning :)

    Oh so the snobbery is based on the size/market of the car?! :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
Advertisement