Stupid decisions (when drunk) that ruin your life[Mega merge]

pq0n1ct4ve8zf5

Alternating Current wrote: »

I don't think anyone knows what you mean after that waffle babble you inflicted on us all.

Aw babez, were the words too long? I'll try again.

There are differences between humans and other primates.

Still too hard?

People not monkeys.

Crann na Beatha

This post has been deleted.

Sponge25

Joe Duffy.. wrote: »

I'd hardly call it performing sex acts on 24 men, a couple of seconds on each that's all.

Regardless; If you put a guy's penis in your mouth for two seconds. It's a sex act!

Muise...

Sponge25 wrote: »

Regardless; If you put a guy's penis in your mouth for two seconds. It's a sex act!

I thought the rule was three seconds if it fell on the floor.

pq0n1ct4ve8zf5

Muise... wrote: »

I thought the rule was three seconds if it fell on the floor.

If it's hitting the floor you'd want to spend more than a few seconds to do it justice in fairness

mickydoomsux

mickydoomsux wrote: »

Have you ever been in a room with a guy ever?

It's that kind of guy. 99.9% of men would gladly except a free blowjob from some tanked up young one.

I wouldn't go judging all men by your own personal standards.

Buzz Killington the third

Joe Duffy.. wrote: »

I'd hardly call it performing sex acts on 24 men, a couple of seconds on each that's all.

If you licked 24 girls in a row for a few seconds each would it be a sex act?

Maphisto

whupdedo wrote: »

Has anyone the ****in link to put up, i want to see, i want to see

NSFW
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCu-mRwpYj0

whupdedo

Buzz Killington the third wrote: »

If you licked 24 girls in a row for a few seconds each would it be a sex act?

Jaysus it would be like lickin sandpaper

Muise...

whupdedo wrote: »

Jaysus it would be like lickin sandpaper

No, no, Buzz said "girls".

Daveysil15

whupdedo wrote: »

Jaysus it would be like lickin sandpaper

Would their boobs feel like a bag of sand?

Maphisto

whupdedo wrote: »

Jaysus it would be like lickin sandpaper

You mean after a day on the beach?

whupdedo

Muise... wrote: »

No, no, Buzz said "girls".

But surely every girl shaves now...don't they, please don't tell me some girls still leave it natural :eek:

Muise...

whupdedo wrote: »

But surely every girl shaves now...don't they, please don't tell me some girls still leave it natural :eek:

You know the bits that have, or had, the hair on them?

That's not exactly where the focus should be...

Renegade Mechanic

whupdedo wrote: »

But surely every girl shaves now...don't they, please don't tell me some girls still leave it natural :eek:

Nothing wrong with an aul bush to rest your head on! Though the "velcro effect" after sexy time can be a bit disadvantageous, truth be told..

conorhal

Lucifer MorningStar wrote: »

Poor girl, camera phones are curse

I put it you that camera phones are a fine invention, I have some lovey pic and great memories on mine.
The 'problem' here is a deficit of common sense, to total lack of dignity, a pretty rapey hyper-sexualized culture that objectifies women (I don't see any blokes having to gob some cock for a bottle of beer) and a complete lack of self respect on the part of all parties involved.
If I had raised any of those kids I'd feel utterly ashamed of them.

Shakespeare's Sister

mickydoomsux wrote: »

Have you ever been in a room with a guy ever?

It's that kind of guy. 99.9% of men would gladly except a free blowjob from some tanked up young one.

This "99%" or "99.9%" or "99.99%" thing gets used quite a bit. It's meaningless... unless in reference to an ice-cream.
You must try not to mix up yourself with most guys.

eviltwin wrote: »

A group of people got drunk and did something dumb, it is not that big a deal, yeah it's gross and pathetic for all concerned but it's not like they killed anyone. Everyone consented. Get over it people.

That's just your opinion and I'm not sure why you're forcing it on others. It isn't the end of the world, but it's not no big deal IMO either. It's fairly horrible stuff and I hate the idea of kids feeling this is the way to carry on, and would be gutted if I had a teenager who resorted to it (whether the girl or guys).
Whoever filmed and uploaded it is a crap person, but she is a fecking dope too. Even if it wasn't filmed.
But those who call her a slut... well the guys enabled her slutdom; it's a two-way street (crap pun intended).

Daveysil15

conorhal wrote: »

I put it you that camera phones are a fine invention, I have some lovey pic and great memories on mine.
The 'problem' here is a deficit of common sense, to total lack of dignity, a pretty rapey hyper-sexualized culture that objectifies women (I don't see any blokes having to gob some cock for a bottle of beer) and a complete lack of self respect on the part of all parties involved.
If I had raised any of those kids I'd feel utterly ashamed of them.

With good reason. However if a bloke sucked 20 tits it'd be grand.

Buzz Killington the third

conorhal wrote: »

a pretty rapey hyper-sexualized culture that objectifies women

Only a matter of time before this crap was to emerge :rolleyes:

conorhal wrote: »

(I don't see any blokes having to gob some cock for a bottle of beer)

Na, they just have to expose themselves so she can get one.

gctest50

919 in a day by this woman seems to be the record

Lisa Sparxxx

• She’s married.
  
• The rules say that each sexual contact has to take more then 30 and the most 60 seconds.
• Each sexual contact was carefully watched, rated and counted by referees.
• 6 cameras were used to record the event..

on_my_oe

My list of stupid things I'm glad weren't caught on camera are fairly short ('borrowing' the McDonalds mascot Ronald McDonald, and being watched by the cops while we carefully returned it; hunting for car keys in a traffic island garden after a lousy game of catch, again carefully watched by the cops who satisfied themselves one of us was sober). My parents know my stupidity (and shared a few stories of their own too), but I'm grateful it wasn't on video.

I doubt though my antics would have made the newspaper while this girl has achieved notoriety that's going to follow her for a long time, and create a few arguments over many Christmas dinner too.

It's sad though that guys are probably getting back slaps while she getting called a slapper

on_my_oe

Daveysil15 wrote: »

With good reason. However if a bloke sucked 20 tits it'd be grand.

No, there would be 20 girls being called sluts for getting their boobs out.

eviltwin

Magaggie wrote: »

This "99%" or "99.9%" or "99.99%" thing gets used quite a bit. It's meaningless... unless in reference to an ice-cream.
You must try not to mix up yourself with most guys.

That's just your opinion and I'm not sure why you're forcing it on others. It isn't the end of the world, but it's not no big deal IMO either. It's fairly horrible stuff and I hate the idea of kids feeling this is the way to carry on, and would be gutted if I had a teenager who resorted to it (whether the girl or guys).
Whoever filmed and uploaded it is a crap person, but she is a fecking dope too. Even if it wasn't filmed.
But those who call her a slut... well the guys enabled her slutdom; it's a two-way street (crap pun intended).

Yes it is horrible but it nothing new. I know bars in resorts in Spain and Greece that were doing similar stunts years ago. I don't condone it but I don't understand why people freak out over casual sex either.

Muise...

Buzz Killington the third wrote: »

Only a matter of time before this crap was to emerge :rolleyes:


Na, they just have to expose themselves so she can get one.

I don't think it's crap, because the event itself really had very little to do with sex and all to do with how far they'd go for fame/infamy and a free drink. If the participants were all being called sluts for having an orgy of mutual pleasure, I'd defend them against the charge, but because it was all so detached from pleasure (which is how I'd see 'objectified'), I'm baffled at the seedy sluttiness of it all.

Shakespeare's Sister

eviltwin wrote: »

Yes it is horrible but it nothing new.

I know it's nothing new but that doesn't lessen it IMO.

I don't condone it but I don't understand why people freak out over casual sex either.

"Casual sex" is the term I'd use for having sex with someone (or more than one person) whom you fancy and because you enjoy the sensation of sexual contact. In private.

This... is miles off the above.

Buzz Killington the third

conorhal wrote: »

This from a poster over on the french veil ban thread insisting that it's fine that women should be consigned to walking prisons?
It sounds like a contradiction but it is in fact consistent with a person who's attitude towards women is pretty debased.
The attitudes on both threads typifies an view of women as commodities by narcisists who are only concerned with how they can control them, they can either be sexually available commodities or owned ones that walk four paces behind you.

I didn't post in that thread. Check your facts and revert back with an apology... Thanks.

conorhal

Buzz Killington the third wrote: »

I didn't post in that thread. Check your facts and revert back with an apology... Thanks.

Fair enough, I've clearly mixed you up with sombody else. Sorry.

MD1990

Would she get paid overtime for this?

Muise...

Buzz Killington the third wrote: »

I didn't post in that thread. Check your facts and revert back with an apology... Thanks.

conorhal wrote: »

Fair enough, I've clearly mixed you up with sombody else. Sorry.

Phew. I kind of agree with both of ye on this thread. Sort of an argumentative boardsie troilism...

HomelessMidge

Seen the video, Max was 5 second contact with each penis. That's only 2 minutes of public d!ck sucking. If it was on the same penis it wouldn't have been too bad but she seemed to be getting dragged around the d!cks. She seemed pretty happy all the way through!

Buzz Killington the third

conorhal wrote: »

Fair enough, I've clearly mixed you up with sombody else. Sorry.

That'll do pig, that'll do...


That was joke by the way!

conorhal

Muise... wrote: »

I don't think it's crap, because the event itself really had very little to do with sex and all to do with how far they'd go for fame/infamy and a free drink. If the participants were all being called sluts for having an orgy of mutual pleasure, I'd defend them against the charge, but because it was all so detached from pleasure (which is how I'd see 'objectified'), I'm baffled at the seedy sluttiness of it all.

I think that hits the nail on the head about what's so disturbing about the whole thing, the numb, seedy, unpleasant sensuality free nature of the affair. It's been described as the pornification of culture, and I suspect that it's going to leave a lot of emotionally damaged and detached people in it's nhilistic wake.

Buzz Killington the third

On a side note, I don't think alcohol can be blamed for this at all. She seemed fairly with it and I'm tired of seeing "I was drunk" being an excuse when clearly she can function.

pq0n1ct4ve8zf5

eviltwin wrote: »

Yes it is horrible but it nothing new. I know bars in resorts in Spain and Greece that were doing similar stunts years ago. I don't condone it but I don't understand why people freak out over casual sex either.

For sure, it's wall to wall boobs and willies in a lot of those places. It makes me feel a bit sorrier for her than I otherwise would, sure she's an idiot but it probably seemed a lot less remarkable in context than it did in the cold light of day, back at home once the holiday's over.

Dublin Red Devil

When I was drunk a few years ago, I tried it on with a good female friend. Friendship was never the same again, didn't speak for about 18 months which made for many awkward meeting as both of us have many mutual friends.

We just recently exchanged hello's and a smile, in passing, but I doubt we will ever be good mates like we were before.

Buzz Killington the third

Melany Squeaking Desktop wrote: »

For sure, it's wall to wall boobs and willies in a lot of those places.

People that book these type of party holidays know what they're in for. Then they're shocked when people at home find out that what happens on tour never stays on tour.

Soft Falling Rain

Shame on the person who uploaded this and the dirt birds who partook, but I'm finding it hard to sympathise with the woman in question. I see myself as quite understanding and compassionate, but FFS she put 25 dicks in her mouth in a public space. I don't even think the term slut is apt here, just ****ing stupid is the term I would use.

Seriously, the mind boggles.

harry Bailey esq

gctest50 wrote: »

919 in a day by this woman seems to be the record

Lisa Sparxxx

• She’s married.
  
• The rules say that each sexual contact has to take more then 30 and the most 60 seconds.
• Each sexual contact was carefully watched, rated and counted by referees.
• 6 cameras were used to record the event..

what a lil' trooper....

ColeTrain

Will this girl attend mass when she gets home? That's the question I want answered..

userod

Melany Squeaking Desktop wrote: »

Oh shut up you know what I mean.

F.uck off

average hero

I feel sorry for the girl involved. Regarding the incident, I know plenty of lads that would queue for that if they were in Magaluf and were 18-20. Particularly the peer pressure and notoriety of it when out with the lads. It's the stuff of many lads fake stories. Particularly as the lads weren't identified and got a cheap thrill. I don't think that the lads can be blamed as male peer pressure, alcohol, a sex and porn obsessed society and being that age (being the biggest factor) probably contributed to them partaking. Men have a certain 'drive' after all - warped and all as the incident is/was.

The girl involved has to take responsibility for her own actions and her own reputation. I feel bad for her but ultimately she is responsible as she appeared to be in control of herself and did it by consent (actually by her urging in a few instances).

Maphisto

mickydoomsux wrote: »

It's that kind of guy. 99.9% of men would gladly except a free blowjob from some tanked up young one.

I'm a married man so blowjobs are a bit of a mystery to me. We weren't really talking about blowjobs there though were we? I don't believe anyone goty anything out of it other than the attention and notoriarty.

Buzz Killington the third

Maphisto wrote: »

I'm a married man so blowjobs are a bit of a mystery to me.

Hope you're joking... Poor guy.

limklad

urabell wrote: »

We've all been there.

Well I never suck 24 men dicks before or any one for that matter.

Yes, You have been.... Thankfully not with me.....:pac::pac:

Greenmachine

The whole story blows. Come on that girl really sucks.

Maphisto

limklad wrote: »

Well I never suck 24 men dicks before or any one for that matter.

Is it just the number putting you off?

limklad

Buzz Killington the third wrote: »

Hope you're joking... Poor guy.

No, He not Joking.. Sad I know. .. My married friends are definitely in the same boat.. :P So It is more common than you think.

limklad

Maphisto wrote: »

Is it just the number putting you off?

nah,, It just not my thing...... I am more into introverts in the front, not extroverts..:p

K4t

Why do people care about this story? It's completely uninteresting. I've done far worse than that girl (respectively.) The whole thing is more a reflection on the people who spread the story and who are posting in this thread than the girl herself who made a drunken mistake she probably doesn't even really remember. Such a sad little society we live in here.

auldgranny

limklad wrote: »

No, He not Joking.. Sad I know. .. My married friends are definitely in the same boat.. :P So It is more common than you think.

What has married got to do with it? Is it people in long term relationships? Because I can't see how being married can make a difference.