Brazil v Netherlands, World Cup 3rd/4th Place Playoff, 9PM 7/12/14

irishmays

wonski wrote: »

No, I am not. I watch the game.

Who was the top player for the Brazil team in this game then, let's leave Oscar out of this.

Their two down are you well in the head Chelsea just won the lottery selling that pleb

Al_Coholic

fernandinho got a yellow card :O

vidor

Al_Coholic wrote: »

I am going for 5 fouls for Fernandinho before he gets a yellow card.

Ishmael

Fairly rough tackle on rvp

sammy37

Nolars wrote: »

Why don't people that want real analysis on a nothing game switch the channel.

exactly this game is nothing more than a friendly, switch over to hoddle and co if it bothers you so much and Kerr seems to be sobering up a bit anyway he must have had a bucket of coffee at half time

wonski

irishmays wrote: »

Their two down are you well in the head Chelsea just won the lottery selling that pleb

Yeah, because the rest of the team did great job so far.
Luiz has to play as a centre and a midfielder, no other player seems to be interested in passing the ball around.

Corholio

Brazil really, really need someone who wants the ball. None of them look to go to the effort to make space to demand it. I wouldnt be a huge fan but Coutinho would have been a decent player to do that.

Al_Coholic

De Vrij has been really impressive

Corholio

wonski wrote: »

Yeah, because the rest of the team did great job so far.
Luiz has to play as a centre and a midfielder, no other player seems to be interested in passing the ball around.

He gave away a goal. Stop going on about the rest of the team who havent done that.

keith16

In the buke.

Guy:Incognito

wonski wrote: »

Yeah, because the rest of the team did great job so far.
Luiz has to play as a centre and a midfielder, no other player seems to be interested in passing the ball around.

Doesn't matter what position hes playing, it was a poxy defensive header for the 2nd goal. Out of the all the directions he could choose to head that he chose one of the 2 that could lead to a goal (the othe rbeing to just head it in himself)

Though we did get to hear Kerr call him Day-vid Louise.

wonski

Brazil back to the kicking tactics.

syklops

Nolars wrote: »

Why don't people that want real analysis on a nothing game switch the channel.

I did.

Corholio

syklops wrote: »

I did.

Thought you said you were switching to ITV.

Guy:Incognito

Nothing game my ass. I'd rather go home from a world cup with a Bronze medal than no medal any day.

Plus when Holland win it in 4 year , Kuyt will have a gold, silver and a bronze.

wonski

Corholio wrote: »

He gave away a goal. Stop going on about the rest of the team who havent done that.

I know he did, but linking it to the PSG deal sounds silly.

Al_Coholic

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

Nothing game my ass. I'd rather go home from a world cup with a Bronze medal than no medal any day.

Plus when Holland win it in 4 year , Kuyt will have a gold, silver and a bronze.

i dont think they have a medal for this game?

Lapin

"Posession means absolutely nothing in the game of football."

Harry Angstrom

Looks like a toe poke to me Brian.

Turtyturd

'Dear Kite'

JONJO THE MISER

Lapin wrote: »

"Posession means absolutely nothing in the game of football."

when they cant get goals.

syklops

Corholio wrote: »

Thought you said you were switching to ITV.

I stopped watching RTE coverage.

murpho999

Lapin wrote: »

"Posession means absolutely nothing in the game of football."

As in the Brazil stats show they have much more possession but are loing 2-0. So he's right in my opinion.

rolliepoley

wonski wrote: »

I know he did, but linking it to the PSG deal sounds silly.

Well if i had anything to go with PSG i would have my head in my hands woundering why the fuk did i spend that money.

Corholio

syklops wrote: »

I stopped watching RTE coverage.

It was meant that you said you wanted proper analysis and yet went to ITV.

The Peanut

With all the sums being thrown about for footballers, how in the name of God was Luiz valued at what PSG paid?

It's incredible.

tastyt

Alkin is such a ****ing dope. How could you possibly think luiz toe pokes those free kicks. A two year old can see it isnt. And possession means absolutely nothing in football was another humdinger

Chagan

No chance that's a penalty.

Guy:Incognito

murpho999 wrote: »

As in the Brazil stat show they have much more possession but re loing 2-0. So he's right in my opinion.

You'll find it very hard to score goals without the ball.

Pighead

syklops wrote: »

So why are they on the TV?

Mainly because a lot of people disagree with your opinion. The sketches have been hit and miss this tournament but I've enjoyed them this evening so far.

irishmays

wonski wrote: »

Yeah, because the rest of the team did great job so far.
Luiz has to play as a centre and a midfielder, no other player seems to be interested in passing the ball around.

Hmmm I believe you may be watching a different game to me. Was he not the fool in last game who was captain, and instead of worrying about winning a world cup semi final, he was wearing a ridiculous cap and holding up neymars jersey. If Roy Keane seen a player doing that there's a good chance hed have kicked him sqaure in the nuts

Skid X

murpho999 wrote: »

As in the Brazil stat show they have much more possession but re loing 2-0. So he's right in my opinion.

Yeah, but the way he said it was weird. After a long pause he added the bit about it's only what's on the scoreboard that counts.

Like he realised how what he had said was nonsense, unless he explained it better.

Muahahaha

Think Kerr got his wings clipped somewhat at half time, he's not as chirpy this half

Corholio

Type of game will suit the Dutch now. Should probably see it out.

murpho999

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

You'll find it very hard to score goals without the ball.

That is not what he meant and you know that.

syklops

Pighead wrote: »

Mainly because a lot of people disagree with your opinion. The sketches have been hit and miss this tournament but I've enjoyed them this evening so far.

Ah Pighead me old mucker.

Al_Coholic

that looked like a penalty

yeah its a penalty even though Oscar makes the most of it

Nuri Sahin

Oscar

Washington Irving

Should have been booked earlier anyway

sammy37

blatant penalty alkin has not a clue

tastyt

Stonewall

Corholio

Probably just about a penalty, even if Oscar bought it.

Turtyturd

Usual from Oscar, on his way down as soon as he kicked the ball.

Guy:Incognito

Id like to hear what the ref said when Oscar asked him how he hirt himself if he didn't make contact.

Will I Amnt

Harsh one that. Don't think there could be too many arguments if he got the pen there.

Rayne Wooney

They're given most of the time really

Pighead

Definite penalty. Referee probably realises it now given Blind's knee is busted.

Ishmael

Should have been a penalty.

efb

A man with a seeing-eye dog led him down the tunnel, you could say it the blind leading the blind...


/gets coat

wonski

irishmays wrote: »

Hmmm I believe you may be watching a different game to me. Was he not the fool in last game who was captain, and instead of worrying about winning a world cup semi final, he was wearing a ridiculous cap and holding up neymars jersey. If Roy Keane seen a player doing that there's a good chance hed have kicked him sqaure in the nuts

Well, I am watching this game, not the last one:D