Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Round 4 Football Qualifiers

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,048 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Prop Joe wrote: »
    Kerry v Galway
    Mayo v Cork
    Dublin v Monaghan/Kildare
    Donegal v Armagh/Meath

    All 1/4's would fit perfectly in each teams home venue

    I think it would be a bit much to make the Cork team to travel up to Mayo for that match, you are talking about a 7 hour round trip, then you need time for warm up, match and food after, thats not fair to force that on amateur players who have made it to the QFs. Also, you wont have many Cork fans travelling which is not good either.

    Really, these games should be fixed with a bit of common sense in mind - you need to look at logistics for both teams, maximising the attendance, etc. Not considering these will affect the game, the atmosphere and the product we want to promote. That is why I dont think hard and fast rules like automatically giving one team home advantage is a good idea. It would be very unfair to make Armagh travel to Kerry, or Cork to Donegal. It should be decided based on both counties involved, after all, it is their players who will be on the pitch and their supporters in the stands.

    I still think Kerry v Galway and Mayo v Cork as a double header in the Gaelic Grounds is the best solution for all involved. It would cut at least an hour off the journey for those involved and hopefully entice a few more through the turnstile.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,621 ✭✭✭Nidgeweasel


    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    I think it would be a bit much to make the Cork team to travel up to Mayo for that match, you are talking about a 7 hour round trip, then you need time for warm up, match and food after, thats not fair to force that on amateur players who have made it to the QFs. Also, you wont have many Cork fans travelling which is not good either.

    Really, these games should be fixed with a bit of common sense in mind - you need to look at logistics for both teams, maximising the attendance, etc. Not considering these will affect the game, the atmosphere and the product we want to promote. That is why I dont think hard and fast rules like automatically giving one team home advantage is a good idea. It would be very unfair to make Armagh travel to Kerry, or Cork to Donegal. It should be decided based on both counties involved, after all, it is their players who will be on the pitch and their supporters in the stands.

    .

    Win your province then. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    iDave wrote: »
    Non-Monaghan Ulster counties would have no problem nominating Clones as their home for a QF. Although when Casement is done there would be pressure on them to use that to justify its existence.

    Casement is a fair bit away for Donegal, as indeed is Clones. Most counties have 25/30k stadia not too far away, Ulster is at a bit of a disadvantage that way. Its odd really, Ulster/Leinster counties get punished for having smaller, more realistic size grounds while Connacht and Munster, who have too many 30k+ stadia, benefit!

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,265 ✭✭✭ciarriaithuaidh


    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    I think it would be a bit much to make the Cork team to travel up to Mayo for that match, you are talking about a 7 hour round trip, then you need time for warm up, match and food after, thats not fair to force that on amateur players who have made it to the QFs. Also, you wont have many Cork fans travelling which is not good either.

    Really, these games should be fixed with a bit of common sense in mind - you need to look at logistics for both teams, maximising the attendance, etc. Not considering these will affect the game, the atmosphere and the product we want to promote. That is why I dont think hard and fast rules like automatically giving one team home advantage is a good idea. It would be very unfair to make Armagh travel to Kerry, or Cork to Donegal. It should be decided based on both counties involved, after all, it is their players who will be on the pitch and their supporters in the stands.

    I still think Kerry v Galway and Mayo v Cork as a double header in the Gaelic Grounds is the best solution for all involved. It would cut at least an hour off the journey for those involved and hopefully entice a few more through the turnstile.

    That would make perfect sense in this case, couldn't disagree.

    Just on the "7 hour round trip to Mayo" thing...have a look at trip time for Allihies, Castletownbere, Bantry to Croke park..or from Waterville, Caherdaniel, Sneem to Croke park...you're looking at 10 hour round trips or more there which is already the accepted norm for 1/4 finals..so if there was a chance of a home quarter final every second or third year with the odd long trip to say Mayo, Limerick or even Clones..the distance travelled would even out or maybe even be less than what it would be anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,426 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Quarter finals at provincial venues is something that definitely should be looked at.
    As said above, Kerry v Galway in Killarney (or Salthill) would have a great buzz and the capacity wouldn't be an issue. It also could reward the Provincial winners with a home quarter final. There is arguably no advantage from winning your province these days as the layoff can in some cases actually be detrimental rather than beneficial.

    Mayo v Cork in Castlebar. (40k+)
    Monaghan v Kildare/Dublin in Clones/Croker
    Donegal v Meath/Armagh in Breffni Park/Clones (Both 32k+ capacity)

    There are plenty venues capable of holding such games, the problem is the GAA have 10 year ticket holders and corporate sponsors who want all these games at Croker, however it would be great if you could have 2 1/4 finals at Croker and maybe 2 outside it each year...the overall attendance would actually increase I'd be fairly sure.

    There are many many advantages to winning your provincial.
    Any serious contender will want to win the provincial, it makes planning easier and means you avoid another provincial champ in the QF.

    On the subject of QF outside of CP.

    They are on CP cos its reward for winning the provincial, just like it was by playing the SF there are 2001


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,265 ✭✭✭ciarriaithuaidh


    There are many many advantages to winning your provincial.
    Any serious contender will want to win the provincial, it makes planning easier and means you avoid another provincial champ in the QF.

    On the subject of QF outside of CP.

    They are on CP cos its reward for winning the provincial, just like it was by playing the SF there are 2001

    How is that a reward? Teams coming through back door get the same thing..AND they will have had an extra game to tune up (possibly in Croker also)..so like I said, there is not much advantage and arguably a DISadvantage to scraping a win in provincial final and having a 5 week layoff, rather than going through the backdoor and having the extra game.

    Look at the amount of provincial champions who have been caught cold in quarters over last few years AND the number of qualifiers who have made it to semis, finals and even won the whole thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,048 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Win your province then. :)

    I understand the point of giving an advantage to provincial winners but dont you think that could be a bit punitive on the other team?

    Like I said, we should be trying to accommodate players (the guys who put in all the training and effort) and fans (the people who pay over the money) as much as possible. This is extra important when it comes to showpiece matches such as QFs. Dragging one team the length of the country to play in front of almost exclusive opposition fans is not good for the Championship.

    "Win your province then" seems a very arrogant answer and not the kind of attitude that should be taken if we want to grow and develop the sport.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,621 ✭✭✭Nidgeweasel


    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    I understand the point of giving an advantage to provincial winners but dont you think that could be a bit punitive on the other team?

    Like I said, we should be trying to accommodate players (the guys who put in all the training and effort) and fans (the people who pay over the money) as much as possible. This is extra important when it comes to showpiece matches such as QFs. Dragging one team the length of the country to play in front of almost exclusive opposition fans is not good for the Championship.

    "Win your province then" seems a very arrogant answer and not the kind of attitude that should be taken if we want to grow and develop the sport.

    Carlow had to travel to Ballybofey a few years ago for a qualifier. Was that fair?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,426 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    How is that a reward? Teams coming through back door get the same thing..AND they will have had an extra game to tune up (possibly in Croker also)..so like I said, there is not much advantage and arguably a DISadvantage to scraping a win in provincial final and having a 5 week layoff, rather than going through the backdoor and having the extra game.

    Look at the amount of provincial champions who have been caught cold in quarters over last few years AND the number of qualifiers who have made it to semis, finals and even won the whole thing.


    Losing a provincial at any stage only guarantees you one more game, not a trip to CP.
    Winning it does though.

    And since 2010 when all provincial winners lost their QF only one has, and that was Monaghan.
    The days to the route through the back door to hone your game are gone.

    By the way that set on 2010 provincial winners included the likes of Meath and Roscommon


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,967 ✭✭✭✭The Lost Sheep


    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    I understand the point of giving an advantage to provincial winners but dont you think that could be a bit punitive on the other team?

    Like I said, we should be trying to accommodate players (the guys who put in all the training and effort) and fans (the people who pay over the money) as much as possible. This is extra important when it comes to showpiece matches such as QFs. Dragging one team the length of the country to play in front of almost exclusive opposition fans is not good for the Championship.

    "Win your province then" seems a very arrogant answer and not the kind of attitude that should be taken if we want to grow and develop the sport.
    The showpiece games should be in the showpiece ground
    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    I think it would be a bit much to make the Cork team to travel up to Mayo for that match, you are talking about a 7 hour round trip, then you need time for warm up, match and food after, thats not fair to force that on amateur players who have made it to the QFs. Also, you wont have many Cork fans travelling which is not good either.

    Really, these games should be fixed with a bit of common sense in mind - you need to look at logistics for both teams, maximising the attendance, etc. Not considering these will affect the game, the atmosphere and the product we want to promote. That is why I dont think hard and fast rules like automatically giving one team home advantage is a good idea. It would be very unfair to make Armagh travel to Kerry, or Cork to Donegal. It should be decided based on both counties involved, after all, it is their players who will be on the pitch and their supporters in the stands.

    I still think Kerry v Galway and Mayo v Cork as a double header in the Gaelic Grounds is the best solution for all involved. It would cut at least an hour off the journey for those involved and hopefully entice a few more through the turnstile.
    How is it unfair? The preparation time would be the same for a league game and there isn't complaining about time etc taken to get to the game during the league. Yes the players are amateur and it would be a considerable time to travel but it isn't that much time and the players are well looked after.
    Giving a team, like provincial champions, home advantage promotes success and rewards earlier successes. I wouldn't see it as unfair Armagh travelling to Kerry or Cork to Donegal.
    Croke Park as a day out etc entices people in to games. The top games should be in the showpiece ground.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,621 ✭✭✭Nidgeweasel


    And anyway Pete, It'll be a while before yourselves have to worry about it!


Advertisement