Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

woman refused abortion - Mod Note in first post.

Options
1424345474895

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭shruikan2553


    A defenceless child, that has done nothing wrong, also has rights

    You may be surprised to hear this as it is often ignored by pro life people but there is a woman with rights involved too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,748 ✭✭✭DeadHand


    I'm not talking about wiping out the human species altogether, but reducing the planet's human population to about 3 billion will help put an end to things like climate change.

    Good man yourself.

    Will you be volunteering your own life to help us get down to the 3 billion or will you be nominating a family member?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 581 ✭✭✭Ralphdejones


    Muise... wrote: »
    The law did not protect the human life of the woman in this case - it treated her as a troublesome vessel, to be deliberately left hanging in distress till her foetus was viable. This is disgusting.
    You may be surprised to hear this as it is often ignored by pro life people but there is a woman with rights involved too.

    If only the law had treated the child as a parasite with no human rights it would be great then


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭Muise...


    Sure if only the law had treated the child foetus as parasite with no human rights it would be great then

    yep. over and out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    If only the law had treated the child as a parasite with no human rights it would be great then

    Simple question for you,

    If your teenage daughter (future daughter?) came home tomorrow and said

    "Mom/Dad, I'm pregnant, I was raped on a night out and i was to ashamed to go to the police or tell anyone. I don't want to have this baby i want an abortion"

    What would you say to that girl?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 581 ✭✭✭Ralphdejones


    bumper234 wrote: »
    Simple question for you,

    If your teenage daughter (future daughter?) came home tomorrow and said

    "Mom/Dad, I'm pregnant, I was raped on a night out and i was to ashamed to go to the police or tell anyone. I don't want to have this baby i want an abortion"

    What would you say to that girl?

    I'd say why, what did the child do, and why do you think killing an innocent child will make you feel better ? Why should the child or you be stigmatised ? Neither of you did anything wrong.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    I'd say why, what did the child do, and why do you think killing an innocent child will make you feel better ? Why should the child or you be stigmatised ? Neither of you did anything wrong.

    So you would try to talk your own teenage rape victim daughter into carrying and giving birth to the child of her rapist?

    And they call pro choice people sick :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 581 ✭✭✭Ralphdejones


    bumper234 wrote: »
    So you would try to talk your own teenage rape victim daughter into carrying and giving birth to the child of her rapist?

    And they call pro choice people sick :confused:

    If you think killing an innocent child, and stigmatising them and their mother, is a solution to rape, it's not.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    If you think killing innocent child, and stigmatising them and their mother, is a solution to rape, it's not.

    It's not a child it's a bunch of cells.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    If you think killing innocent child, and stigmatising them and their mother, is a solution to rape, it's not.

    No, it's a solution to a threat to life from suicide.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 33,749 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    Calina wrote: »
    This is an asinine comment.

    Tell that to the ethicists linked to Oxford university.
    I am just putting forward their argument, given abortion is a treatment for suicidal ideation according to some including the law based on fairy tales/not evidence.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 369 ✭✭Ineedaname


    If it's just a "jellybean with no brain", why kill it ?
    I don't think killing or blaming a child for the crimes of adults is any solution in a civilised world.
    Why should such innocent children continue to be deliberately stigmatised in society ?
    In who's interest is the perpetuation of this stigmatisation ?
    Two wrongs don't make a right.

    What about the innocent woman?

    First of all she is raped. Secondly she is forced to carry her rapists child against her will. But the child was saved.

    Did the end justify the means? Do those two wrongs make a right?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,748 ✭✭✭DeadHand


    I'm for the legislation of abortion but calling a foetus a parasite... That's just callous.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,749 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    lazygal wrote: »
    No, it's a solution to a threat to life from suicide.

    That is the fairy tales argument.

    If someone is suicidal over huge debts and is about to jump from the 40th floor of a building, does one step in and pay the debts or get the person proper treatment for their mental healthcare problem?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 581 ✭✭✭Ralphdejones


    bumper234 wrote: »
    Simple question for you,

    If your teenage daughter (future daughter?) came home tomorrow and said

    "Mom/Dad, I'm pregnant, I was raped on a night out and i was to ashamed to go to the police or tell anyone. I don't want to have this baby i want an abortion"

    What would you say to that girl?
    bumper234 wrote: »
    So you would try to talk your own teenage rape victim daughter into carrying and giving birth to the child of her rapist?
    bumper234 wrote: »
    It's not a child it's a bunch of cells.

    Now it's a bunch of cells
    We're all a 'bunch of cells'


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,323 ✭✭✭eeepaulo


    If you think killing an innocent child, and stigmatising them and their mother, is a solution to rape, it's not.

    I do not think you meant stigmatising

    It would be people like you who would be branding her a disgrace


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    RobertKK wrote: »
    People voted to give the unborn the right to life.

    In a civilised progressive society this is what one would expect.

    People voted (twice) to strike down a law excluding sucicidal ideation as a reason to allow termination of a pregnancy


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,063 ✭✭✭Kiwi in IE


    I'd say why, what did the child do, and why do you think killing an innocent child will make you feel better ? Why should the child or you be stigmatised ? Neither of you did anything wrong.

    Well I feel genuine pity for any daughter/future daughter that you may have.

    Would you really consider a few cells dividing inside your daughter, put there by a rapist, equally as or more important than her?

    If my daughter were in that hideous position I would do anything it took to ensure she was taken out of this country and an abortion was preformed at the earliest oppurtunity. If I had to remortgage my house, take out a loan or even sell my own body in order to make it happen I would do so!


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    RobertKK wrote: »
    That is the fairy tales argument.

    If someone is suicidal over huge debts and is about to jump from the 40th floor of a building, does one step in and pay the debts or get the person proper treatment for their mental healthcare problem?

    Which do you rescue from a burning hospital, a Petri dish of embryos or a newborn baby?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,769 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    Would it? Can't see what's to be gained from comparing Ireland to a (presumably) less developed country. "If you think we suck, then why does this other place suck more?":confused:.

    It hasn't been established that she came from a less developed country.

    There are many countries with excellent healthcare, but appalling human rights, especially to women.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 33,749 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    efb wrote: »
    People voted (twice) to strike down a law excluding sucicidal ideation as a reason to allow termination of a pregnancy

    Yes Dana and Ivana Bacik on the same side...says it all about that referendum.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 581 ✭✭✭Ralphdejones


    eeepaulo wrote: »
    I do not think you meant stigmatising

    It would be people like you who would be branding her a disgrace

    What exactly do you mean by 'people like me' ?
    And why would I be branding her or her child a disgrace ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,812 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    Because the woman was forcibly hydrated until the foetus was viable.
    Because some medic decided it was a good idea to deny the woman her legal right to an abortion. I'd have thought that was evident.
    'demands?' Fcuking hell. The woman was suicidal.

    The LAW states that she was entitled to an abortion.

    An 'ethical' medic wouldn't have taken the law into his own hands.
    Nope. Breaking the law did, actually. An unethical, non-law-abiding medic did.

    But sure, it's grand. Force every woman who's raped to give birth. Cut their bodies open to remove the parasite inside.

    Who cares about the rights of the women, anyway?

    I'm sorry, but there is no evidence for what you are asserting. From my reading the s9 apication for a termination was granted in the form of a delivery as the foetus was viable. At that stage the woman went on hunger strike as she maintained she wanted an abortion, not a c section. An order was then sought to hydrate her. After that she consented to the Caesarian.
    Asserting that she was denied her right to an abortion, and that the doctor broke the law to delay until the foetus was viable is not doing your cause any favours.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,323 ✭✭✭eeepaulo


    What exactly do you mean by 'people like me' ?
    And why would I be branding her or her child a disgrace ?

    People who scream child while frothing at the mouth

    My point stands, people like you would be the ones branding her

    Stigmatizing is branding someone


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,453 ✭✭✭Shenshen


    RobertKK wrote: »
    That is the fairy tales argument.

    If someone is suicidal over huge debts and is about to jump from the 40th floor of a building, does one step in and pay the debts or get the person proper treatment for their mental healthcare problem?

    So you would offer counselling rather than help and advise on how to manage the debt, how to talk to creditors and banks, or even just how to declare bankcrupcy?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    Now it's a bunch of cells
    We're all a 'bunch of cells'

    When it's inside the womb it's a bunch of cells, when it's born it's a baby/child....how is this so hard for you to understand? Do you consider a 6 week old fetus to be a child?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 581 ✭✭✭Ralphdejones


    Kiwi in IE wrote: »
    Well I feel genuine pity for any daughter/future daughter that you may have.

    Would you really consider a few cells dividing inside your daughter, put there by a rapist, equally as or more important than her?

    If my daughter were in that hideous position I would do anything it took to ensure she was taken out of this country and an abortion was preformed at the earliest oppurtunity. If I had to remortgage my house, take out a loan or even sell my own body in order to make it happen I would do so!

    Well I don't think trying to stigmatise your daughter or the baby is the solution to anything.
    And I don't think killing a child is any solution to a rape.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    RobertKK wrote: »
    Yes Dana and Ivana Bacik on the same side...says it all about that referendum.

    That was the second one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭Muise...


    Kiwi in IE wrote: »
    Well I feel genuine pity for any daughter/future daughter that you may have.

    Would you really consider a few cells dividing inside your daughter, put there by a rapist, equally as or more important than her?

    If my daughter were in that hideous position I would do anything it took to ensure she was taken out of this country and an abortion was preformed at the earliest oppurtunity. If I had to remortgage my house, take out a loan or even sell my own body in order to make it happen I would do so!

    This. I think this is motherhood, when chosen and cherished.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,812 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    RobertKK wrote: »
    The twisted thing is people dismissing psychiatrists because their views don't suit.

    If a woman suffers severe depression after the birth, lets say gets post natal depression, and starts getting suicidal thoughts due to the baby, should the baby be killed as a treatment?
    A woman in the UK who was suffering from PND, jumped in front of a train going 100mph because she was so depressed from a baby that cried a lot and wouldn't sleep at night.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10451374/New-mother-with-post-natal-depression-killed-by-100mph-train.html

    The baby was the cause of the suicidal thoughts and eventual suicide, given the logic used by some for pregnant women who are suicidal, would killing the baby have been the right approach or would more supports to the woman and mental health care be the option?
    btw at Oxford University they came out with killing a baby is no different to killing an unborn and should be allowed, so it could be used to treat suicidal mothers...

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9113394/Killing-babies-no-different-from-abortion-experts-say.html

    Your understanding of post natal depression is appalling.


Advertisement