Price Changes FPL 14/15 **Mod warning 1st post**

iroced

Big Borg wrote: »

With the normal transfers per week and now Wildcarding, the only changes are a mid-fielder and striker from New Castle?

It's not Moussa Sissoko, it's Aly Cissokho left back from Aston Villa .

That said, the lack of movements price changes wise is definitely due to the WC transfers not being taken into account for price changes this year. WC weeks have actually been the quietest (at the exception of the first and last 2 days) of the season so far in terms of price changes.

Ziegler1988

Dzeko and Weimann down

Also, Aguero flag changed from red to orange so no price protection

km79

Ziegler1988 wrote: »

Dzeko and Weimann down

Also, Aguero flag changed from red to orange so no price protection

oh no.......this could be a problem......

CSF

km79 wrote: »

oh no.......this could be a problem......

Wildcard is happening fo sho.

jimmii

Ziegler1988 wrote: »

Also, Aguero flag changed from red to orange so no price protection

Bugger.

Fingers crossed casuals only bring him in on wildcard don't think I can fade too many rises!!

CSF

jimmii wrote: »

Bugger.

Fingers crossed casuals only bring him in on wildcard don't think I can fade too many rises!!

He'll be up .3 by the morning of the Arsenal game I'd say.

jimmii

CSF wrote: »

He'll be up .3 by the morning of the Arsenal game I'd say.

You think that many will restructure their team that much without using their wildcard? Hopefully not!

Iused2likebusts

Yaya hanging tough at 10.9 is great news for me as I won't be selling till next gw.

jimmii

Iused2likebusts wrote: »

Yaya hanging tough at 10.9 is great news for me as I won't be selling till next gw.

Yeah think I might do the same.

CSF

jimmii wrote: »

You think that many will restructure their team that much without using their wildcard? Hopefully not!

I think that the sight of Aguero with no flag will immediately begin the by now ritual of transferring him in immediately............last season more often than not being met with another injury.

I'll be wildcarding anyway I'd say.

jimmii

CSF wrote: »

I think that the sight of Aguero with no flag will immediately begin the by now ritual of transferring him in immediately............last season more often than not being met with another injury.

I'll be wildcarding anyway I'd say.

It will hopefully slow down the price increase atleast not easy to get him in unless he was replaced with rvp.

iroced

Ziegler1988 wrote: »

Also, Aguero flag changed from red to orange so no price protection

This is by far the stupidest rule in the entire game. And then we have the official talk of fairness about the secret around price changes data and info :rolleyes:...

Iused2likebusts wrote: »

Yaya hanging tough at 10.9 is great news for me as I won't be selling till next gw.

Sometimes casuals can be of great help :P...

AdMMM

Ziegler1988 wrote: »

Dzeko and Weimann down

Also, Aguero flag changed from red to orange so no price protection

Eek, that's a bit of a blow!

Shedite27

I want Aguero at the current (or close to that price). It's an easy transfer (RVP - Aguero). But...

RVP in January - SOU, qpr, LEI
Aguero in Jan - eve, ASR, che

km79

CSF wrote: »

He'll be up .3 by the morning of the Arsenal game I'd say.

He surely won't go up .1 before Saturday though .......right ?

OneColdHand

km79 wrote: »

He surely won't go up .1 before Saturday though .......right ?

I feel the masses are reactive rather than proactive. I feel he'd have to at least come on as a sub before there's any noticeable amount of people getting him in. Almost double the amount of people have transferred him out this week than have transferred him in, though that will probably change over the next few days.

CSF

km79 wrote: »

He surely won't go up .1 before Saturday though .......right ?

This week, no. I'd be shocked. He hasn't got the 'green light' yet.

CSF

OneColdHand wrote: »

I feel the masses are reactive rather than proactive. I feel he'd have to at least come on as a sub before there's any noticeable amount of people getting him in. Almost double the amount of people have transferred him out this week than have transferred him in, though that will probably change over the next few days.

I think he'll be on as a sub against Everton, and once he does there'll be a rake of transfers in. He might not come on though, and that would certainly slow it all down.

iroced

km79 wrote: »

He surely won't go up .1 before Saturday though .......right ?

If fiso "NTI Today" is correct his NTI-NTO balance is currently +312. Let's see how it evolves...

Only tonight & tomorrow to change though. And it's a WC week. And no official confirmation of him featuring at the week-end bar this article in which you have all the ingredients for another injury in 2 to 3 weeks time :rolleyes:... I hope the journalists spoke (well wrote) a little be too fast...

Pellegrini press conference will be scrutinised now :pac:...

OneColdHand wrote: »

I feel the masses are reactive rather than proactive. I feel he'd have to at least come on as a sub before there's any noticeable amount of people getting him in. Almost double the amount of people have transferred him out this week than have transferred him in, though that will probably change over the next few days.

:eek:. That's actually a big worry (price wise). NO ONE should have transferred him in this week !

Rikand

Shedite27 wrote: »

I want Aguero at the current (or close to that price). It's an easy transfer (RVP - Aguero). But...

RVP in January - SOU, qpr, LEI
Aguero in Jan - eve, ASR, che

Form over Fixtures

Even a returning from injury Aguero has unreal form

OneColdHand

iroced wrote: »

:eek:. That's actually a big worry (price wise). NO ONE should have transferred him in this week !

It was probably before the red flag was removed.

iroced

OneColdHand wrote: »

It was probably before the red flag was removed.

Yeah but no one should have transferred him in anyway.

OneColdHand

iroced wrote: »

Yeah but no one should have transferred him in anyway.

There are a LOT of baffling transfer made though - 15,000 people have transferred Yaya IN! Bony has 7,000 in. So nothing ever surprises me.

jimmii

OneColdHand wrote: »

There are a LOT of baffling transfer made though - 15,000 people have transferred Yaya IN! Bony has 7,000 in. So nothing ever surprises me.

I think there are some people out there who play random in games like trying to get as few points as possible or getting a low team value etc. I put it down to people be cray.

menoscemo

jimmii wrote: »

I think there are some people out there who play random in games like trying to get as few points as possible or getting a low team value etc. I put it down to people be cray.

Nope, there were a good few days after the last GW that Yaya + Bony didn't have a red flag and loads had transferred yaya in because of his good form. He scored in the last GW...
I highlighted this Last thursday as over 6000 had transferred him in directly after he got 8 pts against Sunderland.

8-10

jimmii wrote: »

I think there are some people out there who play random in games like trying to get as few points as possible or getting a low team value etc. I put it down to people be cray.

Gomis has the highest rate of transfers in after Kane right now, despite having scored a total of 1 goal all season, 26 points in fantasy, and an average of less than 35mins per game he's featured in.

People be crazy

iroced

menoscemo wrote: »

Nope, there were a good few days after the last GW that Yaya + Bony didn't have a red flag and loads had transferred yaya in because of his good form. He scored in the last GW...
I highlighted this Last thursday as over 6000 had transferred him in directly after he got 8 pts against Sunderland.

Admittedly but transferring in a player who leaves for AFCON just because he got a good score is plain stupidity or at least total carelessness isn't it?

jimmii

menoscemo wrote: »

Nope, there were a good few days after the last GW that Yaya + Bony didn't have a red flag and loads had transferred yaya in because of his good form. He scored in the last GW...
I highlighted this Last thursday as over 6000 had transferred him in directly after he got 8 pts against Sunderland.

So you don't think people are crazy or playing games other than trying to get the most points and that could be a reason for transfers?

jimmii

8-10 wrote: »

Gomis has the highest rate of transfers in after Kane right now, despite having scored a total of 1 goal all season, 26 points in fantasy, and an average of less than 35mins per game he's featured in.

People be crazy

And i'm sure a few of those new Gomis owners will jump on Oliveira once he gets added! It would be interesting to hear some peoples reasoning for transfers at times. I guess Gomis in isn't the worst at least he is going to be available to play!

Swiper the fox

Iused2likebusts wrote: »

Yaya hanging tough at 10.9 is great news for me as I won't be selling till next gw.

Why so busts? There must be someone out there worth a 4 point hit at that price, you must be very happy with your remaining front 7??

OneColdHand

Swiper the fox wrote: »

Why so busts? There must be someone out there worth a 4 point hit at that price, you must be very happy with your remaining front 7??

*AHEM*DiMara*AHEM*

Iused2likebusts

Swiper the fox wrote: »

Why so busts? There must be someone out there worth a 4 point hit at that price, you must be very happy with your remaining front 7??

I went with a strong front 8 over Xmas with the intention of an early wildcard. Turns out I don't really need to wildcard I did carroll to Kane with my freebie as I felt it was more urgent. My front 7 is
Silva sterling hazard sanchez
Ings Kane austin
Yaya on bench. I don't see who I can bench and certainly don't think it's worth a -4.
IF Aguero is back ill do Yaya to a cheapie and austin to aguero for -4 next week.

AlanDeGenerous

OneColdHand wrote: »

*AHEM*DiMara*AHEM*

Who?!

menoscemo

iroced wrote: »

Admittedly but transferring in a player who leaves for AFCON just because he got a good score is plain stupidity or at least total carelessness isn't it?

jimmii wrote: »

So you don't think people are crazy or playing games other than trying to get the most points and that could be a reason for transfers?

There might be some transferring him in as a Joke, but the bulk of the transfers in came after the last GW and before he got a red flag, so I'd say lots of the casuals were just unaware of the AFCON situation.

jimmii

menoscemo wrote: »

There might be some transferring him in as a Joke, but the bulk of the transfers in came after the last GW and before he got a red flag, so I'd say lots of the casuals were just unaware of the AFCON situation.

Yeah talking to some of the casuals in leagues I am in its amazing how unaware they are of certain things! The amount of point chasing is unreal! Lots of I bought player A this week he scored two goals last week wish I had him then er did you not see he is away to Chelsea and City the next two weeks? No dammit I didn't even look at fixtures ah sure if you can score against one team you can score against any.

iroced

jimmii wrote: »

Yeah talking to some of the casuals in leagues I am in its amazing how unaware they are of certain things! The amount of point chasing is unreal! Lots of I bought player A this week he scored two goals last week wish I had him then er did you not see he is away to Chelsea and City the next two weeks? No dammit I didn't even look at fixtures ah sure if you can score against one team you can score against any.

Maybe they think they have 11 Agueros in their starting 11 :pac:.

wonski

iroced wrote: »

Maybe they think they have 11 Agueros in their starting 11 :pac:.

9 Agueros and 2 Kanes would suffice:D

I think you worry to much about other players, especially those 3 million players who are behind you now.

There is, however, element of the game that you need to understand - there are real players who can offer a very good return at a very low price.
You need to get it right at least few times during the season if you want to stay on top.

Austin is a good example. The game changes every week, you can't make all decisions right, but you can't expect that if you have all the top players you will win it.

Unless your target is 500k I wouldn't worry about these transfers.
3 millions is a huge amount of players and You can't expect all of them to be as dedicated as we are.

Getting players in form works this season, though. Not just cheap players (Austin / Kane) but expensive players, too (Terry got 15 points in 2 games in a row).

Like with any other game - prove them wrong. Finish in front of them.

Last season was a bit easier when all of us watched the prices and could afford both Aguero and RVP. This season price changes are not playing big part - plenty of cheap players doing their job. You have to adjust.

wonski

jimmii wrote: »

Yeah talking to some of the casuals in leagues I am in its amazing how unaware they are of certain things! The amount of point chasing is unreal! Lots of I bought player A this week he scored two goals last week wish I had him then er did you not see he is away to Chelsea and City the next two weeks? No dammit I didn't even look at fixtures ah sure if you can score against one team you can score against any.

Boyd scored against City, Kane against Chelsea.

You can't just ignore it, kane you:D

iroced

wonski wrote: »

9 Agueros and 2 Kanes would suffice:D

I think you worry to much about other players, especially those 3 million players who are behind you now.

There is, however, element of the game that you need to understand - there are real players who can offer a very good return at a very low price.
You need to get it right at least few times during the season if you want to stay on top.

Austin is a good example. The game changes every week, you can't make all decisions right, but you can't expect that if you have all the top players you will win it.

Unless your target is 500k I wouldn't worry about these transfers.
3 millions is a huge amount of players and You can't expect all of them to be as dedicated as we are.

Getting players in form works this season, though. Not just cheap players (Austin / Kane) but expensive players, too (Terry got 15 points in 2 games in a row).

Like with any other game - prove them wrong. Finish in front of them.

Last season was a bit easier when all of us watched the prices and could afford both Aguero and RVP. This season price changes are not playing big part - plenty of cheap players doing their job. You have to adjust.

Sorry wonski, is this directed at me ?

wonski

iroced wrote: »

Sorry wonski, is this directed at me ?

Nope, at jimmii:D

And at anyone who is ofended by these sily transfers.

Apologies for quoting your post.
Nothing to do with you.

G1032

wonski wrote: »

9 Agueros and 2 Kanes would suffice:D

I think you worry to much about other players, especially those 3 million players who are behind you now.

There is, however, element of the game that you need to understand - there are real players who can offer a very good return at a very low price.
You need to get it right at least few times during the season if you want to stay on top.

Austin is a good example. The game changes every week, you can't make all decisions right, but you can't expect that if you have all the top players you will win it.

Unless your target is 500k I wouldn't worry about these transfers.
3 millions is a huge amount of players and You can't expect all of them to be as dedicated as we are.

Getting players in form works this season, though. Not just cheap players (Austin / Kane) but expensive players, too (Terry got 15 points in 2 games in a row).

Like with any other game - prove them wrong. Finish in front of them.

Last season was a bit easier when all of us watched the prices and could afford both Aguero and RVP. This season price changes are not playing big part - plenty of cheap players doing their job. You have to adjust.

Ramsey:o:)

JR6

G1032 wrote: »

Ramsey:o:)

You still going on about Ramsey!?!

Gits_bone

A price rise for Hutton would bank me .1
No chance of it happening I suppose.

JR6

Gits_bone wrote: »

A price rise for Hutton would bank me .1
No chance of it happening I suppose.

You thinking about selling him? Decent squad player for me.

CrabieCrawford

Gits_bone wrote: »

A price rise for Hutton would bank me .1
No chance of it happening I suppose.

Not likely this week, possibly if he keeps a clean sheet against leicester.
3 tough fixtures after that so would be an ideal time to sell him

Ziegler1988

CrabieCrawford wrote: »

Not likely this week, possibly if he keeps a clean sheet against leicester.
3 tough fixtures after that so would be an ideal time to sell him

Don't do it. That's what I thought in my first WC and banked the 0.1m before their terror run. How I wish I ditched Moore instead of him. You'll want a Villa defender beginning GW25 anyway

Gits_bone

JR6 wrote: »

You thinking about selling him? Decent squad player for me.

Not thinking of selling him but be nice to bank the .1

CrabieCrawford

Ziegler1988 wrote: »

Don't do it. That's what I thought in my first WC and banked the 0.1m before their terror run. How I wish I ditched Moore instead of him. You'll want a Villa defender beginning GW25 anyway

I might keep him in, but even if he gets clean sheets in any of the tough matches he'll likely be my third sub for those

FHFC

Ziegler1988 wrote: »

Don't do it. That's what I thought in my first WC and banked the 0.1m before their terror run. How I wish I ditched Moore instead of him. You'll want a Villa defender beginning GW25 anyway

Exactly this, look at the all things FPL article or some of the he posts about rotation options here. Villa have three bad fixtures but if you have Sunderland and say Burnley cheapies there too you get past those spells. If you have a good rotation plan from now for the next ten weeks or so you shouldn't have to be using transfers shifting defenders in and out and can keep them for keeping your front 8 in good shape.

iroced

wonski wrote: »

Nope, at jimmii:D

And at anyone who is ofended by these sily transfers.

Apologies for quoting your post.
Nothing to do with you.

No pb . I didn't take any offence but was just not quite understanding the link with my previous posts... or for a second thought I made a crazy drunken post in the middle of the afternoon :pac:... (and no jimmii I don't mean at all that your post was crazy or drunken ).