Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

New Lane Layout at Groody Roundabout

  • 09-09-2014 8:34am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 123 ✭✭


    Anyone notice the new layout at the Groody Roundabout (since the roadworks where completed a few weeks ago)?

    Under the new lane markings, when crossing from the Plassy Road to the L5173 (going straight though the roundabout from UL to the Tipperary road) you are meant to use the inside lane (in both directions).
    This is the opposite to the normal roundabout convention that was in place before these road markings where added.

    In the mornings and evening at peak traffic, drivers cannot see the road markings, and are using the outside lanes instead. Over the last few weeks I have seen this lead to multiple near-misses, as drivers in both lanes attempt to turn off at the same exit, and both drivers feel they are in the correct lane.

    Surely its possible some sort of signage can be placed at this roundabout to indicate the correct lane that drivers should be in.
    Really looks like its only a matter of time before there is a crash here, or some road-rage incident as both drivers turning off refuse to give way to the other.

    Crazy stuff Limerick City Council!

    I wrote to limerick council about this, wonder what they will get back with (if they get back at all).


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,370 ✭✭✭Skuxx


    I noticed alright the road markings indicate to use inside lane for going straight across, it's the same coming from Tipp side heading to UL! Be interested to hear if the council get back to you!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,808 ✭✭✭Comhrá


    Also at the same roundabout, the speed ramp as one exits towards Castletroy, seems to be unduly severe. The first time I used the new exit, I hit the ramp a fierce thump and I wasn't speeding by any stretch of the imagination.

    It seems that all the ramps at that roundabout have slightly different degrees of severity. Looks like there isn't any set angle for speed-ramps and no method of deciding on their severity. They're like snowflakes - no two are exactly alike.


  • Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 11,135 Mod ✭✭✭✭MarkR


    I did notice them last week, and had the same concerns in regard to the road markings. Did they change them again over the last day or so? They seemed to be gone when I passed Sunday.


  • Registered Users Posts: 408 ✭✭johnmolloy554


    tippman1 wrote: »
    Also at the same roundabout, the speed ramp as one exits towards Castletroy, seems to be unduly severe. The first time I used the new exit, I hit the ramp a fierce thump and I wasn't speeding by any stretch of the imagination.

    It seems that all the ramps at that roundabout have slightly different degrees of severity. Looks like there isn't any set angle for speed-ramps and no method of deciding on their severity. They're like snowflakes - no two are exactly alike.

    As above - no regard given to the fact that the Dublin Road is one of the main entry / exit points to the City. The angle on some of the ramps is what you'd expect in a housing estate or outside a school to slow traffic to 15kph, this shouldn't be on a national route


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,694 ✭✭✭thesimpsons


    In addition to above, on the cycle track on the left side as u approach the roundabout from town side, the directional markings are opposite the norm. They indicate a 'cycle on the right' usage.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 123 ✭✭angryInch


    Looks like they are going to revert back to what was there originally, here is what I received from the council:
    Thank you for your recent correspondence with Limerick City & County Council / Limerick Smarter Travel.

    We take great care to ensure that important matters such as this are properly managed and that all complaints / concerns are taken very seriously. I apologise for the inconvenience or distress this incident may have caused.

    Your concerns has been recorded and discussions with our Consulting Engineer RPS Group, who designed and supervised this project has been reviewed. We will be modifying the current road markings / lane designation arrows to match what was there previously. This work is been carried out as I send this email.

    I trust this will be acceptable to you.

    Should you need any further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 208 ✭✭Cityslicker1


    Surely a fly over pedestrian foot bridge to accommodate students would be more practical considering it being a major road into the city. Maybe too expensive though compared to speed bumps. What's with Limerick with all it's roundabouts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,278 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    Should never have been a roundabout but there or up at the parkway imo, the junctions are simply too busy especially for pedestrians.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,152 ✭✭✭✭Berty


    The engineer obviously hasn't a bean how to design lane designations. Look at the Coonagh roundabout. Coming from the old n18 and going right to the condell the right exit pool lane has been covered in chevrons forcing you to the left exit pool lane which is actually for the other orbital lane.

    The idea of those two exits lanes is because it aids a free flow of traffic using both the inner and orbital lanes of the roundabout and merge safely whilst existing the roundabout like a zipper effect.

    The same applies to the outbound on the ennis road. The left lane is now for the 3rd exit but in reality it is after 12pm on a clock so should have stayed as the right lane. I despair sometimes.

    Don't talk to me about the height and inconsistency of the speed humps on the groody roundabout though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,083 ✭✭✭Iranoutofideas


    bazz26 wrote: »
    Should never have been a roundabout but there or up at the parkway imo, the junctions are simply too busy especially for pedestrians.

    Not to mention putting a pedestrian crossing right at the entrance to the roundabout. They're deathtraps.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,808 ✭✭✭Comhrá


    Quote:
    Thank you for your recent correspondence with Limerick City & County Council / Limerick Smarter Travel.

    We take great care to ensure that important matters such as this are properly managed and that all complaints / concerns are taken very seriously. I apologise for the inconvenience or distress this incident may have caused.

    Your concerns has been recorded and discussions with our Consulting Engineer RPS Group, who designed and supervised this project has been reviewed. We will be modifying the current road markings / lane designation arrows to match what was there previously. This work is been carried out as I send this email.

    I trust this will be acceptable to you.

    Should you need any further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me.

    The above hardly gives much reason for confidence in the ability or competence of the "Consulting Engineer RPS Group"

    If they don't know how to lay out basic road markings for a roundabout and have to rely on feedback from a member of the public to correct their mistake, it's a shameful state of affairs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,808 ✭✭✭Comhrá


    By the way, could someone let me know,please, the name and address of whom I could write to in order to air my feelings about the over-sharp speed-ramps?

    Thanks in anticipation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,240 ✭✭✭mgbgt1978


    Any councillor you like tippman.
    Look up the traffic Engineer for Limerick city & county council....now that they have amalgamated you will probably get passed from one to the other.

    http://www.nationaltransport.ie/downloads/archive/traffic_management_guidelines_2003.pdf

    ...somewhere around page 108 are 'guidelines' for speed ramps/bumps. But there is no actual legal requirement in this country to keep them below a certain height etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,152 ✭✭✭✭Berty


    The ramp on the outbound lanes by the maxol is perfect and smooth. Most others are freakin nuts. They will cause heavy breaking(crashes) and sumps being damaged.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,939 ✭✭✭wingnut


    Another curiosity is the heading in the Dublin road towards town. The turn for Park Road has you in the right hand lane turning right or going straight, and the left hand lane for turning left further down the Pennywell road. A car turning right here will hold up all the traffic heading straight on, as a result many cars (myself included) will look out for cars looking to turn right and try and cut out / in before the turn for the Pennywell. Easy fix have the lane for straight on the left hand and have the right hand side as a fitler lane!

    THE MOST annoying junction in Limerick for me has to be coming from Sexton Street/Lower Gerald Griffin street to Roches street. There is one lane clearly marked with a straight ahead arrow from Parnell street and two lanes pointed right down the two lanes of Roches street. 9 times out of 10 cars will take the lane CLEARLY marked straight ahead and then turn right down Roches Street. Am I the only one who finds this head wrecking!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,152 ✭✭✭✭Berty


    I've lost hope with the sexton street to roches street turn. The same goes for Henry street where the two right lanes have to find their way into the middle lane by the savoy without direction from arrows or signs.

    I do like the park road turn because I like people who are annoying drivers get caught behind people turning right. It does annoy me when a car in front of you in the right lane only decided to indicate when the lights go green and you have to switch lanes or wait.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,939 ✭✭✭wingnut


    Lol yeah, Park Road - sometimes you win sometimes you loose. The worst are the feckers who wait until the last minute to indicate. I'm no traffic planner but If I was laying out that road a lot man hours sitting behind right turning cars would have been saved.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,501 ✭✭✭Delphi91


    Beer Baron wrote: »
    The ramp on the outbound lanes by the maxol is perfect and smooth. Most others are freakin nuts. They will cause heavy breaking(crashes) and sumps being damaged.

    Noticed this evening that the speed ramp as you exit the roundabout heading up the hill to Castletroy now has some of the tarmac gouged out of it - looks like sumps. chassis', etc are hitting it. Some major damage gonna be caused to cars.


  • Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 11,135 Mod ✭✭✭✭MarkR


    I'm in a standard focus, and I've to slow right down. I was behind a lowered passat the other day, and he nearly beached himself!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 677 ✭✭✭dougie-lampkin


    mgbgt1978 wrote: »
    Any councillor you like tippman.
    Look up the traffic Engineer for Limerick city & county council....now that they have amalgamated you will probably get passed from one to the other.

    http://www.nationaltransport.ie/downloads/archive/traffic_management_guidelines_2003.pdf

    ...somewhere around page 108 are 'guidelines' for speed ramps/bumps. But there is no actual legal requirement in this country to keep them below a certain height etc.

    http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1988/en/si/0032.html

    10 cm max height ;)

    Also worth noting in any complaints to the council:
    3. Where a road authority proposes to provide or remove a bollard or ramp, the notice of the proposal required to be given pursuant to section 101 A (4) (a) of the Act shall be given by publication of the matters referred to in the said section 101 A (4) (a) in a daily newspaper circulating in the functional area of the road authority.

    ...

    2. Where ramps are provided, they shall not be positioned—

    ( b ) on or within 30 metres of a pedestrian crossing,

    ( f ) at or within 8 metres of a junction or a 45° bend with an inner kerb radius of less than 50 metres,


    4. Ramps shall not be provided on a roadway where the road concerned is—

    ( d ) a road on which an omnibus service operates.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    angryInch wrote: »
    Looks like they are going to revert back to what was there originally, here is what I received from the council:

    They are back this morning. Inside lane of the roundabout to go straight on, ie use the right hand lane as you come toward the roundabout.

    Although, at this stage you could almost say this IS the convention in Limerick - so many roundabouts use this non-standard-outside-of-Limerick configuration.

    The ramps don't bother my car, but people accelerating to get onto the roundabout at busy times then almost immediately lamping on the brakes emergency stop style is bound to cause an accident.

    The entrance to the roundabout from the "Conlans BMW" side has high grip surface just put down - tbh the whole roundabout needs this surface to facilitate the braking needed by passats etc to clear these ramps.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,094 ✭✭✭db


    Beer Baron wrote: »
    I've lost hope with the sexton street to roches street turn. The same goes for Henry street where the two right lanes have to find their way into the middle lane by the savoy without direction from arrows or signs.

    The worst part about this whole section is that the lights aren't synchronised. Coming from Cathedral Place across the new street (Song St ???) down Sexton St and onto Roches St you get caught by every set of lights. I would have expected this to be the primary route through these junctions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,021 ✭✭✭Miike


    http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1988/en/si/0032.html

    10 cm max height ;)

    Also worth noting in any complaints to the council:
    3. Where a road authority proposes to provide or remove a bollard or ramp, the notice of the proposal required to be given pursuant to section 101 A (4) (a) of the Act shall be given by publication of the matters referred to in the said section 101 A (4) (a) in a daily newspaper circulating in the functional area of the road authority.

    ...

    2. Where ramps are provided, they shall not be positioned—

    ( b ) on or within 30 metres of a pedestrian crossing,

    ( f ) at or within 8 metres of a junction or a 45° bend with an inner kerb radius of less than 50 metres,


    4. Ramps shall not be provided on a roadway where the road concerned is—

    ( d ) a road on which an omnibus service operates.

    Seriously, I wouldn't consider them "ramps" they relate more to mountains than any speed ramp I've ever encountered!

    In relation to their positioning has anyone contacted the city council?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,808 ✭✭✭Comhrá


    I noticed another potential hazard while driving over these ramps yesterday. Having discovered how sharp they are and how much I had to slow down to negotiate them without causing damage to my car, I found that the traffic immediately behind me came dangerously close to me before braking suddenly.

    These ramps might indeed have the unwanted effect of actually causing a rear-end collision, where unwitting drivers don't realise they need to slow so much, as well as causing damage to suspensions, shock absorbers, wheel-rims, tyres etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,152 ✭✭✭✭Berty


    The pedestrian crossings have already being causing crashes so one will assume the heavy braking for the ramps will only make it worse.

    The students years ago sprayed down their own white zebra crossing way further up the road(safer ) and the council cracked up removed it and then made them cross on a roundabout instead.

    Sometimes you'd have to wonder.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    What's wrong with pedestrian crossings on a roundabout?

    In my experience of numerous European cities and towns they're the norm just about everywhere except Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,694 ✭✭✭thesimpsons


    If you are in position to enter the roundabout and the crossing is in front of you, you wouldn't be approaching the roundabout at much speed as you'd be watching for traffic and the roundabout is highly visible in your direct line of sigh. but one one of the problems with ped crossings at roundabouts is in the situation where you enter the roundabout at 3 o'clock position and intend exiting at 12 o'clock. you enter the roundabout at an accelerating speed (even at a low speed) and checking for cars to your right, and the crossing is offset to your line of sight. straight away you could be braking for pedestrians. It can be hard enough when you know the road layout but in alot of occasions could be driving in unfamiliar area, there is no consistancy to roundabout lanes or crossings in Ireland and pedestrians often just step out without checking for traffic.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    enter the roundabout at an accelerating speed (even at a low speed) and checking for cars to your right, and the crossing is offset to your line of sight. straight away you could be braking for pedestrians.


    What's wrong with braking for pedestrians?

    What you seem to be describing is a situation whereby vehicles enter a roundabout without slowing (or even accelerating as you suggest) and where the driver is only looking out for traffic coming from the right.

    That should not be possible/acceptable.

    The level of deflection should be sufficient to slow motorised traffic down to a speed that accommodates vulnerable road users, and drivers should be on the lookout for crossing pedestrians, including children, disabled people and older people who may be a bit slow on their feet.

    There is absolutely no justification for having a roundabout in an urban environment where the design permits motorists to take "the racing driver's line" without slowing sufficiently and without due regard for pedestrians.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    If the crossing is only safe for pedestrians with extreme speed bumps in place, perhaps an alternative should have been used?

    Crossings at roundabouts are fine and all on quieter suburban roads with good visibility (plenty in limerick without good visibility though), but at bottle neck roundabouts on main arterial routes with 8 lanes in and 6 lanes out?
    That roundabout is "who dares, wins" at peak time. Wait for the first rainy day... destruction derby.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,278 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    The problem is not motorists stopping as they approach the roundabouts but rather motorists already on the roundabout who are exiting having to brake/stop to allow pedestrians cross. The motorists behind them may not react in time and suddenly you have a knock on effect. The whole idea of a roundabout is to allow traffic on the roundabout to flow off the exits without causing a build up which is defeated and dangerous when you have pedestrian crossings right at the edge of them. The roundabout at the Shannon bridge/Dock Road is the exact same, too busy and dangerous for crossing pedestrians. In an ideal world it should work but this is not an ideal world.


Advertisement