Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Question for Antenna Heads!

Options
  • 10-09-2014 11:03am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 2,234 ✭✭✭


    Not quite amateur radio, but I am hoping you'd have some ideas:

    So I have a wireless shock sensor for my intruder alarm that's right on the limit, distance-wise. Once every week or two the system 'loses' it.

    The sensor transmits at 868MHz. The antenna in soldered to the PCB, it's shaped in the form of a spring with a straight bit, I guess its tuned to the tramsmit frequency. Photo below.

    What can I do to improve the transmission distance by about 10%?

    Is there any point in attaching a longer wire to the end of the antenna. Or could I de-solder the antenna from the PCB, mount it somewhere more favourable & connect to the PCB with a piece of wire?

    Any ideas welcome!

    Many thanks.
    321648.jpg


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,729 ✭✭✭martinsvi


    putting a wire on top of it will de-tune it, it will introduce a standing wave that will attenuate the signal. Similar thing will happen if you de-soldier it and move it - you will have great difficulty matching it's impedance I think, also any cable will introduce losses. I'd say - don't touch it and try to solve your problem by decreasing the distance between two "stations"


  • Registered Users Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    It's illegal to change the aerial as that is part of the certification.
    See SRD 868MHz regulations on www.comreg.ie

    Wireless alarm systems are toys. They are inherently insecure. Use a cabled shock sensor to a real alarm system.

    I'm not going to explain how, but I can trivially make your system useless with cheap readily available gear.


  • Registered Users Posts: 177 ✭✭brownmini


    deandean wrote: »
    Not quite amateur radio, but I am hoping you'd have some ideas:

    So I have a wireless shock sensor for my intruder alarm that's right on the limit, distance-wise. Once every week or two the system 'loses' it.

    The sensor transmits at 868MHz. The antenna in soldered to the PCB, it's shaped in the form of a spring with a straight bit, I guess its tuned to the tramsmit frequency. Photo below.

    What can I do to improve the transmission distance by about 10%?

    Is there any point in attaching a longer wire to the end of the antenna. Or could I de-solder the antenna from the PCB, mount it somewhere more favourable & connect to the PCB with a piece of wire?

    Any ideas welcome!

    Many thanks.
    321648.jpg


    I have an idea which might require surgery to it but I'll keep that off the table for now.

    Long shot 1.
    If the orientation of the actual module is not critical then turn it around 180degrees so that the aerial wire is 'pointing up'.

    Long shot 2.
    If the orientation of the actual module is not critical then turn it so that the aerial is side on to the intended reception point.



    If you look carefully, you see that the little circuit board with the aerial on it has a small chip and other stuff on the other side from the coiled up aerial.
    This is your 868MHZ module and it looks like its soldered onto the main board using those three long links-pins.

    You probably know that a 1/4 wavelength at 868MHZ is 8.6cms.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,234 ✭✭✭deandean


    thanks brownmini, your mention of surgery has given me an idea,you might be thinking the same thing?
    the three connections to the RF board seem to be 0V, +ve and data. the board itself might be acting as a very small ground plane. So, unzolder the RF board, extend the three conductors by a couple feet and mount the RF board in a more favorable position?


  • Registered Users Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    Pointless

    1) It's crap and easily defeated

    2) Any modification makes it illegal to operate!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 177 ✭✭brownmini


    deandean wrote: »
    thanks brownmini, your mention of surgery has given me an idea,you might be thinking the same thing?
    the three connections to the RF board seem to be 0V, +ve and ....

    My idea (the secret 3rd one) would have left your module completely intact and looking the same but with one addition.

    Just a thought, you say you need an extra few feet or so on the range of the module (I presume to get to the main unit).
    Is there any way you could improve the reception ability at the main unit rather than perform surgery on the module itself?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,043 ✭✭✭martinedwards


    pro burglars will have a jammer in their bag.

    just like the shoplifters now invest in £30 Baofengs to listen into the shop security radios.

    I'm with Watty on this.

    bin it an buy some cable.


Advertisement