Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
2016 US Presidential Race - Mod Warning in OP
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Trumps not doing that.JPNelsforearm wrote: »What would those reasons be?
What like ending the war on Drugs?
http://reason.com/blog/2015/11/09/when-he-called-for-an-end-to-the-war-on
Stephanopoulos: You used to think that legalization, taking the profit out, would solve that problem. What changed your mind?
Trump: Well, I did and I—I —not think about it, I said it's something that should be studied and maybe should continue to be studied. But it's not something I'd be willing to do right now. I think it's something that I've always said maybe it has to be looked at because we do such a poor job of policing. We don't want to build walls. We don't want to do anything. And if you're not going to want to do the policing, you're going to have to start thinking about other alternatives. But it's not something that I would want to do. But it's something that certainly has been looked at and I looked at it. If we police properly, we shouldn't do that.
Will this also come with winning lottery tickets for all?Ending the criminality, taking away criminal gangs and the violence they bring?
And tanking the economy to do so.Sealing the border,
Which would further tank the economy.deporting illegals?
Yes, that is exactly what we can expect from the corporate billionaire!Fighting the corporatocracy?
By running for one of the two parties.Fighting the two party cronyism,
So ruin the country all in the interest of a childish 'nyeh nyeh'. I wonder why people who use terms like 'PC brigade' get mocked so often, and labelled as immature.giving two fingers to the PC brigade?
Womens rights - staunchly pro life, wants to defund Planned Parenthood, frequently makes misogynistic attacks against women. Yeah, he's in complete contrast to the Republican party positions on women's right :rolleyes: - must be why many women's websites consider him the worst candidate on that front.In terms of his current positions as regards womens rights, immigration, gay rights etc, in the Republican field he stands alone.
Immigration - you clearly know nothing about the Republican party.
Gay rights - He is anti SSM, again fitting the Republican party like a glove.
So he is lying, and you fully acknowledge that but still support him.Do I believe half or even a quarter of the things Trump says? No, do I believe he believes half or even a quarter of the things he says? No, he is saying things to attract as many dissatisfied voters as he can,
Translation: hence why he is lying on these issues.hence why some of those things jar with the opinions he held when he wasnt running for the Republican nomination.
Trump has gone on record saying he will bring torture and bombings. What you know already is that Trump will bring war. Trump supporters also love to bash Clinton on issues in the middle east, but guess who supported both the Iraq War and Libyan intervention? That's right, Trump.Its called strategy. Even at that he is still not as dangerous as the rest of the Republican field or Hillary Clinton, who will bring the US to war for imperialist aims, guarantee it.
How?The system needs reform Trump will bring that reform,
Yeah, why elect a politician who has been bought out mostly by corporate interests when you can just elect the embodiment of those corporate interests directly?look at the rest of the field, Goldman Sachs candidates, religious lunatics and a communist relic, Trump is the least worst option.
Good that he's not pandering to the religious lunatics though...
Oh.
You also clearly have no idea what communism is, but that's not surprising.
That's not true and you know it. Worst case scenario is he causes race riots on a scale not seen before, helps ISIS grow a hell of a lot stronger than they are now or have ever been (seriously, their recruitment department must be LOVING the prospect of Trumps US torturing families), destroys the US economy possibly beyond repair (you can't just go and claim bankruptcy then wipe your hands of it all when you're a country) and takes on 'other' solutions when his plans to keep Mexicans and Muslims out doesn't work.Worst case scenario is literally that Trump is basically the same as all the other candidates, another Obama, a politician.
Such as? Because what you've been pointing to in this post is clearly not the case.Best case scenario he instigates true political reform.0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
Again, electioneering.Trumps not doing that.
http://reason.com/blog/2015/11/09/when-he-called-for-an-end-to-the-war-on
Stephanopoulos: You used to think that legalization, taking the profit out, would solve that problem. What changed your mind?
Trump: Well, I did and I—I —not think about it, I said it's something that should be studied and maybe should continue to be studied. But it's not something I'd be willing to do right now. I think it's something that I've always said maybe it has to be looked at because we do such a poor job of policing. We don't want to build walls. We don't want to do anything. And if you're not going to want to do the policing, you're going to have to start thinking about other alternatives. But it's not something that I would want to do. But it's something that certainly has been looked at and I looked at it. If we police properly, we shouldn't do that.
Will this also come with winning lottery tickets for all?
Nope, immigration costs more in services then it brings inAnd tanking the economy to do so.
Which would further tank the economy.
Yes, that is exactly what we can expect from the corporate billionaire!
Of which the party is doing its damnedest to get rid of himBy running for one of the two parties.So ruin the country all in the interest of a childish 'nyeh nyeh'. I wonder why people who use terms like 'PC brigade' get mocked so often, and labelled as immature.
Utter bull****, donald Trump is an favour of planned parenthood, "the worst republican", complete lie.Womens rights - staunchly pro life, wants to defund Planned Parenthood, frequently makes misogynistic attacks against women. Yeah, he's in complete contrast to the Republican party positions on women's right :rolleyes: - must be why many women's websites consider him the worst candidate on that front.
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/03/14/attention-donald-trump-killing-330000-babies-outweighs-any-good-planned-parenthood-does/
What Republican party? the one that has allowed over 11 million illegals into the country that supports amnesty etc, whilst saying the opposite in public?Immigration - you clearly know nothing about the Republican party.
So was Hilary ClintonGay rights - He is anti SSM, again fitting the Republican party like a glove.So he is lying, and you fully acknowledge that but still support him.
Translation: hence why he is lying on these issues.
Trump has gone on record saying he will bring torture and bombings. What you know already is that Trump will bring war. Trump supporters also love to bash Clinton on issues in the middle east, but guess who supported both the Iraq War and Libyan intervention? That's right, Trump.
Again, massive lie, Trump didnt support Iraq, nor did he support Libya
ExactlyYeah, why elect a politician who has been bought out mostly by corporate interests when you can just elect the embodiment of those corporate interests directly?
How about listen to the religious lunatics themselves, like Glenn Beck etc, they are all voting for Cruz, because they they think Trump is lying lolGood that he's not pandering to the religious lunatics though...
How so?You also clearly have no idea what communism is, but that's not surprising.
Victim blaming on a massive scale, typical of the left, that is all ideology you have posted, none of it fact.That's not true and you know it. Worst case scenario is he causes race riots on a scale not seen before, helps ISIS grow a hell of a lot stronger than they are now or have ever been (seriously, their recruitment department must be LOVING the prospect of Trumps US torturing families), destroys the US economy possibly beyond repair (you can't just go and claim bankruptcy then wipe your hands of it all when you're a country) and takes on 'other' solutions when his plans to keep Mexicans and Muslims out doesn't work.
Such as? Because what you've been pointing to in this post is clearly not the case.
You cant post big paragraphs based on anti Trump propaganda and then expect me to reply to them seriously, "race riots", "torturing muslim families", bombing(as if they are not doing it now) "destroy the US economy". The only people who want race riots are the likes of "Black lives matter" and other hardcore racists.
All of that is nonsense, just smear. You are posting propaganda, should I attack Bernard or Hilldog through their ties to George Soros etc?0 -
So you support him being pro legalisation because he says he is anti legalisation. Got it.JPNelsforearm wrote: »Again, electioneering.
Will this also come with winning lottery tickets for all?
Good luck seeing how businesses go when they instantly lose all of their cheap labour, particularly in hospitality and construction!Nope, immigration costs more in services then it brings in
Again, the disconnect with reality. Care to explain why corporate billionaires are the ones we can rely on to get rid of corporate influence?Yes, that is exactly what we can expect from the corporate billionaire!
That must explain how he has over 60 endorsements from Republican politicians, legislators and the likes.Of which the party is doing its damnedest to get rid of him
Congratulations on linking to a an article that does not even attribute a single quote to Trump.Utter bull****, donald Trump is an favour of planned parenthood, "the worst republican", complete lie.
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/03/14/attention-donald-trump-killing-330000-babies-outweighs-any-good-planned-parenthood-does
Here you go, from the very same site you linked to: http://www.lifenews.com/2015/10/19/donald-trump-planned-parenthood-should-absolutely-be-de-funded/
Laura Ingraham: Yesterday, Planned Parenthood was exposed again in an eighth video released by the Center for Medical Progress. Do you still believe there are two Planned Parenthoods or is it time to defund this organization?
Donald Trump: Well, you should defund anyway because they are doing the abortions. It is like an abortion factory, which is terrible. So you should defund anyway. But those videos are horrible. Every time you see them, they get worse and worse. And it’s not only that, the messengers are so bad. There always, I mean these people, what they say and the way they, it’s like you are selling parts to an automobile or something. It’s a terrible situation going on with Planned Parenthood. There’s no question about it.
And here we are again -- http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/11/politics/donald-trump-refutes-third-party-run-report/index.html
"The biggest problem I have with Planned Parenthood is the abortion situation. I mean its like an abortion factory, frankly, and you can't have it and you shouldn't be funding it. It shouldn't be funded by the government," Trump said.
So because someone illegally enters a country, that makes the government of that country an advocate of (or at least lenient towards) illegal immigration?[/B]What Republican party? the one that has allowed over 11 million illegals into the country that supports amnesty etc, whilst saying the opposite in public?
Well in that case, Trump is going to be an advocate of (or at least lenient towards) illegal immigration within hours of his inauguration.
Back to the 'but, but but... Hillary!!' line of thinking, eh? Remind us all what Hillary Clinton has to do with Donald Trump's stance on gay rights?So was Hilary Clinton
Howard Stern, 2003... http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/donald-trump-iraq-war-219471Again, massive lie, Trump didnt support Iraq, nor did he support Libya
“Are you for invading Iraq?” Stern asked.
“Yeah, I guess so,” Trump responded. “I wish the first time it was done correctly.”
And now Libya... http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/feb/25/donald-trump/donald-trumps-pants-fire-claim-he-never-discussed-/
"I can’t believe what our country is doing," Trump said, according to a BuzzFeed transcript. "Gaddafi in Libya is killing thousands of people, nobody knows how bad it is, and we’re sitting around we have soldiers all have the Middle East, and we’re not bringing them in to stop this horrible carnage and that’s what it is: It’s a carnage."
Trump continued.
"You talk about things that have happened in history; this could be one of the worst," Trump said. "Now we should go in, we should stop this guy, which would be very easy and very quick. We could do it surgically, stop him from doing it, and save these lives. This is absolutely nuts. We don’t want to get involved and you’re gonna end up with something like you’ve never seen before."
So you are for more corporate interests in government. Why didn't you just say so in the first place, instead of saying the exact opposite?Exactly
They're whack jobs too.How about listen to the religious lunatics themselves, like Glenn Beck etc, they are all voting for Cruz, because they they think Trump is lying lol
But they don't think Trump is lying, they know Trump is lying.
And so do you, you have said as much over and over and over.
The fact you consider Bernie Sanders to be communist. Here's a link to help distinguish the difference that I am assuming you will never click on (it won't help that confirmation bias, after all).How so?
No, just the typical cowardice seen more and more on the right in modern years... push push push push push push push push push... get pushed back once, and run away crying.Victim blaming on a massive scale, typical of the left, that is all ideology you have posted, none of it fact.
I will try use less big words next. I will also try use less big sentences next. I will try help you learn the things.You cant post big paragraphs based on anti Trump propaganda and then expect me to reply to them seriously,
We've seen them already."race riots",
I said torturing families. What made you throw Muslim in there, especially considering you tried to use it at a direct quote."torturing muslim families",
Oh, that's right! You consider Muslims to be terrorists! I completely forgot what you are willing to agree with Trump when he says one thing, then agree again when he says the opposite.
"I will bomb the sh*t out of them" -- who said that again?bombing(as if they are not doing it now)
Like he has destroyed companies he has ran before by over reaching too soon with no plan how to pay back. Exactly like his whole 'wall' idea."destroy the US economy".
"Oh help, help, I'm a victim!!"The only people who want race riots are the likes of "Black lives matter" and other hardcore racists.
The factual truth, with attributable quotes and video evidence really does hurt, eh?All of that is nonsense, just smear.
Again, "but but but... but Hillary!"You are posting propaganda, should I attack Bernard or Hilldog through their ties to George Soros etc?
It shows you know you're wrong and making a bit of a mockery of yourself at this stage, to be honest.0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement