Liverpool Vs West Brom Sat 3pm KO

Grayditch

**** ref.

googled eyes

Johnsons coming on

livinginkorea

Johnson coming on...not sure how I feel

klose

Class finish!


Haha oh boy here come glen

8-10

Good play by Lambert not touching that on the way in, probably not easy to do that in the split second, instinct would be to tap it in but he was offside, well left.

Should have been a peno

Timmyctc

What advantage would've been necessary? It was shoulder to shoulder.

mada999

nope ref was not giving it ...

5starpool

mayordenis wrote: »

Not sure the ref was trying to play advantage there

Wasn't advantage, he never moved when Sterling fell. If it was advantage he would have had his arms out. Also, he wouldn't have played advantage that way for a peno decision.

DDC1990

Referee wasn't playing advantage.

Didn't move a muscle.

Giving praise for no reason there.

livinginkorea

Lambo off for Mario as predicted

Harry Palmr

One up front again

Johnson on again

joseph brand

Inch-perfect pass from Sterling. Beautifully placed from Henderson.

~Rebel~

come on Balo!

NukaCola

Lambert was ****e.... glad he's off tbh

edgecutter

Sterling goes down with a puff of wind.

Agent Coulson

This is the Liverpool we all expect

~Rebel~

We've come to life a bit here.

Sooner or Later

Bit more buzz about the play now

Kerrigooney

Jaysus...we've burst into action. What's going on?

googled eyes

Nice bit of play.

This is more like it.

livinginkorea

Not bad, getting better. Come on a third to finish them game off and help my heart

whatawaster

Kerrigooney wrote: »

Jaysus...we've burst into action. What's going on?

It's going to make the west brom equalizer all the more sickening

2-1 up and fullbacks attacking like we are 3 down.

We'll never learn

Sideshow Mark

The last 10 minutes has been the best we've played for weeks.

Kerrigooney

Double post.

Will I Amnt

8-10 wrote: »

Good play by Lambert not touching that on the way in, probably not easy to do that in the split second, instinct would be to tap it in but he was offside, well left.

Should have been a peno

There would have to be an argument for interfering with play there no?

googled eyes

We need another goal

livinginkorea

Hmm midfield sitting too deep in my opinion

Timmyctc

Hate the way the commentator keeps saying "Sterling bundled down" are ye not allowed shoulder to shoulder no more. Liverpool like very likely to add a third here. Some good last ditch blocks from WBA

Agent Coulson

Skrtel and Lovren split so easy.

Lord Trollington

Said it against Basel.

Balotelli is making very clever runs. Our midfielders are not picking him out. Until they do he is going to struggle.

Agent Coulson

Timmyctc wrote: »

Hate the way the commentator keeps saying "Sterling bundled down" are ye not allowed shoulder to shoulder no more. Liverpool like very likely to add a third here. Some good last ditch blocks from WBA

No sadly not.

Henderson goal aside has been brilliant today

8-10

Will I Amnt wrote: »

There would have to be an argument for interfering with play there no?

if he in any way blocked the keeper's vision then yes, but he wasn't interfering at all

5starpool

Will I Amnt wrote: »

There would have to be an argument for interfering with play there no?

Possibly, but would have been harsh. The keeper wasn't getting it anyhow and never even appealed I think.

Timmyctc

8-10 wrote: »

if he in any way blocked the keeper's vision then yes, but he wasn't interfering at all

I think that rule is used too liberally at times. Would've been stupid to take the goal away even if he is offside.

livinginkorea

rarnes1 wrote: »

Henderson goal aside has been brilliant today

When he plays with such a high tempo it must inspire some of the others as well

Timmyctc

Skrtel gets away with man handling players far too often.

NukaCola

Skrtel is brainless

5starpool

Lucas on for Coutinho I'd say.

livinginkorea

Lucas coming on for Cou

googled eyes

Lads Lovren is a liability

Agent Coulson

4-5-1 ffs

Will I Amnt

8-10 wrote: »

if he in any way blocked the keeper's vision then yes, but he wasn't interfering at all

Doesnt necessarily have to be obstructing the view, depending on how strict the letter of the law is applied you could argue the keeper was unsure if Lambert would redirect it or not. It would be harsh but it's happened before.

Alfred Borden

What happened Lovern? Looks terrible all season

Stevecw

Lovren, what does he be at

5starpool

5starpool wrote: »

Lucas on for Coutinho I'd say.

Good sub.

Need to tighten things up and hold onto these 3 points

Lord Trollington

Really only a brainfart by Skrtel away from it being 2-2. Could be a long 15 minutes.

darced

This post has been deleted.

Agent Coulson

googled eyes wrote: »

Lads Lovren is a liability

He can't be thats Sakho's job!