Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Buying a house, but may lose job!

Options
  • 28-10-2014 1:45pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 20


    Hi All, I am in the process of buying a house with my husband. We were approved in principle - found the house of our dreams in Wicklow have had the valuation done and are just waiting on the contracts and for the bank to send out formal loan offer. However my boss announced to us last Friday that they are planning on announcing redundancies next week!! I am now terrified that we are going to lose the house. I know that we would be well able to make the mortgage repayments on my husbands salary alone - but I am worried about the formal loan offer from the bank now. Has anyone ever been in this situation before? The bank has documentation from both mine and my husbands employers stating that we are in full time permanent employment - are they going to ask for these documents again before going ahead with formal loan offer?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,429 ✭✭✭Woshy


    What bank is it with? We have our mortgage with ebs and they didn't ask for us to provide anything more when getting our official loan offer - they used what we provided for the approval in principle. We did apply for the formal loan offer a few days after we got the aip though because we found a house quickly.

    Whether you're obliged to tell them if you lose your job before you sign the papers, I'm not sure.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,643 ✭✭✭Woodville56


    What if you sign the Contract for Sale on the property and the lender subsequently "discovers " your possibly reduced financial circumstances and refuses or reduces mortgage available to you ? You will have entered into an enforceable legal contract with the vendor and have no guarantee that the mortgage is forthcoming ? Whatever the consequences, I would come clean with your lender if the redundancy happens - hopefully will not arise for you. Did you ask the advice of your conveyancing solicitor on your situation ?
    In our mortgage application process, our bank sought updated financials before letter of offer issued, but that was some months after Approval in Principal received. I wouldn't risk signing the Contract for Sale until you were sure the funds were ready for drawdown.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭Little Miss Cutie


    You will have entered into an enforceable legal contract with the vendor and have no guarantee that the mortgage is forthcoming ?

    Is there not a standard cavet in contract "subject to mortgage"? My memory is hazy considering we only bought a couple of months ago but I am sure our solicitor told us when we signed contracts the only way out of the contract was the mortgage not being granted.

    At that point our mortgage had been issued so wasn't too focused on the issue.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,411 ✭✭✭ABajaninCork


    I wouldn't panic just yet. You haven't been told anything other that there will be redundancies. As I understand it from your OP the numbers haven't been announced as yet, neither have you been told that your position will be affected.

    Unless and until you're told otherwise, I wouldn't be doing anything just yet. Once that happens seek advice from your solicitor. That's what you pay them for!


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,134 ✭✭✭Lux23


    This happened to a girl I worked with when I lost my job in 2010, there was a massive rake of redundancies announced and she had to wait a month until she knew if her job was safe or not. She gave up on the application and then found out her job was safe all along. If I was you, see if you can stall a little until you know what is going to happen.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,643 ✭✭✭Woodville56


    Is there not a standard cavet in contract "subject to mortgage"? My memory is hazy considering we only bought a couple of months ago but I am sure our solicitor told us when we signed contracts the only way out of the contract was the mortgage not being granted.

    At that point our mortgage had been issued so wasn't too focused on the issue.

    Looking back now, yes there was a " subject to mortgage" clause in our contract. To OP. just make sure it's in your's in case difficulty with mortgage arises . Hopefully you won't need to invoke it. Personally though, in the event of a redundancy , I would be reluctant to proceed without updated bank approval based on your changed financials.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,894 ✭✭✭Triceratops Ballet


    Don't panic until you know if you are in trouble, I wouldn't disclose this to the bank unless you have to. I pulled out of a mortgage offer from kbc a couple of years ago upon being made redundant, even though I could have afforded the payments on JSB, they looked for further payslips and a confirmation letter from work, which I couldn't give so I had to pull out.

    In terms of the bank looking for updated info, I got my loan offer there last week and in it was stipulated that I had to submit an updated salary cert most recent payslip and bank statements, that was with BOI so it's possible they could ask you for more info.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,321 ✭✭✭Brego888


    I changed jobs just after going sale agreed. Didn't mention anything to the bank.


  • Registered Users Posts: 548 ✭✭✭paulers06


    We're in a similar situation, my partner might be getting made redundant this week.

    We have our loan offer and are just waiting to close the sale in the next couple of weeks. Contract is signed. We are both satisfied that we will be able to afford the mortgage payments on my salary if it comes down to it. because of this, we have no intention of telling the bank.

    Get all of your paperwork in order before the redundancy - most importantly your salary cert signed by your employer. It will at least keep your options open


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭JimsAlterEgo


    Isnt this close to Fraud, if not actually is? Dont you have to sign documents later in the process to the effect that all infomation provided is truthful? I would also be concerned about using a solicitor who would ignore this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 155 ✭✭f3232


    Isnt this close to Fraud, if not actually is? Dont you have to sign documents later in the process to the effect that all infomation provided is truthful? I would also be concerned about using a solicitor who would ignore this.

    No its not fraud or close to it. At the time of application the OP is in a job, with the threat of redundancy only. She may not be made redundant. Nothing got to do with the bank.

    All information at the point of signing the contract would be true.

    The decision as to whether to get the mortgage application is a financial one only, nothing to do with fraud.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,716 ✭✭✭Balmed Out


    Rose1000 wrote: »
    I know that we would be well able to make the mortgage repayments on my husbands salary alone

    If that's true you were getting a mortgage well below what ye're income was and will still get mortgage approval.

    If your not taking into account possibility of children, home repairs, property taxes, utilities, home/garden/estate maintenance etc etc then you really should delay until you find out your employment position and step back if you need to get a new job (unless in a field where its easy to get a new job at similar pay?)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,663 ✭✭✭MouseTail


    I see no reason to inform the Bank, or solicitor for that matter.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭JimsAlterEgo


    f3232 wrote: »
    No its not fraud or close to it. At the time of application the OP is in a job, with the threat of redundancy only. She may not be made redundant. Nothing got to do with the bank.

    All information at the point of signing the contract would be true.

    The decision as to whether to get the mortgage application is a financial one only, nothing to do with fraud.

    Depends on what you sign might be certifying, also I seem to recall some banks close to drawdown ring the employers to confirm details (I believe you dign something to say this is ok).

    If you knowingly sign something that you know is incorrect, IMO this is dodgy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 155 ✭✭f3232


    Depends on what you sign might be certifying, also I seem to recall some banks close to drawdown ring the employers to confirm details (I believe you dign something to say this is ok).

    If you knowingly sign something that you know is incorrect, IMO this is dodgy.

    No they ring before issuing a loan offer, not at time of drawdown, if they ring at all. A broker will confirm this.

    Also if the person is in her job on signing then she is not being dodgy in any way. The overall morality is up to the OP anyway, having considered all issues involved.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,507 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    Rose1000 wrote: »
    Hi All, I am in the process of buying a house with my husband. We were approved in principle - found the house of our dreams in Wicklow have had the valuation done and are just waiting on the contracts and for the bank to send out formal loan offer. However my boss announced to us last Friday that they are planning on announcing redundancies next week!! I am now terrified that we are going to lose the house. I know that we would be well able to make the mortgage repayments on my husbands salary alone - but I am worried about the formal loan offer from the bank now. Has anyone ever been in this situation before? The bank has documentation from both mine and my husbands employers stating that we are in full time permanent employment - are they going to ask for these documents again before going ahead with formal loan offer?

    Losing the house isn't a big deal, losing your job and struggling financially because your mortgage exceeds what you can repay is though. You say you can make the mortgage repayments on the one salary but are you sure you are accounting for all the insurances that go along with it and how much margin are you leaving yourself?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭JimsAlterEgo


    f3232 wrote: »
    No they ring before issuing a loan offer, not at time of drawdown, if they ring at all. A broker will confirm this.

    Also if the person is in her job on signing then she is not being dodgy in any way. The overall morality is up to the OP anyway, having considered all issues involved.

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91632853&postcount=11

    not according to this person
    I do know that KBC, while not requesting documentation in addition to what was sent in in the earlier stages of the application, absolutely called my place of employment to confirm my current status before the loan drawdown.

    They may not request documentation from you - but they can make a phone call incredibly quickly and easily. I would be wary of lying in this situation.

    Not sure if all banks woudl do a follow up call but to me it makes sense


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,643 ✭✭✭Woodville56


    I would suggest getting advice from your solicitor if your redundancy happens before you sign contracts


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 819 ✭✭✭Beaner1


    Call the bank and tell them. It's for your own benefit.

    Please don't come back in in 5 years time saying the bank were throwing money at you and they didn't evaluate the risk properly and please I want a mortgage write down because my husband has had is income fall.


  • Registered Users Posts: 155 ✭✭f3232


    Beaner1 wrote: »
    Call the bank and tell them. It's for your own benefit.

    Please don't come back in in 5 years time saying the bank were throwing money at you and they didn't evaluate the risk properly and please I want a mortgage write down because my husband has had is income fall.

    If you can afford a mortgage on one income and your happy to take the risk forgot the begrudges and do it.

    Sure you both could loose your jobs, the sky could fall in, etc. Then again, you might not be made redundant or if you are you could end up getting a better job.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 155 ✭✭f3232



    I assume the person would still be in employment if KBC rang. The employer (human resource department)would not mention the threat of redundancy I assume.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭JimsAlterEgo


    f3232 wrote: »
    I assume the person would still be in employment if KBC rang. The employer (human resource department)would not mention the threat of redundancy I assume.
    I would say they would have to and if the bank is clever enough it would be
    asking the correct questions.
    What if they had been made redundant since.


  • Registered Users Posts: 155 ✭✭f3232


    I would say they would have to and if the bank is clever enough it would be
    asking the correct questions.
    What if they had been made redundant since.

    Don't be daft, any member of a management team/personal department who gives out sensitive information like potential redundancies would be fired on the spot.

    The bank has a right to ask if information on the salary cert is correct, nothing more.
    What if they had been made redundant since.
    Worst thing that can happen- the loan offer is rejected on the basis that they are no longer in employment. if the OP is willing to take that risk- then take the risk.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭JimsAlterEgo


    f3232 wrote: »
    Don't be daft, any member of a management team/personal department who gives out sensitive information like potential redundancies would be fired on the spot.

    The bank has a right to ask if information on the salary cert is correct, nothing more.


    Worst thing that can happen- the loan offer is rejected on the basis that they are no longer in employment. if the OP is willing to take that risk- then take the risk.

    I am speaking about a scenario where a person has either accepted, been selected for or actually been made redundant not where are potential redundancies. In that case HR would IMO have to disclose that.

    The bank has a right to ask for whaever you give them permission to.


  • Registered Users Posts: 155 ✭✭f3232


    I am speaking about a scenario where a person has either accepted, been selected for or actually been made redundant not where are potential redundancies. In that case HR would IMO have to disclose that.

    A HR department does not have to disclose anything to anyone. A company does not have any obligation to a bank in these issues.
    The bank has a right to ask for whaever you give them permission to.

    Yes but the HR department does not have to answer these questions. In fact when it comes to something like potential redundencies, it would be stupid for them to do so.


  • Registered Users Posts: 537 ✭✭✭rgmmg


    You may be made redundant but may not (hopefully the latter :)).

    I have no direct knowledge tbh but if you're made redundant it would be a material change in circumstances and I guess you would have to disclose that to the lender.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭JimsAlterEgo


    f3232 wrote: »
    A HR department does not have to disclose anything to anyone. A company does not have any obligation to a bank in these issues.



    Yes but the HR department does not have to answer these questions. In fact when it comes to something like potential redundencies, it would be stupid for them to do so.

    Do you really think a bank will process the application any further if the HR department refused? Alarm bells would be going off.


  • Posts: 24,714 [Deleted User]


    Do you really think a bank will process the application any further if the HR department refused? Alarm bells would be going off.

    A HR department would be hung out to dry if they gave away any sensitive information. They could also refuse to disclose any info if they wished, it would be will within in their rights to not discuss an employee.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭JimsAlterEgo


    A HR department would be hung out to dry if they gave away any sensitive information. They could also refuse to disclose any info if they wished, it would be will within in their rights to not discuss an employee.

    Not saying they would or wouldnt but would you expect a bank you were borrowing from to ignore it if it happened. I would expect them to ask for revised written conformation of employment status.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 155 ✭✭f3232


    rgmmg wrote: »
    You may be made redundant but may not (hopefully the latter :)).

    I have no direct knowledge tbh but if you're made redundant it would be a material change in circumstances and I guess you would have to disclose that to the lender.

    You would have to do nothing if you did not want to.


Advertisement