Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
'But can he do it on a wet, cold winter night in …'- League
Options
Comments
-
GT_TDI_150 wrote: »Feel free to point more managers this way!
Done. Promoted on THE GOOD LEAGUE Facey page.
When (if ever) my ban from posting on the News Feed is lifted I'll be promoting it in G1 (almost 300 managers) so hopefully it will be filled up soon!0 -
baza Rakus wrote: »It's class divide Mal. One law for the Rich, one for the poor. Us poor pauper teams have little chance to compete with these global hyper mega super clubs!
We all started as poor teams
That was the challenge of this gameworld at the start. Buy, sell, while always improving your starting 11.
Now it's a race to sign and keep the best players. I'm not selling my best players anymore to make a profit. I guess the same tactic applies to the hazzard deal.
My bench is full of 10k players :pac:0 -
tonic wine wrote: »We all started as poor teams
That was the challenge of this gameworld at the start. Buy, sell, while always improving your starting 11.
Now it's a race to sign and keep the best players. I'm not selling my best players anymore to make a profit. I guess the same tactic applies to the hazzard deal.
My bench is full of 10k players :pac:
We didn't tho. We all started with the same in the bank, but some of us had 10-20m more worth of squad players from the start, evidenced by the teams who are choc full of 91+ rated players now. Not that I'm complaining. Much.
I did worry last season that all the Page 1 players would be gone by the time I could afford more than one of them, but this fear was assuaged by the fact that even the top clubs seem to need to recycle to sell. So it's still pretty organic (and anyone joining can hope to have a decent team within a season or so).0 -
baza Rakus wrote: »We didn't tho. We all started with the same in the bank, but some of us had 10-20m more worth of squad players from the start, evidenced by the teams who are choc full of 91+ rated players now. Not that I'm complaining. Much.
.
Excuses excuses :P
20M might have bought two players extra, and possibly made 5M profit. It would hardly of bought you a "choc squad full of 91+ players". 20M would only buy hazzards left leg
Tactical and smart transfers is what make good teams imo.0 -
tonic wine wrote: »Excuses excuses :P
20M might have bought two players extra, and possibly made 5M profit. It would hardly of bought you a "choc squad full of 91+ players". 20M would only buy hazzards left leg
Tactical and smart transfers is what make good teams imo.
Well you would say that, wouldn't you? You ivory tower teams have no idea of the struggles us ducky underplogs have to go thru DAY TO DAY!0 -
Advertisement
-
tonic wine wrote: »Excuses excuses :P
20M might have bought two players extra, and possibly made 5M profit. It would hardly of bought you a "choc squad full of 91+ players". 20M would only buy hazzards left leg
Tactical and smart transfers is what make good teams imo.
It doesn't hurt when your team come with some very highly valued players to begin with.0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Advertisement