Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

ENG v NZ, 08.11.2014, 1430, @THOR™

124»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    At home, in front of a partisan crowd (of my countrymen) and they couldn't manage it. None of my bets came in but what do I care especially since the King scored again!!! As I settled in to the game down at my local, the owner told me that the All Blacks were an ageing team and that Richie McCaw and Dan Carter were past it.

    While it was far from a vintage performance by the ABs, the day these guys finally click I wouldn't care to be on the receiving end. I did warn before the game of the consequences of trying to drown the Haka. :D

    You're a bigger supporter of NZ than me LOL but it is foolish to ever write off England.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,549 ✭✭✭✭Judgement Day


    Swiwi. wrote: »
    You're a bigger supporter of NZ than me LOL but it is foolish to ever write off England.

    Are you my local publican? That's what he said too. I write them off here and now. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,549 ✭✭✭✭Judgement Day


    Highlights below.



    Highpoint of game Richie McCaw's try at 6.30. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 370 ✭✭Klunk_NZ


    Nigel Owens kept the scores close in that 2nd half..... he was painful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭hahashake


    Curious as to what neutrals think of the Whitelock non-try. Personally I think it was a try.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 370 ✭✭Klunk_NZ


    I had try, if the play was onside. I still don't understand how a ref can award a try and go to the TMO when the kicker is lining up the conversion. I don't condone kicking, but it was reckless as opposed to malicious and the TMO even said just a penaly on Coles. And what about England blatantly preventing the match sealing try on their line with an offside play and not even receiving a card?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 609 ✭✭✭English Lurker


    Cba arguing on matters of opinion but it was the TMO who requested the double-checking of that try, not Owens.


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,171 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    i personally have no problem at all with a ref that has a different viewpoint on an action than a TMO, when the ref can see exactly what the TMO can


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    hahashake wrote: »
    Curious as to what neutrals think of the Whitelock non-try. Personally I think it was a try.

    I'm not neutral of course but 50/50 for me. Not sure Cruden scored though either. I actually thought the English scrumhalf put downward pressure on the ball behind the line before whitelock knocked on so I thought could have been 5m scrum to NZ.

    I think Hansen does have a point about the tv director drawing incidents to the refs attention - it's not in the remit and I can't possibly see how the the TV director can be neutral: easy to select what to draw attention to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭hahashake


    Swiwi. wrote: »
    I'm not neutral of course but 50/50 for me. Not sure Cruden scored though either. I actually thought the English scrumhalf put downward pressure on the ball behind the line before whitelock knocked on so I thought could have been 5m scrum to NZ.

    I think Hansen does have a point about the tv director drawing incidents to the refs attention - it's not in the remit and I can't possibly see how the the TV director can be neutral: easy to select what to draw attention to.

    Crudeness definitely scored but it did look a bit dubious in real time.
    https://33.media.tumblr.com/19181b6a79aa39b60bf278fad04ee411/tumblr_neqs1uIdAA1sg3nzko1_1280.png

    You are probably right that it should have a 5m scrum to the ABs but I fail to see how it was a knock on. It only needs a millisecond of hand touching ball on over or the line to be a try, what happens after that is immaterial


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    hahashake wrote: »
    Crudeness definitely scored but it did look a bit dubious in real time.
    https://33.media.tumblr.com/19181b6a79aa39b60bf278fad04ee411/tumblr_neqs1uIdAA1sg3nzko1_1280.png

    You are probably right that it should have a 5m scrum to the ABs but I fail to see how it was a knock on. It only needs a millisecond of hand touching ball on over or the line to be a try, what happens after that is immaterial

    Ok that gif is definitive, tx. Yeah it could well have been a try but I see why knock on given. Would have been real egg on faces stuff for England if he had scored.

    So lads for Scotland: hope Carter Piutau Fekitoa Vito and Romano all get a run.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭hahashake


    Swiwi. wrote: »
    Ok that gif is definitive, tx. Yeah it could well have been a try but I see why knock on given. Would have been real egg on faces stuff for England if he had scored.

    So lads for Scotland: hope Carter Piutau Fekitoa Vito and Romano all get a run.

    DC will start and will give the youngsters a lesson in kicking goals. Both were shockingly bad from the tee v England, inexcusable at this level.


Advertisement