Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Street Fighter V: Despite all his ragé he's still just a rat in a Kage
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
chopperbyrne wrote: »I've only had one rage quit.
Set to five bars only and most matches are great connections.
Cross play against PC users produces the leggy matches for me.
Similar experience for me. I get about 1 in 10 bad matches and they're nearly all PC. I get one rage quitter a session roughly but I got the same in USF4 so no change there
0 -
-
-
[*]It should have been a multi-console game
Capcom Pro Tour would not exist in its current form among other things if so. So, no for me as I've enjoyed the CPT events immensely I've been to.[*]He approves of Sony allowing it to come to PC
I'm sure they're delighted[*]He is talking about the divide in critic reviews and customer reviews
Review scores stopped be relevant for me a long time ago. I know more about FGs than 99% of people reviewing them, and when I realised that I realised I should ask experts in a given genre what THEY think of a game before buying it instead, instead of people who have 10 games they have to play for 3 hours then bang out 1,000 words.
If someone asked me- and they have- I would tell them if they don't want to go online, or play local, not to bother yet. I tell them if they're all about the multiplayer, it's awesome fun. Which it is.[*]Doesn't believe professional reviewers are paid to review as it's got good mechanics
Neither do I. Not directly anyway. As a partnered youtuber I'm aware there is constant opportunity to go to the dark side if you want though.[*]Compares the game to the Beta basically
It's no beta but clearly it's following the destiny model. From my pespective, they got the minimum viable product for the CPT out, and the rest will be patched in with the DLC over time to ensure people are kept interested. Personally, not a massive fan of that, but there you go. They got to try to find a way to minimise the "URGH Super Street Fighter alpha turbo hyper champion edition" moaning. Competitive players want their annual rebalance. That's got to be paid for somehow. They get moaned at when they do multiple disc releases. They got moaned at for releasing yearly DLC. So what do they do?[*]Game is lacking and this is a trend in modern games
Depends what you're looking for, but for some demographics (casual players) it certainly is. I'm disappointed; but not for me. I thoroughly enjoy playing SFV.
[*]Compares SFV to MKX and Killer Instinct and points out the vast difference in content
MK yes but KI was bare bones when it launched. Then again Capcom do other things much better than MK (netcodes been woeful on all of them from what I hear, severe balance issues needing constant patching, etc etc.). A perfect game would be MK's single player with SF's combat mechanics; that would probably require a herculean amount of work though.[*]At Launch "This game is Early Access, or a Beta" in a few months it will have the content to be a full game
Game is plenty fun for me and being honest all new content outside of balance/ characters will be a momentary distraction.[*]Reviewers are reviewing it as "the game it will be" vs users reviewing it "as it is now"
If so that's a bit crap, but as mentioned above why give a damn about reviews?[*]Loves Street Fighter as a series but was let down by the game even though it's a robust foundation
I don't care about anything else really as long as the training mode and multiplayer- online and off- works, and for me it does. The rest is decoration. The difference here is that I don't think everyone should agree with me and accept other people want that stuff.[*]A modern figher game needs all the additional modes to be successful,"It should have been the Street Fighter version of Mortal Kombat X"
Completely incorrect based on the model Capcom/Sony are chasing. They want to grow SF into an esport. The type of game they are building needs to engage and entertain a competitive scene. That's also a modern fighter, just a different type.
How many people were at evo for MK compared to SFIV? They're different scenes.[*]The hardcore fans wanted a bigger game
I seriously doubt he's a more hardcore fan of SF than I am and I don't care, but disappointed that the content other people wanted is not there to snare them in.[*]This is an example of whats wrong with gaming today
Speaking as someone who's getting support directly from Capcom because of this game, to help our local scene, he can shag off with this one. If they're everything that's wrong with gaming today, try getting support from Namco or Sega for a gaming tournament for their properties.[*]Capcom as a publisher with a great legacy, sponsered by Sony should have ensured this game was full to the brim of features
To him, to me I'm happy a working SFV is here in time for CPT. To me, that's ensuring the games legacy.[*]If you're thinking of buying Street Fighter 5, just wait 3 months
Not going to hurt anyone if you do that!0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Advertisement