Will you vote in the gay marriage referendum?

david75

estudent wrote: »

The next step of these people is to remove age of consent and legally abuse children.

There was a doco about this on bbc2 the other night. A serious move was made by some elected MPs and paedophiles in a regular newsletter/fanzine for paedophiles in the 1930s to lower the age of consent to 3 or 4.
Never happened of course but it didn't stop a secret Ring of people, most quite powerful and some even MPs from carrying on as paedophiles.

osarusan

c_man wrote: »

I picked the figure from the Met, which as I understand it covers London. That's the pop figure I gave.

So if a transgender person and their friend are both walking down the street and get jumped, is one counted as a hate crime and the other not? That's pretty much what I was getting at with numbers being 'ramped up'.

Report quoted says 'motivated by a person's gender..'

estudent

shruikan2553 wrote: »

At least the church cant say its against their tradition!

I'm against any child abuse whether it by church or not, idiot.

Plenty of examples showing groups trying to legalise sex with minors like NAMBLA.
Most members of NAMBLA consider themselves to be homosexual yet they want age of consent abolished.

There are even groups of men that want to force circumcision of young baby boys for their own perversions.

circleaks [dot] org

Why is society always fixated with homosexuality?

osarusan

estudent wrote: »

I'm against any child abuse whether it by church or not, idiot.

Plenty of examples showing groups trying to legalise sex with minors like NAMBLA.
Most members of NAMBLA consider themselves to be homosexual yet they want age of consent abolished.

There are even groups of men that want to force circumcision of young baby boys for their own perversions.

circleaks [dot] org

Why is society always fixated with homosexuality?

what has any of this nonsense got to do with a marriage equality referendum in Ireland?

SpaceSasqwatch

osarusan wrote: »

what has any of this nonsense got to do with a marriage euality referendum in Ireland?

Absolutely nothing...just an angry bald man spouting rubbish........

estudent

Doctor Jimbob wrote: »

Why are you fixated with homosexuality?

I'm not. I just see "gay marriage referendum" threads all over the internet TODAY and recall all the politically lobbied legislation in the 80s and 90s calling for abolition, age of consent laws.

Calibos

There's definitely candidate Poe's Law posts in this thread.

estudent

Doctor Jimbob wrote: »

Yes. Because some of us like the idea of equal rights. Crazy, I know. I'm not fixated with homosexuals. I just think it would be nice if they had the same rights as the rest of us.

Lots of gay men, joined the the Catholic Church so they could get away with abusing young boys just like lots of other men could get away with abusing young girls.

Why is it that young boys abused are less important to those who approve of homosexuality?

I'm not religious but I do hope there is some powerful force to punish these people.

estudent

Doctor Jimbob wrote: »

No, lots of pedophiles joined the catholic church for that reason. Pedophilia is not equivalent to homosexuality.

Maybe you can correct me but both men and women were treated like animals by the Catholic Church. A despicable, arrogant and ignorant institution which still runs schools in Ireland.

From what I understand, Irish people still force their children to learn from this scribe called 'The Bible' and turn up in best clothes for Sunday mass? Why not donate all your success to your good Catholic upbringing? Just ignore those homeless people as you pass them by.

Yet you want to pontificate the virtues of human rights?

Your arguments are nonsense and reprehensible.

In your opinion.

david75

eStudent, looking over your posting history, you definitely seem to attempt to make every topic about the bible and futility of teaching it, or living by it. This topic isn't about that and attempting to equate Gay people as paedophiles or believing every Priest was a paedophile, doesnt really help you or the topic at hand. It's a poorly informed view.

thaidad2

Doctor Jimbob wrote: »

No, lots of pedophiles joined the catholic church for that reason. Pedophilia is not equivalent to homosexuality.

Your arguments are nonsense and reprehensible.

So lot's of gay men joined the priests cause they where gay and lots of gay paedophiles also joined, was there a link? I mean the preists all went aftwr boys so they where gay paedophiles, where did the straight paedophiles go? Is there less straight paedophiles?

david75

I wouldnt imagine any at all joined the priesthood as an avenue to allow their paedophile activities. Children were just the only outlet available to these men, sexually repressed and probably subjects of abuse themselves even.. Plenty of priests ended up having female lovers and children by them, let's not forget.

estudent

david75 wrote: »

eStudent, It's a poorly informed view.

In your opinion.

thaidad2

david75 wrote: »

I wouldnt imagine any at all joined the priesthood as an avenue to allow their paedophile activities. Children were just the only outlet available to these men, sexually repressed and probably subjects of abuse themselves even.. Plenty of priests ended up having female lovers and children by them, let's not forget.

Yes but being gay and a paedophile where big sins so joined the preists to repent but they could not help but offend and the boys where easy compaired to getting a grown man to be quite about the gay acts they committed.

david75

estudent wrote: »

In your opinion.

Fair enough..but it's relevancy to this topic and thread? there is none. It's irrelevant.

thaidad2

Doctor Jimbob wrote: »

No, not gay pedophiles, just pedophiles. I don't think gay or straight needs to be brought into it when we're talking about abusing children.

They where paedophiles that where gay they went after boys only, the chruch should have called they out and kicked them out for being gay when it learned about them rather then try cover it, these gay paedophiles did so much damage to the chruch all cause they did not want to admit to being gay deviants.

SpaceSasqwatch

thaidad2 wrote: »

They where paedophiles that where gay they went after boys only, the chruch should have called they out and kicked them out for being gay when it learned about them rather then try cover it, these gay paedophiles did so much damage to the chruch all cause they did not want to admit to being gay deviants.

And what has any of this to do with SSM ?

estudent

david75 wrote: »

I wouldnt imagine any at all joined the priesthood as an avenue to allow their paedophile activities. Children were just the only outlet available to these men, sexually repressed and probably subjects of abuse themselves even.. Plenty of priests ended up having female lovers and children by them, let's not forget.

There's less importance among society for rape of males. For example, in the US more men are raped than women as a result of mass incarceration.

Jail rape is considered to be a joke because the victim is a man.

In the recent Torture report of CIA against their 9/11 detainees, not one women's name was mentioned but do you really believe no women were ever tortured?

david75

Two 'new' posters to the thread both with low post counts and the same view..

i'm hitting the ignore button

thaidad2

SpaceSasqwatch wrote: »

And what has any of this to do with SSM ?

Goes to the character of gay people that they would join the chruch and abuse kids, not into giving these people and extra rights

Nodin

estudent wrote: »

There's less importance among society for rape of males. For example, in the US more men are raped than women as a result of mass incarceration.

Jail rape is considered to be a joke because the victim is a man.

In the recent Torture report of CIA against their 9/11 detainees, not one women's name was mentioned but do you really believe no women were ever tortured?

Whats this to do with the marriage referendum?

david75

estudent wrote: »

There's less importance among society for rape of males. For example, in the US more men are raped than women as a result of mass incarceration.

Jail rape is considered to be a joke because the victim is a man.

In the recent Torture report of CIA against their 9/11 detainees, not one women's name was mentioned but do you really believe no women were ever tortured?

see above post.

Ps almost no women were arrested as part of CIA investigations into 9/11 and they were kept seperately if they were.


Masterclass in thread derailment. And logic abuse. Well done eStudent.

GLaDOS

Thaidad2 and estudent banned

david75

looked likely to be fair..

SpaceSasqwatch

thaidad2 wrote: »

Goes to the character of gay people that they would join the chruForm a start they can already adopt.Secondly what about straight abusers who greatly out numbech and abuse kids, not into giving these people and extra rights

Dont be stupid(or bigoted) ,being gay does not equate to being a child molester.

As for your posts , do you think it says much about the character of straight people?

GLaDOS

Folks going to close this for a bit, bear with me