Another black teenager shot by police in St Louis

arybvtcw0eolkf

GalwayGuitar wrote: »

Lol. The genius drew a gun, what was the cop supposed to do?

Long thread/didn't read it all.... Has anyone suggested the cop should have shot the gun from the guys hands yet?.

end of the road

bennyl10 wrote: »

Noone has expressed delight at his death, simply being pointed out to you thst someone who points a gun at a cop is a thug, and is in all likelihood going to shoot this cop.

Cop then has 2 choices, let the boy with the gun aim at him, hope he doesn't fire, or prrotect himself by taking out the threat.

If you were the cop which option would you prefer to pick?

It's awful, but to in anyway say the teen didn't bring it on himself is just trolling

no its not trolling

end of the road

DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: »

'Suicide By Cop' is another name for that in the States, you point a pistol at a police officer and you'll be put down with plenty of rounds fired into you.

yes, completely riddled while the vermin cop lives out his fantasy

end of the road

bear1 wrote: »

I'm not sure they are wearing body camers yet but regarding the police car camera, from reading this article:

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/120641/antonio-martins-death-shows-limitations-dashboard-and-body-camera

The cameras are only activated if the lights are turned on. Seeing as it was just a routine check the officer must have thought there was no need to turn them on.
I seriously don't believe the cop saw a couple of these kids and thought "they would have a gun so I'll keep the camera off and get away with murder".

with the way things are in that country, maybe they did

end of the road

SeanW wrote: »

Bit like Michael Brown, CCTV showed him robbing the shop and assaulting the owner, then after the shooting the physical evidence, i.e. ballistics, verified officer Wilson's story.

yet his story doesn't add up. wilson is a lier who got lucky. the "evidence" was never going to go against his sort, it never does. and the prosecutor had links with that police force. that says it all.

SeanW wrote: »

Yet still according to some MB was helpless innocent victim of a trigger happy KKK sympathising murdering cop.

trigger happy at least.

SeanW wrote: »

yet those same people take no responsibility when months of cop-hating race-baiting culminates in the execution of two innocent policemen.

not their job to take responsibility for anything. only those who shot the cops are responsible.

Dan_Solo

bennyl10 wrote: »

It's awful, but to in anyway say the teen didn't bring it on himself is just trolling

Anyone else remember when this used to be called back seat modding?
Maybe trolling is OK now so it's OK to accuse people of it?

Little CuChulainn

end of the road wrote: »

yes, completely riddled while the vermin cop lives out his fantacy

What's that? Not dying? If that's the case there's a lot of vermin in the world.

end of the road wrote: »

yet his story doesn't add up. wilson is a lier who got lucky. the "evidence" was never going to go against his sort, it never does. and the prosecutor had links with that police force. that says it all.

No it doesn't. All prosecutors have links with police. They work with them to prosecute offenders. It was the grand jury that made the decision, not the prosecutor, and they did it having examined the evidence that you simply ignore.

end of the road wrote: »

not their job to take responsibility for anything. only those who shot the cops are responsible.

And by the same token .only those cops who have done bad should be responsible for their behaviour, yet you label all as vermin.

Dr Turk Turkelton

Alistair Hollow Stewardess wrote: »

Long thread/didn't read it all.... Has anyone suggested the cop should have shot the gun from the guys hands yet?.

Close Alistair Hollow Stewardess someone reckoned he should have being winged ie just shot in the legs but didn't account for him still having the gun in his hands and the use of them.

RWCNT

SeanW wrote: »

Bit like Michael Brown, CCTV showed him robbing the shop and assaulting the owner, then after the shooting the physical evidence, i.e. ballistics, verified officer Wilson's story.

CCTV shows he paid for the cigars, not that it matters since the store fidnt even call the cops, why you always gotta be so problematic SeanW?

arybvtcw0eolkf

Dr Turk Turkelton wrote: »

Close Makikomi someone reckoned he should have being winged ie just shot in the legs but didn't account for him still having the gun in his hands and the use of them.

lol, mad.

Anyone points a gun at me and the f*cker is getting shot, simple as.. Of course I'd rather they lived and not died ~ death is such a hassle after all.

But yea, defo shot the idiot and it won't be in the legs either.

end of the road

Little CuChulainn wrote: »

No it doesn't. All prosecutors have links with police. They work with them to prosecute offenders.

yes it does. the prosecutor had "links" with the police which could mean bias with the case.

Little CuChulainn wrote: »

It was the grand jury that made the decision, not the prosecutor, and they did it having examined the evidence that you simply ignore.

debatible. we don't and won't know what exactly was put to them.

Little CuChulainn wrote: »

by the same token .only those cops who have done bad should be responsible for their behaviour, yet you label all as vermin.

no i don't, all though i do agree that in america, standards are low when it comes to those allowed into the police.

Dr Turk Turkelton

Alistair Hollow Stewardess wrote: »

lol, mad.

Anyone points a gun at me and the f*cker is getting shot, simple as.. Of course I'd rather they lived and not died ~ death is such a hassle after all.

But yea, defo shot the idiot and it won't be in the legs either.

Yeah I can imagine all the paperwork would be a hassle and I'm sure some health and safety eejit would have to stick his oar in as well.

darkpagandeath

end of the road wrote: »

yes it does. the prosecutor had "links" with the police which could mean bias with the case.



debatible. we don't and won't know what exactly was put to them.



no i don't, all though i do agree that in america, standards are low when it comes to those allowed into the police.

How were the grand Jury's Biased then ?

If you don't know what was put to them how the hell do you know it was biased ?

end of the road

Dr Turk Turkelton wrote: »

Yeah I can imagine all the paperwork would be a hassle

rightly so

Dr Turk Turkelton wrote: »

I'm sure some health and safety eejit would have to stick his oar in as well.

health and safety people are not ejits. they are vital in ensuring high standards.

Highflyer13

If the guy pointed the gun at the cop he deserved to be shot dead imo. They can pitch it all they want cops v blacks or blacks v whites etc but at the end of the day its the retarded American politicians and crazy laws that are responsible for this and in general the decline of their country. I don't think they give a f**k though.

arybvtcw0eolkf

Highflyer13 wrote: »

If the guy pointed the gun at the cop he deserved to be shot dead imo. .

Well shot anyway, I'm not sure about the dead bit. But if that (death) is a consequence of pointing your gun at a cop/soldier well so be it, I see little to dispute or cry over.

mynamejeff

end of the road wrote: »

rightly so



health and safety people are not ejits. they are vital in ensuring high standards.

well that shows exactly the sort of person you are doesnt it !

you dont seem to understand how the judicial system works in america,
the cops gather evidence to be presented by the prosecutor to the grand jury who look at all the evidence and make a informed choice, rather than some people who look at a few videos on you tub or listen to al sharpton or some other race baiter and sprout off on the net

Sand

end of the road wrote: »

yes, completely riddled while the vermin cop lives out his fantasy

You're a little biased against police and the concept of policing aren't you?

mynamejeff

Sand wrote: »

You're a little biased against police and the concept of policing aren't you?

:P he properly didn't really deserve the speeding ticket that set him on that road to thug life :-) :-)

GalwayGuitar

mynamejeff wrote: »

:P he properly didn't really deserve the speeding ticket that set him on that road to thug life :-) :-)

Probably got caught with some hash when he was 16 and now 'HATES DA PIGS!'

end of the road

Sand wrote: »

You're a little biased against police and the concept of policing aren't you?

no, just the low standards applied by a couple of forces around the world including the low grade people that can end up in them due to such low standards

mynamejeff

end of the road wrote: »

no, just the low standards applied by a couple of forces around the world including the low grade people that can end up in them due to such low standards

why dont you join the police your self ? you could improve it no end im sure
your so well informed and experienced in policing, the judicial and political systems and dealing with criminals with special thoughts given to their right entitlements and rehabilitation.

Sand

end of the road wrote: »

no, just the low standards applied by a couple of forces around the world including the low grade people that can end up in them due to such low standards

Nah, you do - its fairly evident in the bile you vomit up on this topic. A cop has a gun drawn on him. Cop shoots his assailant. You describe the cop as vermin. That's a ridiculously biased position.

I'd second the guess that you got a speeding ticket at some point, but most people get tickets when they're mature enough to shrug it off as probably deserved. I'm thinking its more likely you had a negative run in with a Garda when you were a teenager - maybe one of them telling you to move on?

end of the road

Sand wrote: »

Nah, you do - its fairly evident in the bile you vomit up on this topic. A cop has a gun drawn on him. Cop shoots his assailant. You describe the cop as vermin. That's a ridiculously biased position.

I'd second the guess that you got a speeding ticket at some point, but most people get tickets when they're mature enough to shrug it off as probably deserved. I'm thinking its more likely you had a negative run in with a Garda when you were a teenager - maybe one of them telling you to move on?

wrong, i had no runins with the gards.

BattleCorp

end of the road wrote: »

no, just the low standards applied by a couple of forces around the world including the low grade people that can end up in them due to such low standards

What would you have done if you were the cop in that situation?

Infini

Someone linked this on another forum about whats goin on with these. Laughing at it cos the irony is so true!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kb2S3RvC6gg

Tail Docker

The video doing the rounds of "sweet innocent" Michael Brown beating an aul lad unconscious outside an apartment block tends to make the loss of him a bit easier to bear......

h2005

Tail Docker wrote: »

The video doing the rounds of "sweet innocent" Michael Brown beating an aul lad unconscious outside an apartment block tends to make the loss of him a bit easier to bear......

Pretty sure it's established it's not Brown in that video.

Tugboats

Tail Docker wrote: »

The video doing the rounds of "sweet innocent" Michael Brown beating an aul lad unconscious outside an apartment block tends to make the loss of him a bit easier to bear......

Ah why did you drag this thread back up poor egginacup is still in mourning