Prince Andrew in jep?

Sala

Son0vagun wrote: »

Jill Dandos death, Cliff Richard, Jimmy Saville, Roff Harris, Royal Paedo Ring are all connected!

I'm guessing

Seems to be a lot of cases of high profile/wealthy men involved in abuse scandals these days.

Frankie Lee

keeponhurling wrote: »

that daily mail article seems to name the 17-year old

That was a different victim of Epstein who waived her anonymity.

giles lynchwood

Before he married ginger minge, the media gave him the nickname" Randy Andy" because of his string of casual flings including soft porn actress Koo Shark.

kingchess

I loved that quote in the above Newspaper (Mail Online) that said about the Prince- "Colleagues put this down to an inferiority complex about being mentally challenged"".

Billy86

Hitchens wrote: »

Andy seemed to be the most normal of the royals

I would say Harry to be honest, once he got over his teenage phase with things like the Nazi Halloween costume he has gone on to be easily the best walking, talking PR machine for the royals since his mom died.

As for Andrew I guess I wouldn't be shocked if it is true, but as people have said this trial by media/guilty until proven innocent nonsense is nothing short of a blight on modern society.

weldoninhio

Billy86 wrote: »

I would say Harry to be honest, once he got over his teenage phase with things like the Nazi Halloween costume he has gone on to be easily the best walking, talking PR machine for the royals since his mom died.

As for Andrew I guess I wouldn't be shocked if it is true, but as people have said this trial by media/guilty until proven innocent nonsense is nothing short of a blight on modern society.

In fairness, I doubt very much that Harry has any Windsor blood in him. Spencer and Hewitt.

Son Of A Vidic

Sala wrote: »

Seems to be a lot of cases of high profile/wealthy men involved in abuse scandals these days.

Elements of the privileged elite have always abused their power & status. And some elements of the privileged elite have given back & done good for their communities. It's been that way through the ages and depending on what way an individual is wired, it probably always will.

Losty Dublin

keeponhurling wrote: »

To be honest, stuff like this should keep all the names anonymous until something is proven

An unnamed son of an UK based Queen has been linked to a kiddy fiddler.

Is that better?

Venus In Furs

the_monkey wrote: »

Would be surprised if it wasn't true to be honest.

All the UK Royal family are up to all sorts of sick twisted sh/it

"All"? And What twisted sh-t?

People say utterly any old crap here at times. Think things through, people! Stop jumping to believe unsubstantiated crud from people like David (S)Icke(o).

padd b1975

giles lynchwood wrote: »

Before he married ginger minge, the media gave him the nickname" Randy Andy" because of his string of casual flings including soft porn actress Koo Shark.

Young heterosexual male in sewing wild oats shocker!!

padd b1975

Losty Dublin wrote: »

An unnamed son of an UK based Queen has been linked to a kiddy fiddler.

Is that better?

Surely not Elton's son??

Pwindedd

weldoninhio wrote: »

In fairness, I doubt very much that Harry has any Windsor blood in him. Spencer and Hewitt.

Yeh they look absolutely nothing like each other :rolleyes:
http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/05_02/harrycharles_468x325.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.datalounge.com/cgi-bin/iowa/ajax.html?t%3D12756504&h=325&w=468&tbnid=AE1F8gPRjuzJgM:&zoom=1&docid=eiO41zd7bEeYyM&ei=mAyoVNn0CIzV7AatgYH4Dg&tbm=isch&ved=0CD8QMygXMBc

Venus In Furs

padd b1975 wrote: »

Young heterosexual male in sewing wild oats shocker!!

Think that was just mentioned though because there's the misguided notion that he was a virginal young lad.

bnt

I have no idea why this story has popped up again, the allegations date back to 2011 e.g. this article in Vanity Fair.

Fratton Fred

Venus In Furs wrote: »

Think that was just mentioned though because there's the misguided notion that he was a virginal young lad.

Trust me, I know people who remember his time in Portsmouth. Young innocent virgin he was not.

Frankie Lee

bnt wrote: »

I have no idea why this story has popped up again, the allegations date back to 2011 e.g. this article in Vanity Fair.

There is another victim (not Virginia Roberts) of Epstein in court suing him and has named the prince as one of the influential people Epstein forced her to have sex with when she was underage.

Roquentin

If you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas

bjork

Roquentin wrote: »

If you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas

bjork wrote: »

Either way, when you lay with dogs don't be suprised when you get fleas

That's Royalwang, let's rotate the board!

Leinsterblue

its pretty ropey stuff, whatever about trial by media (which it won't be) when Prince Andrew counts a man convicted and imprisioned for soliciting underage girls for prostitution as his friend, it smacks of at best poor judgement at worse you could judge his character by who he hangs with, remember also Epstein paid off some of Fergies debts.... like what was that for ?

Roquentin

bjork wrote: »

That's Royalwang, let's rotate the board!

sorry man, didnt read the earlier posts. my bad

wretcheddomain

Even if he didn't commit the crime, he looks like an individual who would commit such a crime.

Birneybau

Cantremember wrote: »

Who's Jep?

It's actually Jepen old sport, the lend ef the raising sen.

Leinsterblue

padd b1975 wrote: »

Young heterosexual male in sewing wild oats shocker!!

Eh.... he's 54

AdFundum

PizzamanIRL wrote: »

He's part of the royal family. He had an over-privileged upbringing so he thinks he can do whatever he wants. The poor lad.

In this case, another word for over-privileged is weird. Really, would you want a royal upbringing. I would think it's horrendous. It's probably better to be growing up on fingernails and freedom than to be sheltered to that extent.

steddyeddy

Pwindedd wrote: »

Yeh they look absolutely nothing like each other :rolleyes:
http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/05_02/harrycharles_468x325.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.datalounge.com/cgi-bin/iowa/ajax.html?t%3D12756504&h=325&w=468&tbnid=AE1F8gPRjuzJgM:&zoom=1&docid=eiO41zd7bEeYyM&ei=mAyoVNn0CIzV7AatgYH4Dg&tbm=isch&ved=0CD8QMygXMBc

You mean they're both wearing the same outfits? Outfits aren't heritable genetically I'm afraid and can't be used to determine parentage.

bjork

Andrew back to face the music: Prince flies home from skiing holiday amid growing crisis over claims he had sex with under-age girl

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2896532/Andrew-face-music-Prince-flies-home-skiing-holiday-amid-growing-crisis-claims-sex-age-girl.html#ixzz3NwOd22AJ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook






I wonder how many D-Notices and Super- "inaudible"s are flying around.

Beano

does anybody seriously think that he is any kind of legal trouble? Has he even been named as a defendant in any criminal or civil cases?

weldoninhio

Beano wrote: »

does anybody seriously think that he is any kind of legal trouble? Has he even been named as a defendant in any criminal or civil cases?

With the furore over Julian Asange and Britain wanting to extradite him over the rape allegations in Sweden, I'm sure they will comply fully with the U.S. authorities if the same was requested of Andy.

mikom

Do we know for certain that the young lady's name is Jep?

Beano

weldoninhio wrote: »

With the furore over Julian Asange and Britain wanting to extradite him over the rape allegations in Sweden, I'm sure they will comply fully with the U.S. authorities of the same was requested of Andy.

but he hasnt been named as a defendant in any criminal trial so what exactly would they extradite him for?

weldoninhio

Beano wrote: »

but he hasnt been named as a defendant in any criminal trial so what exactly would they extradite him for?

I said "if" the same was requested.

Muahahaha

Its not looking great for him, is it? His buddy Epstein has already been convicted for underage sex and then those pictures of Andy with his arm around the girl thats making the allegations. Obviously thats not proof of anything but it does show he was close to her and it certainly seems like he has a case to answer.

Its about time we had a proper Royal scandal. They're had a free run in the British media for far too long now, the tabloids are almost afraid of reporting on them in any negative way at this stage.

Spook_ie

Sky news reports the girl as being

The woman claims that between 1999 and 2002 she "was forced to have sexual relations with this prince when she was a minor" in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island owned by Epstein.

She is believed to have been 17 at the time - underage in US law.

Age of consent in London is 16, New York 17, Caraibbean varies between 15 and 18

So guilty of what if she was consenting?

weldoninhio

Spook_ie wrote: »

Sky news reports the girl as being


Age of consent in London is 16, New York 17, Caraibbean varies between 15 and 18

So guilty of what if she was consenting?

I think the use of the word "forced" implies that it wasn't consentual.

NSAman

weldoninhio wrote: »

I think the use of the word "forced" implies that it wasn't consentual.

"forced" hmmmm was she held in a confined space ? Something just does not add up. I am sure she enjoyed all the travel and the top class treatment. While young, she was obvious naive or stupid. What were her parents thinking she was doing at the age of 17 travelling the world? Sounds like someone who had a lifestyle and lost it and is now bitter.... but that is just my thoughts.

Have no time for anyone who forces anyone into a sexual relationship, but if forced, why did she continue in this situation?

She was after all above the age of consent?

lazybones32

Hitchens wrote: »

"Suggestion of impropriety with minors untrue," says Buckingham Palace after Prince Andrew named in US sex lawsuit

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30659629

this is surprising if it's true

I've heard talk of this from some time ago...around the time the Jimmy Saville thing broke. It has been said, that the whole thing would have been made Public much earlier but there are possibly Royals or high-level Govt. figures involved also.

We must wait and see...

Muahahaha

Spook_ie wrote: »

Sky news reports the girl as being


Age of consent in London is 16, New York 17, Caraibbean varies between 15 and 18

So guilty of what if she was consenting?

Sky News will do their best to help the Royal Family whatever way they can. Irrespective of whether or not she was under the age of consent her claim is that she was held as a sex slave for three years during which time this happened. The daughter of former Mirror owner Robert Maxwell is implicated as the Manhattan based Madame who facilitated young girls for Epstien.

So far this ain't looking great for Prince Andrew, theres lots to come in this story yet though. The FBI had been keeping tabs on Maxwells daughter for several years so if shes going down shes likely to bring a few with her in a plea bargain if it gets that far.

GalwayGuitar

NSAman wrote: »

"forced" hmmmm was she held in a confined space ? Something just does not add up. I am sure she enjoyed all the travel and the top class treatment. While young, she was obvious naive or stupid. What were her parents thinking she was doing at the age of 17 travelling the world? Sounds like someone who had a lifestyle and lost it and is now bitter.... but that is just my thoughts.

Have no time for anyone who forces anyone into a sexual relationship, but if forced, why did she continue in this situation?

She was after all above the age of consent?

And now realises she can take him to the cleaners. And then can publish her memoirs, talk show appeareances etc. Nice little earner

K-9

Fratton Fred wrote: »

I'm not a big fan of Man United. I'd stop short of saying they're doing sick twisted **** though.

Luckily Rooney still plays for them and Giggs is coaching them then.

weldoninhio

NSAman wrote: »

"forced" hmmmm was she held in a confined space ? Something just does not add up. I am sure she enjoyed all the travel and the top class treatment. While young, she was obvious naive or stupid. What were her parents thinking she was doing at the age of 17 travelling the world? Sounds like someone who had a lifestyle and lost it and is now bitter.... but that is just my thoughts.

Have no time for anyone who forces anyone into a sexual relationship, but if forced, why did she continue in this situation?

She was after all above the age of consent?

Get onto Bucks Palace, if you are sure that she enjoyed it then it's an open and shut case.

I mean it's not like you'd ever hear of anyone "above the age of consent" being forced to do anything. I'm sure rapists the length and breadth of the country are sacking their lawyers now to use your sterling defence.

Peist2007

NSAman wrote: »

"forced" hmmmm was she held in a confined space ? Something just does not add up. I am sure she enjoyed all the travel and the top class treatment. While young, she was obvious naive or stupid. What were her parents thinking she was doing at the age of 17 travelling the world? Sounds like someone who had a lifestyle and lost it and is now bitter.... but that is just my thoughts.

Have no time for anyone who forces anyone into a sexual relationship, but if forced, why did she continue in this situation?

She was after all above the age of consent?

I think your sense of logic isnt adding up. The allegation is the sex was forced ie not consensual. The girl being over the age of consent is another issue.

Venus In Furs

Lots of people are forced into sex and they're over the age of consent. What the hell difference does age make?

Roquentin

NSAman wrote: »

"forced" hmmmm was she held in a confined space ? Something just does not add up. I am sure she enjoyed all the travel and the top class treatment. While young, she was obvious naive or stupid. What were her parents thinking she was doing at the age of 17 travelling the world? Sounds like someone who had a lifestyle and lost it and is now bitter.... but that is just my thoughts.

Have no time for anyone who forces anyone into a sexual relationship, but if forced, why did she continue in this situation?

She was after all above the age of consent?

the psychology of who we are changes with age. as we mature we look back at things we did when we were young and say that we were taken advantage of.

She will try and make a bit of money from it which is understandable.

having said that the law is the law. Same thing happened berlusconi with his parties.

really the prince shouldnt be keeping company with questionable characters such as epstein. You are the people around you

RobYourBuilder

Lawyers acting for the woman who alleges she was forced by a multimillionaire financier to have sex with Prince Andrew when she was 17 are formally requesting that he respond under oath to her accusations.

Details of the request, contained in a letter addressed to Andrew at Buckingham Palace asking him to take part in a two-hour interview, were contained in a new legal submission filed by the woman, Virginia Roberts, in a Florida court on Wednesday.

The court bundle also contains a sworn affidavit from Roberts, providing new details about the sexual encounters she alleges she had with Andrew on three separate occasions beginning when she was 17 and working for Jeffrey Epstein, a former hedge fund boss since convicted for soliciting sex with a minor.

Roberts alleges she was paid $15,000 by Epstein after she claims she first slept with Andrew partly “to keep my mouth shut about ‘working’ with the Prince”. She also claims she was involved in an “orgy” in the US Virgin Islands with the duke, Epstein, and eight other girls, who she said all appeared to be under 18.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jan/21/woman-affidavit-prince-andrew

Muahahaha

Squeaky bum time for the Prince. The photo of him with his arm around her looks really bad, she is clearly very young in that photo. If Randy Andy doesn't respond to the claims he can expect a law suit in London to be filed and then he's going to have this girl chase him on home soil, in the full glare of the media and British public.

banoffe2

Watched a documentary on Prince Andrew last night - will this be another cover up? lots of evidence and photos, him and Fergie best of friends, the Queen's golden boy.

Inquitus

banoffe2 wrote: »

Watched a documentary on Prince Andrew last night - will this be another cover up? lots of evidence and photos, him and Fergie best of friends, the Queen's golden boy.

His defense in the upcoming BBC interview is weak at best.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-50431163

ILoveYourVibes

I never knew he existed until this I don't know a lot about royals. Its awful. He seems horrible.

Coillte_Bhoy

tdf7187